Battery Storage and Fire Safety: An Overview of the Basics and Requirements

Building design
A structural detail of the building related to battery storage and fire safety
A red fire extinguisher hangs on a wall – Photo: jakubzerdzicki / Unsplash

Lithium-ion batteries, lithium-polymer cells, and related energy storage devices have become an integral part of modern buildings: They are found in electric vehicles, pedelecs, power tools, emergency power systems, and countless small appliances. But storing batteries means storing concentrated chemical energy in a component that can react uncontrollably under certain conditions. Fire safety in battery storage is therefore not a minor bureaucratic issue, but a serious design and organizational challenge that affects architects, planners, operators, and users alike.

  • Why lithium-based batteries pose a particular fire risk and how so-called thermal runaway occurs
  • Which storage quantities, storage types, and usage profiles require which protective measures
  • What building code and regulatory requirements apply to battery storage
  • How storage rooms, storage boxes, and charging infrastructure should be designed and constructed
  • What role fire detection systems, suppression systems, and firefighting water play in battery fires
  • How fire safety requirements vary depending on the building type and use
  • What common mistakes to avoid during planning and operation
  • How this topic fits into a building’s overall fire protection planning

The specific fire risk posed by lithium batteries: thermal runaway and its consequences

To understand the fire safety requirements for storing batteries, one must first grasp what happens inside a lithium cell when it reacts uncontrollably. The key term here is “thermal runaway.” This refers to a self-sustaining chain reaction within the cell: If the temperature rises above a critical threshold, the cell releases additional heat through exothermic decomposition reactions, which further increases the temperature, which in turn triggers further reactions. Once this process has begun, it can no longer be stopped without external intervention.

The causes of thermal runaway are varied. Mechanical damage to the cell, deep discharge below the permissible minimum voltage, overcharging, external heat sources, manufacturing defects, or signs of aging can trigger the process. What makes this particularly treacherous is that a damaged or improperly charged cell can develop thermal runaway with a significant time delay: hours or even days after the triggering event, the cell may suddenly begin to smoke and catch fire. For warehouse planning, this means that a battery that appears undamaged on the outside may still pose a latent risk.

The fire characteristics of lithium batteries differ fundamentally from those of conventional fires. During thermal runaway, lithium cells release flammable and toxic gases, including hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen fluoride. These gases can accumulate in enclosed spaces and create an explosive atmosphere before a visible flame develops. In addition, a fire in a single cell can spread to neighboring cells—an effect known as cell-to-cell propagation. A battery pack consisting of hundreds of individual cells can therefore cause a fire that far exceeds a comparable conventional fire in terms of intensity and duration.

For firefighters, a lithium-ion battery fire poses a particular challenge. Water cools the cells and prevents thermal runaway from spreading to neighboring cells, but it does not extinguish the reaction within a cell that is already affected. Large amounts of water are required, and the firefighting operation can last for hours. Extinguished batteries can reignite after hours or days, which is why they must be stored underwater or secured in special containers after a fire. These characteristics make it clear why preventive fire protection is so much more important when storing batteries than with conventional fire loads.

Regulatory and Building Code Foundations: What Are the Fire Safety Requirements for Storing Batteries?

The regulatory landscape for storing batteries from a fire safety perspective is still evolving in Germany and German-speaking countries and is shaped by various regulations from different areas of law. To date, there is no single, uniform standard covering all applications. Instead, depending on the specific application, building codes, occupational safety laws, hazardous materials regulations, and technical standards all interplay.

The building codes of the federal states form the basis. The Model Building Code (MBO) and the state building codes based on it regulate requirements for storage rooms, fire compartments, and escape and rescue routes. Special building regulations often apply to the storage of large quantities of batteries in buildings, such as in underground parking garages with electric vehicles, commercial warehouses, or industrial facilities. The Technical Rules for Workplaces (ASR) and the Industrial Safety Ordinance (BetrSichV) apply in the commercial sector. For the storage of lithium batteries as hazardous materials, the requirements of hazardous materials law also apply, particularly when large quantities are transported or temporarily stored.

At the standards level, several documents are relevant. The VdS guidelines issued by the German Insurance Association (Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft), particularly VdS 3103 on lithium batteries, provide practical recommendations for storage, charging, and fire safety measures. The VDMA standard sheets and information sheets from the employers’ liability insurance associations, such as the DGUV, round out the picture for commercial applications. The DIN VDE series of standards governs electrical safety aspects of battery systems. For stationary energy storage systems, such as those used in building services engineering, DIN EN IEC 62619 applies, which specifies safety requirements for lithium cells and batteries in stationary applications.

It is important to note that compliance with these regulations does not automatically guarantee complete fire protection. Standards describe minimum requirements based on the state of the art at the time they were developed. Since battery technologies and their fields of application are evolving rapidly, close coordination with the relevant fire safety authority, the insurer, and an experienced fire safety planner who assesses the specific risks of the respective project is recommended.

Structural Requirements for Storage Rooms and Charging Infrastructure

The structural requirements for rooms where batteries are stored or charged are derived from the specific fire characteristics of these energy storage devices. As a general rule, the greater the amount of stored energy, the higher the requirements for fire resistance, smoke extraction, and firefighting readiness. For small quantities—such as a few device batteries in an office—the requirements are manageable. For e-bike batteries in storage rooms, power tool batteries in warehouses, or large-scale stationary storage systems in utility rooms, the requirements increase significantly.

Storage areas for larger quantities of batteries should be designed as separate fire compartments, separated from adjacent areas of use by walls and ceilings with sufficient fire resistance. The fire resistance class depends on the building class and the amount of energy stored. As a guideline, partition walls separating these areas from areas requiring protection should have a fire resistance rating of at least F 90 (REI 90 according to European classification). Doors and gates in these walls must be designed as fire-rated doors and be self-closing. Openings for cables and conduits must be fitted with certified fire barriers to ensure that the fire compartment remains intact.

Ventilation and smoke extraction are particularly important for battery rooms because thermal runaway produces flammable gases before a flame becomes visible. Battery storage rooms should be mechanically or naturally ventilated to prevent gas buildup. Ventilation openings must be arranged to create cross-ventilation; exhaust vents should be located in the upper part of the room, as many of the released gases are lighter than air. At the same time, ventilation openings must be equipped with fire dampers to prevent smoke from spreading to other areas of the building in the event of a fire.

Additional requirements apply to the charging infrastructure. Chargers and charge management systems must be suitable for the types of batteries used and must not allow overcharging. Electrical installations in battery rooms must comply with the relevant VDE standards; outlets and switches should be located outside the room or at a sufficient distance from the batteries. Charging stations for electric vehicles in underground parking garages require special attention, as these garages generally lack natural ventilation and the fire load from a burning vehicle is extremely high. Here, experts recommend fire suppression systems, enhanced smoke extraction systems, and the separation of charging areas from parking areas by means of fire-resistant clearances or protective walls.

Storage Boxes and Cabinets as a Supplementary Safety Measure

For smaller quantities of batteries, such as in workshops, schools, or offices, specially designed battery storage cabinets and storage boxes offer a practical solution. These containers are made of non-combustible materials, have a defined fire resistance rating, and feature integrated ventilation openings. In the event of a fire, they limit the spread of the fire to the contents of the cabinet and give firefighters time to respond. Some models are equipped with integrated fire suppression systems that activate automatically when temperatures exceed a certain threshold. These solutions do not replace compartmentalization fire protection measures, but they are a useful supplement when structural measures are not possible or would be disproportionate.

Fire Detection Technology and Suppression Systems: Early Detection and Suppression

Early detection is of central importance in battery storage fire protection because thermal runaway can still be halted at an early stage through cooling. Conventional smoke detectors have their limitations here: They respond to visible smoke, but the gas phase preceding a battery fire can already be dangerous before smoke is produced. For battery rooms, fire protection planners therefore recommend the use of heat detectors that respond to rising temperatures, or gas detectors that detect specific fire gases such as carbon monoxide or hydrogen fluoride. Combined multisensor detectors, which monitor smoke, heat, and gases simultaneously, offer the highest level of detection reliability.

The fire alarm control panel should automatically trigger defined measures upon an alarm: shutting down the charging infrastructure, activating the smoke exhaust system, alerting the fire department, and, if necessary, triggering a stationary fire suppression system. For battery rooms with a higher fire load, fixed fire suppression systems are a serious consideration. Water is considered the preferred extinguishing agent for lithium-ion battery fires because it cools the cells and slows the spread of thermal runaway to adjacent cells. Sprinkler systems that respond to heat sensors can be effective in battery rooms but must be designed for the specific fire load: The required volume of extinguishing water is significantly higher for battery fires than for conventional fires.

Gas suppression systems, which are commonly used in conventional electrical installations, are only partially suitable for battery fires. They can smother a flame but cannot stop the exothermic reaction inside the cell. After a gas suppression system is triggered, thermal runaway can continue and, once the suppressant has dissipated, may lead to a flame reigniting. For battery rooms, water is therefore generally preferable to gas as an extinguishing agent, provided the structural requirements for water application are met.

Fire Safety for Battery Storage in Various Building Types

Fire safety requirements for battery storage vary significantly depending on the building type and its use. In residential buildings, the increasing prevalence of e-bikes, e-scooters, and home energy storage systems poses new challenges. E-bike batteries are often stored and charged in stairwells, basements, or storage rooms—that is, in areas that serve as or are adjacent to escape and rescue routes. A battery fire in a stairwell can block the only escape route and therefore poses a particularly high risk. Experts recommend that e-bike batteries not be stored or charged in stairwells or directly adjacent rooms, but rather in separate, well-ventilated rooms equipped with fire-rated doors.

In commercial and industrial buildings, the quantities of batteries are often considerably larger. Power tool batteries, industrial truck batteries, and stationary energy storage systems can store energy in the range of several hundred kilowatt-hours. Here, the requirements for fire compartments, fire suppression systems, and fire alarm technology are correspondingly higher. The workers’ compensation association and the insurer must be involved at an early stage, as their requirements may exceed the minimum standards set by building codes. For industrial trucks with lithium-ion batteries used in warehouses, the relevant technical guidelines recommend dedicated charging rooms equipped with fire-resistant partitions, smoke extraction, and a fire suppression system.

Underground parking garages with charging stations for electric vehicles are a separate, intensely debated topic. The combination of limited ventilation, high fire load from vehicle batteries, and difficult access for firefighters makes underground parking garages one of the most challenging applications. Several federal states have now formulated specific requirements for underground parking garages with electric vehicles or are working on them. Sprinkler systems, enhanced smoke extraction, and limiting the number of charging points per fire compartment are typical measures that are discussed and required in this context.

Common Mistakes and Misconceptions in Battery-Related Fire Protection

A common mistake is underestimating the amount of energy stored in modern batteries. A single e-bike battery with a capacity of five hundred watt-hours contains enough energy to cause a significant fire if released uncontrollably. An electric vehicle with a battery capacity of fifty to one hundred kilowatt-hours exceeds the fire load of a conventional vehicle many times over. Anyone who equates these energy amounts with conventional fire loads and designs systems accordingly systematically underestimates the risk.

Another mistake is the assumption that a battery that is not being charged poses no fire risk. As described above, a damaged or deeply discharged battery can develop thermal runaway even while in storage. Batteries that have been mechanically damaged—for example, by a fall or impact—should not be stored any longer without first being evaluated by a specialized company. Deeply discharged batteries—that is, batteries that have been discharged below the minimum voltage—should not be recharged but should be disposed of properly.

Fire safety is also often neglected during charging. Charging is the operating condition with the highest risk because it places the greatest thermal and electrical stress on the cells. Batteries should not be left to charge unattended overnight unless a suitable charging infrastructure with monitoring is available. Charging in bedrooms or in rooms without smoke detectors is not recommended for fire safety reasons. Chargers that are not approved for the specific battery type significantly increase the risk of overcharging.

Finally, the need for regular inspection of fire safety measures is often underestimated. Fire doors held open with wedges, fire suppression systems that have not been maintained, and fire alarms with dead batteries render even well-planned fire safety concepts ineffective. Battery Storage: Fire safety is not a one-time planning task, but an ongoing operational responsibility that requires regular inspections, user training, and documented tests.

Storing Batteries: Fire Safety as an Integral Part of Building Design

The storage of batteries from a fire safety perspective is no longer a niche topic that concerns only specialists. With the widespread adoption of electric vehicles, stationary energy storage systems, and battery-powered devices in nearly all types of buildings, the topic has taken center stage in architectural and planning practice. Anyone planning a residential building, an office building, or a commercial property today must ask where and how batteries will be stored and charged, and integrate this consideration into the fire safety concept from the very beginning.

In practical terms, this means: Storage areas for batteries must be designated early in the floor plan and not treated as leftover space to be addressed later. Their requirements for fire resistance, ventilation, smoke extraction, and fire suppression readiness must be taken into account during the design phase, as retroactive adjustments can be disproportionately costly. Coordination with fire safety authorities, insurers, and the fire department should take place early on, as their requirements often exceed the minimum standards set by building codes and vary depending on the specific project.

Architects and specialist planners who take the topic of fire safety for battery storage seriously make a concrete contribution to the safety of buildings and their occupants. The fire characteristics of lithium batteries are well known, the structural and technical means for risk management are available, and the regulatory framework is continuously evolving. What is often lacking is an awareness that these energy storage systems require a different planning approach than conventional fire loads. Those who understand this difference and take it into account in their planning protect not only the building but also the people who use it.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

How Kigali uses GIS for participatory planning

Building design
aerial-view-of-a-city-through-which-an-influence-flows-P2d8SKdbjEE

Atmospheric aerial view of a town with a river running through it, photographed by Carrie Borden

Wie gelingt partizipative Planung in einer wachsenden Millionenstadt, in der jede Entscheidung über Straßen, Parks und Infrastrukturen das Leben von Hunderttausenden beeinflusst? Kigali, die pulsierende Hauptstadt Ruandas, hat mit dem Einsatz von GIS-Technologien nicht nur die digitale Stadtplanung revolutioniert, sondern auch eine neue Ära der Bürgerbeteiligung eingeläutet. Wer wissen will, wie datenbasierte Werkzeuge und partizipative Methoden selbst unter herausfordernden Bedingungen eine sozial gerechte Stadtentwicklung ermöglichen, sollte jetzt weiterlesen.

  • Einführung: Warum Kigali als Vorreiter für partizipative Planung mit GIS gilt
  • Grundlagen: Was ist GIS und wie funktioniert es im urbanen Kontext?
  • Partizipation digital gedacht: Wie GIS Werkzeuge neue Beteiligungsformate ermöglichen
  • Praktische Umsetzung: Konkrete Projekte und Prozesse aus Kigali
  • Herausforderungen und Learnings: Technische, gesellschaftliche und kulturelle Aspekte
  • Transferpotenziale: Was deutsche, österreichische und Schweizer Städte lernen können
  • Fazit: GIS als Katalysator für gerechtere, effizientere und transparentere Stadtentwicklung

Kigali als Labor der digitalen Stadtplanung: Warum die Hauptstadt Ruandas auf GIS setzt

Kigali hat in den letzten beiden Jahrzehnten eine Transformation durchlebt, die ihresgleichen sucht. Die Stadt, einst gebeutelt von den Nachwirkungen politischer und wirtschaftlicher Krisen, gilt heute als eine der saubersten und sichersten Metropolen Afrikas – und zunehmend auch als Innovationsmotor für Stadtentwicklung. Zentrale Rolle spielt dabei der strategische Einsatz von Geographic Information Systems, kurz GIS. Während viele europäische Städte noch über die Digitalisierung der Bauleitplanung debattieren, hat Kigali längst die Vorteile digitaler Werkzeuge erkannt und gezielt für die Stadtentwicklung adaptiert.

Doch warum ausgerechnet GIS? Anders als klassische CAD-Modelle oder statische Karten sind GIS-Plattformen lebendige, multilayerfähige Werkzeuge, die es ermöglichen, Geodaten, sozioökonomische Informationen und Umweltdaten miteinander zu verknüpfen. Im Unterschied zu herkömmlichen Planungsansätzen eröffnet GIS die Möglichkeit, große Mengen an Raumdaten zu erfassen, zu analysieren und in Echtzeit zu visualisieren. In Kigali war das kein Selbstzweck, sondern eine Notwendigkeit: Die rapide Urbanisierung, das knappe Bauland und die komplexe Topografie verlangten nach einer neuen, flexiblen und datenbasierten Herangehensweise.

Bemerkenswert ist, wie früh die Stadtverwaltung das Potenzial von GIS für die partizipative Planung erkannt hat. Während GIS in Europa oft noch als Expertentool in spezialisierten Nischen verortet wird, ist es in Kigali längst Teil der öffentlichen Debatte. Von der Planung neuer Straßen und Parks über die Analyse von Verkehrsflüssen bis hin zur Entwicklung von Hochwasserschutzmaßnahmen – überall kommt GIS zum Einsatz, und zwar nicht isoliert im Planungsamt, sondern im direkten Austausch mit der Bevölkerung.

Mit gezielten Pilotprojekten und internationalen Partnerschaften hat Kigali in den letzten Jahren eine digitale Infrastruktur aufgebaut, die vor allem eines kann: Brücken schlagen zwischen Verwaltung, Experten und Bürgern. Es geht nicht mehr um die Frage, ob GIS eingesetzt wird, sondern wie intelligent und inklusiv die Technologie genutzt werden kann, um die Stadt gemeinsam weiterzuentwickeln.

Diese konsequente Digitalisierung ist nicht ohne Risiken und Nebenwirkungen, aber sie zeigt eindrucksvoll, wie auch Städte außerhalb der klassischen Planungshochburgen innovative Impulse setzen. Kigali beweist, dass mit Mut, Know-how und politischer Entschlossenheit digitale Werkzeuge zu Katalysatoren einer neuen, partizipativen Planungskultur werden können.

GIS im urbanen Kontext: Funktionsweise, Potenziale und Grenzen

Geographic Information Systems sind weit mehr als nur digitale Landkarten. Sie sind datengetriebene Analyseplattformen, die räumliche Informationen mit Attributen verknüpfen, auswerten und für unterschiedlichste Zielgruppen aufbereiten können. Im Kern handelt es sich bei GIS um eine Kombination aus Datenbanken, Visualisierungstools und Analysewerkzeugen, die es ermöglichen, komplexe räumliche Zusammenhänge sichtbar und verständlich zu machen.

Im Kontext der Stadtplanung ist diese Technologie ein Gamechanger: Sie erlaubt es, Flächenpotenziale zu ermitteln, Infrastrukturbedarfe zu simulieren, Umweltbelastungen zu prognostizieren und soziale Dynamiken zu analysieren. GIS kann beispielsweise zeigen, wie sich ein neuer Buskorridor auf Fußwege, Luftqualität oder Lärmbelastung auswirkt. Es kann helfen, Standorte für soziale Infrastruktur wie Schulen oder Gesundheitszentren zu optimieren – und das alles auf Basis tagesaktueller Daten, die laufend aktualisiert werden können.

Die Potenziale von GIS sind enorm, insbesondere wenn es um partizipative Planung geht. Denn durch die Möglichkeit, Daten interaktiv und visuell aufzubereiten, können auch Nicht-Fachleute in Diskussionen eingebunden werden. GIS-Anwendungen lassen sich so konfigurieren, dass Bürger auf einfache Weise Ideen einbringen, Probleme melden oder Planungsszenarien bewerten können. Damit wird GIS zum Brückenbauer zwischen Verwaltungsexpertise und Alltagswissen.

Natürlich hat auch diese Technologie ihre Grenzen. Datenverfügbarkeit, Datenschutz und digitale Kompetenzen sind zentrale Herausforderungen, die es zu adressieren gilt. Gerade in Städten wie Kigali, wo der Zugang zu digitalen Endgeräten und Internet nicht flächendeckend gewährleistet ist, bedarf es intelligenter Lösungen, um niemanden auszuschließen. GIS kann und darf kein exklusives Expertensystem bleiben, sondern muss so gestaltet werden, dass es Transparenz und Inklusion fördert.

Die Entwicklung offener Schnittstellen, einfacher Bedienoberflächen und partizipativer Visualisierungstools ist daher ebenso wichtig wie die technische Weiterentwicklung. Nur wenn GIS als sozial integriertes System gedacht wird, entfaltet es seine volle transformative Wirkung für die Stadtentwicklung.

Partizipative Planung neu gedacht: Wie GIS die Beteiligungskultur in Kigali verändert

Die klassische Bürgerbeteiligung in der Stadtplanung ist in vielen Teilen der Welt noch immer geprägt von Papierplänen, Auslegungsfristen und mühseligen Konsultationsrunden. In Kigali setzt man auf einen anderen Ansatz: Die Digitalisierung der Planung mit GIS-Technologie macht Beteiligung skalierbar, zugänglich und dialogisch. Bürger können sich nicht nur informieren, sondern aktiv mitgestalten – und das auf Augenhöhe mit Behörden und Experten.

Herzstück dieser neuen Beteiligungskultur sind digitale Plattformen, auf denen Karten, Analysen und Planungsszenarien öffentlich zugänglich sind. In Workshops, Online-Dialogen und mobilen GIS-Anwendungen werden Bürger eingeladen, Vorschläge zu machen, Konflikte zu benennen oder eigene Ortskenntnisse einzubringen. Das reicht von der Markierung unsicherer Straßen über das Einzeichnen fehlender Grünflächen bis hin zur Priorisierung von Sanierungsmaßnahmen.

Ein zentrales Element ist dabei die Integration von „Community Mapping“: Lokale Gruppen, NGOs und Bewohner erfassen gemeinsam mit GIS-Experten Daten über ihre Stadtteile. So entstehen detaillierte Karten von Wegen, Märkten, Sammelpunkten oder Risikozonen, die in die formale Planung einfließen. Dieser Bottom-up-Ansatz stellt sicher, dass auch informelle Siedlungen, die im offiziellen Kataster oft fehlen, sichtbar werden und Berücksichtigung finden.

Die Rückkopplung zwischen digitalen und analogen Beteiligungsformaten ist ein weiterer Erfolgsfaktor. In Kigali werden GIS-gestützte Stadtmodelle nicht nur online, sondern auch in physischen Räumen wie Nachbarschaftszentren präsentiert, diskutiert und weiterentwickelt. Digitale Tools ersetzen damit nicht den persönlichen Dialog, sondern ergänzen und unterstützen ihn.

Diese Offenheit hat einen entscheidenden Vorteil: Sie schafft Vertrauen. Wenn Bürger sehen, dass ihre Hinweise in Karten und Plänen sichtbar werden, steigt die Akzeptanz für Planungsentscheidungen. GIS wird so zum Medium demokratischer Stadtentwicklung – transparent, nachvollziehbar und adaptiv.

Praxisbeispiele aus Kigali: GIS als Werkzeug für gerechte Stadtentwicklung

Die Umsetzung partizipativer Planung mit GIS in Kigali ist keine graue Theorie, sondern gelebte Praxis. Ein besonders eindrucksvolles Beispiel ist das „Kigali Master Plan Update“, bei dem die Stadtverwaltung gemeinsam mit internationalen Partnern und lokalen Akteuren eine umfassende Analyse der Stadtstruktur durchgeführt hat. Mithilfe von GIS wurden bestehende Infrastrukturen, Topografie, Wachstumsprognosen und soziale Indikatoren zusammengeführt – und in interaktiven Karten für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht.

Im Rahmen dieses Prozesses wurden zahlreiche Workshops organisiert, bei denen Bürger, Planer und Verwaltungsmitarbeiter gemeinsam Karten auswerteten, Verbesserungsvorschläge einbrachten und Prioritäten für die Stadtentwicklung definierten. GIS ermöglichte es, verschiedene Entwicklungsszenarien visuell zu vergleichen und deren Auswirkungen auf Verkehr, Umwelt und soziale Infrastruktur unmittelbar zu diskutieren.

Ein weiteres Anwendungsfeld ist das Management von Risiken wie Überschwemmungen oder Erdrutschen, die in Kigali aufgrund der Topografie und des Klimas ein großes Problem darstellen. GIS-Analysen helfen, gefährdete Zonen zu identifizieren, Evakuierungsrouten zu planen und Präventionsmaßnahmen gezielt einzusetzen. Auch hier werden lokale Kenntnisse systematisch integriert, indem Bewohner über mobile Apps oder Hotlines auf Problemstellen hinweisen können, die dann in die GIS-Datenbank einfließen.

Im Bereich der Grünflächenplanung nutzt Kigali GIS, um Verteilung, Qualität und Zugänglichkeit von Parks und Erholungsräumen zu erfassen. Bürger können über digitale Plattformen Wünsche äußern, Missstände melden oder Vorschläge für neue Grünflächen machen. So entsteht ein kontinuierlicher Dialog, bei dem Verwaltung und Bevölkerung gemeinsam an einer lebenswerteren Stadt arbeiten.

Nicht zuletzt dient GIS in Kigali auch der Förderung von Transparenz und Rechenschaft. Öffentliche Dashboards zeigen aktuelle Projekte, den Stand der Umsetzung und offene Herausforderungen. Bürger können so nachvollziehen, wie Planungsprozesse ablaufen und welche Argumente in Entscheidungsfindungen eingeflossen sind. Das Ergebnis: Eine intelligent gesteuerte, sozial gerechte und ökologisch nachhaltige Stadtentwicklung, die als Vorbild für viele andere Städte dienen kann.

Herausforderungen, Chancen und Lehren für den deutschsprachigen Raum

Auch wenn Kigali beeindruckende Fortschritte gemacht hat, verläuft die digitale und partizipative Planung nicht ohne Stolpersteine. Technische Infrastruktur, Datenqualität und digitale Kompetenzen sind zentrale Herausforderungen, die immer wieder adressiert werden müssen. Gerade in heterogenen Stadtgesellschaften gilt es, digitale Beteiligung so zu gestalten, dass auch marginalisierte Gruppen und informelle Siedlungen eingebunden werden. Die kontinuierliche Weiterbildung von Verwaltung und Bürgern ist dabei ebenso wichtig wie die Entwicklung barrierearmer Zugänge zu GIS-Plattformen.

Für Städte in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz sind die Erfahrungen aus Kigali hochrelevant – auch wenn die Ausgangsbedingungen unterschiedlich sind. Die konsequente Integration partizipativer Methoden in die digitale Planung, die Offenheit für lokale Expertise und die Bereitschaft, Planung als dialogischen Prozess zu verstehen, können auch hierzulande Impulse setzen. Besonders die Verbindung von digitalen Tools mit analogen Beteiligungsformaten und die transparente Kommunikation von Daten und Entscheidungen sind Erfolgsfaktoren, die überall gelten.

Ein weiteres Learning: Technische Innovation allein reicht nicht. Erst wenn GIS als kulturelles Werkzeug verstanden wird, das Verwaltung, Experten und Bürger auf Augenhöhe bringt, entsteht nachhaltige Wirkung. Das erfordert Mut zur Öffnung, Bereitschaft zur Fehlerkultur und eine Verwaltung, die sich als Dienstleister für die Stadtgesellschaft begreift.

Datenschutz und Datensouveränität sind in Mitteleuropa besonders sensible Themen. Die Erfahrungen aus Kigali zeigen, dass Transparenz, offene Schnittstellen und klare Verantwortlichkeiten das Vertrauen in digitale Systeme stärken. Gleichzeitig müssen klare Regeln für die Nutzung, Speicherung und Weitergabe von Daten entwickelt und kommuniziert werden.

Abschließend bleibt festzuhalten: Digitale und partizipative Planung mit GIS ist kein Allheilmittel, aber ein mächtiges Werkzeug für gerechtere, resiliente und zukunftsfähige Städte. Wer den Sprung wagt, wird mit besseren Prozessen, höherer Akzeptanz und einer lebendigeren Stadtgesellschaft belohnt. Kigali zeigt, wie es gehen kann – und legt die Messlatte hoch für alle, die Stadtplanung als Gemeinschaftsaufgabe begreifen.

Fazit: GIS als Motor partizipativer Stadtentwicklung – Inspiration und Auftrag zugleich

Die Geschichte Kigalis beweist eindrucksvoll, dass digitale Werkzeuge wie GIS weit mehr sind als technologische Spielereien. Sie sind Katalysatoren für einen Paradigmenwechsel in der Stadtplanung: von der Behördenlenkung zur kooperativen Governance, von der Expertenentscheidung zum gemeinsamen Aushandlungsprozess. In Kigali ist es gelungen, GIS als Brücke zwischen Verwaltung, Fachleuten und Bürgern zu etablieren – und damit die Qualität, Transparenz und Legitimität der Stadtentwicklung spürbar zu erhöhen.

Für den deutschsprachigen Raum ist das eine Einladung, den eigenen Planungsansatz zu hinterfragen und mutig Neues zu wagen. GIS muss auch hier als Instrument für soziale Innovation genutzt werden – offen, adaptiv und dialogisch. Die Integration partizipativer Methoden, die Förderung digitaler Kompetenzen und die konsequente Öffnung von Daten und Prozessen sind dabei zentrale Erfolgsfaktoren.

Natürlich gibt es Unterschiede in Infrastruktur, Ressourcen und Rechtsrahmen. Aber der Kern bleibt gleich: Nur wenn Stadtplanung als Gemeinschaftswerk verstanden wird, in dem digitale Tools die Beteiligung aller ermöglichen, entstehen wirklich nachhaltige Lösungen. GIS ist dabei kein Selbstzweck, sondern ein Werkzeug, das die Tür zu einer gerechteren, effizienteren und lebenswerteren Stadt öffnet.

Kigali hat vorgemacht, wie es geht – und dabei gezeigt, dass auch unter schwierigen Bedingungen partizipative Planung zum Erfolg führen kann. Der deutschsprachige Raum kann von diesen Erfahrungen profitieren, sie adaptieren und weiterentwickeln. Die Zukunft der Stadtplanung ist digital, kooperativ und offen. Jetzt liegt es an uns, diese Zukunft aktiv zu gestalten.

“Change of scenery” at the Bayerischer Hof

Building design

The floor-to-ceiling panoramic windows fill the rooms of the Penthouse Garden Suite with natural light and provide access to the terrace from almost all areas. Photo: Benjamin Monn

A vacation in your own city – this was possible in a special way in Munich this August. As part of the “Change of scenery” campaign, around 50 city hotels invited Munich residents to stay with them for a discounted night. The campaign aims to support Munich’s hotel industry, which has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic. Baumeister editor Theresa Ramisch took part in the campaign […].

A vacation in your own city – this was possible in a special way in Munich this August. As part of the “Change of scenery” campaign, around 50 city hotels invited Munich residents to stay with them for a discounted night. The campaign aims to support Munich’s hotel industry, which has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic. Baumeister editor Theresa Ramisch took part in the campaign and was able to stay in a room designed by Axel Vervoordt at Munich’s Grand Hotel Bayerischer Hof and met Innegrit Volkhardt, owner of the Bayerischer Hof, for a chat.

The German hospitality industry is facing a wave of insolvencies. This is the result of a survey presented by the German Hotel and Restaurant Association (DEHOGA) in mid-August. From January to July 2020, German cafés, restaurants and hotels recorded sales losses of 60.1%. For the year as a whole, businesses are expecting sales to fall by 51.0%. Restaurants and hotels in cities are particularly affected by the crisis. DEHOGA President Guido Zöllick describes their situation as “catastrophic”. While businesses in the vacation regions can already draw hope again, business travelers and tourists from abroad are still missing in the cities.

Munich has now responded to the crisis with the “Change of scenery” campaign. Supported by the local DEHOGA district office and the Munich Department of Labour and Economic Affairs, the Tourismus Initiative München (TIM) and the Munich Hotel Alliance (MHA) organized a unique offer that should at least provide the hotel industry with a small additional source of income. The promotional deal: from August 10 to September 6, 2020, residents of the city of Munich and the surrounding area were able to stay in around 50 Munich city hotels – including first-class and luxury hotels – at flat rates of 79 euros, 99 euros and 139 euros. The prices were per double room, per night including breakfast for two people. In addition, all guests received a Munich Card, with which they can visit Munich’s museums at a reduced rate and which is also a ticket for local public transport.

Munich’s grand hotel par excellence, the Bayerischer Hof, also took part in the campaign. The people of Munich were enthusiastic – within a very short time, the contingent was exhausted. “We thought it was a great idea and definitely wanted to take part out of solidarity with the other MHA members,” says Philipp Herdeg, Head of PR and Communications. This campaign does not cover the costs for the 5-star hotel – breakfast alone costs 42 euros per person. The advantage of the Bayerischer Hof is that it is debt-free. The Volkhardt family, who own the hotel, have always put 25 percent of profits into reserves and have been able to bridge the crisis comparatively well.

Security conference 2021 already planned at the Bayerischer Hof

The 5-star luxury hotel on Munich’s Promenadeplatz, which opened in 1841 and is managed by Innegrit Volkhardt in the fourth generation, has 337 rooms and suites, numerous restaurants and bars as well as a 1,300 square meter wellness area. From Empress Elisabeth and Sigmund Freud to Michael Jackson, Lenny Kravitz and Roger Waters – there is hardly a celebrity who has not stayed at the Bayerischer Hof. Then there are all the politicians, diplomats, managers and journalists who attend the annual Munich Security Conference at the Bayerischer Hof. Incidentally, this is still planned for 2021 – albeit much smaller than in previous years and with digital formats, as owner Innegrit Volkhardt reports in an interview.

The Bayerischer Hof stands for more than 150 years of hotel tradition and at the same time for intelligent, modern and authentic design – largely shaped by the Belgian interior designer, art collector and antiques dealer Axel Vervoordt. Innegrit Volkhardt and Axel Vervoordt have been working together successfully for over ten years. Following the redesign of the Garden and Atelier restaurants, the Cinema Lounge and the Palaishalle, the renovation of the north and south wings was Vervoordt’s fourth and largest project at the Bayerischer Hof to date. Between 2016 and 2018, four floors were demolished, rebuilt and an additional floor was added to the building, which now houses the 350 square meter Penthouse Garden Suite. The main challenges here were statics, construction time and the maintenance of the “Komödie”, the theater in the Bayerischer Hof, which is located below the new floors. The investment volume amounted to twelve million euros and a total of 29 new guest rooms and suites were created.

From the large scale to the smallest detail, Axel Vervoordt succeeded in linking the new building with the old building. At the same time, he gave the project his own touch without detracting from the character of the Bayerischer Hof. The design strikes a balance between traditional and modern design – partly because Vervoordt works with his surroundings, not against them. The design concept for the new rooms was based on the direction of the windows: Vervoordt designed the south-facing rooms with light colors, fabrics and tones, while he furnished the north-facing rooms with darker elements. The rooms in the north wing also become increasingly lighter towards the top.

When designing the interior of the rooms, Vervoordt focused on natural and durable materials: the reveal of the room doors is made of stone, the doors themselves are made of poplar wood and the door handles are made of pickled steel. Beds, sofas, armchairs, chairs and cushions are upholstered with linen fabrics in natural and earthy tones. The furniture, made from old wood, is always unique and allows for corners and edges. This is what is striking about Vervoordt’s interior design at the Bayerischer Hof: while quirks and breaks are an absolute no-go for many other designers in hotel rooms, Axel Vervoordt allows them in his design. In this way, he brings naturalness and calm to the rooms. And they will not be his last project at the Bayerischer Hof: He is already working on the next conversion project, the event rooms in Palais Montgelas. The opening is planned for fall 2020.

At the age of 27, Innegrit Volkhardt took over the management of the Bayerischer Hof in 1992. Today, she is the fourth generation to run the Munich grand hotel in 28 years. And with success: from 2011 to 2017, the Bayerischer Hof was the hotel with the highest turnover in Germany. We spoke to Innegrit Volkhardt about the current situation.

Baumeister: Innegrit Volkhardt, there’s no need to discuss the critical situation in the hospitality industry. The situation is extremely serious. In an interview with Handelsblatt at the beginning of June, you were critical of Germany’s coronavirus policy and said that you don’t expect business to stabilize again until 2022. In your opinion, what does the hospitality industry need now?
Innegrit Volkhardt: The first step has now been taken with the extension of short-time working. This is certainly the most important step in order to preserve jobs, but also to have the opportunity to return employees to work when the order situation improves in order to meet the increasing demand.
Of course, it is also important that the industry itself engages in good or even better lobbying. The extent to which the hotel industry in particular has been affected does not yet seem to be clear enough in the minds of politicians or the general public. Unfortunately, explanations to guests about necessary adjustments to opening hours or the reduction of services that are simply not economically feasible due to coronavirus often dominate everyday life. The discussion about a further, often necessary reduction or hours of, for example, rent or other very high fixed costs for companies that are normally profitable is also more than regrettable. For some, it is a question of bare survival in these very difficult times.

B: You and the Bayerischer Hof took part in the “Change of scenery” campaign this summer. Why?
I V: It has always been very important to my family that Munich residents are welcome in our hotel. Almost 90 percent of our five restaurants, the comedy, the spa and the cinema are used by Munich residents, which is why we naturally wanted to take the opportunity to offer locals a great overnight experience. We provided a small contingent of two rooms a day for the campaign, which were all booked in no time at all. We have also received around 150 inquiries so far. However, as we have not been able to expand our contingent, we have of course referred to the other participants. The campaign is not cost-covering for us, but purely out of solidarity with the MHA and TIM.

B: Between April 2016 and January 2018, you had the entire part of the building above the Komödie in the Hotel Bayerischer Hof renovated. You commissioned the interior designer, art collector and antiques dealer Axel Vervoordt to do this. A centerpiece of his work in your hotel is the Penthouse Garden Suite. A place to marvel at. Hand on heart: What is your personal favorite place in the Bayerischer Hof?
I V: I feel at home everywhere in the hotel. Everything is incredibly familiar. My favorite place to stay is the Penthouse Garden Suite, because it’s so quiet up there that you can even hear the birds chirping in the middle of the city.
I also particularly like the Blue Spa. I love my hometown and sitting up there on a beautiful summer evening, when the city and the cathedral are illuminated and close enough to touch and at the same time radiate a great sense of calm but also power, that is something very special.

The text was written on the occasion of the article “Unterwegs im Bayerischen Hof München” for the B10: Wohnungsbau mit Holz.