Bridge of hope

Building design

London Architectural Photography

The new Esperance Bridge, built by Moxon in London’s booming King’s Cross district, combines old and new in more ways than one.

The architects at Moxon have built a new pedestrian bridge over Regent’s Canal in the boom district at King’s Cross station in London. The elegant steel structure mediates between tradition and modernity. It thus picks up on a leitmotif of the development project on the former railroad site.

For many decades, the area around London’s King’s Cross station was one of the city’s back alleys, characterized by drug dealing and prostitution. Anyone visiting the area today will no longer find any of this. Instead, a new district has been created on the old railroad and industrial sites, attracting locals and tourists alike in droves. The prerequisite for this was extensive urban development work. The two large railroad stations that characterize the area, King’s Cross and St Pancras, were extensively renovated and converted into modern transport hubs. Between the two historic station buildings, a new office district has been created around the new Pancras Square, where Universal Music and Google, among others, now reside. The internet company is currently building its European headquarters there with BIG and Heatherwick Studio.

However, the jewel in the crown of the King’s Cross revitalization lies on the other side of Regent’s Canal, which runs behind the large platform halls. This is where the freight yard of King’s Cross Station was located. Coal, fish and grain supplies were once stored here and transported to the capital by train. The historic buildings from the early days of the railroad era have been renovated and repurposed in recent years. Thomas Heatherwick provided the Coal Drop Yards, now a shopping center, with an eye-catching roof construction. The Granary Building was converted by architects Stanton Williams into the home of the famous Central Saint Martins School of Art. And designer Tom Dixon moved into the Fish and Coal Buildings with his studio and a flagship store.

The new Esperance Bridge by Moxon Architects now completes the pedestrian infrastructure in the King’s Cross district. The bridge creates a new link from the office district across Regent’s Canal to the former freight yard area. It was built on the site of a previous bridge dating from 1821, which was used to transport coal to the warehouses and into the city. This had been demolished in the 1920s.

The design of the Esperance Bridge makes reference to the industrial heritage of King’s Cross. Nevertheless, it is clearly a contemporary structure. The red color and the use of metal as a material are reminiscent of the early cast iron bridges that started the triumph of this building material. These bridges, above all the “Iron Bridge” over the River Severn near Birmingham, marked the beginning of modern engineering and symbolize the industrial revolution in Great Britain.

Moxon also created a very elegant engineering structure with the Esperance Bridge in King’s Cross. To do so, they used the principle of the truss bridge, which was already used in the early cast iron bridges. The architects have transformed this construction method into a sophisticated structure that makes do with just a few different components. This is particularly evident in the bridge’s truss girders, which also form its railings. They consist of a series of twisted metal brackets. The bridge elements are designed in such a way that they can be subjected to alternating compressive and tensile loads.

Incidentally, the name of the bridge was chosen by the children of King’s Cross Academy, a nearby school. The pupils wanted to use the name as a sign of hope during the coronavirus pandemic. They were inspired by the Espérence Club. This club was a pioneering social project based in the nearby St Pancras district. It was founded by the two women’s rights activists Mary Neal and Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence. Shortly before the turn of the 20th century, they supported girls who worked as seamstresses.

Not every bridge leads to the opposite bank: the “Bridge Sprout”, built by Atelier Bow-Wow from Japan in Munich, ends over the river!

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Ulmer Prize 2023 announced

Building design
Students and graduates can submit their work for the Ulmer Prize of the Karl Foerster Foundation until May 15. Read all about the award here. Photo: Norbert Kühn

Students and graduates can submit their work for the Ulmer Prize of the Karl Foerster Foundation until May 15. Photo: Norbert Kühn

The Karl Foerster Foundation for Applied Vegetation Science is once again promoting young talent. Students and graduates have until May 15 to submit their work for the Ulmer Prize 2023. Read all about the award here.

The Karl Foerster Foundation for Applied Vegetation Science is once again promoting young talent. Students and graduates have until May 15 to submit their work for the Ulmer Prize 2023. Read all about the award here.

Bachelor’s and Master’s theses can be submitted for this year’s Ulmer Prize until May 15, 2023. One focus of the Karl Foerster Foundation for Applied Vegetation Science is the promotion of young talent. For this reason, the international Ulmer Prize has been awarded every two years since 2007. The award is intended to highlight awareness of the use of plants in garden and landscape architecture. The Ulmer Prize honors the concrete use of plants as a design tool. Outstanding graduates and students of landscape architecture and planning are thus to be motivated to actively engage with plants as a means of construction.

The Ulmer Prize honors significant work by graduates and students from the relevant universities and universities of applied sciences. Both theoretical-conceptual works and concrete planning designs can be submitted. Proposed planting concepts must be convincing in terms of design. They should also have a lasting effect.

Professors of landscape architecture and planning or related courses of study nominate students or graduates for the Ulmer Prize. They must substantiate their choice with a two- to three-page expert opinion. The proposed participants must be a maximum of thirty-five years old. The work must be written in German or English. They must also be no more than three years old. Normally, individuals are nominated. However, smaller groups are also permitted in justified exceptional cases. Theses (Bachelor’s/Master’s theses), coursework as well as doctoral theses and research papers can be submitted.

For the Ulmer Prize, the work must demonstrate an increase in the quality of the open space through the creative use of plants. On the one hand, the proposed design and spatial quality of the work is assessed. How the socio-cultural and historical references have been worked out is also important here. On the other hand, the functional and site suitability is relevant. The maintenance and development concept also plays a role here. In detail, the proposed species and variety combinations, the form and color concept, as well as the adjacencies must be convincing.

The work must be submitted to the Karl Foerster Foundation by May 15, 2023. The Ulmer Prize consists of a certificate and 4,000 euros. The publisher Eugen Ulmer donates the prize money. The jury consists of three members of the Foundation’s Board of Trustees. The decision will be communicated to the nominating professor. The results will also be published in specialist publications and on the Internet.

The submission address for the Ulmer Prize is: The Board of Trustees of the Karl Foerster Foundation, c/o Prof. Dr. Norbert Kühn, TU Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 22, 14195 Berlin. You can also view the call for entries online here.

More about the winners of the Ulmer Prize 2021. The award went to Patrick Putzig and Sebastian Hobmeier. The two works impressed with their innovative approaches to the use of plants. In his master’s thesis, award winner Sebastian Hobmeier demonstrated the potential of the combined use of seeds and woody plants in urban spaces. He focused on “coppicing” as a care and design tool in the use of plants. In his master’s thesis, Patrick Putzig wrote about design strategies for the site-specific use of woody structures in the city, so-called “Treescapes”.

Collection items in safety

Building design

The classic “Collections in Safety” is still a standard work for practical museum operations. Although the third, expanded edition was published in 2002, it contains important additions for conservators that are still valid. When a book appears in its third edition, it must be pretty good or pretty important. In the case of “Sammlungsgut in Sicherheit”, both are true. Because […]

The classic Collections in Safety is still a standard work for practical museum operations. Although the third, expanded edition was published in 2002, it contains important additions for conservators that are still valid.

When a book appears in its third edition, it must be pretty good or pretty important. In the case of “Sammlungsgut in Sicherheit”, both are true. This is because the book on the topics of lighting and light protection, air conditioning, prevention of harmful substances, pest control, security technology, fire protection and hazard management is a fundamental work for museum work. It contains knowledge and numerous tips for the organization of tasks in a museum.

The volume has been expanded to include chapters on the prevention of harmful substances and pest control. This expansion was particularly requested by conservators and restorers. The section on hazard management was created at the suggestion of security experts.

However, some chapters begin with overly basic information. At the beginning of her article “Fire protection in museums”, Barbara Fischer explains what a fire is: “A fire is a chemical process in which a flammable substance combines with oxygen (oxidation) and which takes place exothermically – i.e. with the release of heat – at a high reaction rate.”

This sounds a bit like elementary school science lessons and will underchallenge, if not annoy, any reader. And this is completely unnecessary, because Fischer’s article is good and important, as it not only describes the causes of fires and how to combat them, but also goes into detail about protection and the problems it can cause. These include, for example, emergency exits, which can save the lives of museum visitors in the event of a fire, but which can also be used by thieves. Here, Fischer brings together all the usual options for opening escape routes in an emergency, but making them more difficult for thieves to pass through.

The other articles are similarly structured: They list which technical options exist and thus provide decision-making aids and the basis for weighing up which systems a particular museum might need. All of this is illustrated with numerous tables, formulas and graphics, such as Wibke Unger’s very convincing article on pests in museums. Various insects are clearly illustrated and there are precise instructions on how to destroy them.

All the authors are well aware of one shortcoming of their contributions, as editor Gunter S. Hilbert writes in the foreword: “In the course of working on their manuscripts, the co-authors found themselves in the situation of the hare from the fable of the race with the hedgehog. Although always striving for topicality, by the end of the last chapter some novelty, some innovation, had already caught up with them.” One of the authors, Hans-Jürgen Harras, Head of the Security Department at the Berlin State Museums of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation, explains that, in line with Hilbert’s guiding principles, the chapters were preceded by the basics and history of the respective topic. The results were described as a guideline for action and the way in which the knowledge was gained was also made clear.