Cycling and traffic turnaround

Building design
Stationary bicycles in a town square.

The bicycle is already a popular means of transportation for many city dwellers. Photo: Philipp Böhme

Time for cycling: A new publication by the German Institute of Urban Affairs states that the time for cycling has never been better. Read here what the Difu says is necessary for a successful transport transition.

A new publication by the German Institute of Urban Affairs states that the time has never been better for cycling. Read here what the Difu says is necessary for a successful transport transition.

The publication “Radwege und Verkehrswende. A history of headwinds and tailwindsby the German Institute of Urban Affairs looks at cycling – from the past to the present. It shows the transport policy potential of cycling. The publication also outlines what is needed for a successful transport transition.

The pandemic and, above all, the associated lockdowns have changed people. They have developed new habits for moving around their neighborhoods, cities and surroundings. As a result, there were suddenly more pedestrians than ever before. Bicycles also appeared in unexpected numbers. Cycling was particularly attractive because the lockdown had reduced car traffic. Pop-up cycle paths appeared in some cities. In many places, these were intended to be temporary, but they are now indispensable. The bicycle hype can now be seen in many cities around the world.

Bottlenecks despite the bike hype

Although the signs are pointing to cycle paths and a turnaround in traffic, progress is slow. Many local authorities do not yet have any feasible projects. Or they lack the staff or the necessary funds. In addition, road traffic law or other standards often block changes. The priority given to car traffic is often a major brake on the necessary change. This is also reflected in the title of a new publication by the German Institute of Urban Affairs. With “Cycling and traffic turnaround. A story of headwinds and tailwinds”, the dilemma is already outlined in the title. The publication draws attention to the current road traffic regulations and makes it clear how the strong focus on the car came about. However, it also shows that the signs are currently good for cycling and the traffic turnaround.

Many people associate the car with prosperity and mobility. But the enormous increase in automobility is increasingly limiting our living space and our health. Cars have become a disruptive factor in many urban structures. This was not always the case. When the bicycle became affordable around 1900, bicycles soon became a means of mass transportation. Cycling got its first tailwind. Riding streetcars, on the other hand, was expensive. And the mass distribution of private cars was initially unthinkable. That only came after the Second World War. The first and early cycle paths were built on and at the side of roadways. This allowed cyclists to ride alongside the dirt roads that had been soiled by horses and carts. It was only later that cycle paths moved to the side of the road, often separated by a raised kerb.

The first headwinds arose in the 1930s. During the Nazi era, motor vehicles became a national symbol of progress. Hitler announced a major road construction plan. From then on, road planning was primarily concerned with getting disruptive bicycles out of the way. The flow of car traffic was given top priority. The Reich Road Traffic Regulations from 1934 literally pushed cyclists to the sidelines. They also had to ride one behind the other. The federal states and provinces were encouraged to build cycle paths to get unwanted bicycles off the road. But the time until the Second World War was too short for this.

Traffic turnaround started in 1973

In the years after the war, the number of cars multiplied. At the same time, cycling fell to a historically low level. Many cycle paths fell into disrepair and were dismantled or repurposed. Only cycle paths were built along federal highways in order to reduce traffic congestion and facilitate the flow of car traffic. The first turnaround in traffic came in the 1970s. After the Club of Rome warned of the limits to growth in 1972 and the oil crisis in 1973 led to driving bans on Sundays, there was a kind of turning point. The modern environmental movement emerged and brought about a rethink.

The return of cycling

The bicycle slowly returned to the transport policy agenda. In 1983, the first program for environmental relief through bicycle traffic was published. In addition, research initiatives for model projects for bicycle-friendly cities flourished. A concept for the transport transition emerged after the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio in 1992. This was followed by various resolutions that had an impact on cycling. In 1997, there was even an amendment to the road traffic regulations for bicycles. In 2002, 2012 and 2021, the German government adopted a National Cycling Plan.

The renewed tailwind for cycle paths and the traffic turnaround initiated various funding programs. Since 2013, the Federal Ministry for the Environment has also been funding municipal cycling investments. Since 2018, the federal government has been supporting the construction of high-speed cycle paths. And thanks to the pressure to act on climate protection, the Federal Ministry of Transport currently has over 1.4 billion euros in various funding programs. However, innovative technologies, electric-assisted bicycles and bicycle-based logistics and delivery services are also gaining in importance and conquering the market and the streetscape.

Despite positive developments, cycling and the traffic turnaround are not making rapid progress. According to Difu, many local authorities lack projects that can be implemented or the will to do so. This is because road traffic law and other standards are still making change difficult. Any change that could affect the convenience of car traffic or cost parking spaces has a hard time. In addition, local authorities lack the staff to apply for funding and to plan and implement investments in cycle paths. In many places, municipal finances are also insufficient to raise the necessary funds.

Nevertheless, the long-standing head of the mobility research department at the German Institute of Urban Affairs has never found the time to be as favorable for cycling as it is at the moment. In addition to great pressure to act, there is a change in values and numerous innovations. More and more resolutions and concepts are supporting cycling. And there is more funding than ever before. This gives us reason to continue to believe in cycling and the traffic turnaround and to push ahead with their implementation.

Speaking of mobility: Bahn.Business customers can benefit from a 50 percent “climate discount” on the BahnCard 100 thanks to the Glasgow Commitment. You can find out more about the offer here.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Par force ride through the history of construction

Building design

Peter Märkli and Jacques Herzog

Dietmar STEIN bids farewell to the AzW with the 20th Vienna Architecture Congress.

Dietmar STEIN has been an observer and player in the international architectural discourse for around four decades. He founded the Architekturzentrum Wien in 1993 and is now ending his work there. Not only for reasons of age, but also because he has become pessimistic, as he says: “…I must confess that I am no longer interested in contemporary business architecture. In recent years, universities have produced too many architects who only want to be successful on the market as service providers…”

He has organized 19 architecture congresses and bid farewell last weekend with the 20th edition. But not on just any topic, no, he reviewed every single decade since 1960: Over two days, there was a lecture on each decade followed by a discussion. Protagonists from that time were invited to the podium, a long illustrious list that attracted many listeners: Rob Krier, Jacques Herzog, Dominique Perrault, Hermann Czech, Wiel Arets, Nathalie de Vries, Roger Diener, STEIN Holl, Bart Lootsma, Peter Märkli, Wolf Prix, Bruno Reichlin and many more – Dietmar Steiner’s companions from his “architectural socialization”, as it was called.

A good concept: the older gentlemen report, the younger generation provides the moderators and the questions. But as is often the case with such a wealth of contributions, the audience soon got the feeling that the architectural celebrities, who had traveled a long way to be there, did not get to speak enough, were not allowed to talk at length about what it was like back then and, above all, how they see their own history today, because there was far too little time. Especially as the debates, with the exception of one discussion, were held in English: So there was a danger with a lack of knowledge of the language – which no one can be blamed for – that the statements were greatly simplified, even trivialized. There was hardly any conversation on the podium, with one short statement following another and no questions from the audience.

But of course there were many remarkable moments in this architectural history marathon: For example, when Jacques Herzog said about his teacher Aldo Rossi – in German, by the way, in his strong language – that he admired him as a student, but was disillusioned when he visited the Gallarartese residential row in Milan again and found only a “built drawing”. Or when Wilfried Wang surprisingly spread the hope in the much-vaunted times of crisis that creativity today comes from the more innovative third world and that architects there are in the process of finding solutions to the problems of our time. Or when Wolf Prix stated that today everyone is “afraid of the future, whereas in the sixties people believed in the future”. Or when Rob Krier sternly admonished architects to develop their own “signature style without offending the cities”.

There was also a successful introduction to the congress by Jean-Louis Cohen, who sensitively brought the post-war period back to life for the audience and prepared them for the decades to come. As well as a particularly successful conclusion with Juhani Pallasmaa: the great, old, wise Finnish gentleman of architectural history advised in a profound essay for less excitement, more prudence and modesty: no fear of repetition, “let’s repeat ourselves”.

What remains? There will be an issue of the magazine Arch+ on the congress in the middle of next year, and you can visit an exhibition worth seeing at the AzW until March 20, 2017: Curators Karoline Mayer, Sonja Pisarek and Katharina Ritter have not let Steiner’s pessimism get to them and have put together an optimistic show with interesting buildings as cornerstones of the decades. They were able to translate Dietmar STEIN’s attitude that architecture is at an end into the title “At the End: Architecture. Time travel 1959 – 2019”.
Incidentally, Angelika Fitz will take over the management of the AzW in the new year and we will introduce her in more detail in our February issue.

Photos: eSel.at / Lorenz Seidler

Clothe, undress

Building design

Photo: Reimer Verlag

David Ganz has written an extremely knowledgeable history of medieval book bindings. Whether the book exists as an object of artistic design or is drowning in the euphoria of digital marketing ideas – David Ganz cannot answer this question. However, there is no doubt that there are wonderful book bindings. Especially not for David Ganz, Professor of Art History of the […]


„Buch-Gewänder“ von David Ganz
Book bindings by David Ganz

David Ganz has written an extremely knowledgeable history of medieval book bindings.

Whether the book exists as an object of artistic design or is drowning in the euphoria of digital marketing ideas – David Ganz cannot answer this question. However, there is no doubt that there are wonderful book bindings. Especially not for David Ganz, Professor of Medieval Art History at the University of Zurich and author of the recently published book “Buch-Gewänder – Prachteinbände im Mittelalter”. However, Ganz complains at the beginning of his richly illustrated, highly complex and fascinating study, which delves deep into medieval religious thought, that the “weight of holy books as aesthetically designed sacramentals is dramatically underexposed in more recent accounts”. Ganz’s book stands against this trend, which, like any good pictorial description, not only opens the reader’s eyes to details, but also places its subject in its time. It is clear that details of splendid bindings of the Gospels and liturgical texts require a great deal of basic knowledge, but this is not a prerequisite for the author. And that is a very good thing, because there is much to explain about medieval thought.

These explanations are often highly theoretical, but extremely exciting. For example, when Ganz explains the depictions of the Genoels-Elderen book cover from the Musées Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire in Brussels: “The motif of Mary with spindle and skirt was frequently found in late antique Byzantine pictorial art, but rather rare in Western art. These paintings are based on the stories of the apocryphal Protoevangelium Jacobi, according to which Mary was stretching purple for the temple curtain at the moment of the Annunciation. In the early Middle Ages, the motif of Mary’s handiwork in book covers appears again, albeit in a much more symbolic form: “The Christian interpretation of the veil, which Paul develops in the Letter to the Hebrews, speaks of the veil of the flesh and thus refers to the incarnate Christ himself. The Jewish curtain in front of the Holy of Holies is reinterpreted here as the garment into which Christ slips at the incarnation. Mary’s role as the Mother of God, as can often be read in the literature of the Church Fathers, was that of a robe-giver.” This depiction in turn serves to adorn a garment – the book garment, which is made of ivory. The precious white ivory was regarded as a symbol of Mary’s virginity, from whose flesh Christ was born. The artistically perforated surface of the picture “imprints the flesh-like material with its own enveloping quality”, writes Ganz.


Elfenbeintafeln
Ivory panels, photo: Reimer Verlag


Elfenbeintafeln
Ivory panels, photo: Reimer Verlag

The web of meaning that is uncovered here corresponds with the artistic design of the book covers, which were often boxes that housed the Gospels. This is why Ganz, using the example of the wonderful Uta Codex of 1020/30 from a Regensburg goldsmith’s workshop, speaks of vestments on two levels “On the first level, the binding is a decorative ornament of the Gospel book made of precious materials. This is the exterior-interior relationship constitutive of our genre. On a second level, the binding is the carrier for an image that represents the body of Christ. In this image, Christ himself is already wrapped in a robe. The wearer of the robe, who has taken his place in such full form on a throne, is a figurative image body that is only made available by the book cover itself. “But that is not all: when a book is taken out of the book case for reading, it is undressed and made to sound through the reading. When the book was put back into the box after the reading, “the codex filled with characters was reunited with its pictorial cover, which indicated the presence of Christ in the Gospel book for the entire remaining part of the Mass.”


Buchkasten
Uta codex from 1020/30, book box, photo: Reimer Verlag

Such an explanation is nothing short of breathtaking. Explanations of the book held in the hand of a Christ depicted on a book case lead even deeper into medieval thinking: “The figure of the ruler of heaven represents a person constituted by the book, in this book.”


Buchkasten
Uta codex from 1020/30, book case, photo: Reimer Verlag

These examples, which are only excerpted here, already show the huge wealth of knowledge that David Ganz spreads out. And which is not only of immense value in terms of religious history, history and art history, but must be the basis of any study of medieval book bindings.

David Ganz “Buch-Gewänder -Prachteinbände im Mittelalter”, Reimer Verlag, 368 p., 79 Euro