Helmut Schmidt and architecture

Building design

On October 7, 1980, the SPD and FDP delegations met in the Chancellor's Bungalow in Bonn for initial talks on the continuation of the government alliance. Photo: Ulrich Baumgarten / picture alliance

Helmut Schmidt was not only an outstanding politician, he also had style. He enriched the architecture he lived in.

The relationship between building and user is not an easy one. People and architecture do not always fit together. So the question is: what does the perfect occupant of a building look like? My thesis: Like Helmut Schmidt. Whether it was the Chancellor’s bungalow or a terraced house in Hamburg, Schmidt succeeded in lending dignity to very different buildings through his own aura.

The personality of the recently deceased former chancellor has been illuminated in all its facets in recent days. However, precisely this aspect, Helmut Schmidt’s relationship with architecture, has been left out. Yet, unsurprisingly, he also had something to say on this subject – and it was quite determined. In a round table discussion with Louisa Hutton, for example, he spoke out against the construction of the new Berlin City Palace. The Elbphilharmonie does not come off well with Schmidt either. He finds the music building “rather nouveau riche”.

Schmidt’s attitudes seem a little conservative in places – but understandable throughout. He was not a man of baroque gestures. He was someone for whom function was important. But the interesting thing about Schmidt as a public person is that, unlike many social democrats, his demonstrative sobriety does not come across as quiet, but on the contrary, always skillful. Helmut Schmidt was definitely a man of style. And not just because he was simply good-looking. No, the entire Schmidt composition had something discreetly elegant and at the same time confident about it. Of course, the pipe placed in the picture and later the public cigarette was always an act of self-dramatization. The suits fit, the hair was neatly combed, but not anxiously hyper-short. And, of course, the Elbsegler was ultimately also a style statement – one that, together with Schmidt’s political wisdom and intellectual cosmopolitanism, created a coherent whole.

And this coherent whole also had an effect on the architecture in which Schmidt lived. Hardly any other German chancellor has lived in Sep Ruf’s Bonn Chancellor’s Bungalow as appropriately as Schmidt. In his eight years there, he created a much more rounded image in this perhaps most beautiful of all post-war German political buildings than, for example, Helmut Kohl. The latter is quoted as saying that Ruf’s house was an “absurd building – in the sense of a Federal Chancellor’s apartment”. It was probably too minimalist for him. Helmut Schmidt, who incidentally would have liked to have been an architect himself, would never have said anything like that.

But the interesting thing is that the public figure of Schmidt not only lends an iconic building like Ruf’s pavilion a sense of design and cultural significance. But also an unadorned semi-detached house in Hamburg-Langenhorn. Schmidt had lived there with Loki since 1961, when the house had just been completed. Nothing about this brick building is impressive, and the garage placed in front of the rather flat building would have to be described as a failure in terms of architectural criticism. But that is not the point. Schmidt’s presence in this house says: this is not about representation. People live here in an unagitated way – and do a lot of work. Schmidt regularly received state guests there. What might Schmidt’s friend Valéry Giscard d’Estaing have thought when he arrived directly from the Elysée Palace in Paris?

One can assume, however: Giscard d’Estaing will have understood that Schmidt deliberately did not swap his residence for a more opulent building on the Elbchaussee, for example. This was also the new Germany of the time – a country that viewed the pompous gesture with skepticism. Gerhard Schröder later followed this philosophy of architectural anti-symbolism with his terraced house in Hanover. And, as is well known, he fared better with it than Christian Wulff, whose longing for a little architectural grandeur was ultimately his undoing. Something like that would never have happened to Schmidt. And this despite the fact that he certainly made a lot of money from his public appearances after his chancellorship at the latest.

So now the Langenhorn duplex is empty. But not for long. Schmidt decided that a museum should be set up there, on Neubergerweg, after his death. Personally, I am looking forward to breathing the aura of the world politician in this normal Hamburg location.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

A monument in granite

Building design

An archaic-looking monument stands in the heart of New York. Embedded in a park, granite weighing several tons forms a memorial space in memory of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his speech on the four freedoms.

An archaic-looking monument stands in the heart of New York. Embedded in a park, granite weighing several tons forms a memorial space in memory of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his speech on the four freedoms.

Photo/©Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park/Iwan Baan

Almost a year ago, the time had come: the Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park was opened to the public. The designs were drawn up in 1973 and 1974, but due to Kahn’s death and numerous other unfavorable circumstances, they have not yet been implemented. Now, forty years later, the stone testimony of granite blocks weighing tons sits enthroned at the tip of Roosevelt Island in the heart of New York. With millimeter precision, huge granite blocks form an atmospheric space, behind whose walls the skyline of the mega-city is relegated to secondary importance. Instead, the view is of the river, the bridge and the sky. In a tapering park, the visitor is led through avenues and withdrawn from the hustle and bustle of the city. Their attention is automatically drawn to the monument to the speech made by President Roosevelt on the eve of America’s entry into the war in 1941, in which he argued about the moral preconditions for military intervention.

Photo/© Rober Schäfer

Thirty blocks of granite, 3.70 meters high and weighing 36 tons each, are positioned on the north, west and east sides of the platform to create a memorial space measuring just 18 square meters and lined with granite slabs. This opens to the south side to unfold the magnificent panorama of the East River in front of the President’s words carved in stone.

Photo/©Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park/Iwan Baan

Louis Kahn chose the granite for the monument himself. The stone had to be as pure as possible – without inclusions – and have an absolutely homogeneous surface. The architect attached particular importance to the stone surface not being veined in order to achieve the most glistening white-grey surface possible. This is why he ultimately chose the granite from Mount Airy in North Carolina. This quarry is the largest surface quarry in the world. The granite blocks and granite slabs were left as rough as possible in accordance with Louis Kahn’s specifications and were therefore not reworked or only minimally reworked.

Photo/© Rober Schäfer

Read more about the “Four Freedoms Memorial” in STEIN 5/2014.
You can find out more about Franklin T. Roosevelt, his presidency and his famous speech on the “Four Freedoms” on the “Digital Resource” website of the Four Freedom Park at fdr4freedoms.org.

A pink corner

Building design

Neuhāusl Hunal Architects have created a pink corner in a small first floor apartment in Prague. The founder of Studio U/U commissioned the office to redesign the apartment. In one room, the kitchen dominates together with a multifunctional podium that serves as a bed, storage room, library, changing room and bench. With its pink color, it is the highlight and invites you to cook!

Check out this post on Instagram

A post shared by NEUHÄUSL HUNAL (@neuhauslhunal)