Luma Arles: Atelier of the South

Building design

Parc des Ateliers

The spectacular new building of the Luma Foundation in Arles is a work of art for art.

The spectacular new building of the Luma Arles Foundation is a work of art for art: Frank Gehry’s tower is both a museum and a studio building. It is the highlight of an art and cultural area that Luma founder Maja Hoffmann has realized over the course of 15 years.

Arles and art – the first thing that comes to mind is, of course, van Gogh, who sought to realize his dream of a studio in the south in an artistic partnership with Gauguin. However, his stay in Arles turned into a debacle for van Gogh. Not only did his collaboration with Gauguin end in a rift – in Arles he also began to suffer increasingly from delusions, until he finally had to go to the mental hospital in nearby Saint-Rémy.

It almost seems as if Maja Hoffmann had set out to heal van Gogh’s fate in Arles in retrospect. Hoffmann, who comes from the Basel industrialist dynasty of the same name, is one of the world’s most important art collectors and patrons. She has been a cultural initiator and patron of the arts in Arles for almost 20 years. In 2004, she founded the Luma Foundation there, which promotes and commissions contemporary art.

Three years later, Maja Hoffmann began a working process together with the architect Frank Gehry, the curator Hans-Ulrich Obrist and a number of important contemporary artists. Together, they developed ideas for a new type of art and cultural center for the 21st century. Hoffmann chose the “Parc des Ateliers” as the location for this project. This is the site of the SNCF railroad depot on the edge of the historic old town of Arles, which has been abandoned since the 1980s. The historic workshop buildings have been renovated in recent years by architect Annabelle Selldorf. The building now houses exhibition spaces, artists’ studios and apartments as well as a restaurant.

The redesign of the “Parc des Ateliers” has now been crowned with the opening of the “Tower”, a 56-metre-high exhibition and studio building designed by Frank Gehry. The initial preparatory work for the project began back in 2009 and construction work began in 2013. The result is unmistakably the work of Gehry – who, however, combines the free forms so characteristic of his work with enormous geometric volumes. The architect designed a three-storey high plinth zone as a huge glass cylinder. A reference to the Roman amphitheater in Arles.

The actual tower rises from the cylinder. Its side facing the city center presents itself as a shiny and wildly moving metal skin with rectangular window cores. On the side facing away from the city, on the other hand, the tower appears to be composed of two cubic bodies that stand next to each other at a slight angle. Inside the glass cylinder, the volumes of the various galleries appear to be freely distributed throughout the space. This form of organization is similar to that found in Gehry’s Fondation Louis Vuitton in Paris. There are also several studio spaces for artists here. The tower, on the other hand, mainly houses the foundation’s administrative offices. A public viewing terrace forms the upper end.

Numerous works of art, including those by Philippe Parreno and Olafur Eliasson, are an important part of the tower. They were created especially for this location. Incidentally, Atelier Luma is also part of the Luma Foundation’s work. This workshop has developed various sustainable building and furnishing elements made from local materials for the project: the building features textile wall coverings made from bioplastics, tiles dyed with algae and acoustic elements made from sunflowers.

You can see another museum adorned with successful architectural details here.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Riding the Hills – “Into the Wild” design studio

Building design
Perspective, graphic: Sabine Seemann

Perspective, graphic: Sabine Seemann

Mountain bikers already ride through the hills of Berlin’s Volkspark Prenzlauer Berg. With her design, Sabine Seemann wants to further strengthen this use of the park. Not only the riders themselves, but also other park visitors should be able to immerse themselves in the sport. Sabine Seemann describes how these two groups come into contact with each other in her project presentation below. The work was created as part of the “Into the Wild” design studio at the TU Berlin.
Mountain bikers already ride through the hills of Berlin’s Volkspark Prenzlauer Berg. With her design, Sabine Seemann wants to further strengthen this use of the park. Not only the riders themselves, but also other park visitors should be able to immerse themselves in the sport. Sabine Seemann describes how these two groups come into contact with each other in her project presentation below. The work was created as part of the “Into the Wild” design studio at the TU Berlin.

It’s not just in our September 2023 issue that we make space for student projects. Students also present their own work on our website – for example in this article. You can find all the projects on our “Studies” topic page and the September issue is available in our store.

Volkspark Prenzlauer Berg is becoming the new mountain bike hotspot in Berlin. The Volkspark, which was filled with rubble from the Second World War, is characterized in particular by its topography. This special topography is already used and appreciated by mountain bikers.

The design aims to promote the existing use of mountain biking and bring it into harmony with park visitors. Elements will be developed to make mountain biking visible, tangible and safe for walkers. This will create interesting intersections where the different flows of mountain bikers and visitors can meet at different height levels.

In addition to the crossing points, so-called contact points are also created between the two user groups. At these contact points, there is always the opportunity to meet at eye level within the park. For example, the wall rides at different heights provide dynamic moments between the two user groups.

Individual mountain bike elements such as doubles, step ups and step downs are also designed to provide riders with a challenge and enjoy the sport on the trails. These are based on the usual elements found on established mountain bike trails. Individual mountain bike elements will also be implemented on the trails for park visitors.

Wallwalks, sticks and stones as well as ups and downs bring the most common challenges to visitors without a bike. For example, there are always individual stations on the walking paths that can be negotiated on foot without cutting through the barrier-free access. In the southern section of the park around the Hohe Plateau, mountain biking is set to become a highlight.

Riders can start their training with the so-called Towerride and the Northshore route (elevated mountain bike route) on the existing open land biotope. The tower ride on the high plateau is a circular tower that initially leads up a 20 percent incline to an intermediate level, the viewing platform. Here, mountain bikers can ride upwards on a one-meter-wide path.

In addition, a one-metre-wide asphalt path also leads up to the platform, which can be used by park visitors. Here, pedestrians can experience how challenging mountain biking can be on the steep ramp. From the viewing platform, visitors to the park get a great view of the continuing mountain bike route across the open land biotope.

The design was created as part of the “Into the Wild” design studio at the TU Berlin. You can read more about the background to the studio and Volkspark Prenzlauer Berg here, and discover more designs by students here.

Rotterdam catches up

Building design

View of the Wilhelminapier (Render: MVRDV)

Europe’s culture vultures know Rotterdam as the architectural capital of the Netherlands. Among the Dutch themselves, however, the city tends to be frowned upon as an “ugly working-class city”. Amsterdam, on the other hand, is considered chic and its beautiful old town attracts masses of tourists from all over the world. Our Baumeister Academy winner tells us why Rotterdam is more charming than you might think. I have three […]

Europe’s culture vultures know Rotterdam as the architectural capital of the Netherlands. Among the Dutch themselves, however, the city tends to be frowned upon as an “ugly working-class city”. Amsterdam, on the other hand, is considered chic and its beautiful old town attracts masses of tourists from all over the world. Our Baumeister Academy winner tells us why Rotterdam is more charming than you might think.

I lived in Amsterdam myself for three months and really enjoyed the scenery and the “Dutch lifestyle”. However, tourists overcrowd the city center so much that even cycling becomes a pain in the neck. Rotterdam, whose old town was heavily bombed during the Second World War, is much more relaxed with its wide streets. Rotterdam is almost a relief after all the cute typical Dutch brick houses and canals. It is the only city in the Netherlands that is really different. The city is authentic, with all the nooks and crannies that make it special. There is constant change, with lots of potential for development, especially around the old port areas and in the city center. At least since the construction of the iconic Erasmus Bridge, which connects the southern part of the city with the city center proper. In the meantime, Rotterdam’s prestigious “mini-Manhattan” has emerged with the Wilhelminapier, where well-known architects such as Rem Koolhaas, Norman Foster, Alvaro Siza and Renzo Piano are represented. The last vacant building plot will soon be completed by MVRDV’s “The Sax”, a multifunctional residential building.

Amsterdam also has modern architecture to offer, albeit somewhat outside the old town. For example, the “Zuidas” office district in the south of the city or the areas around the central station north of the old town, on both sides of the large river “Ijs”. The demand for high-quality living space close to the city center is high, which is why it is currently expensive to build in Amsterdam. This can also be seen in MVRDV projects such as “The Valley”, a residential and office building planned in the Zuidas with elaborate glass and natural stone façades. The building stretches upwards like a mountain landscape.

Up-and-coming Rotterdam

In Rotterdam, on the other hand, things had to be cheap until a few years ago. Perhaps it is precisely this pressure that has led to ingenuity. MVRDV’s impressive market hall, for example, is only profitable thanks to the combination of two typologies, as they support each other. The residential complex forms the roof of the hall. But things are slowly getting more expensive in Rotterdam: since 2014 – partly due to the opening of the market hall, which has contributed to continuous visitor records – the housing market has been changing rapidly. A lot of new housing for middle and high income groups is being built around the Wilhelminapier, which is also having a positive impact on areas further south, such as the former red light district of Katendrecht. For example, the hip and expensive “Fenix Food Factory”, a local food market, was built in an old warehouse. Overall, the range of cultural and leisure activities on offer in Rotterdam has increased.
The port and working-class city is changing for the better, and at a rapid pace. Young architects, designers and artists have already conquered it.

Although I really enjoyed Amsterdam’s nightlife and the many museums, I now feel much more at home in Rotterdam – this is where I belong, among the international creatives, in a city where not everything has to be perfect.