Exposed concrete and wood for a modern home in Reinach

Building design
While the house in Reinach has a modern mineral exterior, regional wood plays a major role in the roof construction and interior design. Photo: © Gautschi Lenzin Schenker

While the house in Reinach has a modern mineral exterior, regional wood plays a major role in the roof construction and interior design. Photo: © Gautschi Lenzin Schenker

The architects Gautschi Lenzin Schenker have built a detached house in the Swiss town of Reinach that incorporates the characteristics of local buildings while offering a contemporary design.

The architects Gautschi Lenzin Schenker have built a detached house in the Swiss town of Reinach that incorporates the characteristics of local buildings while offering a contemporary design.

Architects Gautschi Lenzin Schenker have built a residential building for a private client in the Swiss town of Reinach on a plot of land half of which is in the village zone. In this area of Reinach, the buildings all have a pitched roof and are divided into a mineral base storey plus a wooden superstructure. The architects adopted these design features and implemented them in a contemporary design.

The first floor of the house in Reinach consists of a double-shell exposed concrete construction. The upper floor with a pitched roof has a timber construction with solid glued panels and wood wool insulation. The architects adapted the house in Reinach to the geometry of the plot and the existing development: The south side, which is angled at 45 degrees, directs visitors to the entrance and at the same time allows parking on the forecourt. This creates an independent volume.

The two-storey building with attic and garage is a sculpture. It offers a courtyard-like seating area, a covered entrance and a covered outdoor space on the first floor. The construction consists of glue-free solid wood systems with local silver fir and ash. This creates a dialog with the nearby edge of the forest. In combination with the solid limestone floors, a pleasant, biologically high-quality indoor climate is created. The house in Reinach also follows a sustainable construction method.

There is an office space on the first floor of the house, which is accessed separately and can also be used as a small granny apartment if desired. The second entrance door leads into an entrance area and on to the spacious living and dining area. The design of the internal structure echoes the external geometry of the house. Individual wooden fixtures serve as accents in the otherwise mainly mineral first floor.

An opening in the ceiling above the living area provides a view of the upper floor, which is largely made of wood. There are two bedrooms and bathrooms as well as a dressing room. This connected room serves as a master bedroom with two work and reading areas. The house was built between 2019 and 2020.

The plot in Reinach is slightly elevated on the edge of a residential area. Three sides border on the agricultural zone and one on the village. For the architects, the concept of wide open spaces was very important for the design of the house. The building and its surrounding design are therefore part of the generous open space of the landscape.

Instead of a garden, there is a large lawn area, as neither fences nor planting should delimit the property boundary. This preserves the openness of the landscape. The clients wanted a versatile outdoor space with a high degree of privacy, which is achieved by placing the dining room and kitchen on the top floor. From this floor, the view of the adjacent forest and the surrounding landscape is particularly beautiful.

The dining room is connected to the living area below by an open space. Like the two children’s rooms at the front of the building, it is generously glazed. A cascading staircase connects the three floors of the house in Reinach. Thanks to the sequence of rooms, it is possible to see as far as the terrace on the top floor as soon as you enter the building. The difference in level between the areas and the elongated shape of the building allow the house to be gently embedded in the terrain, which rises on two sides.

With the help of structural plywood, a completely different type of timber house has been built on Simon Square in the middle of Edinburgh to help with redensification.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB). The latest results of their […]

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB).

From March 3 to May 31, 2015, the Berlin Gemäldegalerie and the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB) are presenting the latest results of their examination of the Dutch artist Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn in the exhibition “Rembrandt’s Berlin Susanna and the Two Old Men. The creation of a masterpiece”. What exactly did you find out?

Kleinert: Rembrandt worked on the Berlin “Susanna” for more than a decade and created three different versions of the depiction during this time. This was already known and documented by the Rembrandt Research Project. Now, however, it is possible to reconstruct the three versions in detail. In addition, in collaboration with the Kupferstichkabinett, it has now been possible to reassess the time when work on the painting began. The first composition must have been created around 1635 rather than 1638. What was previously completely unknown and truly spectacular is the discovery that the work was extensively reworked again in the 18th century.

How did you track down this sensation?

Kleinert : The decisive clue came from a reproduction engraving by Richard Earlom (1743-1822) from 1769. The original is kept in the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB). The sheet documents the version of the picture that Rembrandt left to posterity in the 17th century. A comparison with the present-day work reveals how much more differentiated the painterly execution of the painting must originally have been. As a result, it was possible to correlate existing art technological results, which proved that parts of the painting had clearly been reworked at a later date.

Laurenze-Landsberg: ” Earlom’s reproduction engraving was a relief for me. I had already examined the panel painting with a stereomicroscope before I became aware of it. The separation of the paint layers and chipped areas revealed beautiful, precisely executed details that had been very roughly painted over. At the time, however, I still assumed that Rembrandt had reworked the painting and was confused by the master’s superficial, less meticulous way of working.

What investigations did you then carry out to investigate the suspicion of a later intervention by a third party?

Laurenze-Landsberg: In addition to the neutron autoradiographs, we also analyzed the X-ray, infrared and grazing light images and examined the image stereoscopically. The image carrier is a sugar box wood which, contrary to previous assumptions, is not made of mahogany but amaranth. The sugar trade flourished in Amsterdam in the 17th century.

You assume that the later overpaintings are by the English painter Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792). What supports this theory?

Kleinert : The provenance of Rembrandt’s Berlin “Susanna” is very well documented. Two painters had the panel in their possession. Sir Joshua Reynolds was one of them. He owned the painting for a particularly long time. We also know that Reynolds was interested in old painting techniques. And that he often worked on other people’s works and altered or corrected them to suit his own taste. He was also not afraid to remove paint in order to study the working methods and techniques of other artists. By looking at the original together with English colleagues from the Reynolds Research Project, the painting technique could then be clearly attributed to Reynolds.

Laurenze-Landsberg: The neutron autoradiography supports this thesis. It shows intense blackening caused by the antimony isotope SB-124. Since no tin can be detected at the same time, the antimony-containing pigment must be Naples yellow. It came into increasing use from the middle of the 18th century. Elsewhere, the paint layer is swollen, which indicates the use of copaiva balsam. This is a resin that was used to “freshen up” paintings. It is known that Reynolds used it as a binding agent.

How do you assess the reworkings today?

Kleinert: There are examples of even more far-reaching interventions that raise the question of the extent to which one can still speak of an original masterpiece. The Berlin “Susanna and the Two Old Men” is a painting that has been altered at a later date and must be declared accordingly. But it remains a Rembrandt.

The interview was conducted by Britta Grigull.

More on Rembrandt’s drawings, the biblical Susanna theme and the corresponding Berlin exhibition in RESTAURO 2/2015.

Community center restored: Kinning Park Complex, Glasgow

Building design
The Kinning Park complex is a multi-purpose space for community, creativity, education and comfort. Photo: Will Scott Photography

The Kinning Park complex is a multi-purpose space for community, creativity, education and comfort. Photo: Will Scott Photography

New Practice, an architecture studio based in Glasgow and London, has refurbished the Kinning Park community center in Glasgow. The result is a multi-purpose space designed to promote community, citizenship, creativity and wellbeing. More about the project here.

New Practice, an architecture studio based in Glasgow and London, has refurbished the Kinning Park community center in Glasgow. The result is a multi-purpose space designed to promote community, citizenship, creativity and wellbeing. More about the project here.

The Kinning Park Complex was originally built in 1910 as an extension to the then Lambhill Street School. Today, the complex is a community center. Since 2017, architecture studio New Practice has been working with the Kinning Park team on a design, which ultimately won an award from the National Lottery Community Fund Scotland. A total of £1.2 million (€1.39 million) was awarded to the project. In March 2019, additional funding was also secured from the Scottish Regeneration Capital Grant Fund.

This enabled New Practice to carry out the urgently needed refurbishment and restoration work at the community center. ArmourConstruction Consultants, David Narro Associates and Max Fordham LLP also contributed to this.

Work was due to start in March 2020. However, as the UK entered lockdown instead, the plans had to be changed. New Practice was able to carry out the work between August 2020 and March 2022. The reopening of the Kinning Park Complex took place in April 2022.

The Kinning Park Complex has a long history of education and activism. It has held the neighborhood together for over 100 years. In 1976, the school closed. Its building became the Kinning Park Neighbourhood Centre, organized by Strathclyde City Council to provide residents with an important space for meetings and learning opportunities. However, this facility closed in May 1996.

Mothers who benefited from the childcare and other supporters, including former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, organized a protest and blocked the entrance. The building was occupied around the clock for a total of 55 days. In the end, the city council decided to hand over the center to the neighborhood for a symbolic price of one pound. Resident Helen Kyle and her organization called Scotland in Europe took care of the center from then on. Artists and organizations that rented old classrooms at low cost supported the project and generated income.

Over the last 20 years, the repair and maintenance costs for the building have risen steadily. The heating, electrics and roof all had problems. The neighborhood team was unable to find the resources to make repairs to a rented building. But thanks to the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, it was possible to buy the building and then fundraise and send out applications for financial support.

Since 2018, New Practice has been working on designs to prepare the building for the future. This has included an approach that both showcases the history of the old school and offers new ways to make better and more flexible use of the existing spaces. Through an internal reorganization, it is now more possible to combine valuable community events and resources, a café and learning opportunities. Conferences, sports classes and cultural events can now also take place in the Kinning Park Complex.

New Practice’s designs have visually opened up the spiral staircase to make the building safer and the space easier to understand. There is now also more natural light. As many users of the complex have accessibility requirements, a priority was placed on making the building as accessible as possible. This includes a new elevator with a ramp to the entrance. In addition, there is now a new quiet room for praying, breastfeeding and as a sanctuary for anyone who wants peace and quiet. A maximum of three people can use this room at any one time.

This work has succeeded in maintaining or even enhancing the community feel of the Kinning Park Complex. The center continues to serve as a safe place in the neighborhood that provides comfort, education and activism for all.

Read more: The CitizenM hotel in Glasgow also aspires to be a focal point for the community.