Beethoven: time to take out the trash

Building design
Photo: Daderot

Photo: Daderot

When Taiwanese people hear Beethoven’s “Für Elise” or “Maiden’s Prayer” by Bądarzewska-Baranowska, it’s time to take out the garbage. Because that’s when the garbage trucks in Taiwan come and take away the household waste. For people in Taiwan, this is also an important moment of social interaction at night. Read all about the urban phenomenon here.

When Taiwanese people hear Beethoven’s “Für Elise” or “Maiden’s Prayer” by Bądarzewska-Baranowska, it’s time to take out the garbage. Because that’s when the garbage trucks in Taiwan come and take away the household waste. For people in Taiwan, this is also an important moment of social interaction at night. Read all about the urban phenomenon here.

Classical melodies such as Beethoven’s “Für Elise” and Bądarzewska-Baranowska’s “Maiden Prayer” are ubiquitous in large parts of the world, in piano lessons, children’s toys and advertising. But in Taiwan, the famous jingle is a call to action and a signal for the nightly ritual of taking out the garbage.

“I like taking out the garbage because I can meet my friends,” one Taipei resident told reporters.

Taiwan’s garbage trucks are canary yellow, often followed by smaller white recycling trucks. They announce their evening presence with a cheerful jingle, instantly transforming quiet neighborhoods into a street party of sorts. Residents of all ages leave their homes to have their garbage collected. Some come by bike or scooter, others take the opportunity to walk their pets.

This waste disposal strategy is decades old in Taiwan. Here, waste is “not allowed to touch the ground” in order to keep the cities as clean as possible. Therefore, residents have to take their garbage to the garbage collection point by hand. Taiwan was once known as a “garbage island”, but now it is surprisingly clean.

Watch the video to see what the process looks like:

Promoting community through garbage collection in Taiwan

The simple but effective use of Beethoven and Bądarzewska-Baranowska’s melodies has not only led to cleaner streets, but also a better sense of community in many neighborhoods. People wait for the bell to ring and then even queue up to have their garbage collected. This time is used for small talk, getting to know new neighbors or, in some cases, even starting a romantic relationship.

In upscale neighborhoods, the property managers usually take care of the garbage collection. This means that the managers of the neighboring buildings have the opportunity to chat and exchange gossip – the residents who don’t stop by are probably missing out on an important part of the evening.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, neighbors in Taiwan have been more cautious, keeping their distance in pick-up lines and sharing less. However, many of them were happy to see familiar faces, exchange gifts or simply get some fresh air during the evening garbage collection.

Taipei, the capital of Taiwan, used to be known for its littered streets and overflowing landfills. The situation became particularly bad in the 1990s when many disgruntled residents protested for better waste collection.

This led to the government initiating an overhaul of waste management. From then on, residents had to buy blue bin bags issued by the government, a kind of tax on waste production and an incentive to throw away less. This “Pay as You Throw” system included 4,000 waste collection points throughout the city. Illegal dumping was made more difficult and fines for illegal waste disposal were increased.

These measures have worked well: In 2017, Taiwan had the second-highest recycling rate in the world. The country is also a world leader in producing as little waste as possible per person. According to Nate Maynard, a waste management expert based in Taipei, personal interaction with their own waste forces residents to be more mindful.

In many other countries, people don’t even know when waste is collected or who takes care of it. In Taiwan, on the other hand, Beethoven’s music announces the opportunity to get in touch with people and dispose of their waste personally. Many residents know the truck drivers personally and have even become friends with them, making the normally arduous task of garbage collection fun.

It is still a mystery why Beethoven’s “Für Elise” and the “Maiden’s Prayer” are the songs of choice to announce garbage collection. Various rumors circulate, such as that the daughter of a health official learned “Für Elise” on the piano or that pre-programmed jingles are part of the truck technology.

The New York Times called these jingles a “Pavlovian call to action” for the Taiwanese. Like the sounds of ice cream trucks in other cities, Beethoven and Bądarzewska-Baranowska have certainly become part of the soundscape in Taiwan. Deviations such as other melodies or English language lessons instead of Beethoven have not stood the test of time. When the southern city of Tainan tried to replace Beethoven, no one responded.

Although some neighbors complain that the music is too loud, and others are annoyed that they have to organize their daily lives around the time of garbage collection, the system will be maintained, according to the city government. It can’t think of a better way to make garbage collection efficient and even entertaining.

You might also be interested: In addition to clean streets, Taiwan has set itself the goal of a carbon-free future. MVRD’s “Sun Rock” megaproject is intended to be a step in this direction. Read more here.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Zaha Hadid builds Tokyo’s Olympic Stadium – but not after all

Building design

Back to square one in Tokyo: Zaha Hadid Architects will not be building the central stadium for the 2020 Olympic Games after all.

It’s back to square one in Tokyo: Zaha Hadid Architects will not be building the central stadium for the 2020 Olympic Games after all. Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has now declared that the entire process will be reset to zero for cost reasons. “We are starting all over again,” the Guardian quotes the Japanese politician as saying. So there will probably be a new competition.
Ultimately, however, the ever-increasing construction costs are likely to be just one reason for the decision. Architecturally, the extravagant building (Hadid, that is) also came in for a lot of criticism – not least from other architects. Arata Isozaki had described Hadid’s design as a turtle just waiting for Japan to sink into the sea so it could swim away. Pritzker Prize winner Fumihiko Maki had organized a symposium against the design, which was attended by Toyo Ito, Kengo Kuma and Sou Fujimoto, among others. A petition against the building was also initiated.
Patrik Schumacher, the first architect in Zaha Hadid’s office, apparently holds this architect-dominated counter-movement partly responsible for the decision. He wrote on Facebook: “Maki and Ito will be remembered for this.”

The center of Berlin remains green

Building design
The perspective shows the planned steps on the banks of the Spree.

1st prize to Büro RMP Lenzen: Steps on the banks of the Spree with a view of the cathedral (Visualization: RMP Lenzen)

RMP Stephan Lenzen win the open space competition for the City Hall and Marx-Engels-Forum in Berlin: The office won against 52 other entries.

It’s all about a prominent area in Berlin’s historic center: sandwiched between the new Humboldt Forum and the television tower, the Rathaus- and Marx-Engels-Forum are getting a new design. The RMP Stephan Lenzen office has won the competition for the green center of Berlin.

Where the roots of the city of Berlin lie, there will soon be no new construction. The open spaces of the Rathaus-Forum and Marx-Engels-Forum will remain green. However, the area will be given a new design, which will result in a flight of steps leading down to the adjacent Spree. The Berlin Senate Administration invited people to take part in a competition in the spring. After an initial phase, citizens were allowed to have their say. A total of 21 landscape architecture firms then developed their ideas further in the second phase of the competition. The landscape architects from RMP Stephan Lenzen ultimately won over the jury. They proposed a central ribbon that connects listed areas of the Rathausforum with the Marx-Engels-Forum. This green ribbon ends in a large staircase on the banks of the Spree. Opposite, on the other side of the water, the eastern façade of the new Humboldt Forum shines.

The open space in the middle of old Berlin used to be called “Park an der Spree”. As one of the most central green spaces in the Mitte district, it dates back to the Second World War. It damaged the Heilig-Geist-Viertel, which ultimately prompted the GDR leadership to demolish it. Since then, the area between Karl-Liebknecht-Straße in the north, the park by the television tower in the east, Rathausstraße in the south and the Spree in the west has remained undeveloped. For a long time, there was an ensemble of monuments in the middle of the area, but this had to be moved to the north-western edge when the subway was built. The future of the Marx-Engels Forum has been under discussion since the 1990s. The ideas were many and varied. They ranged from the reconstruction of the Heilig-Geist-Viertel to the design of a park at the Marx-Engels-Forum. The latter ultimately prevailed.

Marx-Engels-Forum competition brief

The design of a park on the Marx-Engels-Forum now had to be fleshed out as part of the ideas and realization competition. The participants were asked to engage with the place where Berlin was founded, the historical layers hidden in the ground and the surrounding area. At the end of the long debate about the future of this site, citizens’ guidelines for the future development of the Rathaus Forum and the Marx-Engels Forumwere drawn up . These guidelines state that an open space should be designed that does justice to the dimensions and significance of the location and strengthens the identity of the site. In addition, it should bring the eventful history to life and at the same time enable diverse and intensive uses.

In the first phase, the competition initially asked for a vision and an idea for the entire Marx-Engels-Forum. Only the participants in the second phase had to derive their vision. In addition, they outlined an intermediate state for the year 2030 in the ideas part of the competition. In a third realization part, the concrete implementation for 2024 was then to be shown. This step-by-step approach is based on the intended gradual realization of the project. This will take a long time. Accordingly, the ideas must be based on a clear approach and offer a great deal of flexibility for process-based implementation.

The landscape architects from RMP Lenzen provided the most convincing solution for the new design of the Rathaus- and Marx-Engels-Forum. They designed an open space that is characterized by a striking figure. The plan is to keep the Rathaus- and Marx-Engels-Forum free of buildings. The green space promises a high quality of stay with areas for strolling, relaxing and enjoying spectacular views of the cathedral, Humboldt Forum and television tower. RMP Lenzen is equipping the new space with plenty of greenery and lots of shady trees. But water is also included, which contributes to cooling as well as infiltration areas that fit in with future rainwater management. Overall, the contribution to the Marx-Engels-Forum competition envisages a modern, climate-resilient urban space that enables a variety of uses.

Good things take time

The idea of initially creating a green space in the heart of old Berlin preserves opportunities for future generations. For the near future, the jury recommended that the first prize-winning work by RMP Lenzen be realized. This brings a controversial debate to an end. Hardly any other place in Berlin has experienced more planning and discussions than the Marx-Engels-Forum. But for the building senator, it is clear that the city of Berlin has done the right thing. After the fall of the Wall, it did not rush into planning. Now, against the backdrop of current plans for Alexanderplatz and Molkenmarkt and against the backdrop of climate adaptation and the mobility turnaround, things can be designed in peace.

Would you like to find out more about projects in the capital? We have summarized the next planning steps on the former Berlin Tegel airport site for you.