Hebe – goddess of youth

Building design
Depictions of the ancient goddess Hebe were also very popular during the Classicist period. Photo: Eandré - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, via: Wikimedia Commons
Depictions of the ancient goddess Hebe were also very popular during the Classicist period. Photo: Eandré - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, via: Wikimedia Commons

In ancient Greece, the goddess Hebe embodied one of the most coveted goods of all: immortal youth. As the mouth guardian of the gods, she occupied a position of both service and symbolic significance on Mount Olympus. Her story combines mythological depth with a rich artistic reception that extends into the modern age.

Hardly any other figure in the Greek pantheon is as directly associated with a universal place of human longing as the daughter of Zeus and Hera. Youth, integrity and the fullness of life – all this is bundled together in her figure. Yet she is not a goddess with a booming mythological presence like Athena or Aphrodite, but a figure whose significance lies in the stillness of her function: she offered the immortals nectar and ambrosia, the food that guaranteed eternal life. This seemingly subordinate task makes her the linchpin of an idea that has fascinated the whole of antiquity – the idea that youth is not just a phase, but a state of divine perfection.

Origin, function and mythological embedding

According to ancient tradition, Hebe was the daughter of the gods Zeus and Hera, making her a member of the closest circle of the Olympic pantheon. Her name is derived from the Greek term for “youth” or “youthful bloom” – a linguistic immediacy that is rarely found. In addition to her function as the mouthguard of the gods, she is also described as the bath attendant of Ares and was regarded as the personification of youthful vigor par excellence. In Hesiod’s Theogony, she is mentioned as a companion of the gods, but without taking on a dominant role. It is precisely this silent omnipresence that makes her interesting from an art historical perspective: she is not an actor in the dramatic sense, but the bearer of a principle.
Her marriage to Heracles is particularly significant. After the greatest of all Greek heroes was accepted among the gods after his death, he was given the personification of youth itself as his wife – an act that could hardly be more symbolically clear. According to the sources, this union produced two sons: Alexiares and Aniketos, whose names mean “the defender” and “the invincible”. This completes the mythological field of meaning: Youth, strength and invincibility fall into one.

Places of worship and sanctuaries in ancient Greece

Although she is one of the less spectacularly worshipped deities, there is evidence of various places of worship where she was religiously venerated. In Phlius on the Peloponnese there was a grove dedicated to her, which was considered a free place for slaves – a remarkably social aspect of her cult practice. Anyone who entered this area gained protection, which the goddess associated with concepts such as renewal and liberation. In Athens, she was associated with the cult of Heracles; the two were honored together in different districts of the city. Her cultic worship is also documented in Sikyon on the Peloponnese, as well as in Canton on Cyprus. This spatial dispersion proves that their veneration was by no means limited to one region, but resonated throughout the entire Greek cultural area.

Hebe in the visual arts: from antiquity to classicism

The iconographic program that developed around this goddess is rich and varied. In ancient vase painting, she often appears in the scene in which she hands Heracles the potion of the gods – a motif that visualizes deification and renewal at the same time. The calm, upright posture she assumes in these depictions emphasizes her status as both servant and dignitary. However, Hebe made her strongest artistic impact in the age of Classicism and Romanticism. Antonio Canova’s famous marble statue from 1800-1805 is considered a key work in this reception history. The sculpture depicts the goddess in a floating, dancing pose, holding a jug in her hand and leaning her body slightly forward – an image of grace and lightness that perfectly captured the zeitgeist of the early 19th century. Canova created several versions of this work, which demonstrates the extraordinary popularity of the motif. Bertel Thorvaldsen devoted himself to the same subject and created an equally celebrated version. Johann Gottfried Schadow and other German classicist sculptors also took up the theme.

Juventas – the Roman equivalent

The Greek goddess Hebe found her direct equivalent in the Roman religion in Juventas, also spelled Iuventas. Her name is derived from the Latin term iuvenis, meaning “young” or “youth” – a semantic parallel that impressively demonstrates the intercultural continuum of the ancient concept of youth. Like her Greek role model, Juventas was the personification of youth and was regarded as the patron goddess of young men. A particularly revealing aspect of her Roman cult practice was the close connection with the state cult of the gods: Juventas had a sanctuary inside the temple of Jupiter on the Capitoline Hill, which underlines her importance for the religious life of Rome. Young men who donned the toga virilis and thus officially entered adult status traditionally brought a coin as an offering to her. Juventas was thus not only a mythological figure, but also a religious-social institution that ritually accompanied and publicly marked the life transition of Roman youth. In this aspect, she goes beyond her Greek role model: while Hebe is primarily located in the mythological-cosmic context of Olympus, Juventas was deeply embedded in the everyday life and civic ritual of Rome.

Between timeless allegory and modern reception

What makes Hebe so enduring is the inexhaustible appeal of its semantic core. Youth is not an arbitrary quality, but a category that touches on fundamental social, philosophical and aesthetic issues. In advertising, in popular culture and even in medical terms – the word “hebe-” appears in compounds associated with youth and development – her name lives on. Modern iconography has largely secularized the goddess without diminishing her symbolic weight. As an allegory of renewal, beginnings and unbroken vitality, she remains an astonishingly productive myth that has an impact far beyond the boundaries of classical studies. The fact that its equivalent was anchored in both the Greek and Roman pantheon testifies to the cross-cultural resonance of this idea.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

AI curriculum for architecture schools

Building design
white-concrete-building-under-a-blue-sky-day-uber-yz9da_YVV80

Modern, white concrete building under a blue sky during the day - Photo by Marin huang

Artificial intelligence is finding its way into architectural education – and with a force that is making even experienced university lecturers wonder. An AI curriculum for architecture schools promises nothing less than a paradigm shift: away from architecture as a solo act and towards digitally driven, collaborative design that fundamentally reorganizes the profession. What is behind this? Who benefits? And are schools in Germany, Austria and Switzerland even ready for this revolution?

  • The AI curriculum is becoming mandatory for future-proof architectural education.
  • Germany, Austria and Switzerland are still cautiously approaching integration – with major differences between universities.
  • Digital tools and AI are creating new design processes, but are also calling traditional methods into question.
  • Sustainability and climate expertise are being strengthened by data-driven simulations and AI-supported analyses.
  • In future, architects will not only need spatial imagination, but also data skills and a critical understanding of algorithms.
  • The debate between digital optimists and analog advocates is in full swing – and it is a passionate one.
  • The curriculum must not only teach technology, but also address ethics, social impact and critical thinking.
  • Global pioneers such as ETH Zurich and the Bartlett School have long been setting standards – German universities are in danger of being left behind.
  • The integration of AI is no longer an optional extra, but a matter of survival for the profession.

Architectural education in the age of AI: from modeling to prompting

The classic architectural apprenticeship has had its day – at least if the protagonists of digitalization have their way. Where once night shifts were spent at the drawing board, today laptops, VR glasses and cloud servers take center stage. But is that enough? The answer is clear: no. Because the integration of artificial intelligence is not only changing the architect’s toolbox, but the entire job description. An AI curriculum for architecture schools must do far more than just teach how to use Midjourney, Stable Diffusion or ChatGPT. It is about linking spatial imagination, algorithmic logic and social responsibility.

Germany, Austria and Switzerland are in the process of integrating the AI revolution into their curricula – albeit with the handbrake on. While international beacons such as ETH Zurich have long since established their own research institutes and AI chairs, many German universities are still struggling to find the right didactics. Some rely on workshops, others on elective modules, others on interdisciplinary projects between architecture, computer science and urban planning. What is missing is a binding, well thought-out strategy that establishes AI expertise as a cornerstone of architectural education.

It is interesting to look at Switzerland, where the combination of technology and design has always been part of the self-image. Here, AI tools are not seen as a threat, but as an extension of creative potential. Austria is somewhere in between: Some progressive institutes are testing AI-based design studios, while others are still debating the usefulness of digital methods. And Germany? There, the fear of losing the artistic aspirations of architecture dominates – as if algorithms could wipe out the genius loci.

But the reality is sober: Those who do not understand AI today will be overtaken by automated planning systems tomorrow. Architects must learn to juggle data, critically scrutinize algorithms and reflect on the impact of their digital tools on society, climate and urban planning. The AI curriculum is not a gimmick, but the ticket to a professional world in which man and machine design on an equal footing.

The biggest challenge lies in finding the right balance: Enthusiasm for technology meets critical thinking, efficiency meets responsibility, automation meets creativity. Anyone who believes that AI will do away with the architectural profession is ignoring the opportunities: it opens up new spaces, but also forces us to adopt new ethics and professionalism. The curriculum must be able to withstand these areas of tension – and make them productive.

Technology, ethics, creativity: the building blocks of a future-proof AI curriculum

A modern AI curriculum for architecture schools is not a crash course in software operation. It is a complex web of technical, design and social skills that redefines the profession. The focus is on the ability not only to use AI systems, but also to understand and critically design them. This means that the architects of tomorrow need to know how neural networks work, how training data is generated and how algorithms can narrow or expand decision-making spaces.

But it’s not just about technology. A future-proof curriculum must also address ethical, social and ecological issues. Who programs the AI? Who controls the data? What impact do automated design processes have on urban development, on the climate, on the social fabric? The answers to these questions are anything but trivial – and they call for a new didactic openness. Architecture teachers must develop into moderators of a discourse that goes far beyond floor plans and facades.

The potential of AI is particularly evident in the area of sustainability: simulations of energy flows, analyses of microclimates, optimization of daylight and use of materials – all of this is not only faster, but also more precise thanks to data-driven approaches. However, this also means that those who do not master the tools will be left out when it comes to developing climate-resilient cities. AI is becoming a prerequisite for sustainable planning – and therefore a mandatory skill.

However, the curriculum must also shed light on the downsides. Algorithmic distortions, lack of transparency, loss of design autonomy – these are all real risks that must not be ignored. A critical look at the limitations, biases and blind spots of AI systems is just as much a part of the curriculum as the teaching of creativity techniques that strengthen people as active players in the design process. The future of the profession lies in the interaction between machine and human – not in subjugation to digital systems.

Finally, the curriculum must leave room for visions. What will the city look like that is designed jointly by humans and AI? How will the relationship between planning, participation and design change? What happens when design decisions are no longer made in private, but in dialog with intelligent systems? Those who ask these questions are not only training technicians, but architects who are ready to design the future themselves.

Practice or theory? How the DACH region is integrating AI into teaching – and what is still missing

A look into the lecture halls of Munich, Vienna or Zurich shows: The integration of AI is anything but uniform. While some universities are boldly experimenting, others are sticking to traditional teaching formats. ETH Zurich has long since established an international lead with its Digital Design Studios, Machine Learning Labs and interdisciplinary research clusters. Here, data science, coding and AI-supported simulations are part of the compulsory program – and it shows in the graduates.

In Germany, on the other hand, the AI euphoria is often still characterized by scepticism. Many curricula are modularized, AI modules appear as compulsory electives – and are sometimes neglected. There is a lack of practical relevance because lecturers themselves still have some catching up to do. The concern that architecture will degenerate into pure data science is omnipresent. Yet practice shows that those who combine AI and design gain analytical depth – and creative freedom. Universities must learn to productively combine practice and theory instead of playing them off against each other.

Austria is divided: While ambitious AI projects are emerging in Vienna and Graz, other locations are reluctant. Although the digitalization of teaching is being driven forward, the integration of AI remains sporadic. What is missing is a nationwide strategy that systematically promotes the exchange between universities, research and practice. Without this solidarity, the transfer of AI threatens to get bogged down in the small details of the institutes.

What all countries have in common is that the students are more advanced than the curricula. They bring their own AI tools, experiment with generative models and design hybrid workflows. The problem: without a didactic framework, the use of AI degenerates into wild actionism – and the actual potential remains untapped. The task of universities is clear: they must create structures that encourage curiosity and experimentation, but also reflect and classify.

The danger is real: anyone who sleeps through the integration of AI will lose touch with the international debate. Leading global offices are already recruiting their young talent in London, Copenhagen or New York – where AI expertise is a matter of course. The DACH region faces a choice: play along or watch others call the shots.

Resistance, visions, responsibility: the debate about AI in architecture studies

No one is surprised that an AI curriculum does not only have friends. The fronts are clear: on the one hand, there are the digital optimists who see the future of architecture in AI. On the other side are the analog advocates who lament the loss of intuition, materiality and authenticity. In between, a debate is raging that is not just technical, but of a deeply existential nature. What is the value of design when algorithms generate the forms? Who decides what is built – man, machine or a mixture of both?

The criticism is justified: AI systems operate on the basis of data that is rarely neutral. They reproduce biases, cement standards and favor efficient, but not necessarily innovative solutions. The danger that cities will be built according to training data in the future is real. The AI curriculum must therefore also become more perceptive – it teaches not only technology, but also resistance to blind faith in AI.

At the same time, the opportunities are enormous: AI can make complexity manageable, open up new design parameters and revolutionize the sustainability of projects. It can make planning processes more transparent, participatory and democratic if the right interfaces are created. The curriculum must take up these visions – and show students how they can take responsibility.

The role of teachers is changing radically. They will become coaches, discourse moderators and bridge builders between technology and society. The task: to promote the creative, critical and ethically reflective use of AI instead of just testing software skills. The best curricula are those that can withstand contradiction and make them productive – not those that push all students in the same direction.

In the end, one thing is clear: the AI curriculum is not a panacea. It is a tool that needs to be used correctly. Architecture is not being displaced by AI, but rather complemented by it. The profession will remain creative – but it will become more data-driven, more analytical, more global. Those who refuse to accept this reality will only play a minor role in the international architecture discourse in the future.

Conclusion: The AI curriculum as the key to the future of architecture

The integration of artificial intelligence into architectural education is not an academic gimmick, but a question of survival for the profession. Germany, Austria and Switzerland are on the threshold of a new era – and they would do well to take up this challenge with determination. The AI Curriculum is much more than a software guide: It is a manifesto for an architecture that combines creativity, technology and responsibility in a new way. Investing now lays the foundation for a sustainable, innovative and relevant building culture. Those who hesitate are risking the significance of the profession in the 21st century. The future of architecture is not just being built – it is being programmed, simulated, discussed and only then built. Time to design the curriculum accordingly.

Into the Dark – Graphics from Ensor to Munch at the Saarlandmuseum

Building design
The works of Edvard Munch are a focal point of the exhibition at the Saarland Museum. Photo: Tom Gundelwein

The works of Edvard Munch are a focal point of the exhibition at the Saarland Museum.
Photo: Tom Gundelwein

In its major autumn exhibition, the Saarland Museum is devoting itself to a theme that has always been part of being human and yet often remains hidden: dark feelings. Under the title “Into the Dark – Graphic Art from Ensor to Munch”, the show from September 20, 2025 to January 4, 2026 brings together around 110 works that deal with the abysses of human existence in an impressive way.

Fear, despair, jealousy, sadness, anger or even horror – all these emotions are an inseparable part of life. Nevertheless, they often remain unspoken and are rarely shown openly. However, they have played a prominent role in art history in particular. Artists of all eras have tried to make these “heavy” feelings visible and give them form. The exhibition at the Saarland Museum now presents this tradition and impressively shows that the dark does not necessarily have a negative or frightening effect, but is rather an indispensable part of human expression.

At the heart of the show is the graphic art of classical modernism, a medium that is reduced to its essence like almost no other: black and white, line and surface, light and dark. Based on the museum’s own holdings and supplemented by valuable loans, works by important artists are on display. Alongside James Ensor, Otto Dix, Vincent van Gogh, Käthe Kollwitz and Alfred Kubin, Edvard Munch stands out in particular, with his works forming a focal point. The Saarland Museum’s extensive Munch collection is being presented in its entirety for the first time, providing a rare, intensive insight into the Norwegian artist’s graphic work. The exhibition comprises a total of 111 works, including important loans from the Staatliche Kunsthalle Karlsruhe in addition to the museum’s own holdings.

The exhibition shows that darkness in art has many facets. Some works have an immediately oppressive effect, confronting the audience with death, suffering or loneliness. Others, on the other hand, surprise with gallows humor, irony or an almost playful lightness. The result is a field of tension in which visitors are constantly forced to re-position themselves. Sometimes the path leads to deep thoughtfulness, sometimes the works elicit a smile – but the experience always remains intense and immediate.

An important point of reference for the “Into the Dark” show is the artist and art theorist Max Klinger. As early as 1891, he emphasized the “right of the dark side of life to exist”. For him, the dark not only represented a necessary counterweight to the light, but also an indispensable component of artistic exploration. The works that can now be seen in Saarbrücken are part of this tradition: They open up a wide field for that which is often difficult to depict – for the unspeakable, the unconscious, the hidden. Particularly noteworthy is the presentation of Max Klinger’s series “Opus VI, Ein Handschuh” (1897), which is being shown in its entirety on loan from the Staatliche Kunsthalle Karlsruhe.

The exhibition is divided into eight chapters: Hidden Feelings, Restlessness, Urge, Attraction, Lost, Horror, Connectedness and Night Side. Each chapter opens up new perspectives on the dark. Alfred Kubin is represented with 20 works and forms a focal point. His words from 1916 – “Balance is hidden within us; let’s go in search of it” – are emblematic of the entire show. These themes are complemented by works that address existential questions, erotic depictions of agony and death as well as socially critical positions on violence and injustice, for example in the prints by Käthe Kollwitz and Otto Dix

Curatorially, the exhibition relies heavily on the immediate emotional impact of the works. Lines, contrasts and reductions create an immediacy that touches without detours. Paper thus becomes a resonance chamber for that which can hardly be captured in words. “The dark, the abysmal, the hidden is not dark in the clichéd sense – it is human, alive, deep,” emphasizes Lisa Felicitas Mattheis, Head of Art and Cultural Studies at the Saarland Cultural Heritage Foundation.

The exhibition is complemented by a broad educational program that offers visitors numerous opportunities for in-depth exploration. Guided tours, lectures and workshops will help to illuminate the themes of the exhibition from different perspectives. An accompanying publication will also be published, which not only documents the exhibited works, but also contains further-reaching essays and can thus serve as a permanent basis for reflection.
In addition to guided tours and lectures, the museum offers a hands-on station in the exhibition, creative activities for children and adults as well as special programs for school classes. The publication comprises 120 pages, is edited by Lisa Felicitas Mattheis and contains texts by Kathrin Elvers-Švamberk, Laura Prins, Eva Specker and Jane Schmidt-Boddy, among others.

With Into the Dark – Graphic Art from Ensor to Munch, the Saarland Museum opens up an impressive view into the world of feelings that are often difficult for us, but are nevertheless part of the core of human experience. The exhibition invites us to confront the dark sides of life – not as a threat, but as an opportunity for self-reflection and deeper understanding.