Domberg Freising: Redesign by Latz + Partner

Building design
A paved courtyard, surrounded by houses at the edges, a fountain in the center; many people are standing in the square. In Freising, Bavaria, Latz + Partner redesigned the open spaces on the Domberg. There is now a fountain in the center of the redesigned cathedral square. Photo: Latz + Partner

In Freising, Bavaria, Latz + Partner redesigned the open spaces on the Domberg. A fountain can now be found in the center of the newly designed cathedral square. Photo: Latz + Partner

In Freising, Bavaria, Latz + Partner is redesigning the open spaces on the Domberg. The first construction phase, Domplatz and Domhof, was opened in spring 2024. In an interview about the project, Iris Dupper and Tilman Latz from Latz + Partner explain what makes their project special, what demands are placed on the cathedral square today and how they designed the facilities on the Domberg Freising to be more inclusive.

Editorial team G+L: In May of this year, you opened the first construction phase of your project on Freising Cathedral Hill: Domplatz and Domhof, both of which have been redesigned and further developed. What characterizes the project?

Iris Dupper and Tilman Latz: Walking through the archways to the new open spaces on the Domberg is a special moment thanks to the redesigns: with its continuous, bright surface, the cathedral square appears like a feast for the eyes between the surrounding facades of the cathedral, stables, residence, St. John’s Chapel and the gates to the Belvedere. Loosely scattered benches mark the edges of the square and today allow people to relax. A fountain rises in the middle, water falls from a horn of plenty from a great height. Gently rippling water fills the space and accompanies the everyday sounds of passers-by, visitors, music school and church events.

You can now experience the cathedral next to the cathedral fountain and residence, between the high cathedral towers, Otto von Freising in the greenery and the sweeping view over the Isar and Moosach floodplains along the river to the edge of the Alps. A unique resonating space has been created that invites you to linger. Here you can find peace and quiet before continuing on to the cathedral or the stables.

How did you arrive at the design of the central open spaces on the?

Three decisions were essential:

Firstly, a consistently contextual language is applied to the cathedral square and cathedral courtyard with appropriate materiality and formal language. It emphasizes the spatial conditions, such as the different architectural styles, dimensions and materiality of the boundary façades. With this approach, both spaces have formed a coherent unit. At the same time, this contributes to the new diversity of spaces on the Domberg. This diversity corresponds to the historically handed-down stock of buildings and architectural styles.

A change was then made from a roughly gravelled surface to a paved, finely structured cathedral square. This also significantly extends and improves the possibilities for use in terms of time and quality. A light-colored paving set diagonally in passé creates a restrained yet robust balance to the architecture. Wachenzell dolomite with formats of 8 x 8 to 12 x 12 centimetres with a finely crowned surface and split sides was used for the paving. It is traversed by strips of slabs of the same material set in a fan-like pattern. These strips bring together the asymmetrical façades of the cathedral and residence. Graduated, semi-circular and round frames emphasize the entrances facing the squares and the central fountain. The main protagonists – the cathedral, the residence and the cathedral fountain – were emphasized in a representative manner.

Finally, the cathedral square has been given back an attractive center in keeping with its importance through the re-erection of a central fountain.

What is the historical background to the rebuilt fountain?

The new fountain interprets the many manifestations that this watering place had until its removal during secularization in 1803: first a horse pond, then a baroque fountain, but from 1857 just a planting bed with a sculpture by Otto von Freising. A new round fountain made of split river pebbles is set on a horizontally fitted plinth. On it is the new fountain made of Untersberg marble with a tall column, at the top of which the historical figure of the “Moor” holds a horn of plenty as a source of water. The sculpture is actually the original of the emblem of the monastery of Freising. Together with the client, we decided to put the fountain back on the cathedral square. As a result, the figure of Otto von Freising by sculptor Kaspar Zumbusch was to be moved to the quieter cathedral courtyard, which was green for the first time. From there, he now looks out over the passageway to the cathedral square and the two cathedral towers, surrounded by beautiful flowers swarming with insects.

These changes created a new perception of the spatial sequences on the Domberg.

To what extent does a cathedral square have to meet different requirements than a secular town square? How is this reflected in the design of the Domberg in Freising?

Historically, both a cathedral square and a “profane” town square focused equally on representational possibilities, functionality and suitability for everyday use. In detail, however, the symbolism of a sacred and secular nature often differed. Ecclesiastical clients often formulated significantly higher demands in terms of design. In addition, they sometimes commissioned great Baumeisters and artists to design public spaces.

Today, both have to “rediscover themselves” to a certain extent and deal with often excessive legislation and standards, local monument and nature conservation and complex technical requirements in equal measure. Just think of underground pipelines or buildings and the increasing challenges of climate change. The public interests of a more diverse leisure society, square clichés and short-lived fashions are playing an increasing role.

A specific feature of Domplatz Freising is that it was commissioned by a culturally highly ambitious private client who also acts responsibly and is socially committed. In 2022, the Archbishop’s Ordinariate of Munich (EOM) commissioned us to work on the public spaces on the Domberg: Domplatz with Belvedere, Domhof and Kreuzgarten, areas in and around the Residenz, the new Cardinal Döpfner House (KDH) and around the Diocesan Museum as well as the long Anger. The Domberg is the spiritual center of the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising. The EOM was concerned with a contemporary design which, on the one hand, could offer an appropriate response to the complex spatial situation from various centuries. On the other hand, it was also a question of integrating various public and private usage requirements and difficult questions of monument protection. The special history of the site and its significance for Freising also had to be taken into account.

What did you have to pay attention to during the redesign and what did you implement as part of your project on the Domberg in Freising?

On the one hand, it was important for the client to have visual and pathway connections, especially between the residence and the cathedral, which are important for processions, for example. On the other hand, uses for festivals with music, events and markets were relevant. The location of the fountain is explained, among other things, by the simultaneous importance of direct connections and the staging of such movements. In the end, the emphasis on the main reference façades from the point of view of monument preservation also made the placement of trees appear fundamentally problematic. Added to this were difficult subsoil conditions that did not allow for sustainable tree planting.

The accentuation of the main and secondary players in the area required an intensive examination of the topography and orientation of the square. We developed a regular concave design for the square that emphasizes the facades around the square and supports the fountain in the middle. With a clearly sloping, unsealed square surface – an important sustainability goal – we therefore had to switch from point drainage to linear drainage.
The central cathedral square, as a listed monument and main access to the cathedral and residence, and the cathedral courtyard, as a side entrance to the cathedral library and barrier-free access to the sacristy and cloister, were completed for the start of the Bavarian State Exhibition on May 7, 2024. Now there are places on the Domberg to linger in the moment and without the pressure to consume.

During the final construction phase, we will still be dealing with the problem of the road leading to the parking garage access, which runs across the upper square area. However, its integration and the simultaneous securing of the square against uncontrolled parking will only take place once the construction work on the Residenz has been completed.

Anyone who has ever been up the Domberg in Freising knows that it is a steep climb. Accessibility is an important aspect of your project. How were you able to improve this during the redesign of Domplatz and Domhof? And where did you reach your limits and why?

A topographically exposed and listed site such as the Domberg only allows small but significant steps to be taken towards an accessible site.

In addition to fortifying the cathedral courtyard and cathedral square and moving away from a trickling area, there are mainly small measures. These include, for example, installing handrails on all stairs, ramp-like entrances and level walkways with a maximum gradient of 5 percent in the individual areas. For us, accessibility also includes the provision of public toilets in the passageway to the cathedral courtyard and the positioning of sufficient benches for resting.

Nevertheless, there will still be areas that can only be reached via steps or much steeper ramps, such as the Domberggasse. This includes the Belvedere, whose fencing cannot be changed. Nor will we be adding any ramps to the Anger to improve access between Domberggasse and the various squares. The tree population also has an effect on the microclimate.

Of course, the EOM’s most important decision was to install an inclined elevator on the south side of the Domberg. This connects the general city level directly with the Diocesan Museum, conveniently located between the station and the pedestrian zone. In fact, the inclined elevator can already be seen as a further attraction of the Domberg.

Client: Archdiocese of Munich and Freising

Concept: Latz + Partner Prof. Tilman Latz and Iris Dupper

Project management: Dennis Pytlik, Dörte Dannemann

Collaboration: Roland Jakob, Junyue Deng, Vera Margasova

Planning since 2022, realization BA1 May 2024

LPH 6-8: NU Stefan Huber Landscape Architecture

Area: approx. 1 hectare

Iris Dupper, landscape architect, is a partner and managing director of Latz + Partner. She previously founded Studios Îlot for Landscape Architecture, Munich. In 2006, she was the first Villa Massimo Rome Prize Fellow for Landscape Architecture.

Tilman Latz, landscape architect, architect and urban planner, has been the owner and chief designer of Latz + Partner since 2011. He has held the professorship for planning and design in landscape architecture at Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences since 2022.

Editor’s note: The term “Mohr” or “Freisinger Mohr”, which can also be found in the district’s coat of arms, is commonly used in the name of the fountain and in reporting on it. An explanation of the background to the coat of arms and the use of the term can be found on the Freising district website.

Other sources take a more critical view of the term, such as the Institute for European Ethnology at the Humboldt University of Berlin’s explanation of the renaming of “Mohrenstraße”.

In connection with the term, there are always debates about renaming, such as in the aforementioned case of Berliner Straße and the subway station with the same name, “Mohrenstraße”.

Read more: In the October 2024 issue of G+L, we focus on places of faith. The magazine is available in our store. Theresa Ramisch gives a first insight into the issue in her editorial.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE
Wartburg Castle has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1999. Photo: A.Savin - Own work, FAL, via: Wikimedia Commons

Wartburg Castle has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1999.
Photo: A.Savin - Own work, FAL, via: Wikimedia Commons

Rising high above the Thuringian countryside, Wartburg Castle is one of the most representative cultural monuments in Central Europe. Since its inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage List, it has been one of the most outstanding testimonies to European history. Architecture, political events and literary tradition intertwine here to create a multi-layered cultural narrative.

The history of Wartburg Castle begins in the 11th century, when it was founded as the residence of the Ludovingian landgraves and from then on shaped the political power in the region. Even in the High Middle Ages, the palace, enthroned on a steep limestone cliff, was considered a masterpiece of late Romanesque architecture, whose design and ornamentation make it one of the most important secular buildings north of the Alps. This architectural heritage is evidence of the feudal character of Central Europe and forms one of the foundations for the later recognition as a World Heritage Site.
Wartburg Castle’s role as a center of courtly culture and memory grows through literary traditions such as the so-called Singers’ War, which was passed down in Middle High German poetry. At the same time, historical figures such as St. Elisabeth of Thuringia, whose life and work are closely linked to the castle, are becoming firmly established in the culture of remembrance. Even if some legends were mythically exaggerated, they still reflect the early symbolic value of the place in the cultural imagination.

The architectural appearance of Wartburg Castle is the result of a long development that underwent a profound transformation, particularly in the 19th century. After centuries of changing use and partial decay, the emerging Romantic period initiated a comprehensive restoration that was based less on a historically accurate reconstruction than on an idealized image of the Middle Ages. Under this premise, the Elisabeth Bower and richly decorated interiors were created, which today form an integral part of the complex.
From an art historical perspective, this combination of original 12th century parts and historicist additions is ambivalent: on the one hand, the preserved Romanesque building elements document the civil architecture of its time; on the other hand, the 19th century additions reflect the monument preservation and historical myths of the time. It was precisely this mixture of archaeological and symbolic authenticity that was taken into account in the UNESCO nomination, with the term “authenticity” not only referring to material originality, but also including the ideas and meanings anchored in the collective consciousness.

Wartburg Castle is more than just a stone relic – it is a place of profound cultural connections. Martin Luther’s stay here during his exile from 1521 to 1522, when he wrote the German translation of the New Testament from Greek in the so-called “Junker Jörg” room, was particularly influential. This achievement in the history of language had far-reaching consequences for theology, education and the German literary language as a whole and had a lasting impact on the cultural significance of the castle.
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, Wartburg Castle also became a symbol of national identity and political integration. Events such as the Wartburg celebrations of the German student movement became part of the collective memory, as did literary and musical adaptations in works by Richard Wagner, which romanticized the image of the medieval castle courtyard. Wartburg Castle also remains a living point of reference in cultural memory as an inspirational place for artistic debate.
In 1999, the site was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List on the basis of two criteria: Firstly, as an “outstanding monument of the era of feudalism in Central Europe” (criterion (iii)) and secondly, as a site “rich in cultural references”, particularly emphasizing its connection to the history of the Reformation and the German unification movement (criterion (vi)). These criteria reflect the exceptional universal value that Wartburg Castle has beyond the borders of Thuringia. The castle not only documents the architecture and living environment of high medieval feudalism, but also exemplifies the profound influence of historical events and cultural upheavals on European civilization. The UNESCO designation therefore not only recognizes the material substance of the complex, but above all its role as a place of remembrance that inspires generations of visitors to reflect and research. The integrative perception of architecture, history and cultural impact makes Wartburg Castle a unique medium for communicating the past and present.
At a time when cultural heritage is increasingly being discussed in a global context, Wartburg Castle highlights the importance of historical sites as mediators of identity, memory and transnational understanding. Its place on the World Heritage List helps to secure this significance in the long term and make it tangible for future generations.

Safety – The Baumeister in April 2025 is here!

Building design

Will this makeshift barrier around the bronze statue actually help at night? Not sure ... Cover photo: Rona Bar & Ofen Avshalom / Connected Archives

“Security” in architecture means more than just barriers and alarm systems – there is much more to it than that. This issue sheds light on how buildings can provide protection – be it against the forces of nature, theft or social conflict. Your planners do not see security as a restriction, but as a design potential. In order to avoid repellent gestures, they often find security-relevant solutions in the building form. […]

“Security” in architecture means more than just barriers and alarm systems – there is much more to it than that. This issue sheds light on how buildings can provide protection – be it against the forces of nature, theft or social conflict. Your planners do not see security as a restriction, but as a design potential. To avoid repellent gestures, they often find security-related solutions in the building design.

Security – a word that is supposed to reassure and yet often has the opposite effect. We all long for it, but we also know that there is no such thing as absolute security. A building can protect against rain and cold, a city can be well planned – but can architecture really guarantee that we feel safe? Or does it only create an illusion? And in the end, isn’t the feeling of safety just as important as the safety itself?

The last year alone has shown us once again how fragile our built and lived environment is. Collapsing bridges, poorly maintained high-rise buildings and natural disasters that destroy entire neighborhoods. At the same time, fear of attacks in public spaces is growing, and in many cities measures are being taken to turn urban squares and buildings into high-security zones. But do we really need to turn our built reality into bastions of concrete and cameras in order to feel safe? Or is there a more intelligent answer to the question of protection?

Architecture cannot guarantee absolute security, but it can create trust. It can shape spaces that convey a sense of security without restricting freedom. Architecture has the unique potential to master precisely this balancing act. From fire and earthquake-proof school buildings to carefully considered designs for public spaces: Security architecture must not rely solely on control and barriers, but must enable trust and freedom. A clever choice of materials, for example, can preserve a feeling of openness without sacrificing protection. Ultimately, it must not be about sealing things off, but about proactive design.

Security must not become an aesthetic of mistrust. Walls, bars, barriers and confined spaces may minimize risks, but they also separate us from each other. All too often, they stifle life. The most popular place, both inside and out, is often where people meet, where light and transparency dominate, where architecture acts as a social bond and thus serves a greater purpose.

This issue is an invitation to rethink security. We show projects that prove that protection does not have to mean control, but trust. That architecture not only erects walls, but also builds bridges – between security and freedom, between control and openness. Because true security is not created by fear, but by clever (re)planning, by courageous design and by a society that does not close itself off, but proactively takes the helm. Enjoy reading!

Yours sincerely,
Tobias Hager

Editor-in-Chief
t.hager@georg-media.de

The magazine is available here in the store!

In March, our Baumeister issue was all about building on existing buildings and conversion. Read more about it here!