Just finished your studies and have no plan for what to do next? We’ve been there. We ask young architects about their biggest fears and successes.
Just finished your studies – or in the final stages – and really. no. Plan. what to do next? We’ve all been at this point. Used to always having a goal in mind, there’s now a big question mark. Goodbye university, hello fears for the future. We have the antidote: young offices and employees who are going their own way. We asked them about their biggest fears, inspirations and successes. Today we present: Opposite Office from Munich.
Opposite Office was founded in 2017 in the Norwegian ice when Benedikt Hartl was camping and skiing with a friend. Before that, he had worked at various offices, but quit his last job and left for the icy cold. The idea for the Opposite Office grew out of his skepticism towards architecture on the one hand and his passion for it on the other: to do something with architecture, just in a different way. As a self-employed architect, he now enjoys having the time to design and experiment. In recent months, Opposite Office has been in the media with one project in particular: the design for the conversion of Buckingham Palace.
What makes you speechless?
We live in times when a lot of things are relatively speechless: a wall to Mexico, Brexit. But here in Germany, too, we are sometimes speechless: performance bonuses for unsuccessful managers, cheating software, police task laws, exploding rents …
And in architecture?
Since much of what happens in the world can’t even surpass satire, architecture doesn’t actually do so badly: fire protection at Berlin Airport, cost explosion and acoustics in the Elbphilharmonie concert hall, lizards, weevils and lies at Stuttgart 21 and Prussian splendor and glory in the Berlin City Palace – no problem!
What breaks your heart?
The architect Cedric Price once advised a couple to get divorced instead of buying a new house, but I doubt whether architecture can really break hearts. It’s more likely to be interpersonal relationships that threaten to break hearts.
What caused the last big argument?
Tea or sherry at Buckingham Palace.
What is architecture not allowed to do?
Architecture must not be detached from politics and society. I understand that (star) architects like to build stadiums. But can you really justify treating the workers on the construction site like slaves? Most representative buildings support a political direction: the palace in Versailles supported the power of kings. The Reichstag building in Berlin also shows how political architecture is: the dome can be seen as an element of power, while the glass version by Sir Norman Foster stands as a symbol of democratic transparency. But it is not only on a large scale that architecture always reflects political ideas. Even on a small scale, architecture always has a political dimension. There is a difference between planning a luxury villa in the countryside and social housing.
What are you most proud of?
I would like to replace the term with joy, because social recognition is not as important as the term pride.
So what gives you pleasure?
We are delighted to have recently won two competitions that are now being realized. One is a workshop for the disabled, which we are planning together with another office, and the other is experimental vacation homes in XS format.
Let’s be honest: how many night shifts do you work a month?
Probably too many, really.
What is the next goal?
Now that the conversion of Buckingham Palace has been heavily discussed in the media, we are thinking about which building we would like to convert next. The Arc de Triomphe in Paris, for example. The yellow vests are currently taking over it. I’m not sure yet whether we really want to support them. In general, we think that protest is a legitimate and important democratic tool, but the political orientation of the yellow vests, with their anarchist activists and extreme nationalists, must of course be critically questioned. And in Germany, too, we know some things that are overrated.
And outside Europe?
The Burj Khalifa in Dubai would really be ideal for social housing. It wouldn’t even need to be extended. On the other hand, we don’t want to venture into the White House. It will certainly be put to good use again after Trump. But to be honest, we need to earn some money and plan real buildings. Unless, of course, someone wants to finance our political conversions…
The Baumeister Academy is an internship project of the architecture magazine Baumeister and is supported by GRAPHISOFT and BAU 2019.












