A common house

Building design

In Mannheim, architecture students from TU Kaiserslautern have designed and built a pavilion for and with refugees. The building, designed as a meeting place, is intended to create a place where refugees can exchange ideas.

Mannheim – a working-class city: in the last state election, a good 23% of voters here voted for the AfD – a trend that was confirmed in the federal election. The right-wing populists were particularly popular in Schönau in the north of Mannheim, a district that was dominated by social democrats for decades. Many see the refugee crisis as the reason for this – and the town on the Neckar was indeed the first reception point for refugees in the whole of Baden-Württemberg. This is due to the many empty barracks that date back to the Wehrmacht and the subsequent stationing of American troops after the Second World War – at the height of the refugee crisis, up to 12,000 people were housed here.

In other words, the right place for a refugee meeting center. The project is the brainchild of Stefan Krötsch, Jürgen Graf and Andreas Kretzer. The three know each other from the TU Kaiserslautern – Krötsch holds a junior professorship there in the field of “Tectonics in Timber Construction”, Graf a professorship in the field of “Structures and Materials” and Kretzer, who now teaches at the Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, was a junior professor of digital tools. In Kaiserlautern, they developed the idea for the refugee meeting center with their students. Another important person was Tatjana Dürr, Head of Building Culture at the City of Mannheim: she became aware of the project and suggested the initial state reception facility in the Spinelli Barracks in the east of Mannheim as a location. She also maneuvered it through the authorities.

Building together

Initially, the students produced several drafts individually – they designed the necessary room program together with the refugees. Krötsch, Kretzer and Graf then selected five finalists from the work for further development in groups. The students then presented the results to a jury made up of Manfred Beuchert from the Karlsruhe Regional Council, Tatjana Dürr and Jens Weisener from the City of Mannheim and the three specialist departments. Then it was on to the execution and thus to an elementary component of the project: the aim from the outset was to involve the refugees in the construction process, which in concrete terms meant that 18 students built a house together with 25 refugees, three professors and two assistants. Before that, however, the costs, the dimensions, the supporting structure and the time frame had to be planned – a task that Krötsch, Graf and Kretzer mastered as a working group together with their students. The team worked closely with the building authorities of the city of Mannheim, especially when it came to public procurement and approval planning, which enabled the project to be awarded and approved within a very short time. But the project went even further: students and lecturers lived together with the refugees during the construction process. The operator of the accommodation was initially very concerned about this for fear of attacks by refugees. However, the team managed to convince those responsible of their concept and so the students moved into the Spinelli Barracks together with their teachers. There were no incidents.

Open and closed

The result is a building that is both open and intimate: a 500 square meter wooden pavilion with two courtyards, one of which opens onto the main access axis of the barracks site, while the other courtyard is enclosed on four sides and serves as a place of retreat. In its center is a small garden that is cultivated by the refugees. The large courtyard serves as an event venue with an open communal space that can also be used as a stage.

Photos: Atelier U20

You can find out more in Baumeister 11/2017

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Off into the countryside!

Building design
Undefasa Bali Stone small. Photo: Tile of Spain

Undefasa Bali Stone small. Photo: Tile of Spain

Transform your patio, garden & co. into real oases of well-being with Spanish tiles. The days are longer again, the temperatures are rising and the fresh green lures us outside. In order to enjoy your new favorite spot for a long time, it is important to choose a durable and weather-resistant building material for the floor and walls. Spanish ceramic tiles are […]

The days are longer again, temperatures are rising and the fresh green lures us outside. In order to enjoy your new favorite spot for a long time, it is important to choose a hard-wearing and weather-resistant building material for the floor and walls when redesigning.

Spanish ceramic tiles are the perfect choice for any outdoor area thanks to their many positive properties. Their surfaces are non-slip and resistant to weather influences such as rain, snow and extreme temperature fluctuations.

hhh

Pure nature!

The choice of natural looks is inexhaustible, whether in wood, natural stone or terracotta look – everything is possible. Not only the look, but also the ceramic itself is natural – it is produced from earth and water according to strict European standards and is also very sustainable and environmentally friendly.

hhh

Many tile series are ideal for laying both indoors and outdoors. By laying the same tile series – indoors and outdoors – living spaces can be cleverly enlarged visually. An almost seamless transition favors this effective effect. Especially when using large-format tiles, as these only have a few joints. Spanish manufacturers also offer many of their series in two qualities for indoor and outdoor use.

hhh

Not only in gardens, but also in large areas such as parks and public spaces, Spanish ceramics unfold all their advantages. The slabs can withstand enormous pressure loads and have a long service life of at least 30 years.

The current lookbook offers great inspiration with many beautiful examples for all tile applications in the home and garden. Simply write to us at info@tileofspain.de or request up to 100 free copies via www.tileofspain.de.

Thomas Kröger builds in Munich: urban repair and trophy view

Building design
View of the first courtyard. Photo: Philipp Obkircher

View of the first courtyard. Photo: Philipp Obkircher

Thomas Kröger has built a luxurious apartment building on the banks of the Isar in Munich. However, the architect’s design was less concerned with ostentation than with a sensitive dialog with the historic neighboring buildings.

Thomas Kröger has built a luxurious apartment building on the banks of the Isar in Munich. However, the architect was less concerned with ostentation in his design than with a sensitive dialog with the historic neighboring buildings.

The view from the roof terrace of the new building is impressive. On one side you can see the Isar river, which flows in front of the building, and on the other the famous Munich city skyline with St. Peter’s, the Frauenkirche and the Theatine Church. The duplex penthouse, to which the terrace belongs, would probably be called a “trophy home” in the USA. Incidentally, the apartment has already been sold, as have all but one of the other units in the Erhardtstrasse 10 project. The interior work is currently being completed in line with the new owner’s wishes. In future, he will be able to enjoy the view through the two-storey window wall, over which architect Thomas Kröger has placed a semi-transparent roof made of copper slats. Large wave-shaped openings, which look like dormers from a distance, showcase the view of the Isar.

The copper roofscape is one element with which Kröger fits his house into the riverside row with its late historicist and Art Nouveau façades. Another is the enormous and expansive bay window with which the architect closes off the street façade to one side. In addition, the details of the house show a great deal of decorative pleasure, which it shares with the neighboring buildings. The most striking feature is the painting on the façade, a kind of multicolored serrated band that runs across all the wall surfaces. Kröger is alluding to the sgraffito and wall paintings that were widespread in Munich up until the 1950s, which are apparently currently experiencing a small renaissance – Hild and K also had their recently completed commercial building on Weinstrasse lavishly decorated with paintings(see Baumeister 5/2021).

Naturally, Kröger was required to make the best possible use of the deep and irregularly cut plot. As a result, two further transverse buildings with side wings are now staggered behind the front building. The front of the two inner courtyards is covered by a roof with a huge circular cut-out – an element that is reminiscent of both an oversized opaion and round courtyards, such as those found at the Villa Farnese in Caprarola. This courtyard effectively continues the sequence of rooms that begins in the foyer of the house and then leads down a few steps. According to Kröger himself, the upper-class apartment buildings in Milan from the 1950s with their elegant entrances were the inspiration for this solution.

The stairwells, on the other hand, are small. A lot of black also contributes to making these areas of the building appear somewhat undersized. In the larger apartments in the front building, however, the elevator leads directly to the entrance area, so that the stairwell takes on the role of an escape route rather than an access route. Some of the apartments in the first rear building have complex layouts and are lit by the two courtyards and additional light wells. The floor plans here bear witness to the exploitation pressure that clearly played a role in the planning.

Despite this and the challenging shape of the plot, Thomas Kröger has undoubtedly succeeded in designing a well-designed building that blends harmoniously into the cityscape. It radiates a self-assured and comfortable bourgeoisie that one would wish for elsewhere. The purchase prices of the apartments in the front building, on the other hand, can hardly be described as bourgeois; they cost – or have cost – a mid-single-digit million euro amount, because, as mentioned at the beginning, only one last apartment is still available.

Speaking of expensive housing: architect Jean-Christophe Quinton has achieved the opposite with his Parisian residential building with a sandstone façade, which houses social housing.