Architectural module construction with digital twin

Building design
beige-building-under-a-blue-cloudy-sky-_BQL2rNG6Nk

Metropol Parasol in Seville, photographed by Michael Busch: Impressive modern architecture in Spain, designed by German architect Jürgen Mayer.

Modular architectural construction with a digital twin – sounds like buzzword bingo, but it is the interface where a radical new building culture, industrial precision and data-driven planning meet. While the German construction world is still philosophizing about serial construction, digitally modelled modular buildings are already a reality – and the digital twin is more than just a pretty 3D rendering. Anyone who thinks this is all science fiction has missed the signs of the times.

  • Architectural modular construction is becoming a data-driven planning and production discipline thanks to digital twins.
  • Germany, Austria and Switzerland are showing different speeds and ambitions in modular construction with digital twins.
  • Digital twins enable real-time monitoring, simulation and optimization of construction and operating processes.
  • Modular construction and digital twins are shifting sustainability from a fig leaf to a measurable reality.
  • Technical expertise: data integration, BIM, IoT, AI and parametrics are becoming compulsory reading for professionals.
  • The familiar role of planner is changing from decision-maker to process manager – and the professional field is becoming more complex, but also more exciting.
  • Criticism: Over-engineering, data monopolies and quality standards are up for debate.
  • Visionary approaches: The modular digital twin as a driver for the circular economy, user participation and resilient cities.
  • International pioneers are already defining standards – the DACH region must hurry to avoid being left behind.

Modular construction and digital twin: from the Lego principle to the digitalized process industry

Anyone who thinks of stacks of containers in school playgrounds when they think of modular construction is stuck somewhere in the noughties. Today, modular construction stands for highly industrialized, precisely prefabricated components that are produced in the factory, assembled on the construction site in record time and meet the highest architectural requirements. The actual game-changing element: the digital twin. It is the data-supported image of every module, every connection detail, every building services duct – and it accompanies the building from the first design sketch through production and assembly to operation and, at some point, even to dismantling. Anyone who understands the digital twin no longer thinks of modular construction as a static system, but as a dynamic, changeable process. Planning, construction and operation merge into a digital value chain in which there is less and less room for errors, wasted resources and improvisation.

Switzerland and Austria are already a step ahead of Germany when it comes to modular construction with digital twins. While pilot projects such as the modular school construction offensive in Berlin or individual residential projects in Hamburg are still struggling with teething troubles, Zurich, Graz and Vienna have long been relying on fully modeled modular buildings – including digital building twins that map the entire life cycle. The principle: each module is given its own digital identity, including production data, installation location, maintenance history and recycling potential. Planning thus becomes a data-driven process that no longer depends on the intuition of the individual, but on the quality and timeliness of the data.

The biggest advantage: the digital twin makes the invisible visible. Even in the design phase, variants can be simulated, material flows optimized, emissions calculated and even user behaviour predicted. The construction process becomes a logistical choreography in which every error becomes visible in the model before it becomes expensive on the construction site. And during operation, the building becomes a data-producing object that reports its own condition, triggers maintenance cycles independently and even documents its dismantling and reuse options at the end.

In the DACH region, however, the lack of standardization and the reluctance to fully digitalize often slow things down. While platforms for modular construction processes with digital twins are already established on the market in Scandinavia and the Netherlands, the patchwork quilt still dominates here in Germany: every project, every manufacturer, every planning office cooks up its own data and module soup. The big hit, which integrates all modules, systems and life cycle phases on one platform, is still to come.

Nevertheless, the direction is clear: modular construction and digital twins are the new dream team that could awaken the construction industry from its slumber. Only those who think about the two together have a chance of achieving speed, quality and sustainability – and a building culture that is more than just juggling construction site flair and time pressure.

Digital twins: from BIM model to real-time decision-making platform

The term “digital twin” is often used excessively. But in the context of modular construction, it is far more than just a pretty 3D model with a few parameters. The true digital twin is a living, dynamic system that collects and evaluates all the relevant data of a building in real time and compares it with the physical reality. In modular construction practice, this means that every module, every connection and every interface is digitally documented and can be checked and adjusted during the building’s life cycle. Errors in production or assembly no longer only become visible during final acceptance, but already during the process. This saves costs, reduces stress and makes the famous “last meter” on the construction site a predictable factor.

In technical terms, the digital twin is the result of consistent BIM use, enriched with IoT sensor technology, AI-supported analysis and cloud-based data integration. The data streams range from parametric design planning to production control in the factory and operational optimization in everyday life. This not only enables more precise construction, but also continuous improvement based on the feedback loop principle: The building learns during operation what works – and what doesn’t.

The innovative power of digital twins is particularly evident when they are combined with modular construction processes. Suddenly, scenarios such as mass customization, i.e. the individual adaptation of modules in series, become realistic. The optimization of material flows, the reduction of rejects and the prediction of maintenance requirements become standard functions. Particularly exciting: the integration of AI makes it possible to identify sources of error from operating data at an early stage and to optimize processes independently. The digital twin thus becomes an active player in the construction and operating phase – and not just a passive archive.

Germany is still struggling with this development. The fragmentation of the software landscape, a lack of interfaces and proprietary data formats are holding back the full potential. Austria and Switzerland are more pragmatic in this respect: associations of planners, module manufacturers and operators are emerging there, working together on open platforms for digital twins. The aim is to create a standardized database that maps all relevant information from planning to dismantling – and thus enables a genuine circular economy.

For planners, this means a fundamental change in their own role: they are transformed from designers into process architects who not only have to design spaces, but also data flows, interfaces and processes. The ability to handle digital tools with confidence is becoming a basic requirement – and an understanding of data quality, parametrics and automation a decisive competitive advantage.

Sustainability: from lip service to data-based reality

If there is one area in which the digital twin has the potential to truly revolutionize modular construction, it is sustainability. Until now, sustainability in construction has often been a mixture of good intentions, marketing and a few certificates. With digital twins and modular processes, sustainability suddenly becomes measurable, comparable and controllable. This is because the digital twin not only documents the current status, but also enables simulations across the entire life cycle: from raw material extraction to production, assembly and use through to recycling or reuse.

Practice shows: Those who rely on digital twins in modular construction can optimize material flows, precisely calculate emissions and continuously monitor energy consumption. In Switzerland, for example, school buildings are being constructed on a modular basis and equipped with digital twins that record resource consumption, indoor air quality and usage intensity in real time. If necessary, modules are replaced, reused or dismantled – all documented and traceable. This is the circular economy in its purest form and not a greenwashing show.

However, the challenges are considerable: there is still often a lack of consistent data standards, open interfaces and binding regulations. In Germany, sustainability in modular construction is often proclaimed, but rarely implemented consistently. The fear of additional work, data misuse or liability issues is great. Yet the solution is actually obvious: a transparent, tamper-proof digital twin reduces operating costs, increases flexibility of use and creates trust among investors, users and authorities.

With growing pressure from the EU taxonomy, ESG criteria and rising energy costs, data-based modular construction is turning from a nice-to-have into a must-have. If you invest now, you can not only operate your buildings more efficiently, but also reuse them as a raw material store at the end of their life cycle. The digital twin is thus becoming the key to a genuine circular economy – and the ticket to a construction future in which sustainability is no longer an empty promise.

This requires new skills: planners and operators need to get to grips with material passports, life cycle analysis and data management. The days when sustainability was a by-product of design are over. Today, it is an integral part of every project – and the digital twin is its operating system.

Risks, debates and visions: Who controls the future of construction?

Sounds like a perfect world – but of course there are downsides. The complete digitalization of modular construction raises new questions: Who owns the data? Who is liable for errors in the model? What happens if the platform providers go bankrupt or close their interfaces? And how can we prevent the digital twin from becoming a gateway for surveillance, data misuse or dependence on a few software giants? The debate about data sovereignty, open source standards and the platform economy has long since flared up.

Scepticism towards total digitalization is particularly pronounced in Germany and Austria. There is great fear of a loss of control, data monopolies and the end of the traditional image of the architect – and not without good reason. After all, if the digital twin becomes a black box in which only algorithms and AI tools make decisions, there is a risk of alienation between people and buildings. Architecture loses its character as a cultural practice and becomes a pure process industry.

On the other hand, the modular digital twin opens up enormous opportunities for transparency, participation and innovation. Those who keep the systems open, comprehensible and accessible can bring users, operators and planners together (at least virtually). Simulations become the basis for decision-making, feedback from operations flows directly into further development and new modules and functions can be continuously integrated. The modular digital twin becomes the operating system of the built environment – and this is anything but a dystopian scenario.

The vision: buildings that adapt to changing needs, use resources intelligently and document their own history. Cities in which every module, every façade, every building technology line has a digital passport that makes its origin, lifespan and recycling potential transparent. And an architecture that no longer collects dust in piles of paper, but lives, grows and constantly evolves in digital space.

Making this vision a reality requires courage, openness and the will to collaborate. Proprietary systems, isolated data islands and half-baked compromises will slow down rather than accelerate development. The DACH region is at a crossroads: either it will become a pioneer for open, sustainable modular construction with a digital twin – or it will remain a pawn in the hands of global platform providers and innovation-shy developers.

Conclusion: the digital twin is the ticket to the future of modular construction

Architectural modular construction with a digital twin is not hype, but the logical next step for an industry that must finally wake up from its analog slumber. The digital twin turns modules into intelligent building blocks, construction processes into data-driven value creation and sustainability into a verifiable reality. Those who get on board now are laying the foundations for resilient buildings, sustainable cities and architecture worthy of the name. The fact remains: it’s not the fastest or cheapest that wins, but the one that best networks, understands and controls. Welcome to the new world of modular construction – it is not waiting for latecomers.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Shared mobility: how digital platforms are redefining public transport

Building design

Shared mobility is becoming increasingly important in the modern city: digital platforms enable residents to use vehicles such as car-sharing cars, e-scooters and bicycles quickly and flexibly. These solutions relieve the burden on cities and contribute to sustainable urban mobility. Matthew Archuleta | Unsplash

Cities today face major challenges when it comes to mobility. Private transport leads to traffic jams, air pollution and land consumption. Shared mobility offers a solution that relies on the shared use of vehicles and thus relieves both the environment and the roads. Digital platforms and apps allow people to use vehicles flexibly without having to own a car. These new mobility models are not only an environmentally friendly alternative, but also an important step towards a more sustainable and liveable city. […]

Cities today face major challenges when it comes to mobility. Private transport leads to traffic jams, air pollution and land consumption. Shared mobility offers a solution that relies on the shared use of vehicles and thus relieves both the environment and the roads. Digital platforms and apps allow people to use vehicles flexibly without having to own a car. These new mobility models are not only an environmentally friendly alternative, but also an important step towards a more sustainable and liveable city.

Fun fact: According to a study by McKinsey, shared mobility solutions could reduce the need for private cars in cities by up to 30% by 2030.

Shared mobility is based on a combination of several technologies that work together seamlessly to provide users with a simple and convenient experience.

Digital platforms

Digital platforms such as Uber, Lyft, Free Now and Share Now connect users and vehicles in real time. These platforms offer features such as booking, payment and route optimization that allow users to use a vehicle immediately and without much effort.

Internet of Things (IoT)

The IoT is an integral part of shared mobility. Vehicles are often equipped with GPS and sensors that report their location and status in real time. This data helps to optimize operations by providing information on availability, maintenance and routes.

Mobile apps

Mobile apps are the main tool through which users access shared mobility services. They enable the booking of rides, payment and provide access to information such as the location of the next available vehicle and estimated arrival times.

Practical example: In Amsterdam, the car-sharing company Share Now uses a platform that provides real-time information on available vehicles and allows users to unlock the cars via an app.

Shared mobility comprises various models that are tailored to the different needs of users.

Car sharing

Car sharing enables users to rent a car for short periods of time. Models such as station-based car sharing (e.g. Zipcar) and free-floating car sharing (e.g. Share Now) offer flexibility and reduce the need for private car ownership.

Bike sharing

Bike sharing systems offer an environmentally friendly alternative for short distances. Users can find and use bikes at special stations or via GPS using an app. This promotes healthy, emission-free mobility.

Ridesharing and ride-hailing

Ridesharing (e.g. BlaBlaCar) and ride-hailing (e.g. Uber) offer users the opportunity to share journeys or order a vehicle with a driver. This optimizes traffic flow and reduces environmental pollution.

Scooter sharing

Electric scooters, which can be rented via an app, have established themselves as a popular option for short journeys. They are space-saving and emission-free and complement other means of transportation in the urban environment.

Practical example: Lime offers scooter sharing in many cities around the world and is a practical solution for the so-called “last mile”, which is often difficult to cover with public transport.

Shared mobility offers numerous advantages that have a positive impact on cities, the environment and users.

Reduction of emissions

As fewer people own their own car, the number of vehicles on the roads is reduced. Shared mobility promotes the use of electric and low-emission vehicles and thus helps to reduce CO₂ emissions.

Less traffic and congestion

When people share vehicles, traffic is reduced. Fewer vehicles on the roads means less congestion, better air quality and an overall more pleasant urban environment.

Lower costs for users

Shared mobility is often cheaper than owning a car, as users only pay for what they actually use. Maintenance, insurance and other fixed costs are eliminated.

Flexible mobility

Shared mobility models offer users a flexible and convenient way to get around without having to worry about finding a parking space or vehicle maintenance.

Expert opinion: According to a study by Deloitte, 55% of millennials prefer shared mobility solutions to owning their own car as they offer flexibility and cost efficiency.

Despite its advantages, shared mobility faces various challenges that need to be overcome.

Infrastructure and space requirements

Shared mobility requires special parking spaces and parking areas for bicycles and scooters, which can lead to conflicts in public spaces. Cities need to provide space for these vehicles without interfering with pedestrian traffic.

Safety concerns

Scooters and bikes can pose a safety risk, especially in busy areas. Accidents and lack of helmet use are common problems that jeopardize the safety of users.

Legal and regulatory issues

The regulation of shared mobility services is complex and varies from city to city. Providers must adhere to local regulations, which can increase operating costs and limit availability.

User acceptance and habits

Although shared mobility offers many advantages, some people still prefer to own their own car. It takes time and education to increase the acceptance of shared mobility solutions.

Example: In San Francisco, the rapid growth of scooter sharing has led to problems with poorly parked scooters on sidewalks, resulting in complaints from citizens and the need for stricter regulations.

Amsterdam: Car sharing integration with public transport

In Amsterdam, car sharing providers work closely with public transport to offer integrated mobility solutions. Users can use car-sharing vehicles as a supplement to public transport and thus increase flexibility.

San Francisco: Scooter sharing

San Francisco has successfully integrated scooter sharing and introduced strict regulations to ensure that the vehicles are parked properly and the safety of users is guaranteed.

Copenhagen: Bikesharing

Copenhagen, known as a bike-friendly city, has developed a comprehensive bike-sharing program that is used by locals and tourists alike. This has reduced the use of cars in the city center.

The future of shared mobility will be shaped by the integration of new technologies and business models.

  1. Autonomous driving: Autonomous vehicles could make shared mobility even more efficient and safer as they are continuously available and can move autonomously.
  2. Artificial intelligence (AI): AI can help to better manage traffic flows and vehicle availability in order to maximize efficiency and adapt the service to the needs of users.
  3. Mobility as a Service (MaaS): MaaS platforms combine different modes of transportation in a single app that integrates all mobility services from public transport to car sharing and offers a seamless user experience.
  4. Sustainability and electric drives: The introduction of electric shared mobility vehicles will help reduce emissions and improve air quality in cities.

Future outlook: A pilot project in Helsinki is testing autonomous, electric car sharing vehicles that can be booked via a MaaS app and offer users a complete, sustainable mobility solution.

Shared mobility is fundamentally changing the way people travel in cities. Through the use of digital platforms and innovative business models, it offers a sustainable alternative to private car ownership and contributes to solving urban challenges. Despite the challenges, particularly in terms of infrastructure and user acceptance, it is clear that shared mobility has the potential to make urban mobility more efficient, environmentally friendly and flexible.

Concluding thought: Shared mobility is more than just a technology – it is a vision for sustainable mobility that conserves resources and creates quality of life. If cities and providers work together, shared mobility could become an essential part of urban life in the future.

Read more: The European Garden Award 2024 went to a total of ten projects this year. The focus was on the topic of “Green Oasis”.

National Arena Bucharest – Stadiums of the European Championship 2021

Building design

Lia Manoliu Stadium

If you take a closer look at the national arena in the Romanian capital Bucharest, you are instinctively reminded of a Bundesliga stadium. This is no coincidence, as the roots of the arena lie in Germany. The Romanian national arena in Bucharest has German genes: the 55,000-seat soccer stadium was designed by Hamburg architects Gerkan, Marg […]

If you take a closer look at the national arena in the Romanian capital Bucharest, you are instinctively reminded of a Bundesliga stadium. This is no coincidence, as the roots of the arena lie in Germany.

The Romanian national arena in Bucharest has German genes: the 55,000-seat soccer stadium was designed by Hamburg architects Gerkan, Marg & Partner (gmp), the structural design was carried out by the engineering firms Schlaich Bergermann & Partner from Stuttgart and Krebs und Kiefer from Karlsruhe, and the general contractor was the construction company Max Bögl from Sengenthal in the Upper Palatinate.

Although it is a soccer stadium, the building is named after a female discus thrower: Lia Manoliu won the gold medal at the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico City. However, the stadium is now known exclusively as the “Arena Națională”, i.e. the “National Arena”. The new building was named after Lia Manoliu after its predecessor, the “Stadionul Național Lia Manoliu”, the old national stadium. It previously stood on the same site and was demolished in 2008.

Unlike the arena, it was a multi-purpose stadium. Its stands were not covered and the athletics facilities were located between the pitch and the stands. This meant that at the beginning of the millennium it no longer met the requirements for a venue for international soccer matches. In 2006, Max Bögl won the tender for the construction of the new national arena – which, however, had been planned quite differently at the time. However, the German company submitted an alternative project to the client, the city of Bucharest, which was much simpler and cheaper to build.

The National Arena bears unmistakable similarities to Frankfurt’s Waldstadion. This is no coincidence: the same team of general contractors, architects and engineers built the stadium on the Main between 2002 and 2005. The closable membrane roof in particular is almost a one-to-one replica of the construction in Frankfurt. As there, the roof is located in the large video cube above the pitch when folded up. It extends within 15 minutes when required. It then spans the area between the grandstand roofs. The stand roofs themselves are supported by a so-called pressure ring, which towers over the stadium like a crown. The ring rests on 40 steel pillars, which sit on the concrete construction of the grandstand ring.

The stands have two tiers. The architects designed the spectator area with seating shells in different shades of red, blue and yellow, the national colors of Romania. On the outside of the stadium, the verticality of the concrete columns supporting the stands defines the appearance of the building. The grassy embankment on which the arena stands is still a relic of the old national stadium. It mediates between the new building and the historic sports park that surrounds it. Large steps lead up the rampart. They make a visit to the National Arena a bit of a pilgrimage.

Find out more about the National Stadium Budapest. Here you can find an overview of the EURO 2021 stadiums.