Domberg Freising: Redesign by Latz + Partner

Building design
A paved courtyard, surrounded by houses at the edges, a fountain in the center; many people are standing in the square. In Freising, Bavaria, Latz + Partner redesigned the open spaces on the Domberg. There is now a fountain in the center of the redesigned cathedral square. Photo: Latz + Partner

In Freising, Bavaria, Latz + Partner redesigned the open spaces on the Domberg. A fountain can now be found in the center of the newly designed cathedral square. Photo: Latz + Partner

In Freising, Bavaria, Latz + Partner is redesigning the open spaces on the Domberg. The first construction phase, Domplatz and Domhof, was opened in spring 2024. In an interview about the project, Iris Dupper and Tilman Latz from Latz + Partner explain what makes their project special, what demands are placed on the cathedral square today and how they designed the facilities on the Domberg Freising to be more inclusive.

Editorial team G+L: In May of this year, you opened the first construction phase of your project on Freising Cathedral Hill: Domplatz and Domhof, both of which have been redesigned and further developed. What characterizes the project?

Iris Dupper and Tilman Latz: Walking through the archways to the new open spaces on the Domberg is a special moment thanks to the redesigns: with its continuous, bright surface, the cathedral square appears like a feast for the eyes between the surrounding facades of the cathedral, stables, residence, St. John’s Chapel and the gates to the Belvedere. Loosely scattered benches mark the edges of the square and today allow people to relax. A fountain rises in the middle, water falls from a horn of plenty from a great height. Gently rippling water fills the space and accompanies the everyday sounds of passers-by, visitors, music school and church events.

You can now experience the cathedral next to the cathedral fountain and residence, between the high cathedral towers, Otto von Freising in the greenery and the sweeping view over the Isar and Moosach floodplains along the river to the edge of the Alps. A unique resonating space has been created that invites you to linger. Here you can find peace and quiet before continuing on to the cathedral or the stables.

How did you arrive at the design of the central open spaces on the?

Three decisions were essential:

Firstly, a consistently contextual language is applied to the cathedral square and cathedral courtyard with appropriate materiality and formal language. It emphasizes the spatial conditions, such as the different architectural styles, dimensions and materiality of the boundary façades. With this approach, both spaces have formed a coherent unit. At the same time, this contributes to the new diversity of spaces on the Domberg. This diversity corresponds to the historically handed-down stock of buildings and architectural styles.

A change was then made from a roughly gravelled surface to a paved, finely structured cathedral square. This also significantly extends and improves the possibilities for use in terms of time and quality. A light-colored paving set diagonally in passé creates a restrained yet robust balance to the architecture. Wachenzell dolomite with formats of 8 x 8 to 12 x 12 centimetres with a finely crowned surface and split sides was used for the paving. It is traversed by strips of slabs of the same material set in a fan-like pattern. These strips bring together the asymmetrical façades of the cathedral and residence. Graduated, semi-circular and round frames emphasize the entrances facing the squares and the central fountain. The main protagonists – the cathedral, the residence and the cathedral fountain – were emphasized in a representative manner.

Finally, the cathedral square has been given back an attractive center in keeping with its importance through the re-erection of a central fountain.

What is the historical background to the rebuilt fountain?

The new fountain interprets the many manifestations that this watering place had until its removal during secularization in 1803: first a horse pond, then a baroque fountain, but from 1857 just a planting bed with a sculpture by Otto von Freising. A new round fountain made of split river pebbles is set on a horizontally fitted plinth. On it is the new fountain made of Untersberg marble with a tall column, at the top of which the historical figure of the “Moor” holds a horn of plenty as a source of water. The sculpture is actually the original of the emblem of the monastery of Freising. Together with the client, we decided to put the fountain back on the cathedral square. As a result, the figure of Otto von Freising by sculptor Kaspar Zumbusch was to be moved to the quieter cathedral courtyard, which was green for the first time. From there, he now looks out over the passageway to the cathedral square and the two cathedral towers, surrounded by beautiful flowers swarming with insects.

These changes created a new perception of the spatial sequences on the Domberg.

To what extent does a cathedral square have to meet different requirements than a secular town square? How is this reflected in the design of the Domberg in Freising?

Historically, both a cathedral square and a “profane” town square focused equally on representational possibilities, functionality and suitability for everyday use. In detail, however, the symbolism of a sacred and secular nature often differed. Ecclesiastical clients often formulated significantly higher demands in terms of design. In addition, they sometimes commissioned great Baumeisters and artists to design public spaces.

Today, both have to “rediscover themselves” to a certain extent and deal with often excessive legislation and standards, local monument and nature conservation and complex technical requirements in equal measure. Just think of underground pipelines or buildings and the increasing challenges of climate change. The public interests of a more diverse leisure society, square clichés and short-lived fashions are playing an increasing role.

A specific feature of Domplatz Freising is that it was commissioned by a culturally highly ambitious private client who also acts responsibly and is socially committed. In 2022, the Archbishop’s Ordinariate of Munich (EOM) commissioned us to work on the public spaces on the Domberg: Domplatz with Belvedere, Domhof and Kreuzgarten, areas in and around the Residenz, the new Cardinal Döpfner House (KDH) and around the Diocesan Museum as well as the long Anger. The Domberg is the spiritual center of the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising. The EOM was concerned with a contemporary design which, on the one hand, could offer an appropriate response to the complex spatial situation from various centuries. On the other hand, it was also a question of integrating various public and private usage requirements and difficult questions of monument protection. The special history of the site and its significance for Freising also had to be taken into account.

What did you have to pay attention to during the redesign and what did you implement as part of your project on the Domberg in Freising?

On the one hand, it was important for the client to have visual and pathway connections, especially between the residence and the cathedral, which are important for processions, for example. On the other hand, uses for festivals with music, events and markets were relevant. The location of the fountain is explained, among other things, by the simultaneous importance of direct connections and the staging of such movements. In the end, the emphasis on the main reference façades from the point of view of monument preservation also made the placement of trees appear fundamentally problematic. Added to this were difficult subsoil conditions that did not allow for sustainable tree planting.

The accentuation of the main and secondary players in the area required an intensive examination of the topography and orientation of the square. We developed a regular concave design for the square that emphasizes the facades around the square and supports the fountain in the middle. With a clearly sloping, unsealed square surface – an important sustainability goal – we therefore had to switch from point drainage to linear drainage.
The central cathedral square, as a listed monument and main access to the cathedral and residence, and the cathedral courtyard, as a side entrance to the cathedral library and barrier-free access to the sacristy and cloister, were completed for the start of the Bavarian State Exhibition on May 7, 2024. Now there are places on the Domberg to linger in the moment and without the pressure to consume.

During the final construction phase, we will still be dealing with the problem of the road leading to the parking garage access, which runs across the upper square area. However, its integration and the simultaneous securing of the square against uncontrolled parking will only take place once the construction work on the Residenz has been completed.

Anyone who has ever been up the Domberg in Freising knows that it is a steep climb. Accessibility is an important aspect of your project. How were you able to improve this during the redesign of Domplatz and Domhof? And where did you reach your limits and why?

A topographically exposed and listed site such as the Domberg only allows small but significant steps to be taken towards an accessible site.

In addition to fortifying the cathedral courtyard and cathedral square and moving away from a trickling area, there are mainly small measures. These include, for example, installing handrails on all stairs, ramp-like entrances and level walkways with a maximum gradient of 5 percent in the individual areas. For us, accessibility also includes the provision of public toilets in the passageway to the cathedral courtyard and the positioning of sufficient benches for resting.

Nevertheless, there will still be areas that can only be reached via steps or much steeper ramps, such as the Domberggasse. This includes the Belvedere, whose fencing cannot be changed. Nor will we be adding any ramps to the Anger to improve access between Domberggasse and the various squares. The tree population also has an effect on the microclimate.

Of course, the EOM’s most important decision was to install an inclined elevator on the south side of the Domberg. This connects the general city level directly with the Diocesan Museum, conveniently located between the station and the pedestrian zone. In fact, the inclined elevator can already be seen as a further attraction of the Domberg.

Client: Archdiocese of Munich and Freising

Concept: Latz + Partner Prof. Tilman Latz and Iris Dupper

Project management: Dennis Pytlik, Dörte Dannemann

Collaboration: Roland Jakob, Junyue Deng, Vera Margasova

Planning since 2022, realization BA1 May 2024

LPH 6-8: NU Stefan Huber Landscape Architecture

Area: approx. 1 hectare

Iris Dupper, landscape architect, is a partner and managing director of Latz + Partner. She previously founded Studios Îlot for Landscape Architecture, Munich. In 2006, she was the first Villa Massimo Rome Prize Fellow for Landscape Architecture.

Tilman Latz, landscape architect, architect and urban planner, has been the owner and chief designer of Latz + Partner since 2011. He has held the professorship for planning and design in landscape architecture at Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences since 2022.

Editor’s note: The term “Mohr” or “Freisinger Mohr”, which can also be found in the district’s coat of arms, is commonly used in the name of the fountain and in reporting on it. An explanation of the background to the coat of arms and the use of the term can be found on the Freising district website.

Other sources take a more critical view of the term, such as the Institute for European Ethnology at the Humboldt University of Berlin’s explanation of the renaming of “Mohrenstraße”.

In connection with the term, there are always debates about renaming, such as in the aforementioned case of Berliner Straße and the subway station with the same name, “Mohrenstraße”.

Read more: In the October 2024 issue of G+L, we focus on places of faith. The magazine is available in our store. Theresa Ramisch gives a first insight into the issue in her editorial.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

“You have to arouse curiosity”

Building design

Head of Nature Conservation Policy at BUND Bundesverband (Photo: Simone M. Neumann)

There are many ways to promote biodiversity in the city with species-rich perennial plantings. Elisabeth Rathjen spoke to Magnus J.K. Wessel, Head of Nature Conservation Policy at BUND e.V., about the role model function of the public sector and garden shows and what contribution you can make with your own garden. Elisabeth Rathjen: Mr. Wessel, what function […]

There are many ways to promote biodiversity in the city with species-rich perennial plantings. Elisabeth Rathjen spoke to Magnus J.K. Wessel, Head of Nature Conservation Policy at BUND e.V., about the exemplary role of the public sector and garden shows and what contribution you can make with your own garden.

Elisabeth Rathjen: Mr. Wessel, in your opinion, what role do cities play in promoting biodiversity?

Magnus J.K. Wessel: Cities offer very different habitats and, together with the species that humans have introduced, this leads to a rich diversity of species. They are therefore often an ark for specialists, home to particularly flexible cultural successors and an experimental laboratory for the coexistence of animals, plants and humans. In terms of a green infrastructure, cities must maintain and practically promote this function: by not using pesticides, maintaining and caring for green spaces in a way that protects nature, as well as concrete species protection on buildings. What cities cannot do is compensate for the damage to biodiversity caused by cleared landscapes outside them.

However, cities have other important functions with regard to biodiversity. They shape our aesthetic perception and also our idea of what is worth protecting. This is where “city dwellers” first come into contact with local nature: on the balcony or in the garden.

And what about private gardens and their owners?

People are best able to make a contribution in their own gardens. After all, climate protection or species loss usually remains abstract. Gardening is also fun and an important part of environmental education and health care. Private gardens can be part of the biotope network and an ark for endangered native species if they are properly networked and maintained.

Is there such a thing today as an ethical obligation to garden close to nature?

Close-to-nature gardening is of course the optimum. But garden culture has a long tradition and is diverse. There are worlds between a wildflower meadow, a classic cottage garden and a Japanese Zen garden. Worlds that can be combined and complemented even in a small area. I find the use of pesticides and the trend of burying gardens under gravel and concrete unacceptable.

Should we change our tastes towards a more species-rich garden style?

I would always recommend private garden owners to garden as close to nature as possible and, above all, to steer clear of pesticides and seemingly low-maintenance uniform grass and gravel areas. This also includes having the courage to embrace supposed disorder: even in the smallest garden there is room for woodpiles and wild plants.

In recent decades, the public sector has unfortunately cultivated bad examples in large squares and parks and has increasingly focused on low maintenance. This also applies to the open spaces of residential complexes. And people see that – it leaves its mark. The public sector in particular has a responsibility to show that things can be done differently. In order to create real oases of native biodiversity in the city, money must be made available. The Urban Nature Master Plan, which has been adopted by the federal government and is therefore valid for all departments, can become an important basis for more nature in villages and cities.

“I don’t see the need for a radical conversion of the landscape to Mediterranean species.”

Do you advocate planting concepts that offer a high level of diversity and give preference to native species?

Yes, but for me it’s not about getting rid of every pampas grass and every thuja hedge. I think it’s the mix that counts. We need to stop invasive species and not encourage new risks. Because once an invasive species has reached the landscape, nobody can drive it back. Only precaution can help here. It would be exciting to promote the planting of endangered species in private gardens and, together with public green spaces, turn them into lifelines for nature in the city.

Many organizations vehemently advocate the use of native species. However, it is now becoming apparent that perennials from arid regions are coping particularly well with climate change, while native species are failing. Is there also a rethink in nature conservation?

I believe that the potential of native plants is far from exhausted. I think it’s totally fine if someone plants individual foreign species in their garden for aesthetic reasons. But I don’t see the need for a radical conversion of the landscape to Mediterranean species. Of course, we also discuss in protected areas how to deal with sites that suffer from extreme drought. But I don’t think it’s necessary for two opposing camps to form in this discussion. It is a question of moderation. At the end of the day, the native fauna is in a very complex web to the native species.

“Local authorities need to take tougher decisions.”

Do you see an opportunity to promote protected species through targeted gardening? Or is it more important to focus on structural diversity and the abundance of insect flowers in the garden?

Private gardens are no substitute for the fact that we need a radically different agricultural policy and better management of protected areas to protect species. Every gardener can contribute to a future worth living. There are good examples of how small oases can be created for the preservation of varieties and species. For certain useful plants, gardens were the last places to be found. You can create conservation and oasis gardens by showing people what is available in the landscape.

From classic bog beds to steppe grasslands – many things can be transferred to gardens. This is a great field for experimentation. There are now also innovative concepts for three-zone gardens, with which you can create fantastic oases for insects if you have larger areas available. There are classic species lists on our website that are easy to work with. This is a huge challenge for some gardeners because they are rarely offered in perennial nurseries. Switching to new native plant species requires a lot of curiosity on the part of suppliers and in some cases completely different expertise, but it also presents breeding challenges.

You mentioned the gravel garden trend…

Everything you find on the internet under “gardens of horror” is a horticultural nightmare. For reasons of urban climate and biodiversity, this should not be allowed. Nevertheless, there are suburban housing estates in Franconia, for example, that are designed exclusively in this way. Local authorities have to take tougher decisions here.

“In addition to the public sector, garden shows naturally also have a role model function.”

Do you also see garden shows as having a responsibility?

Yes, in addition to the public sector, garden shows naturally also have a role model function. At the IGA in Berlin, we discussed a lot about how aesthetic and artistic demands can be combined with sustainability. And how to arouse curiosity. After all, people don’t do something in their private garden because they are told to or because they get money for it. In the end, what matters is what my heart is set on and where I find exciting examples that I would also like to have in my own garden.

Interview partner: Magnus J.K. Wessel studied geography, geobotany and administrative law in Trier. He has been head of nature conservation policy at BUND Bundesverband for six years and previously worked for the UN, WWF and NABU. Privately, he is a garden owner and photographer with a soft spot for insects and human portraits.

Author: Elisabeth Rathjen studied landscape architectureat the FH Weihenstephan and worked at the Chair of Landscape Architecture and Public Space at TU Munich from 2016 to 2018. She currently works as a freelance landscape architect and author.

This article is published as part of the “Biodiversity” issue of G+L 08/2018. You can purchase this issue here.

Show restoration in Dresden: “Madonna of St. Sebastian” by Correggio

Building design
The show studio in the gallery. Photo: © Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Photo: Klemens Renner

The show studio in the gallery. Photo: © Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Photo: Klemens Renner

In the Old Masters Picture Gallery of the Dresden State Art Collections (SKD), the painting “The Madonna of St. Sebastian” (around 1524) by Antonio Allegri, called Correggio (around 1489-1534), is being publicly restored – Schaurestaurierung in Dresden

The painting “The Madonna of St. Sebastian” (c. 1524) by Antonio Allegri, called Correggio (c. 1489-1534), is being publicly restored in the Old Masters Picture Gallery of the Dresden State Art Collections (SKD) – Schaurestaurierung in Dresden

Correggio’s “Madonna of St. Sebastian” is too fragile to leave the Old Masters Picture Gallery of the Dresden State Art Collections. That is why the restorers will be coming to the altarpiece every day over the next few months to restore it on site. In a studio directly in the gallery, which offers visitors a view of the work tables through large windows at all times, the badly damaged altarpiece, which was painted around 1524 for the Brotherhood of St. Sebastian in Modena, will be examined and the paint layer and support will be extensively conserved and restored

Correggio’s “Holy Night” – a Christmas painting famous throughout Europe

With four paintings, Dresden owns the world’s largest collection of altarpieces by the painter from Correggio, whose real name was Antonio Allegri, who was born around 1489 and died in 1534. They include the “Madonna of St. Francis” from 1514/15, the “Holy Night” from (1528/30) and the “Madonna of St. George”, which was painted around 1529/30. Dresden bought them from the Estensian Gallery in Modena in the 18th century. At that time, the “Holy Night” in particular was considered a famous Christmas painting throughout Europe.

Aim of the current in situ restoration: restoration of the “Madonna of St. Sebastian” by Correggio

The aim of the current in situ restoration is to make the richness of color and detail of Correggio’s painting “more immediately tangible”, according to the Dresden announcement. The first damage to the paint layer occurred 60 years after completion. Today, it is severely damaged and threatened with loss. What’s more, the original splendid colors can only be guessed at. In the past, the boards on which Correggio painted curved considerably, causing the paint layer to loosen at the joints and, as a result, the paint layer to be lost. The constant need for consolidation and retouching contributed to the surface appearing blotchy, heavily yellowed and deformed today. Visitors can see how Renaissance paintings look after restoration around the Dresden restoration studio: examples of Italian masterpieces that have already been restored are on display there – for example Giulio Romano’s “Madonna with the Washing Bowl”, which was painted just one year after Correggio’s altarpiece of the “Madonna of St. Sebastian”, and Cima de Conegliano’s “Blessing Christ” from 1505/06.

“Correggio’s rinascita”

The current project is entitled “Correggio’s rebirth”, because until the 19th century Correggio was just as well known as his fellow Renaissance artists Michelangelo, Leonardo and Raphael. This is different today, but the Dresden project, which is funded by the Ernst von Siemens Art Foundation and the Schoof Foundation, aims to change this.

Correggio’s “The Holy Night” is also in the Old Masters Picture Gallery in Dresden. Find out more about this painting in the video.