Olympic Stadium Berlin

Building design
The Olympic Stadium offers space for over 74,000 visitors. Photo: Martijn Mureau, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

The Olympic Stadium offers space for over 74,000 visitors. Photo: Martijn Mureau, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

The Berlin Olympic Stadium dates back to 1936 and is known for its architecture influenced by National Socialism. It was extensively renovated between 2000 and 2004. Today, the stadium is home to the Bundesliga club Hertha BSC.

The Berlin Olympic Stadium in the southwest of the city was built from 1934 to 1936 during the National Socialist era. The architect Werner March created space for 100,000 spectators, who were able to attend the 1936 Summer Olympics here. With its clear, geometric shapes, the stadium was inspired by the architecture of ancient sports facilities. Nazi architect Albert Speer probably gave advice on the design of the site.

In addition to the former “Reichssportfeld”, there was also the Maifeld, which served as a site for Nazi propaganda events. The Waldbühne was another part of the Berlin Olympic Stadium. It is designed like an ancient amphitheater and served as the venue for gymnastics competitions in 1936. Today, concerts are held here in the open air. The striking bell tower offers a good view of the city, the stadium, the Maifeld and the Waldbühne.

The Olympiastadion Berlin has already seen numerous major events. The story begins with the XI Olympic Games, which took place as scheduled from August 1 to 16, 1936. A further 20 major events, such as the first German soccer championship in 1937, Mussolini’s state reception and important sports festivals took place over the next few years. With the start of the Second World War, the “Reichssportfeld” was converted. From then on, it served as a bunker, a production site for detonators, an ammunition depot and an alternative location for radio broadcasting. Food and wine were also stored here. After the end of the war, it turned out that there were many bomb craters on the site of the Olympic Stadium. The bell tower was destroyed by fire.

After the Second World War, the stadium was slowly rebuilt. The British military administration ordered the grandstand with the former “Führerloge” to be shortened. The area where Hitler had stood was removed. This served to prevent a possible neo-Nazi place of worship. The bell tower of the Olympic Stadium was blown up in 1947 and rebuilt in 1962. From the 1960s onwards, more soccer matches were played in the stadium, such as the match between Hertha BSC and 1. FC Köln on September 26, 1969, which attracted 88,075 spectators, the highest number of spectators for a Bundesliga match to date. The stadium was given a partial roof for the 1974 FIFA World Cup.

At the turn of the millennium, renovation work began on the Olympiastadion Berlin while the stadium remained open. The lower ring was completely renovated according to designs by architects Gerkan, Marg and Partners. 13 new skyboxes in the upper ring and structural improvements were part of the refurbishment. After completion, the stadium had 74,475 seats. It was ceremoniously reopened on August 1, 2004. An important event in the more recent history of the Olympic Stadium was the staging of the 2006 World Cup final. The main user of the stadium is the German Bundesliga team Hertha BSC. The DFB Cup final has also been held in the Olympic Stadium since 1985.

The total cost of the renovation amounted to around 242 million euros, of which the federal government covered 196 million euros. After the renovation, the UEFA awarded the Berlin Olympic Stadium the status of a five-star stadium. Prizes such as the German Steel Construction Prize in 2004, the Berlin Architecture Prize in 2006 and the IAKS All-Time Award in 2015 recognized the successful renovation of the Olympic Stadium.

Today, the stadium is one of the most modern in Germany. Among other things, it is working on reducing its CO2 footprint with a photovoltaic system on the roof. There are repeated rumors that Hertha BSC wants to leave the Olympiastadion Berlin. Noise complaints and the condition of the pitch are further challenges , according to Timo Rohwedder, Managing Director of Olympiastadion GmbH. However, no major renovation projects are currently planned.

The Olympiastadion Berlin is an important example of architecture influenced by National Socialism. It is located on the axial Olympic site, which was formerly known as the Reichssportfeld. In addition to the stadium itself, the site also includes the Sportforum, the Olympic field hockey stadium, the Olympic equestrian stadium, the Olympic swimming stadium, the Waldbühne, the Maifeld, the Glockenturm and the Langemarckhalle. The central axis, typical of National Socialism, stretches from east to west.

The stadium oval is interrupted to the west by an opening above the Marathon Gate. This opens up a visual axis across the Maifeld to the bell tower. The fire bowl for the Olympic flame is located in the opening. The names of the gold medal winners of Olympic competitions are inscribed on the walls of the two pylons at the breakthrough, the marathon plateau.

The main entrance to the Olympiastadion Berlin is the East Gate, also known as the Olympic Gate. It is highlighted by two 35 meter high towers, between which the Olympic rings hang. The towers are called Preußenturm and Bayernturm. There are four more towers on the border with the Maifeld, which are symmetrical to the east-west axis. They are called the Sachsenturm, Friesenturm, Frankenturm and Schwabenturm.

The stadium itself is partly an earth stadium, so that only the upper ring, which is supported on reinforced concrete pillars, protrudes above ground level. The visible outer walls and pillars of the building are clad in cast stone. In the grandstand area on the south side, there used to be the “Führerloge”, which was accessible at ground level. The stadium is 303.48 meters long and 228.31 meters wide from pillar to pillar.

Today, the Olympiastadion Berlin primarily serves as the home ground of Hertha BSC. The soccer club is the main user of the stadium. Other sporting events and major non-sporting events, such as church congresses or concerts, are also occasionally held here. Around 300,000 tourists visit the Olympic Stadium every year. Recreational athletes have the opportunity to run through the famous stadium during running events. A history trail on the Olympic site with 45 panels guides visitors through the origins and history of the complex. There are also highlight tours where visitors can take a look inside the changing rooms, underground halls and VIP areas. Unguided tours are also possible.

On non-event days, it is easy to find a parking space on the grounds. Alternatively, the Olympiastadion Berlin can be reached by subway line US, S-Bahn line S5 or by bus. Tickets for the Olympiastadion Berlin cost 7 euros. Between November and March, the stadium is open from 10 am to 4 pm. From April to October, it is open from 9 am to 7 pm.

We present even more stadiums here.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Net zero and high building culture? But yes!

Building design

Advertorial Article Parallax Article

The Swiss planning associations’ “Baukultur climate campaign” aims to show that net zero can go hand in hand with high-quality Baukultur.

Switzerland is particularly affected by climate change. This is not the only reason why it has set itself the goal of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050. An initiative has now set itself the goal of communicating that net zero can go hand in hand with high-quality building culture. Swiss planning associations founded the “Baukultur climate campaign”. The BSA, BSLA, SIA, EspaceSuisse, the Swiss Heritage Society and the Monument Preservation Society have taken a clear stance on nine points in the initiative.

As an Alpine country, Switzerland is particularly affected by climate change. This is shown by temperature measurements that have been carried out since 1864: The average temperature in the country has risen by 1.9 degrees Celsius since measurements began a good 150 years ago. This is twice as fast as the global increase over the same period, which is 0.9 degrees Celsius.

Why is Switzerland affected more than average? On the one hand, it is because Switzerland is already characterized by a continental climate. As a landlocked country without access to the sea, there is no large body of water to cool Switzerland. On the other hand, the country is located in the mid-latitudes of the northern hemisphere. The areas north of the equator warm up more than those to the south. For Switzerland, this means dry summers, severe weather events, winters with little snow and significantly more hot days, especially in urban areas. The extent cannot be predicted exactly, but one thing is clear – it depends on the amount of greenhouse gas emissions in the coming decades.

This is where Swiss politics came in when Environment Minister and Federal Councillor Simonetta Sommaruga presented Switzerland’s new climate strategy. The aim of the strategy was to show how the country can reduceCO2 emissions and greenhouse gas pollution to net zero by 2050. Net zero means that a company or country eliminates all emissions as far as possible. The last few percent can ultimately be offset by carbon capture and storage (instead of emittingCO2 into the atmosphere, it is stored and permanently sequestered) and negative emissions technologies (the retrieval of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere). The bottom line is that Switzerland no longer emits any greenhouse gases – it comes out of the equation with a net zero.

Baukultur climate campaign supports net zero target

The Federal Council believes that achieving net zero by 2050 is feasible. Although the building sector currently accounts for a quarter of Switzerland’s greenhouse gas emissions, it is also responsible for 40 percent of the country’s energy budget. However, emissions in the transport, industry and building sectors in particular could be reduced by 90 percent by 2050. To this end, the federal government and cantons are promoting the energy-efficient renovation of buildings as well as investments in renewable energies, the use of waste heat and the optimization of building technology.

To support the goal of net zero by 2050, numerous players in Swiss building culture have now joined forces, from cultural heritage to architecture, landscape architecture and spatial planning. To be more precise: the associations BSA, BSLA, SIA, EspaceSuisse, Heimatschutz and Denkmalpflege. Together, they founded the “Building Culture Climate Initiative”, which aims to show how net zero can be achieved while preserving Swiss building culture. On its website, the initiative writes that “climate measures must be implemented with a high level of Baukultur. Investments and transformations must be future-proof, sustainable and of high Baukultur quality.”

Protected properties can also be renovated according to net zero points

This is how the Baukultur climate campaign describes the starting position. It also clearly defines its position, which it breaks down into nine points:

First and foremost is building culture. This should be high, i.e. holistically high quality in terms of design, sustainability and social aspects. Because, as the initiative makes clear in point two, net zero can also become a reality with a high level of building culture. The combination of consistency, sufficiency and efficiency should ensure this. Thirdly, the requirement for high Baukultur quality also applies to energy measures on existing buildings. Architectural quality can be achieved without reducing, complicating or increasing the cost of energy-efficient refurbishment.

The fourth point relates to reconciling the preservation of cultural heritage with climate goals. Energy efficiency measures are also possible on properties worthy of protection and can be aligned with climate targets. Protected objects are also net-zero capable. According to the initiative, “protected buildings are an inspiration for sustainability in practice. They deserve respect and tailor-made solutions. There is a lot of potential in the careful integration of new and existing architectural quality.” Fifthly, the Baukultur climate campaign also aims to ban fossil fuels from the building sector. However, the balance sheet also includes gray energy and resource conservation. This goes hand in hand with point six: the principle of the circular economy should become the rule and be based on the five Rs (refuse, reduce, reuse, repair, recycle). This also includes implementing fewer and smaller projects, using more durable products, planning more durable constructions and reusing building components.

Building culture climate campaign to network and position Switzerland

The seventh point is aimed at open spaces: Climate-adapted settlement development with sufficient open spaces and trees should go hand in hand with ventilation, cold air flows and intelligent water use. In short: green and blue infrastructure should be coordinated. For this to work, the initiative also calls for existing funding instruments to integrate a high level of building culture as an element for climate protection and biodiversity. Positive incentives would promote the achievement of climate targets with a high level of Baukultur. Last but not least, the Baukultur Climate Initiative has set itself the task of collecting scientific work and findings as well as relevant initiatives and making them tangible. It sees itself as a platform that networks and positions Switzerland within an international framework. At the same time, it aims to promote the development of expertise and advice, communicate good solutions and take economic requirements into account.

The core team of the Baukultur Climate Campaign consists of Stefan Kunz (Managing Director of the Swiss Heritage Society), Claudia Schwalfenberg (Head of Policy, responsible for Baukultur at the Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects SIA), Peter Wullschleger (Managing Director of the Swiss Association of Landscape Architects BSLA), Barbara Franzen (Managing Director of the Conference of Swiss Heritage Conservators KSD), Claudia Moll (Co-President BSLA) and Adrian Altenburger (Vice President SIA).

You can join the Baukultur climate campaign as a supporter here.

Online series: The future of building culture – Statement by Ralph-Uwe Johann

Building design
Ralph-Uwe Johann, owner and managing director of Deffner & Johann, Röthlein

Ralph-Uwe Johann, owner and managing director of Deffner & Johann, Röthlein

What contribution can heritage conservation and restoration science make in view of the worsening climate situation, the scarcity of resources and the energy crisis? We asked experts from various disciplines to comment on this. Read the statement by Ralph-Uwe Johann, owner and managing director of Deffner & Johann, Röthlein, here

What contribution can heritage conservation and restoration science make in view of the worsening climate situation, the scarcity of resources and the energy crisis? We asked experts from various disciplines to comment on this. Read the statement by Ralph-Uwe Johann, owner and managing director of Deffner & Johann, Röthlein, here

Multiple crises are currently forcing us to rethink. There are pandemics, floods, forest fires and war. How do we want to live and build in the future? We are facing many new challenges that require complex considerations and solutions. And it is precisely here that the knowledge and skills of the diverse and interdisciplinary field of heritage conservation are in demand. What contribution can heritage conservation and restoration science make in view of the worsening climate situation, the scarcity of resources and the energy crisis? We asked experts from various disciplines about this. You can read the answers in our new online series Zukunft Baukultur. Every week, we publish a specialist statement on www.restauro.de. Here isthe statement from Ralph-Uwe Johann, owner and managing director of Deffner & Johann, Röthlein

In view of the worsening climate situation, scarcity of resources and energy crisis, both specialist retailers and manufacturers are increasingly responsible for selling ecologically compatible products and providing information on correct and resource-saving processing. Deffner & Johann also sets this standard for itself and, with a view to environmental protection, tries to offer environmentally conscious solutions whenever possible. Conservation and restoration can make a significant contribution to the sustainable use of resources. The preservation and conversion of existing monuments offer enormous potential for saving building materials and energy as well as reducing CO2 emissions.

Furthermore, materials in their traditional use are often significantly more sustainable when the entire life cycle is considered. Traditional binder systems, such as lime or linseed oil, not only offer an advantageous eco-balance, but are also often more resource-efficient in terms of production and maintenance. A few years ago, these were still considered complicated to work with compared to “convenience products” from the building materials industry and were removed from the curricula of technical colleges. Today, they are often regarded as modern or innovative in Europe and presented by leading planners and architects as a solution for sustainable construction. Specialist companies in the preservation and restoration of historical monuments could even contribute their knowledge advantage in the processing of corresponding products. As an internationally active specialist wholesaler for materials, tools and equipment in the field of restoration and monument conservation, we also always ensure that transport is optimized for the supply chain and that resources are used in an environmentally conscious manner.