Meinhard von Gerkan, an obituary

Building design
Meinhard von German was one of Germany's most prominent architects. Photo: Wilfried Dechau

Meinhard von German was one of Germany's most prominent architects. Photo: Wilfried Dechau

With the death of Meinhard von Gerkan, one of the most prominent German voices in architecture has fallen silent. The founder of Germany’s largest architecture firm von Gerkan, Marg and Partners passed away on November 30 at the age of 87.

With the death of Meinhard von Gerkan, one of the most prominent German voices in architecture has fallen silent. The founder of Germany’s largest architectural firm, von Gerkan, Marg and Partners, died on November 30 at the age of 87.

Meinhard von Gerkan helped shape German architecture like few others for more than half a century. There is hardly an architecture studio whose work represents the late Bonn Republic, but above all the Berlin Republic, as much as that of gmp – von Gerkan, Marg and Partners. Meinhard von Gerkan has now died at the age of 87.

Having barely finished his studies, von Gerkan and his office partner Volkwin Marg won the competition for the new Berlin-Tegel Airport. Their innovative concept, in which only a few steps had to be taken from the entrance to the passenger boarding bridge, also caused an international sensation. The closure of the airport two years ago is still regretted by many Berliners today.

With the European Patent Office in Munich, completed in 1979, von Gerkan, Marg and Partners were able to realize another major public building. While the airport and patent office still show the unbroken spirit of modernism, a series of buildings followed in the 1980s that show echoes of a new regionalism and an awakened interest in classical typologies and building forms. In the Hanse-Viertel in Hamburg’s city center, for example, the architects explored classic 19th century arcade buildings. They also responded to the surroundings with carefully structured brick façades. Temporarily threatened with demolition, civic protests and finally the protection of the complex prevented its loss.

In the 1990s, von Gerkan, Marg and Partners won several important competitions: the new Leipzig Trade Fair and the new Berlin Central Station were among the most elaborate and prestigious commissions awarded in the wake of reunification. It is true that Hartmut Mehdorn, the head of Deutsche Bahn, made significant changes to the design of Berlin’s main station shortly before completion. However, this did not prevent the building from becoming a landmark of the city. In international film and television productions, the station was once again used as a location. Stylistically, the work of Meinhard von Gerkan and Volkwin Marg in the 1990s and early 2000s showed a technicist formal language that had parallels in the “high-tech” architecture represented at the same time by Foster + Partners, for example.

Von Gerkan, Marg and Partners was one of the first international architecture firms to build in China. In the meantime, gmp has realized entire cities there and has offices in Beijing and Shanghai, among other places. The Asian market has long since become an important field of activity for the firm. gmp seized a major opportunity in the run-up to the 2006 World Cup in Germany. The office was responsible for the conversion of the Berlin Olympic Stadium and the stadiums in Frankfurt and Cologne. Today, gmp is one of the most prominent experts in stadium and sports facility construction. The office was responsible for several arenas at the World Cups in South Africa and Brazil.

In Germany, the architects at gmp have earned a reputation as sensitive renovators in recent years. Their conversion of the Kulturpalast in Dresden was awarded the DAM Prize in 2019. The Isar-Philharmonie, the temporary venue of the Munich Philharmonic Orchestra, also received praise from all sides. The office is currently restoring the Stadthalle in Magdeburg, an important building from the 1920s. Meinhard von Gerkan will no longer be able to witness the completion of the project.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB). The latest results of their […]

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB).

From March 3 to May 31, 2015, the Berlin Gemäldegalerie and the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB) are presenting the latest results of their examination of the Dutch artist Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn in the exhibition “Rembrandt’s Berlin Susanna and the Two Old Men. The creation of a masterpiece”. What exactly did you find out?

Kleinert: Rembrandt worked on the Berlin “Susanna” for more than a decade and created three different versions of the depiction during this time. This was already known and documented by the Rembrandt Research Project. Now, however, it is possible to reconstruct the three versions in detail. In addition, in collaboration with the Kupferstichkabinett, it has now been possible to reassess the time when work on the painting began. The first composition must have been created around 1635 rather than 1638. What was previously completely unknown and truly spectacular is the discovery that the work was extensively reworked again in the 18th century.

How did you track down this sensation?

Kleinert : The decisive clue came from a reproduction engraving by Richard Earlom (1743-1822) from 1769. The original is kept in the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB). The sheet documents the version of the picture that Rembrandt left to posterity in the 17th century. A comparison with the present-day work reveals how much more differentiated the painterly execution of the painting must originally have been. As a result, it was possible to correlate existing art technological results, which proved that parts of the painting had clearly been reworked at a later date.

Laurenze-Landsberg: ” Earlom’s reproduction engraving was a relief for me. I had already examined the panel painting with a stereomicroscope before I became aware of it. The separation of the paint layers and chipped areas revealed beautiful, precisely executed details that had been very roughly painted over. At the time, however, I still assumed that Rembrandt had reworked the painting and was confused by the master’s superficial, less meticulous way of working.

What investigations did you then carry out to investigate the suspicion of a later intervention by a third party?

Laurenze-Landsberg: In addition to the neutron autoradiographs, we also analyzed the X-ray, infrared and grazing light images and examined the image stereoscopically. The image carrier is a sugar box wood which, contrary to previous assumptions, is not made of mahogany but amaranth. The sugar trade flourished in Amsterdam in the 17th century.

You assume that the later overpaintings are by the English painter Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792). What supports this theory?

Kleinert : The provenance of Rembrandt’s Berlin “Susanna” is very well documented. Two painters had the panel in their possession. Sir Joshua Reynolds was one of them. He owned the painting for a particularly long time. We also know that Reynolds was interested in old painting techniques. And that he often worked on other people’s works and altered or corrected them to suit his own taste. He was also not afraid to remove paint in order to study the working methods and techniques of other artists. By looking at the original together with English colleagues from the Reynolds Research Project, the painting technique could then be clearly attributed to Reynolds.

Laurenze-Landsberg: The neutron autoradiography supports this thesis. It shows intense blackening caused by the antimony isotope SB-124. Since no tin can be detected at the same time, the antimony-containing pigment must be Naples yellow. It came into increasing use from the middle of the 18th century. Elsewhere, the paint layer is swollen, which indicates the use of copaiva balsam. This is a resin that was used to “freshen up” paintings. It is known that Reynolds used it as a binding agent.

How do you assess the reworkings today?

Kleinert: There are examples of even more far-reaching interventions that raise the question of the extent to which one can still speak of an original masterpiece. The Berlin “Susanna and the Two Old Men” is a painting that has been altered at a later date and must be declared accordingly. But it remains a Rembrandt.

The interview was conducted by Britta Grigull.

More on Rembrandt’s drawings, the biblical Susanna theme and the corresponding Berlin exhibition in RESTAURO 2/2015.

Architects in snow fever

Building design

At the beginning of February 2015, the tenth open German Architects’ Championships in the disciplines of skiing and snowboarding took place in Mellau and Damüls, Austria. Around 120 participants took up the challenge. around 120 participants took up the sporting challenge.

At the beginning of February 2015, the tenth open German Architects’ Championships in the disciplines of skiing and snowboarding took place in Mellau and Damüls, Austria. Around 120 participants took up the challenge. around 120 participants took up the sporting challenge. At the warm-up in Peter Zumthor’s “Werkraum” in Andelsbuch on Thursday evening, the early arrivals were able to get a first impression. In the exhibition “No Name Design” by Franco Clivio, the focus was on the inconspicuous things that accompany us in everyday life and yet rarely attract attention.

The following evening, the GAM open 2015 was officially opened by patron Lutz Heese (President of the Bavarian Chamber of Architects) in the Elsenalpstube in Damüls. After the subsequent ‘Kässspätzle’ meal, which was a culinary highlight, originally served in a wooden bowl, the 4 kilometer long and illuminated toboggan run into the valley could be tested. In bright sunshine and perfect conditions with 1.90 meters of snow, the starting signal for the 10th GAM open in the parallel slalom discipline for skiers and snowboarders was given on Saturday morning.

Jannis Merz (men’s skiing) with 22.420s, Armin Tittel (men’s snowboarding) with 27.360s, Birgit Keppler (women’s skiing) with 26.430s and Ulrike Schneider (women’s snowboarding) with 34.780s won the championships with best times. The office championship went to the team from the Reutlingen Chamber of Architects (Nightmare 2). The award ceremony took place in the evening, followed by a party at the four-star Design Hotel Sonne in Mellau.