Manage complaints

Building design
Not every complaint is based on such massive damage as on this terrace. Nevertheless, all complaints should be taken seriously. Photo: Thomas Wilder

as on this terrace. Nevertheless, all complaints should

The demands placed on stonemasons in terms of technology, planning and cross-trade expertise are increasing. Added to this are the expectations of customers. If you want to keep up, you have to train yourself and know the requirements. For 25 years, the consumer protection experts of the German Builders’ Association (BSB) have been investigating construction defects and the amount of damage caused by building projects. “Many defects are caused by construction work that is not […]

The demands placed on stonemasons in terms of technology, planning and cross-trade expertise are increasing. Added to this are the expectations of customers. If you want to keep up, you have to train and know the requirements.

For 25 years, the consumer protection experts at the German Builders’ Association (BSB) have been investigating construction defects and the amount of damage caused by construction projects. “Many defects are caused by construction work that does not comply with the recognized rules of technology or deviates from the contract,” is the current conclusion of BSB Managing Director Florian Becker. A classic: moisture damage. But planning errors, mistakes in coordination or in construction supervision also cause damage, some of which entail considerable costs.

According to the BSB, half of all private builders have to contend with construction defects. In addition, there are contract deviations (for a third), late completion (for almost a quarter) and problems with acceptance. In view of these figures, you would almost think that the customers for whom everything is running smoothly are happy.

From the customer’s point of view, every complaint – even if it is only a minor one – is a disappointment. Service specialist Ralph Lange emphasizes this. Accordingly, companies should handle complaints sensitively. After all, whether rightly or wrongly, the customer’s expectations have not been met. Ralph Lange: “There can be very different emotional reasons behind a complaint: Annoyance, anger, concern about having been cheated or simply a lack of understanding.”

However, not every complaint has to turn into an elephant, just as not every customer inquiry is highly emotional. “This is often confused,” warns Lange, urging caution and advising to first check the degree of agitation and the possibility of an uncomplicated clarification. A purely objective reaction is not advisable in the first instance when people are very upset. It is better to first show understanding and recognize the customer’s situation.

Stonemason as guinea pig

The customers with whom Thomas Wilder, a publicly appointed and sworn expert for the stonemasonry and stone carving trade, deals, have long since passed this phase. But first of all, Thomas Wilder defends the companies: “It’s not getting any easier for the trade. New products are entering the market faster and faster and are being advertised intensively. Stonemasons are sometimes used as guinea pigs in the workshop and on the construction site.”

As an expert, he naturally sees things differently. “We are usually called in when the child has fallen into the well. Then the rules of technology, the standards, the data sheets, the generally accepted procedures that have been used in practice for years apply.” And the rule is: whoever writes, stays. “I can only recommend that colleagues take precautions. Perhaps also get customers and retailers on board,” advises Wilder.

But he also knows that in practice, you can’t protect yourself against all eventualities. Customers would have to sign “folders full of documents”. But it helps if you can explain to your customers when claims are unrealistic.

Read more in STEIN 5/2021.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB). The latest results of their […]

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB).

From March 3 to May 31, 2015, the Berlin Gemäldegalerie and the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB) are presenting the latest results of their examination of the Dutch artist Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn in the exhibition “Rembrandt’s Berlin Susanna and the Two Old Men. The creation of a masterpiece”. What exactly did you find out?

Kleinert: Rembrandt worked on the Berlin “Susanna” for more than a decade and created three different versions of the depiction during this time. This was already known and documented by the Rembrandt Research Project. Now, however, it is possible to reconstruct the three versions in detail. In addition, in collaboration with the Kupferstichkabinett, it has now been possible to reassess the time when work on the painting began. The first composition must have been created around 1635 rather than 1638. What was previously completely unknown and truly spectacular is the discovery that the work was extensively reworked again in the 18th century.

How did you track down this sensation?

Kleinert : The decisive clue came from a reproduction engraving by Richard Earlom (1743-1822) from 1769. The original is kept in the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB). The sheet documents the version of the picture that Rembrandt left to posterity in the 17th century. A comparison with the present-day work reveals how much more differentiated the painterly execution of the painting must originally have been. As a result, it was possible to correlate existing art technological results, which proved that parts of the painting had clearly been reworked at a later date.

Laurenze-Landsberg: ” Earlom’s reproduction engraving was a relief for me. I had already examined the panel painting with a stereomicroscope before I became aware of it. The separation of the paint layers and chipped areas revealed beautiful, precisely executed details that had been very roughly painted over. At the time, however, I still assumed that Rembrandt had reworked the painting and was confused by the master’s superficial, less meticulous way of working.

What investigations did you then carry out to investigate the suspicion of a later intervention by a third party?

Laurenze-Landsberg: In addition to the neutron autoradiographs, we also analyzed the X-ray, infrared and grazing light images and examined the image stereoscopically. The image carrier is a sugar box wood which, contrary to previous assumptions, is not made of mahogany but amaranth. The sugar trade flourished in Amsterdam in the 17th century.

You assume that the later overpaintings are by the English painter Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792). What supports this theory?

Kleinert : The provenance of Rembrandt’s Berlin “Susanna” is very well documented. Two painters had the panel in their possession. Sir Joshua Reynolds was one of them. He owned the painting for a particularly long time. We also know that Reynolds was interested in old painting techniques. And that he often worked on other people’s works and altered or corrected them to suit his own taste. He was also not afraid to remove paint in order to study the working methods and techniques of other artists. By looking at the original together with English colleagues from the Reynolds Research Project, the painting technique could then be clearly attributed to Reynolds.

Laurenze-Landsberg: The neutron autoradiography supports this thesis. It shows intense blackening caused by the antimony isotope SB-124. Since no tin can be detected at the same time, the antimony-containing pigment must be Naples yellow. It came into increasing use from the middle of the 18th century. Elsewhere, the paint layer is swollen, which indicates the use of copaiva balsam. This is a resin that was used to “freshen up” paintings. It is known that Reynolds used it as a binding agent.

How do you assess the reworkings today?

Kleinert: There are examples of even more far-reaching interventions that raise the question of the extent to which one can still speak of an original masterpiece. The Berlin “Susanna and the Two Old Men” is a painting that has been altered at a later date and must be declared accordingly. But it remains a Rembrandt.

The interview was conducted by Britta Grigull.

More on Rembrandt’s drawings, the biblical Susanna theme and the corresponding Berlin exhibition in RESTAURO 2/2015.

Community center restored: Kinning Park Complex, Glasgow

Building design
The Kinning Park complex is a multi-purpose space for community, creativity, education and comfort. Photo: Will Scott Photography

The Kinning Park complex is a multi-purpose space for community, creativity, education and comfort. Photo: Will Scott Photography

New Practice, an architecture studio based in Glasgow and London, has refurbished the Kinning Park community center in Glasgow. The result is a multi-purpose space designed to promote community, citizenship, creativity and wellbeing. More about the project here.

New Practice, an architecture studio based in Glasgow and London, has refurbished the Kinning Park community center in Glasgow. The result is a multi-purpose space designed to promote community, citizenship, creativity and wellbeing. More about the project here.

The Kinning Park Complex was originally built in 1910 as an extension to the then Lambhill Street School. Today, the complex is a community center. Since 2017, architecture studio New Practice has been working with the Kinning Park team on a design, which ultimately won an award from the National Lottery Community Fund Scotland. A total of £1.2 million (€1.39 million) was awarded to the project. In March 2019, additional funding was also secured from the Scottish Regeneration Capital Grant Fund.

This enabled New Practice to carry out the urgently needed refurbishment and restoration work at the community center. ArmourConstruction Consultants, David Narro Associates and Max Fordham LLP also contributed to this.

Work was due to start in March 2020. However, as the UK entered lockdown instead, the plans had to be changed. New Practice was able to carry out the work between August 2020 and March 2022. The reopening of the Kinning Park Complex took place in April 2022.

The Kinning Park Complex has a long history of education and activism. It has held the neighborhood together for over 100 years. In 1976, the school closed. Its building became the Kinning Park Neighbourhood Centre, organized by Strathclyde City Council to provide residents with an important space for meetings and learning opportunities. However, this facility closed in May 1996.

Mothers who benefited from the childcare and other supporters, including former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, organized a protest and blocked the entrance. The building was occupied around the clock for a total of 55 days. In the end, the city council decided to hand over the center to the neighborhood for a symbolic price of one pound. Resident Helen Kyle and her organization called Scotland in Europe took care of the center from then on. Artists and organizations that rented old classrooms at low cost supported the project and generated income.

Over the last 20 years, the repair and maintenance costs for the building have risen steadily. The heating, electrics and roof all had problems. The neighborhood team was unable to find the resources to make repairs to a rented building. But thanks to the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, it was possible to buy the building and then fundraise and send out applications for financial support.

Since 2018, New Practice has been working on designs to prepare the building for the future. This has included an approach that both showcases the history of the old school and offers new ways to make better and more flexible use of the existing spaces. Through an internal reorganization, it is now more possible to combine valuable community events and resources, a café and learning opportunities. Conferences, sports classes and cultural events can now also take place in the Kinning Park Complex.

New Practice’s designs have visually opened up the spiral staircase to make the building safer and the space easier to understand. There is now also more natural light. As many users of the complex have accessibility requirements, a priority was placed on making the building as accessible as possible. This includes a new elevator with a ramp to the entrance. In addition, there is now a new quiet room for praying, breastfeeding and as a sanctuary for anyone who wants peace and quiet. A maximum of three people can use this room at any one time.

This work has succeeded in maintaining or even enhancing the community feel of the Kinning Park Complex. The center continues to serve as a safe place in the neighborhood that provides comfort, education and activism for all.

Read more: The CitizenM hotel in Glasgow also aspires to be a focal point for the community.