Installing a Window Lintel: An Overview of the Definition and Importance

Building design
An illustrative architectural detail on the topic of installing window lintels
A gray wall surface with a subtle texture—an atmospheric architectural image by kevinortizdesign.

Every window opening in a wall creates a structural gap in the load-bearing structure that, without specific measures, puts the building at risk. Installing a window lintel closes this gap: It takes on the loads from the masonry above the opening, safely transfers them to the adjacent wall piers, and creates the structural conditions necessary for windows and doors to be installed permanently and securely in walls. Anyone who understands the window lintel understands one of the most fundamental relationships between openings, loads, and the load-bearing structure in solid-wall construction.

  • What a window lintel is and what structural function it serves
  • What types of lintels exist and how they differ structurally
  • How to properly plan and install a window lintel
  • What materials are used for window lintels and what they are capable of
  • Which standards and design rules apply to installation
  • How thermal bridges form at the lintel and how they can be minimized through design
  • What to consider when retrofitting a window lintel in an existing building
  • What typical installation errors occur and how to avoid them

What is a window lintel? Definition, function, and structural principles

A window lintel—also referred to as a door lintel when it spans a door opening—is a horizontally oriented load-bearing structural element that closes off the top of a wall opening for a window or door. Its primary function is load transfer: The masonry or concrete structure above the opening cannot itself bridge the vertical and horizontal forces acting there because the opening interrupts the force transmission. The lintel takes on these loads as a flexural beam, distributes them to the supports on both sides in the wall piers, and transfers them from there into the foundation.

Structurally, a window lintel behaves like a beam supported at both ends under a uniformly distributed load. The loads originate from the dead weight of the masonry above the lintel, from floor loads transferred into this wall section, and, if applicable, from wind loads on the facade. The span of the lintel—that is, the clear width of the opening—significantly determines the bending moments that occur and thus the required load-bearing capacity. The wider the opening, the greater the bending moment, and the more massive or reinforced the lintel must be. This basic rule is immutable and applies regardless of the chosen material or construction principle.

The term “window lintel installation” encompasses both the design and sizing of the lintel as well as its craftsmanship. The two are inextricably linked: a correctly sized lintel that is installed incorrectly cannot fulfill its structural function. Conversely, a carefully executed installation cannot compensate for an inadequately dimensioned lintel. In practice, responsibility for planning and execution often lies with different parties, making communication between structural engineers, construction management, and the tradespeople carrying out the work a critical factor.

An Overview of Lintel Types: Materials, Shapes, and Design Principles

The most common types of lintels in German masonry construction can be distinguished by material and design principle. Precast reinforced concrete lintels are the most commonly used type in new construction today. They are industrially prefabricated, delivered in standardized dimensions, and installed on-site without the need for complex formwork. Their load-bearing capacity results from the combination of concrete, which absorbs compressive forces, and embedded steel reinforcement, which absorbs tensile forces in the flexural compression zone. Precast lintels conforming to DIN 1045 and the associated product standards are approved for specific load classes and spans; the designer selects the appropriate type based on the design load and the opening width.

In addition to the classic precast reinforced concrete lintel, there is the flat reinforced concrete lintel, which is characterized by a low overall height and is used particularly where the distance between the top edge of the lintel and the bottom edge of the slab is minimal. Flat lintels generally require a concrete cap or are designed as a composite system with the masonry above, which then functions as a structurally active compression zone. This principle is known as a composite lintel and requires that the masonry above the lintel have a minimum height and be fully laid before the lintel is loaded.

For exposed masonry and historic facades, steel lintels made of rolled sections—often L- or T-sections—are a common solution. They allow for a low structural height and can be concealed behind the masonry, ensuring that the facade view remains uninterrupted. However, steel lintels without corrosion protection and without thermal separation are problematic: Steel conducts heat very well, which leads to significant thermal bridges, and is susceptible to corrosion without a coating or cladding. In modern energy-efficient buildings, therefore, pure steel lintels are rarely used without supplementary insulation measures.

For masonry construction using bricks, calcium silicate blocks, or aerated concrete, the respective system manufacturers offer specially adapted lintel systems. Aerated concrete manufacturers supply reinforced aerated concrete beams that integrate seamlessly into the wall system and offer significantly improved thermal insulation compared to reinforced concrete lintels. Brick manufacturers sell U-shaped brick shells, known as brick lintels or lintel bricks, which serve as permanent formwork and are filled with reinforcement and in-situ concrete. These systems combine the load-bearing capacity of concrete with the thermal and aesthetic qualities of the surrounding masonry.

Installing a Window Lintel: Planning, Design, and Execution Step by Step

The installation of a window lintel begins long before the actual placement of the component on the construction site. During the planning phase, the structural engineer determines the required lintel width, the support length, and the load-bearing capacity class. The support length—that is, the length over which the lintel rests on the masonry on both sides—is a critical factor: It must be sufficient to limit the bearing pressure in the masonry to an allowable level. As a rule of thumb, a minimum support length of about ten to fifteen centimeters applies to many lintel types, with correspondingly greater lengths required for larger spans and higher loads. The exact requirements can be found in the relevant approvals and standards.

On the construction site, installation begins with preparing the supports. The masonry must be level, cover the entire surface, and be sufficiently load-bearing at the support points. Any unevenness is leveled with mortar; placing the lintel on an uneven or incomplete support results in point loads instead of distributed loads and can damage both the lintel and the masonry. Heavy precast lintels are installed using lifting aids or a crane; lighter types can be carried by two people, though care must be taken to ensure the correct installation orientation, as precast lintels have a defined compression zone at the top and a tension zone at the bottom and would fail if installed upside down.

After the lintel is installed, the masonry above is continued. It is important to note that the lintel must be temporarily supported during the masonry work and until the mortar has fully cured, provided that the lintel’s inherent stiffness is insufficient for the construction phase. Precast reinforced concrete lintels are generally designed to withstand the dead loads during the construction phase; composite systems and flat lintels often require scaffolding support until the masonry is activated as a structurally active compression zone. Removing the support before the scheduled time is a classic construction error with potentially serious consequences.

Installation in Existing Structures: Special Considerations for Retrofitting Lintels

Retrofitting a window lintel in an existing building is more challenging than installing one in a new construction because the masonry continues to bear loads during the work. Before the opening is created, the masonry above the planned opening must be temporarily supported. This is done using support beams or support truss structures that divert the loads around the work area. Only once this temporary load transfer is secured may the masonry be removed to create the opening.

The new lintel is then installed in the supported opening. The lintel must be carefully set in mortar, with the joints filled completely to ensure even load transfer. The embedding mortar must be sufficiently hardened before the temporary support is removed. In Germany, structural calculations by a licensed structural engineer are generally required for structurally significant modifications of this kind; installation without planning and approval is not only risky from a craftsmanship perspective but also prohibited under building codes.

Thermal Bridges at Window Lintels: Causes, Consequences, and Structural Solutions

Installing a window lintel made of reinforced concrete or steel into an insulated or solid exterior wall almost inevitably creates a thermal bridge. Reinforced concrete has a thermal conductivity of about two watts per meter per kelvin, while steel has a thermal conductivity of as much as fifty watts per meter per kelvin. Both values are far higher than the thermal conductivities of typical masonry materials such as aerated concrete (approximately 0.09 to 0.20 W/mK) or lightweight brick (approximately 0.10 to 0.30 W/mK). A conventional precast reinforced concrete lintel that extends across the entire wall thickness thus forms a highly thermally conductive path through the exterior wall, which significantly cools the interior wall surface in the lintel area.

This has several consequences: First, the building’s heat loss in the lintel area increases, which raises energy consumption. Second, the surface temperature of the interior wall below the lintel drops, which—under certain indoor air conditions—can lead to water vapor condensation and, consequently, mold growth. Third, the thermal bridge can result in additional computational effort when calculating the energy performance certificate and providing verification in accordance with the Building Energy Act (GEG), which must be offset by other measures.

From a structural standpoint, the thermal bridge at the window lintel can be reduced through various measures. System lintels made of aerated concrete or brick shells with in-situ concrete have significantly lower thermal conductivity than pure reinforced concrete lintels and are therefore preferable from an energy efficiency perspective, provided that the load-bearing capacity is sufficient. For reinforced concrete lintels, a layer of insulation applied to the exterior of the lintel—either as an insulation wedge or as part of the facade insulation—can significantly reduce the thermal bridge effect. In external thermal insulation composite systems (ETICS), insulation of the lintel area is a standard component of system design. Standardized thermal bridge catalogs and numerical calculation methods in accordance with DIN EN ISO 10211 are available for verifying the absence or minimization of thermal bridges.

Standards, Approvals, and Building Code Requirements

The installation of a window lintel in Germany is regulated by a network of standards, general building authority approvals (abZ), and state building codes. The structural design is based on the Eurocodes, in particular Eurocode 2 for concrete components and Eurocode 6 for masonry, which are supplemented in Germany by national annexes. Precast reinforced concrete lintels must be manufactured and installed either in accordance with a harmonized European product standard (such as EN 845-2 for masonry lintels) or in accordance with a general building authority approval issued by the German Institute for Building Technology (DIBt).

Manufacturers’ approvals contain detailed installation instructions that must be strictly adhered to. Among other things, they specify the permissible spans, the required support lengths, the minimum masonry strengths at the supports, the permissible load classes, and the installation direction. Installation that deviates from these specifications invalidates the approval and renders the installation non-compliant with building codes. For the designer, this means that when selecting a lintel product, they must always check the manufacturer’s current approval and incorporate the installation instructions into the construction drawings.

For the retrofit installation of a window lintel in an existing building—which involves a change to the building’s structure—a building permit is generally required. The state building codes of the federal states specify which modifications require a permit; in many cases, the dual-review principle applies, under which a qualified design engineer must assume structural responsibility. Anyone who installs a lintel without this safeguard bears full liability for any resulting damage.

Common Installation Mistakes and How to Identify Them

One of the most common mistakes when installing a window lintel is an insufficient support length. If the lintel rests on the masonry for too short a distance, the support forces are concentrated over too small an area, which can exceed the masonry’s allowable compressive stress and lead to cracks or spalling in the support area. Such damage often does not become apparent until weeks or months later as diagonal cracks in the masonry radiating from the corners of the opening. These characteristic crack patterns are a reliable indication of lintel or support problems and should always be assessed by a professional.

Another common mistake is installation without a full-surface mortar bed. If the lintel rests only at specific points because the support surface was not carefully prepared, bending stresses develop in the lintel that were not accounted for in the design. Particularly with precast lintel products, which are designed for uniform support, localized load transfer can lead to cracks in the lintel itself. Quality assurance on the construction site must therefore include support preparation as a separate inspection point.

Incorrect installation orientation is an error that occurs with precast lintels featuring asymmetrical reinforcement. If such a lintel is installed upside down, the reinforcement is located in the compression zone instead of the tension zone, and the lintel cannot absorb the bending stress. Precast lintels are therefore usually marked to indicate the installation direction. This marking must be checked before installation, which unfortunately does not always happen amid the hustle and bustle of construction site operations.

Finally, the thermal decoupling of the lintel from the exterior wall is often neglected. Particularly in renovation projects where an external thermal insulation composite system is retrofitted, the lintel area sometimes remains uninsulated or is covered with an insulation layer that is too thin. The result is thermal bridges, which become apparent in winter through condensation and mold growth beneath the lintel on the interior wall. Careful detailed planning of the lintel area is therefore essential, even in renovation projects.

The Window Lintel as a Key Structural Element in the Overall Structure

The installation of a window lintel is far more than a routine craftsmanship task. It is a structural intervention in a building’s load-bearing framework that requires planning, sizing, knowledge of materials, and careful execution. Anyone who understands the relationships between opening width, load transfer, bearing pressure, and thermal bridging will recognize why this seemingly inconspicuous component is so often a source of damage in practice when it is not treated with the necessary care.

Choosing the right type of lintel is not purely a structural decision. Energy efficiency requirements, the appearance of the facade, the wall system used, and the component’s sound insulation and fire resistance performance all play a role. Today, system manufacturers offer coordinated products that combine load-bearing capacity, thermal insulation, and ease of installation in a single component. These system solutions are the most economically and technically sound choice for new construction, provided they are installed consistently and in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.

In existing buildings, where interventions in the structural framework are always associated with uncertainties, an expert assessment by a structural engineer is not merely an optional safeguard but a technical and legal necessity. Buildings that have evolved over decades or centuries bear loads in ways that are not always apparent at first glance. A lintel installed in such a building without a full understanding of the existing structural system can cause damage that extends far beyond the immediate installation area. In these cases, investing in sound planning is the most cost-effective decision a building owner can make.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Federal Urban Green Prize 2022

Building design
Federal Urban Green Prize 2022

Federal Urban Green Prize 2022

Federal Urban Green Prize 2022: The BMWSB is awarding the Federal Urban Green Prize for the second time. Focus 2022: the importance of urban greenery for climate adaptation.

The Federal Urban Green Prize will be awarded for the second time this year. The Federal Ministry of Housing, Urban Development and Building is focusing on climate adaptation in 2022. The application period runs until the beginning of April.

The new Federal Ministry of Housing, Urban Development and Building is continuing a recent tradition. Like its predecessors, it is awarding a Federal Urban Green Prize. For the second time, exemplary practical examples and projects are being sought and honored. This year, the focus is on climate adaptation. The application period for the Federal Urban Green Award 2022 runs until the beginning of April.

The award for exemplary practical examples is intended to encourage and inspire. It is intended to honor commitment to urban greenery and reward projects that invite imitation. It is not only the awarding of the Federal Urban Green Award that is of value, but of course also the media attention for projects and their actors. Because only when good examples from practice are shown and discussed do they encourage imitation. With this in mind, the Federal Ministry of Housing, Urban Development and Building is once again awarding the Federal Urban Green Prize this year.

With this prize, the Ministry wants to recognize in particular projects that help to positively influence the urban climate. The ministry is therefore looking for examples of how the negative effects of extreme weather conditions can be mitigated. This includes heavy rainfall events as well as extreme heat development in cities. In order to mitigate these consequences of the changing climate locally and also to protect the climate, greenery in the city is of great importance. There are many ways in which urban greenery can make an important contribution to ensuring that our cities remain liveable.

The new Federal Minister

As the new head of the Federal Ministry of Housing, Urban Development and Building, Klara Geywitz is responsible for the Federal Urban Green Award 2022 for the first time. She sees climate change as a stress test for our cities and is campaigning for more trees, soil and biodiversity. Karla Geywitz also points out how important trees are for a better urban climate. However, she also sees the need to unseal surfaces. After all, only open ground can absorb heavy rainfall and reduce flooding. But the quality of our surfaces in cities also plays a role in promoting biodiversity and preventing residential areas from heating up. In this broad field of challenges, projects of the Federal Urban Green Award 2022 are intended to set an example. The new minister is therefore looking for pioneering work that is already shaping the necessary transformation of cities today.

The Federal Urban Green Award is a project that is closely linked to the White Paper on Urban Green. The White Paper, published in 2017, still guides the activities and efforts of the federal government to improve green infrastructure in cities. The relevant federal ministries receive support from institutions such as the German Association of Cities, the German Association of Towns and Municipalities and the German Association of Districts.

Depending on the funds available in the 2022 federal budget, a total of up to 100,000 euros will be available as prize money for the Federal Urban Green Prize this year. The winners will be selected by an independent jury. It will decide on the awards and recognitions in early summer 2022. In 2022, the jury for the Federal Urban Green Award will once again be made up of experts from the fields of garden and landscape architecture, climate adaptation, urban development and urban planning. Representatives of the leading municipal associations and the Federal Ministry of Building will also be involved. The prizes will be awarded in Berlin in September 2022.

Practice and research

The Federal Urban Greenery Award 2022 is not only looking for completely new, creative solutions for dealing with urban greenery. Tried and tested concepts that show how urban greenery can be adapted to the climate and remain vital under current conditions are also important. As the Federal Ministry is not only interested in practical work in municipalities, cooperation with research institutions is also being sought. After all, we are not yet at the stage where our knowledge is sufficient. Cooperation with research on the subject of urban green is of great importance. Against this background, research work will also be honored as part of the Federal Urban Green Prize 2022.

Who can apply?

This year’s Bundespreis Stadtgrün is once again aimed at cities and municipalities of all sizes. However, they must have at least 3,000 inhabitants and be located in Germany. Realized projects from city and municipal cooperations are also welcome. These products of inter-municipal cooperation can also receive an award at the Federal Urban Green Award. Planning offices, citizens, universities, research institutions, initiatives or associations can also apply for the award. However, they must cooperate with their respective municipality. Although the Federal Prize for Urban Greenery 2022 is awarded by the Federal Ministry of Housing, Urban Development and Building, applications must be submitted to the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development. This institute will once again implement the Federal Award this year and provide technical support.

Application deadline

Participation in the competition is via the online form. All information about the competition is also available there. There is also the opportunity to ask questions. The application deadline for the Bundespreis Stadtgrün 2022 is April 4, 2022.

The INTERESS-I research project is testing urban blue-green infrastructures in the vicinity of the major construction site Stuttgart 21 and is exemplary for pioneering projects in the field of urban greenery. Read more about the project here.

Planning news in January 2023

Building design
A group of cyclists entering a left-hand bend, shot in black and white. Photo: Jonny Kennaugh via Unsplash

Photo: Jonny Kennaugh via Unsplash

Does the news sometimes tell you about it? Us too. That’s why you’ll find the latest news, discussions and projects well organized here for you to read. January 2023 in retrospect.

In the January issue of G+L, we asked: How does the next generation of landscape architects want to work in the future? Editor-in-chief Theresa Ramisch presents the issue in the editorial.

The competition for the Rosentalturm Basel on the exhibition grounds has been decided. The “Rooseli” design by Herzog & de Meuron won over the jury. A public open space, a free-standing pavilion and a grove of trees are intended to bring the Rosental site back into the focus of the area. Find out what else is planned here.

The competition for the site of the 2027 State Garden Show in Neustadt an der Weinstraße has been decided. The design by planning office Atelier Loidl from Büro won over the jury. Find out more about the competition and the winning project for the Neustadt State Garden Show here.

A new quarter with 950 apartments is to be built on Dreilingsweg in the north-west of Munich. The urban and landscape planning competition for the district was won by MLA+ and Lohrengel Landschaft, both from Berlin. Here you can read what the planners’ design for residential buildings, green spaces and traffic looks like on Dreilingsweg.

The winners of the competition for the ThyssenKrupp site in Hamburg have been announced. First prize went to the design by gmp and WES LandschaftsArchitektur. Find out here what facilities are planned for the site at Diebsteich station and what the winning design envisages for the open space.

The Tadao Ando Campus and Tower is being built in Düsseldorf. As the city’s future landmark, the architecture is intended to be a symbiosis of high-tech and nature. Landscape designer Enzo Enea is responsible for the latter: he is designing roof gardens and a park. You can read more about this here: Ando Campus Düsseldorf

Carlo Ratti Associati, Office for Living Architecture and the organization GAL Terre del Po developed the Tree Path project together. The elevated cycle path to the Italian town of Sabbioneta is not only located between trees, but is also supported by them. Find out more about the Tree Path here.

Central London gets its first new public space in a decade: The new pedestrian area called Strand Aldwych opened in December 2022 in Aldwych next to Somerset House near the Thames. Read more about the new public space by LDA Design here: Strand Aldwych London

Unism and Arup have designed an underground factory in Poland for food packaging company EcoPet. The EcoPet flagship factory is intended to serve as a model for large-scale developments in rural areas. Read more here.

The Mall Environmental Prize is to be awarded to final theses in the fields of rainwater management and blue-green-grey infrastructures. The Roland Mall Family Foundation intends to award the prize annually from now on. Young scientists can apply for the first award in 2023 until March 31. More about the environmental prize here.

The German Institute of Urban Affairs (Difu) honored ten municipalities as part of the “Climate-active municipalities – pool of ideas and guide” project. Here you can find out who the winners are in the “Climate Active Municipality 2022” competition.

City instead of A104 – this is the theme of the AIV Schinkel Competition 2023. Participants could register until January 16, 2023. The deadline for submitting entries is one month later. We write about what they should be about in our article on the competition.

The thematic competition Europan 17 is aimed at young experts under 40 from the fields of urban planning, landscape architecture and architecture. Applications for this year’s edition of the competition are open from March 2023. Here we report on the theme, aim and previous locations of Europan.

Last year, the BUGG green building competition once again produced a winning project. The green roof of the year 2022 can be found at the main fire station in Karlsruhe. The firefighters should be able to relax there, but also be active. You can see how the roof is designed here.

Autonomous driving, drones, buses and trains without human drivers and so much more. The new 5G mobile communications standard promises a lot and now that German cities are increasingly benefiting from 5G, but we have yet to see parcel delivery drones in the sky or care robots in use, we want to raise awareness of the as yet untapped opportunities of the fifth generation of the mobile communications network.

Mobility never comes without costs. A new study by the Technical University of Munich shows that cars in particular cause many so-called external costs in traffic. These include exhaust fumes, noise andCO2. Read more about the devastating environmental impact of car traffic and the question of whether electromobility can help here.