Environmental organizations make proposals to speed up planning. They criticize the Federal Government’s symbolic policy to date.
Various environmental organizations make proposals for speeding up the planning process. They consider improved planning and participation to be important. They criticize the current federal government’s symbolic policy.
There are numerous environmental organizations in Germany. These include BBN, bdla, BUND, NABU, DUH, UfU, UVP-Gesellschaft and the environmental umbrella organization DNR. Together, these groups have now drawn up specific recommendations for action. They all aim to speed up the implementation of infrastructure projects. In a parliamentary discussion, the representatives of the environmental organizations met with members of the German Bundestag. In this exchange, they emphasizedthat there is an urgent need for acceleration in Germany.
There is an urgent need for action, particularly in the area of climate and environmental protection measures. In order to achieve the set goal of climate neutrality, action must be taken more quickly in many areas. Against this backdrop, the environmental organizations are calling for projects to be strictly prioritized according to their climate and environmental benefits. The representatives argue that instead of hundreds of projects that are often harmful to the climate, only those that really serve climate and environmental protection should be implemented. This often does not include transport infrastructure projects.
The environmental organizations see opportunities to accelerate projects by avoiding potential conflicts between climate and species protection from the outset. Conflicts can be avoided by recognizing tensions at an early stage, avoiding confrontations and involving the public. Comprehensivesolutionsplay a role here. They could make a significant contribution to speeding up the planning and implementation of projects with climate and environmental benefits.
In addition to avoiding conflicts, environmental organizations see great opportunities in makingbetter use of the existing legal framework. There is potential here. There are also numerous acceleration laws that need to be implemented. It is also time to evaluate existing laws in terms of their benefits for planning quality and acceleration. Existing options must be examined before new and extensive legislative amendments are passed. At least that is what the representatives of environmental organizations are calling for. They consider the consistent application of measures that have already been adopted to be crucial. From their perspective, the measures adopted in the last legislative period must now be implemented as a matter of urgency.
The planned use of project managers, the use of application conferences, the establishment of early public participation and planning simplifications for smaller projects are also very important. They are all still waiting to be implemented. From the point of view of environmental organizations, the opportunity to accelerate measures lies primarily in improved implementation. BBN, bdla, BUND, NABU, DUH, UfU, the EIA Society and the environmental umbrella organization DNR say that there is a great opportunity in the implementation and strengthening of legal measures.
The current German government also sees the acceleration of infrastructure planning as one of the most important projects of its government work. The parties involved mention this several times in their joint coalition agreement. It states that important decisionswill be made and implemented in 2022 that will halve the duration of planning and approval procedures. These are ambitious goals. The environmental organizations do not yet see them being achieved.
From their perspective, the coalition agreement also contains measures that are controversial in terms of European law and the rule of law. This legally controversial character can provoke lengthy disputes about admissibility. From the point of view of environmental organizations, this applies above all to the reintroduction of material preclusion. The introduction of a duty to cooperate for environmental associations, theabolition of the suspensive effect and the introduction of fictitious approvals can also lead to considerable legal uncertainty.
From the point of view of environmental organizations, there is a need for action here. Against this backdrop, the representatives of BBN, bdla, BUND, NABU, DUH, UfU, the EIA Society and the environmental umbrella organization DNR warn that this is not an end in itself. The representatives emphasize that speeding up planning is not an end in itself. Rather, they must promote social transformation and do so effectively. They must also promote acceptance of the upcoming changes. Above all, however, acceleration must help to protect the climate and ensure the preservation of biodiversity.
Concrete demands of the environmental organizations
Specifically, the environmental organizations are calling for a clear and comprehensible prioritization of projects based on their ecological cost-benefit analysis. In addition, their climate impact and their effects on biodiversity must be included. Furthermore, the organizations advocate early and serious public participation that includes fundamental alternatives.
However, better equipping ofauthoritiesand the prioritization of human and technical resources are also key, particularly in areas that contribute to climate protection and the preservation of biodiversity. The representatives of the environmental organizations are also calling for improved planning management to support project developers in the application process. As in other areas, the associations are also calling for a reduction in bureaucracy. However, planning simplifications for smaller renovation and replacement measures in the area of climate and environmentally friendly infrastructure should also be simplified.
The list of measures does not yet take into account the particular challenges posed by the energy transition. Nevertheless, the environmental organizations’ list of demands represents a necessary basic framework that helps to accelerate the planning of upcoming and important transformation processes.
Further information on climate change: the IPPC Report 2022. Read here why the IPCC is calling for active action.












