Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

Building design

Ludwig Mies van der Rohe. Photo: Hugo Erfurt MKG Collection via wikicommons

Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, born in Aachen in 1886, is recognized as one of the most important architects of the 20th century. His work and philosophy have significantly shaped the image of modern architecture. Mies’ influence on the history of architecture is enormous, and his designs are characterized not only by aesthetic clarity, but also by the rigorous application of architecture as an art form and technique.

Mies grew up in a family of stonemasons, which gave him a strong practical grounding in the material techniques of architecture from an early age. Even at a young age, he showed an inclination towards architecture and attended the School of Arts and Crafts in Aachen from 1905 to 1907, where he studied the basics of design and construction. From 1908, Mies worked for the important architect Peter Behrens, who not only taught him technical skills, but also an understanding of the architectural ideals of modernism. This formative period shaped Mies both in his understanding of architecture and in his approach to the materiality of buildings.

In 1926, Mies van der Rohe took up what was probably his most important professional challenge as director of the Bauhaus in Dessau. Under his leadership, the Bauhaus changed from a more art-oriented school to an institution that relied heavily on functional, industrial and formal principles. Mies took over responsibility for the practical implementation of “Neues Bauen” from the founders Walter Gropius and Hannes Meyer. He implemented the principle of “free floor plan design” and the open spatial structure by designing architecture that focused on symmetry, strict geometry and a reduced choice of materials. The Barcelona Pavilion of 1929, which was built for the World Exhibition in Barcelona, is considered one of his and Lilly Reich’s outstanding early designs and a manifesto of his formal language. The use of noble materials such as marble, glass and steel, the clear division of the rooms and the play of light and reflections illustrate his vision of an architecture that is both functional and aesthetic.

Mies van der Rohe was known for his careful and precise choice of materials. His works were particularly characterized by the use of steel and glass. For him, these materials were not only functional, but also an expression of a new architectural aesthetic. The use of glass as a “transparent shell” enabled him to dissolve the boundaries between interior and exterior spaces and create a continuous perception of space. The steel frame construction enabled him to create clear, open floor plans and reduce the “loads” on the structure of the building, so that walls had to take on fewer load-bearing tasks and could therefore be designed to be more flexible and open.

Mies van der Rohe is considered one of the main representatives of the International Style, an architectural approach that was characterized by its rejection of regional traditions and ornamentation. This style strove for universal principles that could be applied worldwide. Reduction to the essentials was a central idea for Mies. In his designs, the boundaries between interior and exterior space became blurred and he developed an architecture that contained both functional and aesthetically reduced formal language.

His motto “Less is more” summed up his approach to architecture: The strict reduction to geometric forms and the elimination of the superfluous resulted in an architecture that radiated clarity and precision. Mies consistently implemented these principles in his buildings, resulting in masterpieces such as the Seagram Building in New York (1954-1958). It is a prime example of the way in which Mies transferred the principles of steel and glass to the urban context, developing a new understanding of architecture as sculpture and technology.

For Mies, space was not just a physical entity, but a medium that influences the perception and experience of a building. The layout of space was never rigid or formulaic, but sought to be flexible enough to meet the needs of the users. Mies’ approach involved a clear separation of the structural and non-structural elements of a building. While load-bearing elements such as steel girders or concrete pillars were visible, non-load-bearing walls and partition walls were designed to be restrained and flexible. This enabled an undisturbed perception of the space, in which the room was perceived as a whole and not as a series of individual rooms.

One of his most important works is the Farnsworth House (1945-1951) in Plano, Illinois. This building is a radical example of Mies’ ideas of transparency, lightness and a symbiosis between architecture and nature. The house consists almost entirely of glass walls and a slender steel frame, thus eliminating the boundaries between interior and exterior space. It stands on stilts, making it appear almost weightless and allowing a view of the surrounding nature. The use of few materials and the reduction to the essentials make it a pioneering example of Mies’ understanding of architecture and his vision of modern, functional and at the same time aesthetically sophisticated architecture.

In addition to his work as an architect, Mies van der Rohe also played an important role as a teacher. From 1938, he taught at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, where he trained a new generation of architects. In his teaching activities, he not only imparted technical knowledge, but also his philosophy of architecture. Mies emphasized the importance of clarity and precision, but also of honesty in construction and the choice of materials. Many of his students, including important architects such as Norman Foster, Richard Meier and Frank Gehry, were guided by his principles and developed them further.

Mies van der Rohe died in Chicago in 1969, but his legacy lives on. The principles he pursued in his architecture – clarity, material fidelity, functionality and reduction to the essentials – are still a central component of modern architecture. His works continue to be reference objects for architects worldwide and demonstrate an architecture that is not only technological and functional, but also profoundly aesthetic and timeless. Mies’ ability to merge space and material into a harmonious unity and his philosophy of “less is more” aesthetics make him one of the most important figures in the history of architecture.

More portraits can be explored here.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

MCBW Talk: No blah blah blah! About creative urban development

Building design
The discussion took place in the "Komitee", a pub in Munich's Maxvorstadt district. Photo: Baumeister / Jessica Mankel

Photo: Baumeister / Jessica Mankel

On May 20, our colleagues from Baumeister joined forces with the young architects’ network NXT A to host a talk on creative urban development. The discussion partners Tina Zoch from Münchner Gesellschaft für Stadterneuerung mbH (MGS) and Alexander Deubl and Konstantin Landuris, both freelance artists and co-founders of the Studio+ collective, discussed vacancies, interim use, high rents and complicated funding pots.

On May 20, our colleagues from Baumeister joined forces with the young architects’ network NXT A to host a talk on creative urban development. The discussion partners Tina Zoch from Münchner Gesellschaft für Stadterneuerung mbH (MGS) and Alexander Deubl and Konstantin Landuris, both freelance artists and co-founders of the Studio+ collective, discussed vacancies, interim use, high rents and complicated funding pots.

Deepening the talk topic at “Beer & Architecture”

The Munich Creative Business Week (MCBW) took place in Munich from May 14 to 22 under the motto “Moving Horizons”. MCBW is aimed at designers and design enthusiasts and is also a platform for the Bavarian creative industry. Numerous exhibitions, lectures, talks and discussions were held over nine days in Munich’s Maxvorstadt district.

As partners of MCBW, Baumeister and the young architects’ network NXT A invited visitors to the talk “Kein Blabla! On creative urban development” on Friday afternoon, May 20. Afterwards, “Beer & Architecture” provided an opportunity to discuss the talk topic in greater depth or simply to make new contacts. The backdrop for the event was the “Komitee”, a relaxed pub in Maxvorstadt that can get loud late at night.

Counteracting the trading-down effect with creative urban development

Our colleague Magdalena Schmidkunz spent a good hour talking to Tina Zoch, Alexander Deubl and Konstantin Landuris about creative and cultural urban development in Munich. Tina Zoch is a project manager at Münchner Gesellschaft für Stadterneuerung mbH (MGS), a municipal company of the City of Munich that is active in the field of urban district development. One of the projects that Tina Zoch is in charge of is in the east of Munich, in Berg am Laim – a district where many stores are closing, leaving behind vacancies, betting shops and nail studios. To counteract the trading-down effect in Berg am Laim, Tina Zoch and her team launched the BAAAL project.

“Unfinished” districts offer more space for creative urban development

BAAAL aims to broker vacancies to tradespeople, creative professionals and other committed individuals for interim and multiple uses. The aim is to upgrade the district center and increase the density of use in the district. BAAAL was launched in February of this year. The first conclusions? It remains exciting. According to Tina Zoch, there are thick boards that need to be drilled. The work mainly consists of getting the local people on board and building trust. They are often skeptical about creative interim and multiple uses. Writing concepts or finding creative people who are interested in using spaces, on the other hand, is less of a problem – even if most artists initially prefer inner-city areas to the Berg am Laim district. In this case, Tina Zoch tries to mediate: “In a district that is not yet ‘finished’, you can perhaps live out your creativity better and create much, much more,” says Tina Zoch.

Super+ rents almost 200 studios in Munich

There are some parallels between Tina Zoch’s work and that of Alexander Deubl and Konstantin Landuris: Alexander Deubl and Konstantin Landuris also manage interim use projects in Munich. Together with Christian Muscheid, they founded the Super+ collective in 2012. Their first project was an empty petrol station from the 1960s, which Super+ used for a year with vernissages, fashion shows and installations. Shortly afterwards, the collective rented seven studios for interim use in Frauenhoferstrasse. After a year, however, the artists had to leave the premises. Since then, the temporary use projects have gradually expanded. Today, Super+ rents and manages almost 200 studios in the state capital. This makes Super+ one of the largest studio operators in Munich. The buildings are located at Schwabinger Tor(@TROPICA and @schwabingertor), in the Gesundheitshaus on Dachauerstraße(@KUNSTLABOR 2) and in Moosach(@MichaelUnholzer).

With its many projects, Super+ has made a name for itself in Munich and earned the trust of private owners. “Some people now know us and ask us whether we would like to plan an interim use in building X,” says Konstantin Landuris, a founder of Super+ and freelance interior designer. However, this is not the rule. Super+ acquired most of its properties in the “conventional” way. For example, the three found the old traditional costume factory in Moosach, the Atelierhaus @MichaelUnholzer, via the ImmoScout platform.

“Buildings are better left empty before they are rented out”

Konstantin Landuris and Alexander Deubl report that it is generally not easy to convince owners to allow temporary use. Owners are usually afraid that used properties will lead to problems when they are sold; that creative professionals will damage spaces or ultimately refuse to move out of the buildings.

One solution would be for the city to rent vacant spaces itself and sublet them to creative professionals and tradespeople. After all, owners are perhaps more likely to trust the city or a municipal company such as MGS than an association of artists. But unfortunately, MGS lacks the leeway here, regrets Tina Zoch. And so buildings are left empty before they are rented out.

“In the immediate neighborhood, people aren’t so happy at first”

An absurd reality: in a city like Munich, where around a thousand people move to every year and another thousand live on the streets, buildings stand empty. Tina Zoch answers the question of whether MGS, as a municipal company, has access to more data in order to identify vacancies and, if necessary, place them with artists, in the negative. MGS can query owner names, but no contact details are stored there. The City of Munich also does not know which buildings are vacant. “The city is currently trying to set up a vacancy register. However, such a register can never reflect the simultaneity in an urban area. Uses can change within a few days,” says Tina Zoch.

But even if the city knew where the vacancies were and owners were open to creative use, it takes time for the studio buildings to be accepted by local people. “In the immediate neighborhood, people aren’t so happy at first because they feel disturbed by evening work and parties, for example,” says Alexander Deubl. At the Trachtenfabrik in Moosach, however, many Moosach residents now also use the studios and the baker across the street knows the artists as regular guests. According to Konstantin Landuris, however, there is less networking between the studios and the districts. This is also due to the fact that the studio houses do not always have a café or organize many events.

How can players in creative urban development become more diverse?

Tina Zoch also reports that people often “drag their bubble behind them” and that it is often difficult to get local people excited about truly new approaches. “I really have the feeling that it only works through personal contact. You have to get to know people really well to get them involved in projects. It’s very time-consuming,” says Tina Zoch. And yet the work is important. Because spaces or funding for creative uses are often “always given to the same people”. This raises the question: how can players in (creative) urban development become more diverse?

“It’s especially fun when you see the gems that emerge”

The City of Munich is currently launching a pilot project called “Munich Creative Heart Beat” under the leadership of the Cultural and Creative Industries Competence Team. The project is limited to the area within the Altstadtring and is intended to test new allocation and funding procedures for interim uses and thus also address completely new players. Artists should also find it easier to obtain conversion funding or individual project costs. This is because strict funding requirements currently prevent some creative professionals from receiving support. For example, Alexander Deubl and Konstantin Landuris report that the city of Munich’s studio funding does not apply if the price per square meter is too high or the duration of the rental contract – temporary use projects are often limited to one year – is too short. What would help would be a funding pot that offers quick support to artists – more along the lines of a watering can principle.

Organizing funding, signing rental contracts, discussing with owners and neighbors … At first glance, the work of Tina Zoch, Alexander Deubl and Konstantin Landuris doesn’t sound like creative development. A large part of their work consists of organizing and managing. Is creative urban development creative at all? “Every district needs its own strategy and individual solutions. Districts can’t be developed on the drawing board. But that’s exactly what makes the work exciting and creative,” says Tina Zoch. Alexander Deubl also finds the work very creative. It’s especially fun when you see the “gems” that are created.

Also relevant to urban development: the mobility of the future. We are devoting three entire issues to this topic this year. Find out what the third and final issue is all about in the editorial. The issues in the series on urban mobility are available in our store.

The image of architecture

Building design

Valerio Olgiati asked over 40 renowned colleagues about the references that serve as the basis for their work – images that come to mind when they think of architecture.

Working with references has always been of great importance to designing architects, because words alone are often not precise enough to express what architecture is all about. Only the interplay of words and images conveys an impression of what lies behind an idea, behind an inspiration.

Valerio Olgiati started from this observation when he asked over 40 renowned colleagues for the 2012 Biennale about the images that serve as the basis for their work – images that come to mind when they think of architecture. This collection resulted in the first – now out of print – edition of “The Images of Architects”, which was published by Quart Verlag in 2013 and has now been rejuvenated by the still young Swiss publisher “The Name Books”.

In times when images are uploaded to Instagram every minute and disappear again after a few seconds on Snapchat, it seems downright antiquated for someone to publish a book that is supposed to be nothing less than a Musées Imaginaires and shows 350 images on 432 pages – because the vastness of the Internet allows you to create your own galleries at lightning speed, in which the medium of the image becomes a mass medium that can be reproduced at will.

In this respect, the idea of an imaginary museum is tempting, as the organizing hand of the editor creates a precise collection that also conveys something very personal. And it is not so often that architects reveal their own sources of inspiration. In any case, the published collection gives the reader an insight into the conscious and unconscious emotional world of each architect.

Each architect is allowed to show up to ten images, which the author interprets as explanations, metaphors, foundations, memories and intentions. The conception of the book thus takes place on two levels: On the first level, Olgiati selects those colleagues whose works, in his opinion, make a significant contribution to contemporary architectural history. On a second level, he leaves the stage to these colleagues by taking a back seat as editor and author. Only in a short foreword does he address the reader directly and explain the intentions behind the book. What follows is a very unobtrusive layout, a kind of triad of headline, picture and caption, introduced by a short biography of the architect in question.

In addition to illustrations such as Peter Märkli’s proportion studies of ancient Egyptian relief sculptures or Greek temples, there are also parallels in some references: such as Valerio Olgiati’s choice for Borthwick Castle in Scotland and Aires Mateus’ choice for Clara Castle in Ireland.

The interlocking of the image spectra opens up completely new narratives in relation to the production of architecture. As there are no further explanations of the images, it is up to the reader to engage in contemplative image analysis and to search for iconographic traces of realized buildings by the respective architects.

The Images of Architects
Edited by Valerio Olgiati
The Name Books, Chur 2015
432 pages, 350 photos

www.thenamebooks.com