Houses of the year 2021 – Fuhrimann Hächler wins

Building design
Houses of the year 2021

Houses of the year 2021

Swiss architecture firm Furimann Hächler wins “Houses of the Year 2021”. A total of eight single-family homes are honored.

The Swiss architecture firm has won the “Houses of the Year 2021” competition with an extraordinary residential building in Zurich. At the eleventh award ceremony, a total of eight single-family homes from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were recognized by the jury.

Should German architects be worried? Of the nine prizes awarded for the “Houses of the Year 2021”, four went to Switzerland, three to Austria and only two to Germany. The awards ceremony took place yesterday at the German Architecture Museum in Frankfurt am Main. But joking aside: the range of award-winning projects in this year’s eleventh edition of the competition covers a broad spectrum of building tasks that can be concealed behind the term “single-family home”. The award-winning buildings range from small cottages to full-blown villas. They are located in the high mountains, on industrial estates, in village settlements and in metropolitan residential areas.

The Swiss architecture firm AFGH Andreas Fuhrimann Gabrielle Hächler won the “House of the Year 2021” award. Their Alder House in Zurich is radical in terms of design. The architects are seeking nothing less than a new aesthetic expression for the bourgeois villa. In doing so, they are joining a proud architectural tradition and exploring new aesthetic boundaries for this type of building.

Fuhrimann and Hächler, whose love of the raw and unfinished pervades their entire oeuvre, pursue this approach with the utmost consistency in the winning project. The outer walls are made of a brick that is normally used for agricultural buildings. They let the mortar ooze out of the joints like a paste, so that it covers the façades like a net. What at first glance looks like carelessness is deliberately calculated: The relief formed by the mortar creates a subtle play of light and shadow. Beyond all discussions about the justification and sustainability of the single-family house, the jury recognized the courage of the Alder House for its remarkable and independent aesthetic concept.

The jury also recognized an outstanding architectural achievement in Studio Cascina Garbald by Armando Ruinelli, which received one of a total of seven awards. The small building serves as a residence for the Villa Garbald scholarship holders. The villa itself is the work of Gottfried Semper. The new building follows the local building tradition in terms of cubature and design language, but uses unplastered tamped concrete for all the walls. On the one hand, this choice of material creates a direct link to the surroundings through its colorfulness, but on the other hand also identifies it as a contemporary building. Where Fuhrimann and Hächler seek the raw, Ruinelli celebrates perfection. From the wonderful wooden ceilings to the lights designed by the architect, the design and craftsmanship of the project is outstanding.

Niklaus Graber & Christoph Steiger Architekten also received an award in the “Houses of the Year 2021” category for a residential and commercial building located in an industrial area near Lucerne. The jury recognized the architects’ efforts to create a place that offers a high quality of life in a heterogeneous and uninviting environment.

In contrast, the award-winning project by Hohengasser Wirnsberger Architekten is located in a largely natural landscape in Carinthia. The clients, a married couple, wanted a weekend house that respects this natural landscape and interferes with it as little as possible. The architects developed a minimalist wooden building for the clients that floats on pillars above the meadow on which it stands. The clients wanted it to have a camping-like feel. The small house impressively demonstrates that this does not have to be at odds with convincing architecture.

Equally close to nature, but in a completely different size and price segment, is a villa on Lake Wandlitz near Berlin, for which Thomas Kröger received an award in the “Houses of the Year 2021” competition. Kröger cleverly organizes the luxurious country house over several split-level floors, which are connected by a wide staircase. The building draws its charm from an interplay of rectangular and rounded shapes, giving the street side and the lake side very different faces.

Slightly smaller than Kröger’s house on the lake is another award-winning villa, a project by Wespi de Meuron Romeo, which is located in Klingnau, Switzerland. The most striking design feature of the building is a second façade, which the architects present on the hillside. While the inner façade is made almost entirely of glass, Wespi de Meuron Romeo had the outer façade constructed from rough concrete. This solid wall is perforated with irregularly distributed and differently sized square openings. While the concrete wall shields the residents from view and heat, the wall openings divide the view into different sections.

A conversion by Rüf Stasi Partner from Dornbirn in Austria convinced the jury of the “Houses of the Year 2021”. Using economical means, the architects succeeded in adapting a detached house from the 1930s to the needs of a young family. The most striking external change is a two-storey steel loggia that extends the rear of the house. It creates a versatile outdoor living space and also provides additional access to the upper floors.

Another classic family home also received an award in the “Houses of the Year 2021” competition. The project by Bathke Geisel Architekten is located in a village setting in the Munich area. The architects designed a simple single-family home with timber cladding that blends in sensitively with the architectural structure of the surroundings. The building impresses with its elegant proportions and restrained but finely crafted details.

Houses of the Year 2021: photography prize for Albrecht Imanuel Schnabel

A prize for architectural photography was awarded for the first time at Häuser des Jahres 2021. It was awarded to Austrian photographer Albrecht Imanuel Schnabel for his images of the “Der Einhof” project by LP architektur from Altenmark im Pongau.

All eight winning projects and 42 other buildings selected by the jury can be found in the book “Häuser des Jahres. The best single-family homes 2021”. Architectural journalist Katharina Matzig and actor Udo Wachtveitl, who also sat on the competition jury, collaborated on the book this year.

Find out which project is the “House of the Year 2020” here.

Udo Wachtveitl/Katharina Matzig:
Houses of the Year. The best single-family homes 2021
320 p., 450 color illustrations and plans
23 x 30 cm, hardcover
Munich: Callwey 2021
59,95 Euro
ISBN 978-3-7667-2530-1

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Viva la Piazza Zenetti

Building design
General

Since summer 2018, Piazza Zenetti in Munich has been an example of how a former parking lot can make neighbourly coexistence possible in a large city. Nevertheless, the planners responsible at raumzeug have to defend their project time and again.

Since summer 2018, Piazza Zenetti in Munich has been an example of how a rethought parking lot can make neighbourly coexistence possible in a large city. Nevertheless, the planners responsible at raumzeug have to defend their project time and again. G+L editor Theresa Ramisch presents the project here.

I always thought that the housing situation in Munich depended on how much money you had. But it’s actually a question of luck. At least if you believe the people of Munich. If you ask them where they live in the state capital, the classic answer is: “I was lucky.” Only after a meaningful pause is it revealed where the actual place of residence is. This is usually somewhere within or on the edge of the Mittlerer Ring. Well, or even in Großhadern. Happiness is subjective.
Yes, it takes a lot to find a suitable apartment in Munich. Money alone doesn’t always get you there. The pressure on space is enormous. So it’s no wonder that the financially weak creative scene in the Bavarian capital has little space left – for living and working. But also to initiate new projects. And this despite the fact that it offers so much potential for long-term urban development, as we discuss in the October 2019 issue of G+L.

But despite all these adversities, Munich’s creatives have managed to fight for a small inner-city area where creative bottom-up processes are once again possible. The Munich Schlachthofviertel. Here, players such as the Wanda e.V. association with Alte Utting or Bahnwärter Thiel are proving how creative projects can make a city like Munich – which is already considered to be highly liveable – even more attractive. What is special about the Schlachthofviertel, however, is that the Munich planning department is also jumping on the creative bandwagon that is currently thundering through the district. With the Piazza Zenetti.

Zenettiplatz led a dreary existence until the summer of 2018. There was no quality of stay here. Parking spaces defined the square. Nobody wanted to sit down and stay. But then, as part of the “City2share” project, the city invited tenders for the design of Zenettiplatz as a mobility station including a temporary neighborhood meeting place. The Munich office raumzeug was awarded the project and landscape architects Johann-Christian Hannemann and Felix Lüdicke developed a two-part square design, which is now – with further additions – in its second year.

The design

The southern area accommodates a wide range of mobility options with car-sharing parking spaces, e-charging stations and public transport bikes. The planners developed the northern area, which is part of the recreation and communication area, together with the residents in a needs analysis and a design concept. The result is a multifunctional, colorful square that is well received by the neighborhood.
An all-round, colorful piece of furniture – built as part of a participatory construction site – defines the spatial design. It encompasses the square and continues on the other side of the street, combining mobility with a place to stay. Six raised beds, a collection of potted plants and several rambling trees are responsible for the greenery on the otherwise very gray square.
In summer 2019, a carpet of grass was also added, which was only supposed to be here for two weeks. However, three dedicated neighborhood children campaigned to extend the lawn experiment over the entire summer – and beyond. The lawn is currently spending the winter at the neighbor’s, the Thiel railroad yard.

The use

The planners’ aim was to ensure that the square could be used for a variety of purposes. And they have achieved this. The surrounding (currently green) furniture can be used for sitting, working, but also for running around and playing. There is an information board, which acts as a bulletin board and reports on current activities in the piazza, as well as a book exchange shelf, a deposit niche, a swap board and lockable boxes for toys and tools. Simple, robust and functional – this triad best describes the character of the Piazza.

But wouldn’t parking spaces make more sense?

The planners actively involve the neighborhood with joint activities. One such campaign was the fountain experiment that took place in Piazza Zenetti in mid-July 2019. If you look at the pictures, it looks fun, doesn’t it? And it was. The sad thing is that not everyone is convinced by the fun. Even after two years – even shortly after such a successful event – Johann-Christian Hannemann and Felix Lüdicke in Isarvorstadt are still discussing whether the space is being used at all and whether ten parking spaces wouldn’t make more sense. The planners from raumzeug repeatedly hear “gentrification” criticism at the square: that they are only staging the functioning of the piazza and that the neighbors don’t use the square at all.
Are the critics right? My opinion: No. Firstly, a hundred meters further on, behind the underpass on Tumblingerstrasse, there are always free parking spaces. You just have to use them. Secondly, we should all be driving less anyway. Thirdly, the raised beds are blooming and growing. Why is that an argument? They are looked after by some extremely dedicated space and bed sponsors from the neighborhood. Doesn’t that alone speak for the fact that the community in Piazza Zenetti works? I mean, apart from the fact that there’s always someone sitting here? … Exactly. And fourthly: I’ve rarely been to a place in Munich where neighborly togetherness comes about as easily as in Piazza Zenetti. We don’t need to discuss the fact that neighborly togetherness is rare in a big city like Munich and is becoming increasingly rare. Nor do we need to discuss the fact that we need spaces without consumer pressure that bring us closer together as people, as neighbors, that counteract the increasing anonymity in the big city and that activate togetherness instead of coexistence. Public spaces should invite, not exclude. And that is precisely what the Piazza does. Thanks to the spatial design by Johann-Christian Hannemann and Felix Lüdicke, but also thanks to the social commitment of the planners themselves. They can be found in the Piazza every Wednesday from 6 p.m. for the neighborhood meeting “putz, plausch und plan”. And they don’t even live in the neighborhood. That’s what I call commitment.

Also interesting on this topic: You can find a commentary on why Munich in particular needs creative projects in the October 2019 issue of G+L (topic “Creative city”). Written by: Johann-Christian Hannemann and Felix Lüdicke. Take a look inside the magazine here.

Photos: Johann-Christian Hanneman (raumzeug)

Energy-efficient refurbishment – sustainable building envelopes with DOMICO

Building design
Planum® façade in VO design in the colors "Officers Gold" and black-grey. Photo: ©nps tchoban vos Berlin

Transformation des Gebäudebestands als zentrale Zukunftsaufgabe

Die energetische Sanierung zählt zu den drängendsten Herausforderungen der europäischen Bau- und Immobilienwirtschaft. Insbesondere Gebäude aus den 1960er- und 1970er-Jahren stehen vor einem tiefgreifenden Modernisierungsbedarf. Verschärfte gesetzliche Anforderungen an EnergieeffizienzBrandschutzNachhaltigkeitGebäudehülleFassadeFassadenvorgehängte hinterlüftete FassadenDOMICOBrandschutzDämmungRaumklimaModulleiste „S“VorfertigungEffizienzDie Planum®-FassadensystemeNachhaltiges BauenGebäudehülleEnergieträgerPlanum®SolarLuftdichtheitFassadeEnergiePlanum®SolarGebäudehülleUnterkonstruktionGebäudehülleEnergieeffizienzFassadenPhotovoltaikWeitere Informationen zum Thema Sanierung finden Sie hier:



QR-Code – DOMICO Report „WOHNHAUSANLAGEN“