Digital fund for the digital transformation

Building design
The Federal Cultural Foundation supported the digital transformation of cultural institutions with the Digital Fund. The picture shows the new building of the Federal Cultural Foundation at Franckeplatz 2 in Halle (Saale). Photo: Jens Passoth

The Federal Cultural Foundation supported the digital transformation of cultural institutions with the Digital Fund. The picture shows the new building of the Federal Cultural Foundation at Franckeplatz 2 in Halle (Saale).
Photo: Jens Passoth

The Federal Cultural Foundation has experience with project funding and yet is surprised at how the pandemic has made one project particularly successful. The Federal Cultural Foundation supports dance projects, exhibitions and festivals. It wants to make ideas possible and provide impetus with its funding. In recent years, digitization projects have also been supported by the Digital Fund. A five-year funding phase was planned for this very special fund, which ended as planned in 2023. Although some institutions are only presenting their projects this year, the Digital Fund is definitely coming to an end.

The Federal Cultural Foundation has experience with project funding and yet is surprised at how the pandemic has made one project particularly successful. The Federal Cultural Foundation supports dance projects, exhibitions and festivals. It wants to make ideas possible and provide impetus with its funding. In recent years, digitization projects have also been supported by the Digital Fund. A five-year funding phase was planned for this very special fund, which ended as planned in 2023. Although some institutions are only presenting their projects this year, the Digital Fund is definitely coming to an end.

Julia Mai, who is in charge of the Digital Fund project at the German Federal Cultural Foundation, explains the five-year limit as part of the foundation’s remit. It provides impetus for certain topics and develops model programs for a limited period of time. The Digital Fund was developed “to drive digital change in museums and strengthen digital expertise in the institutions,” says Mai. The aim was never to support the digitization of collections alone. Rather, the aim was to support museums that had already laid the foundations for digitization and were therefore willing and able to develop new, innovative digital projects. Furthermore, the project funds of 15.8 million would not have been enough to digitize entire collections anyway.
The foundation wants to promote lighthouse projects and has therefore primarily targeted larger institutions for this project. However, if you look at the map that the Cultural Foundation has compiled for the distribution of projects, you can see that digital projects have by no means been developed and implemented in all federal states. No digital project was developed and funded in Schleswig-Holstein, most of the eastern German states or Saarland, while there were several joint digital projects in North Rhine-Westphalia.
“Interestingly, larger museums have joined forces with much smaller institutions,” says Julia Mai. As a result, 28 large and small museums, five theaters, two opera houses and one memorial site, which had joined forces in 15 groups, benefited from the Digital Fund. The collaborative work was one of the conditions for receiving any funding at all.

In this project, digital change did not mean digitization, but rather the application of already digitized collections and their use in creative projects. And this goes far beyond the specific needs of a single institution. The calls for proposals were already about ideas that could also be transferred to others. This is why “open source” publication was just as much a requirement as the possibility of making content available as “open access”. In addition, a digital partner – for example a university or an agency – had to be sought for the collaboration.
Despite such complex application conditions, all projects were implemented and almost all have already been published. For example, “Diversify the code”, the project by Hamburg’s Deichtorhallen and the Kampnagel International Culture Factory in Hamburg. Together with the Chaos Computer Club, they have developed open source software to simplify the management of cultural events.
As the projects involved exist in virtual space and can therefore be accessed at any time and from anywhere, a joint project between the Frankfurt am Main Film Museum and the ACMI Museum in Melbourne, the Australian National Museum of Film, Television, Video Games, Digital Culture and the Arts, was also funded. Together, they investigated how digital curating can be implemented in a “consistently open and participatory” way. It was not just about linking the two collections and giving visitors and users the opportunity to create their own digital content for the two institutions. It was also about making the application usable for others.
The “Open Worlds” project, for which four contemporary art institutions joined forces, has also already been presented. The Museum für Gegenwartskunst Siegen, the Kestner Gesellschaft Hannover, the Museum Martha Herford and Imagine the City in Hamburg explored the possibilities of digital staging in urban spaces. An important part of the development was the possibility of networking with users, who can now feed content into the app themselves.
Mannheim and Stuttgart are planning to present their “From Work to Display” project in June 2024, as Heiko Daniels explains in the RESTAURO interview. The two museums have come up with 23 different, artwork-specific projects for 23 works of art from their collections. The aim was to answer the question: “How can art be experienced digitally?”
Looking back, Julia Mai is still impressed by the large number of applications for the program, even though the requirements “were very high”. But the program obviously addressed a need. There is still a need, says Mai, adding: “The federal states are also responding, for example by creating positions.” For example, Baden-Württemberg has a digital manager position for museums and Berlin has resilience dispatchers who deal with specific issues of digital change in cultural institutions.”
Summing up, she says: “I am very, very happy that all 15 associations have tried out innovative things and implemented all their projects.”
In her view, there is one main reason why it worked without a hitch in this case. It was the pandemic, which made it very clear to the institutions shortly after the funding was approved how important the digital transformation is for them.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

“People don’t trust the personal responsibility of citizens”

Building design

The theme of G+L 06/2020: River quality of life: designing urban waterfronts properly. (Photo:© Lucía deMosteyrín)

We spoke to architect Barbara Buser about river swimming as an urban phenomenon and asked her why Germany is having such a hard time with its river baths.

Barbara Buser from the in situ construction office based in Basel, Zurich and Liestal co-curated the Swim City exhibition. We spoke to the architect about river swimming as an urban phenomenon and asked her why people in Germany – think of the Berlin or Munich initiatives – have such a hard time with their river pools.

In 2017, Munich city activist Benjamin David was celebrated nationwide in the media for his way to work. He swims. Unusual for Germans, commonplace for the Swiss. In Basel summers, even people in suits are transported to work by the Rhine. Barbara Buser, what significance does water have for the quality of life in a city?

Water is an important element in every city, be it in the form of fountains, proximity to the lake or sea, streams or rivers. Water defines the possible development, often even the shape of a city. At the water’s edge, you can experience the seasons intensively, take a walk by the water, relax or do sport. In Basel, the Rhine is the largest contiguous urban space. Letting yourself drift through the city in the river and experiencing it from an unusual perspective is a great thing.

You co-curated the “Swim City” exhibition. What was the aim of the exhibition?

The aim of the exhibition was to awaken the desire of city dwellers to reclaim and use urban waters. We wanted to point out to the people of Basel, Bern, Geneva and Zurich how lucky they are to be able to swim in the river through the middle of the city. But it was also about supporting the various national and international initiatives in Berlin, Paris and New York City and encouraging them to continue fighting for the right to swim in the river.

What insights have you gained from Swim City for your own work as an architect?

I have once again realized how formative water is for a city, how important the interfaces between land and water are, and that these need to be designed extremely carefully.

Political tasks and poor water quality

River swimming is almost unthinkable in major German cities. The laborious discussions about river baths in Berlin and Munich are a good example of this. What do you think is the problem?

Three points. Firstly, that people don’t trust citizens to take responsibility: it’s easier to ban swimming than to draw up rules and take responsibility. Secondly, that the waterway laws need to be adapted – an arduous political task. And thirdly, the water quality – which is often inadequate after heavy rainfall in Berlin or Paris, for example.

Nevertheless, a number of river projects are underway across Europe. Which ones are you particularly looking forward to?

Any project that manages to make river swimming a natural part of everyday life (again). I always have my bathing suit with me when I travel so that I can take advantage of every opportunity to swim.

A detailed article on the Swim City exhibition, which identifies river swimming as an urban phenomenon in Switzerland, appeared in G+L 06/2020 on the topic of water in the city.

Barbara Buser is a qualified architect ETH and energy specialist. In 1992, she was the first woman to take the Rhine ferry captain’s exam in Basel and has regularly steered the Münster ferry across the Rhine and back ever since. Since October 2014, she and a dedicated team have been bringing new life to the Markthalle and KLARA in Basel under the motto “eat, drink, enjoy”. She has been involved in various projects in Berlin with “die Zusammenarbeiter” for years. She has also been a member of the Flussbad Berlin association since it was founded.

Miniature models

Building design
Castles and fortresses on a scale of 1:100. Photo: Josef Kleinhenz

Castles and fortresses on a scale of 1:100. Photo: Josef Kleinhenz

Siegfried Schwinn has an unusual hobby: with a great deal of sensitivity and patience, the Franconian recreates historical buildings on a small scale Siegfried Schwinn from Sylbach in Lower Franconia builds churches, castles and fortresses on a scale of 1:100 from small pieces of craft wood. Houses of worship are a particular passion of the pensioner. Schwinn wants to create a visible link to the Christian heritage. Around 20 […]

Siegfried Schwinn cultivates an unusual hobby: the Franconian builds historical buildings in miniature with great sensitivity and patience


Seine besondere Leidenschaft: Gotteshäuser. Siegfried Schwinn baut Kirchen, Schlösser und Burgen im Maßstab 1:100 nach. Foto: Josef Kleinhenz
His particular passion: places of worship. Siegfried Schwinn builds churches, palaces and castles on a scale of 1:100. Photo: Josef Kleinhenz

Siegfried Schwinn from Sylbach in Lower Franconia uses small pieces of craft wood to recreate churches, castles and fortresses on a scale of 1:100. Houses of worship are a particular passion of the pensioner. Schwinn wants to create a visible link to Christian heritage. He has already created around 20 wooden masterpieces.

To begin his work, Siegfried Schwinn first measures the floor plan of the object on site. He is assisted by his wife Gisela. She stands in front of the selected structure with a three-meter long yardstick. The artist takes a photo, which he can later use to estimate the height of the building. An image of the building cut into pieces and a sketch serve as a template for the replica. On average, Schwinn needs more than 2,000 small pieces of wood to build a structure. “I’ve never counted my working hours,” says Schwinn. But it’s clear that it’s a lot. For Unsleben Castle in the Rhön-Grabfeld district, for example, it took him around three months, he explains. “But of course it makes a difference whether I work continuously every day or take longer breaks.”

Siegfried Schwinn makes things for fun. He wants to give people pleasure with his craft. The appreciation of his work is not only the greatest reward for his efforts, but also an incentive to build more. He rarely works on commissions, as his buildings have a high sentimental value for him and he finds it difficult to part with his models.

The synagogue in Bad Königshofen is one of his few commissioned works: the building was constructed in neo-Gothic style between 1903 and 1904. The Jewish place of worship existed for almost 50 years before the interior of the building was destroyed by the Nazis in 1938 and completely leveled in 1951. Today, only a memorial stone in Bamberger Straße reminds us of where it stood. Unlike his usual preparations for the replicas, Siegfried Schwinn had to rely on historical images for the synagogue. An aerial photograph formed the basis for determining the proportions and size for the replica. It took Siegfried Schwinn six months to complete the synagogue, which now has a place in the museum.