5 questions for Christoph Ingenhoven

Building design

Christoph Ingenhoven photographed by Jim Rakete.

For Christoph Ingenhoven, the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic mercilessly expose the failures of recent years. Nevertheless, he remains optimistic.

Too long supply chains, too much consumption, too little substance, too little solidarity, too little Europe, too much populism, too little work, too much life: for Christoph Ingenhoven, the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic mercilessly expose the failings of recent years. But he is far from losing his optimism as a result. We had a chat with him.


10_L1100518_bearbeitet
Christoph Ingenhoven photographed by Jim Rakete.

Christoph Ingenhoven, how are you and your office experiencing these days?
As I was traveling in the Engadin and London, trips to Cannes and Riyadh were cancelled at short notice and I was unable to return to Switzerland, I finally ended up in Düsseldorf, where the majority of our extended family from London, New York and Munich had also arrived in the meantime. My partner stayed in London with her children and one of my daughters was unavoidably deployed in hospital, so it’s a good thing the houses are big enough for that… The office has 45 percent of employees working from home, 45 percent still in the office, 5 percent on sick leave and 5 percent on vacation. We are all trying very hard to do our work with video and telephone conferences, which we are doing well together.

So almost half of your employees are working from home. How quickly was that possible and: Is everything continuing as usual?
We managed the switch within a few days. Everyone can take their computer and screen with them. For everyone else, it’s a new situation, but you get used to it after a few days – especially with the right discipline when preparing for conference calls. This is not a permanent solution and in normal times it is not good for the team and the quality of our work, which thrives on thinking, drawing and talking together. For the moment, however, it secures our ability to act. It’s a good thing that the internationalization of our projects in many very different countries means that we have always been used to working virtually to some extent in different time zones.

What challenges are you and your team currently facing?
Meeting deadlines and commitments to our clients, keeping in touch with clients, prioritizing paid work over unpaid work, carefully pushing projects over the finish line in the final decision-making phase, realistically assessing how the year will continue, running stress tests, reducing costs, motivating employees, holding your nerve, keeping quality high, not losing your sense of humour, finding new orders for the time during and after the crisis, winning competitions …

“You’re all more grown up after the crisis.”

You also have offices in Sydney and Singapore. How is the situation there?
Singapore is continuing to operate relatively normally and, as a large proportion of our Australian projects in Sydney and Melbourne are currently being processed there in addition to the Singaporean projects, capacity utilization is also very good. The opening of our Toranomon Hills project in Tokyo has been postponed, although the project has been completed. A second high-rise there is under construction and will probably open for the postponed Olympics next year.

Architecture students are asking themselves how they should complete their assignments in a team despite the initial restrictions. What advice would you give them?
That shouldn’t be a problem for this generation, Face Time, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Skype …, they can do it. The crisis is an opportunity, it mercilessly exposes our failings and shortcomings: too long supply chains, too much consumption, too much marketing, too little substance, too little vertical integration, too little solidarity, too little Europe, too much populism, too little work, too much life, the world is much nicer without emissions, fewer cars are not a mistake, childcare is difficult to replace, our small businesses are poorly financed.

Everyone tries to get rid of their problems first and foremost with the state, not only those who are really in need, but also those who have always taken all the profit out of the company in a timely manner for years. If we learn anything from this, it may have been very good and when we have the crisis behind us, you will all be much more grown up, stay alive!

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

As the population increases, so does the density stress in Swiss cities and conurbations. At the same time, outdoor recreation and sport are becoming more important. A 2014 publication on the greater Zurich area provides examples of how existing green spaces can be made more accessible. Pieter Poldervaart analyzes the results in the December issue of G+L. The study Freiraumnetz Zürich can be […]

As the population increases, so does the density stress in Swiss cities and conurbations. At the same time, outdoor recreation and sport are becoming more important. A 2014 publication on the greater Zurich area provides examples of how existing green spaces can be made more accessible. Pieter Poldervaart analyzes the results in the December issue of G+L. You can download the Freiraumnetz Zürich study here.

8.42 million people lived in Switzerland in 2017, compared to 7.08 million or 19 percent fewer twenty years ago. In the past, this annual growth of one percent and the increasing demand for living space per capita was accompanied by a partly unchecked urban sprawl. Greater Zurich is particularly affected by the rapid growth in the resident population. Three million people live in the perimeter defined as the Zurich metropolitan area, which includes not only the canton of Zurich but also numerous municipalities in neighboring cantons and even in neighboring southern Germany.

Forecasts suggest that 30,000 people per year will continue to move to Switzerland’s economic center. In addition to housing and jobs, these people also need recreational space. In 2014, the Zurich Metropolitan Area Association therefore published an outline that shows the way to a “settlement-related open space network” – as the title suggests. In addition to describing the problem, the guide aims to show how existing recreational areas can be upgraded and new ones created and how planning is possible across municipal and cantonal boundaries. You can download the study here.

You can read the full article in G+L 12/18.

One brick prize, many awards

Building design
Main prizewinner of the German Brick Award 2019

City library

German Brick Award 2019 presented – one prize, many awards for exemplary energy projects

The results of the German Brick Award 2019 were announced on February 1: 120 submissions of exemplary energy-efficient brick projects from all over Germany made the decision difficult for the jury, chaired by Piero Bruno from the Berlin office of Bruno Fioretti Marquez. The high design quality ultimately led to a large number of awards – two main prizes, six special prizes in various categories and eight commendations.

The main prize for monolithic construction was deservedly awarded to Harris + Kurrle Architekten from Stuttgart for the municipal library in Rottenburg am Neckar. The jury praised “the sensitive positioning of the remarkable new building as a communicative and contemplative place in the fabric of the city”. It also praised the public building for its skillful, creative use of monolithic exterior wall constructions made of highly insulating bricks.

An extension

The main prize for multi-shell construction went to the remarkable extension to the Philosophy Department of the University of Münster by Peter Böhm Architekten from Cologne. “The building, modestly described as a ‘shelf wall’, cleverly incorporates the existing listed building and forms an attractive façade opposite the historic Fürstenberghaus,” said the jury. “In this case, the haptic brick becomes synonymous with sensual appeal and a cleverly reduced, ornamental appearance.”

A special prize for energy efficiency

Several special prizes were also awarded, including one for “Cost-effective, energy-efficient multi-storey residential construction”. This was won by the Ulm-based firm Braunger Wörtz Architekten with their project at Vorwerkstrasse 23/1 in Neu-Ulm. The new building for the Neu-Ulm housing association (NUWOG) comprises 31 publicly subsidized, barrier-free rental apartments in a six-storey building and is designed as a KfW Efficiency House 70. The jury: “The uncomplicated design with monolithic brick exterior walls, which are finished with a white cement scratch coat that does not require painting, guarantees this residential building a low-maintenance, long life.”

Awarded by: Ziegelzentrum Süd e.V. in cooperation with the
Federal Ministry of the Interior
www.ziegel.com

The exhibition can be seen until February 15, 2019 at the Haus der Architektur, Waisenhausstraße 4 in Munich. It will then travel to various universities.

Photos: Roland Halbe; Lukas Roth; Erich Spahn