Climate protection in monument preservation – G+L in August 2024!

Building design
Over the next few years, the Munich office TERRA.NOVA will be planning the redesign of Obermünsterstraße and Obermünsterplatz in Regensburg. The office writes about the balance between the historic, stone old town and green-blue for the climate in its project presentation from page 36. Credit: Paul Trakies and Wolfram Gothe Illustration: Laura Heinemann

Over the next few years, the Munich office TERRA.NOVA will be planning the redesign of Obermünsterstraße and Obermünsterplatz in Regensburg. The office writes about the balance between the historic, stone old town and green-blue for the climate in its project presentation from page 36.
Credit: Paul Trakies and Wolfram Gothe
Illustration: Laura Heinemann

Preserving valuable resources – this common goal unites monument conservation and climate protection. At the same time, however, current discussions about Munich’s Max-Joseph-Platz and Vienna’s Michaelerplatz also show that the two goals are constantly in conflict with each other. In the next G+L, we will examine how heritage conservation and climate protection in public spaces can be better reconciled despite numerous challenges, examine current cases and discuss with experts where the boundaries lie and must lie.

The “Opera for All” traditionally takes place on the last weekend in July in Munich. Every year, the Bavarian State Opera and BMW invite the city’s residents to take a seat on the stone cobblestones of Max-Joseph-Platz and watch an opera performance. For free. Sitting there on the floor for two hours is as uncomfortable and hip as it gets. But while visitors can still experience “Tosca” on hard, cold stone this year, their picnic blankets could possibly find a place on soft, green grass in 2025. The interim greening of the iconic, listed Max-Joseph-Platz, which has since been approved by the city council, has been and continues to be the subject of controversial debate in the city.

In fact, these discussions were the starting point for us in the G+L editorial team to create this issue on the topic of “Climate protection in heritage conservation”. While building construction has already made a great deal of progress in reconciling heritage conservation and climate protection, this challenge often remains unanswered for open spaces. In this G+L, we therefore want to find out how we can and must adapt listed and historically valuable open and urban spaces to the climate requirements of the present – and where the limits lie.

In their article “Not if, but how”, Daniela Michalski and Wolf-Christian Strauss ask the crucial question: How can climate protection measures be integrated creatively and respectfully into listed open spaces? They shed light on innovative projects and provide valuable insights into practice. What seems difficult to reconcile at first glance reveals astonishing synergies and innovative solutions on closer inspection.

These theoretical approaches are complemented by numerous current practical examples. In addition to Munich, we take a look at Bad Muskau, Berlin, Goslar, Hanover, Regensburg, Rothenburg ob der Tauber and Vienna, spoke to numerous experts and let them have their say on the following pages. Of particular interest: the contrasting positions of Florian Hochstätter, Head of the Munich Horticultural Office, and landscape architect Christoph Valentien. In their comments, both provide insights into the challenges and resistance associated with the greening of historic squares. Their discussion shows how important it is to consider different perspectives and find innovative solutions. We hope you enjoy reading this issue.

The magazine is available here in the store!

Our last issue was about village life and how attractive it is. Read more about it here.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Made blue

Building design

I want to be a part of it – New York, New York. The ambience of the new cocktail bar “Only Love Strangers” in New York’s Lower East Side can be experienced with music in your ears. In addition to culinary highlights such as pickled martinis and seafood, the bar, which opened in mid-April this year, focuses on the retro-futurism of the seventies in the context of its interior design. Blue is the motto, punctuated by chrome and mirrors. The New York interior design studio Studio Omar Aqeel worked in monochrome in a dark but bright shade of blue in the furniture as well as the ceilings, walls and floors, which is also picked up in the store’s corporate design. The harmonious overall picture creates a world of its own that attracts the city’s night owls, not least because of the regular jazz evenings. The futuristic-looking various white lights and the bar, around which the floor, walls and ceilings are tiled in blue, are also exciting details. However, if it ends up being entirely too blue for you, you can switch to lighter and more neutrally designed rooms on the upper floor, where less select blue accents have been used.

Take a look at this post on Instagram

A post shared by Studio OA (@studio.omar.aqeel)

Classicism I – Architecture

Building design
The Altes Museum in Berlin is a typical classicist building. Photo: Avda - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, via: Wikimedia Commons

The Altes Museum in Berlin is a typical classicist building.
Photo: Avda - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, via: Wikimedia Commons

The classicism of the late 18th and early 19th century marks a return to the ideals of antiquity: measure, symmetry, clarity and rationality characterize architecture, urban planning and public spaces. Developed in the spirit of the Enlightenment, architecture served not only aesthetic, but also moral and social purposes. Monumental public buildings, museums, palaces and memorials reflect political order, republican virtue and the cultural education of their patrons. This first part of the series examines the central characteristics of classicist architecture and presents pioneering examples.

Classicism is based on the architecture of Greek and Roman antiquity and systematically applies its principles to the present day of the Enlightenment. In contrast to the lively Baroque and the playful Rococo, it strives for calm, austerity and harmonious proportions. Rectangles, circles and squares became the basic elements of spatial composition. Symmetry, systems of measurement and clear axes lend buildings rationality and legibility. Column orders, temple fronts, domes and architraves are formally reinterpreted to express stability and moral dignity. This recollection was an expression of enlightened thinking: architecture should make order, reason and moral clarity visible. Every pillar and every proportion follows a principle of spiritual discipline – buildings become manifestos of rational beauty.

A key work of French classicism is the Panthéon in Paris, designed by Jacques-Germain Soufflot (from 1758). Originally conceived as the Church of Sainte-Geneviève, it was rededicated as a national monument during the Revolution – an architectural expression of republican values. Clearly structured façades, a monumental dome, Corinthian columns and a balanced transept create a space full of grandeur and rationality. Soufflot combined structural innovations (e.g. iron-reinforced stone arches) with the rigor of antique form. The Panthéon thus embodies the Enlightenment’s aspiration to use architecture as a moral and political symbol – as a “temple of reason” for a new society.

In Germany, Karl Friedrich Schinkel embodied the ideals of classicism in its purest form. His buildings – such as the Neue Wache (1816-1818) and the Altes Museum (1823-1830) in Berlin – show how antique forms and systems of measurement can be transferred to a modern, bourgeois society. Schinkel’s architecture is characterized by clear symmetries, horizontal structuring, disciplined ornamentation and a didactic spatial dramaturgy. The buildings appeal to reason, a sense of order and moral responsibility. The Altes Museum, with its open columned hall, was regarded as a symbol of democratic education: art became freely accessible, public space became a place of intellectual elevation.
In terms of urban planning, classicism brought about a reorganization of urban spaces. Axes, squares and visual relationships were designed according to geometric and harmonious principles – for example in Karlsruhe, Mannheim and Weimar. Architecture thus became part of a rationally planned community, an expression of an ideally ordered society.

Classicism also shaped the formal language of European court architecture. Palaces and residences – such as those in Schwetzingen, Pavlovsk near St. Petersburg or the Palais Bourbon in Paris – eschewed Baroque grandeur in favor of quiet grandeur. The façades are rhythmically structured, the interiors clearly proportioned and flooded with light. Antique-style decoration – friezes, pilasters, gable reliefs – replaced the floral ornamentation of past eras. The ideal is now: elegance through simplicity, representation through proportion. Architecture became a symbol of intellectual and moral order.

Classicist architects used materials carefully to emphasize duration and clarity. Sandstone, marble and plaster create calm, matt surfaces. Decor is reduced to constructively clear and meaningful elements: Doric or Ionic columns, geometric friezes, acanthus leaves and meandering bands. The interior design follows a logical sequence: vestibule – hall – gallery. Every perspective is rationally legible, every fall of light planned. The building is designed to be understood – not to overwhelm, but to instruct. The result is an architecture of understanding that shows form and function in moral unity.

Classicist architecture is highly ideological and educational. Museums, theaters, court buildings, libraries and memorials became symbols of public responsibility and cultural identity. Architecture was not only an expression of power, but also an instrument of enlightenment – a visible textbook on order, law and reason. Classicism thus drew on ancient ideals of the civis romanus: the educated, morally responsible citizen. This synthesis of art, ethics and rationality reflects the social aspirations of a new era of modern public life. Classicism stands for a conscious return to the ancient language of form as an expression of reason, moderation and clarity. Its architecture is both a manifesto and a medium – it shapes values, not just spaces.
From the Panthéon in Paris to Schinkel’s Berlin architecture and the reformed residences of Europe, the era shaped the image of a cultivated, orderly modernity. Classicism thus forms the bridge between the cheerful sensual culture of the Rococo and the intellectual seriousness of modernism – a balance of rationality, beauty and moral significance.