A review of the catalog for the Alberto Giacometti exhibition “Material and Vision. The masterpieces in plaster, stone, clay and bronze”, which can be seen at the Kunsthaus Zürich from October 28, 2016 to January 15, 2017. Much has been written about Alberto Giacometti. His art is fascinating not because of, but despite its fame. Exhibitions of his works are always […]
A review of the catalog for the Alberto Giacometti exhibition “Material and Vision. The masterpieces in plaster, stone, clay and bronze”, which can be seen at the Kunsthaus Zürich from October 28, 2016 to January 15, 2017.
Much has been written about Alberto Giacometti. His art is fascinating not because of, but despite its fame. Exhibitions of his works are always crowd pleasers – including at the Kunsthaus Zürich, which has a large collection of Giacometti art and shows it regularly. As now again in the exhibition “Alberto Giacometti. Material and Vision. The masterpieces in plaster, stone, clay and bronze”, which is discussed in RESTAURO 8/2016.
It is a special exhibition, as it shows the results of the research and restoration of 75 plaster sculptures that Alberto Giacometti’s youngest brother Bruno (1907-2012) and his wife Odette donated to the museum in 2006 and which were examined over a period of four years.
A catalog book dedicated to the research and restoration project in preparation for the exhibition will be published alongside the exhibition. The condition of the 75 plasters was not the best. As Giacometti rarely worked directly in plaster – he mostly used clay for the first mold – many of the plaster sculptures show traces of the casting process. In addition, he often worked on them further, emphasizing contours with paint and marking faces. It was the restorers’ task to distinguish between these various traces of soiling and damage.
According to Kunsthaus director Christoph Becker’s announcement in the foreword, their considerations, measures and examination results are the subject of the exhibition’s accompanying volume. Unfortunately, however, the book does not trust the restorers and their exciting results enough to focus on their work. Kerstin Mürer, conservator at the Kunsthaus Zürich, is only allowed to report on the diverse investigations and the discussions about cleaning, closing gaps and presentation on the last few pages. This is a shame, because the artist’s biography, to which a large part of the catalog is dedicated, is well known, as are the phases of his work and the anecdotes about Giacometti’s life.
The findings of the restoration team, however, are new and relevant for the further handling of the plasters. Because: “Two thirds of the plaster models were molded at least once after their completion in order to cast them in bronze or, in a few cases, a second time in plaster,” writes Kerstin Mürer. She can now assign the casting material to each plaster cast. This is because the investigations revealed not only remnants of gelatine, sand and other types of plaster, but also differently colored surfaces that were created as a result of pre-treatment with release agents such as shellac, oil or a dark soap paste (savon noir). The traces of cuts and incisions are so characteristic that the restorers can now assign them to a particular casting process.
Some of the larger sculptures had to be cut up for casting and came into the Kunsthaus collection as individual pieces. The restorer writes that the reassembly of these individual pieces was the subject of particularly heated debate in Zurich. “We are pleased that a solution was finally found for some of the divided plaster casts in line with the agreed restoration concept, which allows them to be temporarily presented in the exhibition in a reversibly reassembled state,” Mürer continues. However, there are no detailed explanations or information about the concept, opponents and defenders afterwards. One would have liked to know more about all the new things.












