Why is the G+L on women in planning so important? Because we lull ourselves too much into a sense of security.
We think female landscape architects are underrepresented. That’s why we’re giving them a platform in G+L 02/2020. We present projects by women, discuss why there are so few female office owners and whether the gender pay gap and the few women-led offices are individual or structural problems. Why is the G+L on women in planning so important? Because we lull ourselves too much into a sense of security.
Gender equality? We are almost all in favor of it. At the moment, it’s even downright hip to stand up for women’s rights and an absolute no-go not to take part in the relevant debates. Feminist issues have become part of discussions with family and friends. However, if you are confronted with questions about egalitarian gender relations in your own professional environment, things get trickier. In fact, it takes courage and overcoming to advocate for equal rights in front of your employer or colleagues.
We had a similar experience when working on this issue. We asked numerous planners for statements on the topic of “women in planning”. The response was muted, to put it mildly. One planner wrote to us in an email that the topic was too complex for a statement. If this is the case, then we in the editorial team want to open up the discussion all the more.
In this issue, we take a look at the working and living environment of female planners in 2020, as well as whether and how planners need to respond to women as a separate stakeholder group in our designs.
The profession lulls itself into a sense of security
In this interview, we get expert input from Tanja Mölders, Junior Professor of Broadcasting and Space at Leibniz Universität Hannover, and talk to her about the gender pay gap, parental leave and quotas. We let the professionals have their say, including Doris Grabner from grabner huber lipp, who describes her positive experiences in the profession, and Laura Vahl from lavaland, who argues that politicians should set more guidelines for gender-equitable freedom. Only then would these become a reality.
What have we learned from working with the magazine? In terms of salary, career and family planning, there is also an imbalance between men and women in planning – to the detriment of women. However, the profession itself is hardly aware of this. They are lulled into a sense of security. As a result, there is no reason to take a closer look at the issue. We would like to change this and ask you to take the commentary in the current G+L to heart, because: We need to discuss it more openly.
You can purchase G+L 02/2020 on the topic of women in planning here.