Jan van Eyck – Come into the picture!

Building design
Jan van Eyck, The Madonna in the Church, around 1437/40, © Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Gemäldegalerie / Christoph Schmidt

Jan van Eyck, The Madonna in the Church, around 1437/40, © Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Gemäldegalerie / Christoph Schmidt

The exhibition in the Gemäldegalerie of the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin “Zoom on van Eyck” celebrates the close-up view and new findings through art-technological investigations in the oeuvre of the Flemish artist Jan van Eyck.

The exhibition in the Gemäldegalerie of the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin “Zoom on van Eyck” celebrates the close-up view and new findings through art-technological investigations in the oeuvre of the Flemish artist Jan van Eyck. The Berlin Gemäldegalerie brings together what is otherwise shown separately: An immersive exhibition installation, all the original Berlin paintings by the Dutch painter Jan van Eyck (c. 1390/1400-1441) and his immediate circle, and a detailed documentation of the restoration. The list of three themes may sound a little dry at first, but what can be seen in the Gemäldegalerie is a great combination. Because “Zoom on van Eyck” explores the Dutchman’s work in three very different ways.

The painter, who was probably born in Maaseik around 1390, is considered the most influential Flemish artist of the late Middle Ages. He was responsible for a new beginning in European painting and his oeuvre can be regarded as one of the highlights in the history of art. Only a few paintings from his oeuvre are known, to which the Gemäldegalerie of the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin is dedicated and where it can also come up with a sensation.

It begins with the originals, workshop works and early copies. Berlin owns three original paintings: the “Portrait of Baudouin de Lannoy”, the “Madonna in the Church” and the “Portrait of a Man with a Red Chaperone”, as well as two workshop works (“Crucifixion of Christ” and a portrait of a man) and four early copies after Jan van Eyck. The Picture Gallery can therefore draw on an extremely rich collection of the artist’s work. The “Zoom” is to be understood in two senses. On the one hand, the Picture Gallery is showing its van Eyck treasures detached from the usual collection context and, on the other, visitors can get closer to the paintings than usual. This is because co-curator and restorer Sandra Stelzig had the idea of providing visitors with magnifying glasses with which they can study the paintings.

The centerpiece of the exhibition, however, is undoubtedly a digital projection that can be seen in the gallery’s foyer. The projection, which was developed by the Royal Institute for Artistic Heritage (KIK-IRPA) in Brussels, offers viewers a glimpse of brushstrokes, eye wrinkles, individual hairs, pearls, jewelry details and folds in the robe. The whole thing is four meters in size and has an extremely brilliant technical design. In the Berlin exhibition, viewers have the opportunity to zoom into the detailed shots of the paintings.

The Zoom project was based on the documentation method developed for the restoration of the Ghent Altarpiece. For the 300 detailed photos, scientists and photographers from KIK-IRPA traveled to the 20 van Eyck originals and 13 workshop works over several years to photograph them using the same equipment, lighting and photography technique. The results were shown for the first time in 2020/21 at BOZAR in Brussels – albeit without the original paintings.

Explanations from the conservation department. Since 2015, all of the paintings have been examined in terms of art technology and three have been restored in preparation for the catalog raisonné on 15th century Dutch and French painting. As part of the project for the catalog, conservators and art historians worked on an interdisciplinary basis with a photographer and wood biologist. The explanation of this work and its results, which can now be seen in the Berlin exhibition, is perhaps nothing special for restorers. But for the public, it offers another fascinating opportunity to get closer to the pictures and better understand the work of the restorers. Large panels explain the methods used to examine the paintings and present the results. The before and after images make it very clear what the removal of the varnish from the “Portrait of Baudouin de Lannoy” and the “Portrait of a Man with a Red Chaperone” has achieved aesthetically. In the course of the restoration, measures were also taken to secure the layers of the painting. At the same time, overpaintings were also removed from the works.

Painting conservator Sandra Stelzig explains how decisive art technological examinations can be for the attribution or depreciation of a painting by examining the “Crucifixion of Christ”, which is considered to be a painting from Jan van Eyck’s workshop. At least so far. Because according to the Berlin findings, this is no longer certain. Neither is the claim that the painting was originally painted on wood and later transferred to canvas. This is because the X-ray image shows “traces of typical canvas cracks and creases of a rolled canvas painting”, according to the exhibition. In addition, IR reflectography made it possible to visualize underdrawings with a metal pen and various fine brushes. This is typical of van Eyck’s working method, writes Sandra Stelzig. If both findings are taken together, there is much to suggest that the attribution of the painting “Crucifixion” must be changed as a result of the art technological investigation. This would have identified the only surviving canvas painting by Jan van Eyck.

The special exhibition, curated by Stephan Kemperdick (curator of German, Dutch and French painting before 1600) and Sandra Stelzig (conservator at the Gemäldegalerie), can be visited at the Gemäldegalerie of the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin until March 3, 2024. On its website, the museum also presents the results of research into the restoration of Jan van Eyck’s portrait “Baudouin de Lannoy” and his “Portrait of a Man with a Red Chaperone”.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB). The latest results of their […]

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB).

From March 3 to May 31, 2015, the Berlin Gemäldegalerie and the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB) are presenting the latest results of their examination of the Dutch artist Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn in the exhibition “Rembrandt’s Berlin Susanna and the Two Old Men. The creation of a masterpiece”. What exactly did you find out?

Kleinert: Rembrandt worked on the Berlin “Susanna” for more than a decade and created three different versions of the depiction during this time. This was already known and documented by the Rembrandt Research Project. Now, however, it is possible to reconstruct the three versions in detail. In addition, in collaboration with the Kupferstichkabinett, it has now been possible to reassess the time when work on the painting began. The first composition must have been created around 1635 rather than 1638. What was previously completely unknown and truly spectacular is the discovery that the work was extensively reworked again in the 18th century.

How did you track down this sensation?

Kleinert : The decisive clue came from a reproduction engraving by Richard Earlom (1743-1822) from 1769. The original is kept in the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB). The sheet documents the version of the picture that Rembrandt left to posterity in the 17th century. A comparison with the present-day work reveals how much more differentiated the painterly execution of the painting must originally have been. As a result, it was possible to correlate existing art technological results, which proved that parts of the painting had clearly been reworked at a later date.

Laurenze-Landsberg: ” Earlom’s reproduction engraving was a relief for me. I had already examined the panel painting with a stereomicroscope before I became aware of it. The separation of the paint layers and chipped areas revealed beautiful, precisely executed details that had been very roughly painted over. At the time, however, I still assumed that Rembrandt had reworked the painting and was confused by the master’s superficial, less meticulous way of working.

What investigations did you then carry out to investigate the suspicion of a later intervention by a third party?

Laurenze-Landsberg: In addition to the neutron autoradiographs, we also analyzed the X-ray, infrared and grazing light images and examined the image stereoscopically. The image carrier is a sugar box wood which, contrary to previous assumptions, is not made of mahogany but amaranth. The sugar trade flourished in Amsterdam in the 17th century.

You assume that the later overpaintings are by the English painter Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792). What supports this theory?

Kleinert : The provenance of Rembrandt’s Berlin “Susanna” is very well documented. Two painters had the panel in their possession. Sir Joshua Reynolds was one of them. He owned the painting for a particularly long time. We also know that Reynolds was interested in old painting techniques. And that he often worked on other people’s works and altered or corrected them to suit his own taste. He was also not afraid to remove paint in order to study the working methods and techniques of other artists. By looking at the original together with English colleagues from the Reynolds Research Project, the painting technique could then be clearly attributed to Reynolds.

Laurenze-Landsberg: The neutron autoradiography supports this thesis. It shows intense blackening caused by the antimony isotope SB-124. Since no tin can be detected at the same time, the antimony-containing pigment must be Naples yellow. It came into increasing use from the middle of the 18th century. Elsewhere, the paint layer is swollen, which indicates the use of copaiva balsam. This is a resin that was used to “freshen up” paintings. It is known that Reynolds used it as a binding agent.

How do you assess the reworkings today?

Kleinert: There are examples of even more far-reaching interventions that raise the question of the extent to which one can still speak of an original masterpiece. The Berlin “Susanna and the Two Old Men” is a painting that has been altered at a later date and must be declared accordingly. But it remains a Rembrandt.

The interview was conducted by Britta Grigull.

More on Rembrandt’s drawings, the biblical Susanna theme and the corresponding Berlin exhibition in RESTAURO 2/2015.

Architects in snow fever

Building design

At the beginning of February 2015, the tenth open German Architects’ Championships in the disciplines of skiing and snowboarding took place in Mellau and Damüls, Austria. Around 120 participants took up the challenge. around 120 participants took up the sporting challenge.

At the beginning of February 2015, the tenth open German Architects’ Championships in the disciplines of skiing and snowboarding took place in Mellau and Damüls, Austria. Around 120 participants took up the challenge. around 120 participants took up the sporting challenge. At the warm-up in Peter Zumthor’s “Werkraum” in Andelsbuch on Thursday evening, the early arrivals were able to get a first impression. In the exhibition “No Name Design” by Franco Clivio, the focus was on the inconspicuous things that accompany us in everyday life and yet rarely attract attention.

The following evening, the GAM open 2015 was officially opened by patron Lutz Heese (President of the Bavarian Chamber of Architects) in the Elsenalpstube in Damüls. After the subsequent ‘Kässspätzle’ meal, which was a culinary highlight, originally served in a wooden bowl, the 4 kilometer long and illuminated toboggan run into the valley could be tested. In bright sunshine and perfect conditions with 1.90 meters of snow, the starting signal for the 10th GAM open in the parallel slalom discipline for skiers and snowboarders was given on Saturday morning.

Jannis Merz (men’s skiing) with 22.420s, Armin Tittel (men’s snowboarding) with 27.360s, Birgit Keppler (women’s skiing) with 26.430s and Ulrike Schneider (women’s snowboarding) with 34.780s won the championships with best times. The office championship went to the team from the Reutlingen Chamber of Architects (Nightmare 2). The award ceremony took place in the evening, followed by a party at the four-star Design Hotel Sonne in Mellau.