Hannes Meyer

Building design

Hannes Meyer

The Bauhaus Dessau Foundation is dedicating its 2015 annual program to the theme “Collective”. – and thus the work of the second Bauhaus director Hannes Meyer.

The Bauhaus Dessau Foundation is dedicating its 2015 annual program to the theme of “Collective”. At a time when communal living and working are once again gaining in attractiveness, it made sense to review the work of the second Bauhaus director Hannes Meyer. The exhibition “The Coop Principle” is the first since the 1989/90 retrospective to mark the centenary of his birth. After all, it was the Swiss architect who was appointed by Walter Gropius in 1927 as the first head of the newly created architecture department of the State Bauhaus – with the Freidorf cooperative housing estate in Muttenz near Basel (1919-26) as a reference. From then on, he consistently adapted teaching and workshops to the idea of community: Bauhaus students were involved in the planning and building process at an early stage, for example in the construction of the ADGB school in Bernau and the extension of the housing estate in Dessau-Törten (both 1928-30).

The design of the exhibition in Dessau is based on a traveling Bauhaus exhibition initiated by Meyer himself and designed by Alfred Arndt. In cooperation with the Deutsche Werkstätten Hellerau and others, a stool and a table from the so-called Volkswohnung, which never went into series production at the time, were reproduced. The exhibition is very vivid in this respect.

Unfortunately, it leaves many questions unanswered: Why did Gropius bring Meyer to Dessau in 1927 – who until then had no teaching experience? Why did he even propose him as his successor a year later and was ultimately involved in his resignation? How did Meyer, an avowed communist, implement his idea of collective planning practice in the Soviet Union (1930-36) and in Mexico (1939-49) – and who were his comrades-in-arms there? What concrete difficulties did he encounter in these two revolutionary countries and to what extent did he continue to live his idea of collective planning practice there? You learn nothing about any of this in Dessau. To fill in some gaps in knowledge, visitors can refer to the catalog of the Hannes Meyer retrospective from 1989/90.

The exhibition runs until October 4 at the Bauhaus Dessau, daily 10 a.m. – 5 p.m.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Neighboring land issue

Building design

The Architecture of the Common Ground / Luxembourg Pavilion at the 16th International Architecture Exhibition of La Biennale di Venezia.

The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is one of the few countries to take an unusually political approach to the biennial theme of “Freespace”, which is appealing in many ways. “The Architecture of the Common Ground” welcomes visitors as a black box with a narrow, brightly lit corridor. What appears to be a barrier-free welcoming gesture quickly reveals itself to be a finger in the wound. This is because the corridor symbolizes the 8% of building land that is available for construction in the public sector.

The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is one of the few countries to take an unusually political approach to the Biennale theme of “Freespace”, which is appealing in many ways. “The Architecture of the Common Ground” welcomes visitors as a black box with a narrow, brightly lit corridor. What appears to be a barrier-free welcoming gesture quickly reveals itself to be a finger in the wound. This is because the corridor symbolizes the 8% of building land that is available for construction in the public sector.

Not much for the urgently needed space for affordable housing. This is because Luxembourg, a small country with an area of 2586 square kilometers, in which only 14% of the country’s surface area is built on, has been experiencing population growth for years and the forecast is for continued growth. In Luxembourg City alone, the population has grown from 100,000 to 116,000 inhabitants within 10 years, with 180,000 commuters joining the 602,000 inhabitants (as at 1.1.2018) every day. Economic growth is both a curse and a blessing: new jobs are being created, but at the same time the necessary infrastructure is reaching its limits; urban sprawl is increasing and the lack of affordable housing is growing. Building land and real estate ownership is simply unaffordable for the younger generation. Land is becoming an object of speculation.

What does this mean for civil society? And above all: how can or even must architecture react to this? The creators of the Luxembourg Pavilion – the LUCA Luxembourg Center for Architecture and the University of Luxembourg – are aware that architects and urban planners cannot solve the land issue. Nor is “complete communalization or complete privatization of land” a solution, as Florian Hertweck – who teaches at the university – emphasized in an interview. But through the way they build, planners have a great influence on creating unexpected added value in the sense of freespace by opening up the architecture or the built environment for the benefit of civil society.

The current Biennale presentation of selected built and unbuilt examples from the history of architecture is an excellent demonstration of the possibilities for the sustainable use of urban and rural land – for the benefit of the general public and thus also for the cohesion of society.

Door system with sophisticated design

Building design

The new Schüco door system “AD UP” (Aluminum Door Universal Platform) combines the values of an aluminum door with stability, thermal insulation and tightness in one system.

The new Schüco door system “AD UP” (Aluminum Door Universal Platform) combines the values of an aluminum door with stability, thermal insulation and tightness in one system.

The special design principle with a 5-chamber profile structure also offers the technical requirements for an intelligent door system. The profile structure without foams supports concealed cable routing and enables the technology to be integrated with a perfect fit. With leaf-covering door panels (single or double-sided top panels), concealed door hinges and various sash variants, the system also offers visual design freedom. AD UP is available in core construction depths of 75 and 90 mm.

More information about the Schüco door system