Our penchant for petitionism

Building design

In the cultural world, open letters and public protests are constantly being bandied about. For our author, the constant agitation goes a little too far.

A few months ago, I experienced a remarkable first for me: I signed an “open letter”. I was still a little unsure, but I supported the tenor of the letter and appreciated the initiative, so I put my name to it and put a good feeling in my own soul.

One signature so far – with this rate of signatures, I am well below average, at least in the architectural discourse scene. At least that’s my guess. There’s a lot of decreeing going on. Every week, a new signatory initiative is circulating on social media, and at least once a month there is a lot of excitement somewhere. The initiators are usually right in some way. Often, they are also fighting for demands that are on the borderline of truism. The latter must be the case, because in the world of Facebook and the like, the truism (i.e. what can be entered into the “What are you doing right now” field in two sentences) simply works brilliantly. The claims industry is also fueled by platforms such as Change.org. It has elevated the ingeniously vague Obama formulation of “change”, which is brilliant from a marketing perspective, to its own brand essence and used it to create an attitude to life among the signatories that oscillates somewhere between detached cultural pessimism and activist do-gooderism.

A few days ago, a new open letter caused my filter bubble to bubble. It was about a journalism prize for an author from the NZZ. Antje Stahl had been awarded this year’s FAZ Critics’ Prize (named after the legendary film critic Michael Althen) for her text “No more Frauenghetto, bitte”. The text revolves around the “Frau Architekt” exhibition at the German Architecture Museum. Roughly speaking, Stahl came up with the (unsurprising) idea that such an exhibition cements male domination because it turns female architecture into something surprising and therefore something to be exhibited.

Various curators and others involved in the exhibition (but not the DAM itself, mind you) have now objected to this. In a public statement, they said: “Where fakes rather than facts form the basis, talk of analytical acuity becomes a farce. Responsible journalism looks different. It is not only the justification for this award that needs to be questioned, but also the judgment of the jury, which is made up of film and theater professionals and a writer … It is made up of respected names who have not yet made a name for themselves with any competence in questions of architecture or building culture.”

Quite apart from the “not from the field” brush (remember – this is a prize for journalistic quality, not for buildings) – couldn’t it be a little less excited? You don’t have to share the attitude of the award-winning journalist. But why “protest” against an award for her by diligently collecting signatures? Is such a protest (which is always somewhat pathetic) really an adequate means of debate here? Is a simple “I don’t think the text is that great”, often spread via social media, not enough?

It seems to me that a whole lot of personal sensitivities are involved here. People seem to be offended by the criticism and articulate this using the big discourse club of the “open letter”. And that is a symptom of our times. It is precisely this permanent ability to feel personally attacked that characterizes many of the petitions, demands, protests, open letters, etc. that are circulating online. And which gives our time something fundamentally hysterical. We live in a world of permanent hyperventilation. This is not necessarily good for the social climate or the architectural discourse.

Which brings this text to an end. But is it enough to simply put it online and hope that someone will read it? Perhaps I should … a very small petition perhaps? Is there anyone who would like to sign it?

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

AI and architecture: the role of artificial intelligence in the design of smart cities

Building design

AI-supported traffic systems in cities can optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion by up to 15%. In Copenhagen, for example, sensors and AI are used to control traffic in real time in order to alleviate peak times. Mike Petrucci | Unsplash

Architecture is facing a digital revolution. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has already changed the construction industry and is now finding its way into urban planning and architecture. From planning and design to building and city management, AI offers solutions that are faster, more precise and more efficient. AI-supported systems analyze huge amounts of data and propose solutions that inspire and support architects and urban planners. In the context of the smart city, AI makes a significant contribution to the development of sustainable, liveable and future-oriented urban spaces. […]

Architecture is facing a digital revolution. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has already changed the construction industry and is now finding its way into urban planning and architecture. From planning and design to building and city management, AI offers solutions that are faster, more precise and more efficient. AI-supported systems analyze huge amounts of data and propose solutions that inspire and support architects and urban planners. In the context of the smart city, AI makes a significant contribution to the development of sustainable, liveable and future-oriented urban spaces.

Fun fact: In recent years, investment in AI-supported architectural tools has increased by around 40% worldwide, particularly in the areas of energy optimization and predictive maintenance of buildings.

Machine Learning (ML)

Machine learning, a sub-form of AI, enables systems to recognize patterns in large data sets and make predictions based on these patterns. For architects, this means that building data, weather forecasts, material consumption and energy requirements can be analyzed in order to develop a more efficient design.

Generative design

Generative design is an AI technology that can generate thousands of designs from a given set of parameters and design requirements. Architects provide certain specifications – such as location, material and desired functions – and the AI creates design options that can be tested through simulations.

Neural networks and deep learning

Neural networks, especially deep learning models, enable AI systems to understand complex relationships and propose innovative solutions. For example, they can carry out simulations for air currents and sunlight that improve the comfort and energy efficiency of a building.

Natural Language Processing (NLP)

NLP models such as language assistants and text processing systems help architects and urban planners to easily analyze and process complex data and reports. With the help of NLP, data can be searched more quickly and historical data can also be incorporated into the decision-making process.

Practical example: In a construction project in San Francisco, an architecture firm is using generative design to create an office building that minimizes energy consumption and reduces its carbon footprint. By simulating thousands of design options, a shape was found that resulted in 30% less energy consumption.

AI offers a wide range of possible applications for urban planning, from traffic control to the optimization of buildings and the use of resources. Some of the most exciting applications are

Traffic and mobility management

AI can be used to analyze data on traffic density, weather conditions and the use of public transport in real time. This results in intelligent traffic systems that minimize traffic congestion by efficiently distributing modes of transport.

Energy optimization of buildings

Energy efficiency is a central component of smart cities. AI systems make it possible to optimize the energy consumption of buildings. By analyzing data on temperature, occupancy density and sunlight, lighting, heating and cooling can be adjusted in real time, which can reduce energy consumption by up to 40 %.

Urban development and resource management

The development of cities requires the optimal use of available space and resources. AI can help analyze the urban space available and provide suggestions for optimal land use to balance development and green spaces.

Air quality and environmental monitoring

AI-powered air quality monitoring models can measure and predict emission levels and air pollution in different parts of the city. This data is important for targeting measures to reduce pollutants and thus improve the quality of life of residents.

Practical example: In Copenhagen, AI models are used to control the flow of traffic. Sensors analyse the traffic situation in real time and the AI optimizes the traffic lights and distribution of modes of transport. The result is a reduction in the volume of traffic at peak times of around 15 %.

The advantages of AI in architecture and urban planning are manifold, but its implementation also poses a number of challenges.

Advantages

  1. Greater efficiency and precision: AI can process huge amounts of data and thus make more accurate predictions, which optimizes planning.
  2. Cost reduction: Early detection of errors and optimization opportunities can reduce construction costs.
  3. Faster decisions: AI enables faster, data-based decisions and relieves architects of repetitive tasks.
  4. Sustainability: AI models can analyze energy consumption and emissions and help to make buildings and cities more environmentally friendly.

Challenges

  1. Complexity and implementation costs: The introduction of AI-supported systems requires high investments in technology and training.
  2. Data protection and ethics: The use of personal data for AI analyses raises questions about data protection and ethical responsibility.
  3. Dependence on data quality: The quality of AI results depends directly on the data used. Poor data quality can lead to erroneous results.
  4. Acceptance and adaptation: Skepticism towards AI in the construction industry remains high, and acceptance of new technologies requires a cultural change.

Expert opinion: According to a survey by the American Institute of Architects, 75% of architects see great potential in AI, but expect it to take up to five years before AI is used across the board in architecture.

AI can make a significant contribution to sustainability in architecture by optimizing energy consumption and using resources more efficiently.

Energy-efficient buildings

With AI, buildings can be designed to minimize their energy consumption. AI-supported simulations analyze solar radiation, indoor climate and ventilation so that buildings can be operated with minimal energy consumption.

Conserving resources

By analysing material and energy data, AI helps to ensure that building materials are used efficiently and construction waste is minimized. AI-based optimization models can help to reduce the use of materials as early as the planning phase.

Longer service life of buildings

AI can identify maintenance requirements in buildings at an early stage and thus contribute to a longer life cycle. Predictive models can be used to estimate maintenance requirements and better allocate resources.

Sustainable construction project: An architectural project in the Netherlands uses AI-supported systems to analyze solar radiation and adjust energy consumption. By optimizing the heating and cooling systems, annual energy consumption was reduced by over 20 %.

AI in architecture is still in its infancy. However, developments over the next few years promise exciting innovations that could revolutionize construction and urban planning.

  1. Autonomous planning: In the future, AI could have the ability to design and plan buildings autonomously, without human intervention.
  2. Collaborative AI systems: As AI evolves, systems will emerge that work collaboratively and support each other. Architects could “work together” with AI to plan more creatively and efficiently.
  3. Smart City Integration: AI will increasingly connect and coordinate infrastructure and buildings in a city to optimize traffic flow, energy distribution and environmental impact.

Future outlook: Singapore is working on a concept for autonomous buildings that are controlled and optimized by AI. The aim is to develop a fully integrated smart city that uses resources efficiently and minimizes environmental impact.

Artificial intelligence is one of the most promising technologies for the construction and architecture industry. It offers solutions that can make planning processes more efficient, buildings more sustainable and cities more liveable. The challenges are considerable, but the benefits outweigh them. By using AI, architects can design cities that are prepared for the needs of the future.

Final thought: AI and architecture form an alliance that has the potential to lead the construction industry towards a sustainable, smart and liveable future.

By the way: Oostenburg in the heart of Amsterdam is a district in transformation. The De Gieter and De Slijper residential complex by Space Encounters was built here in 2023. Read here how the architects combine urban density and industrial history.

Noble back

Building design

Architects Fala Atelier transformed an abandoned 19th century terraced house in Porto into four identical one-bedroom apartments.

The youngest of the young European architecture firms has come of age. After the many exhibitions and publications in practically all architectural media (including B10/17), Fala Atelier is now one of the most established offices in Portugal. Originally known for its atmospheric collages, the trio, consisting of Filipe Magalhães, Ana Luisa Soares and Ahmed Balkhodja, is now working on major renovation projects in Porto and Lisbon, designing exhibitions, installations and stores – and, above all, has developed a clearly defined architectural language.

An abandoned 19th century terraced house in Porto was to be divided into four independent one-bedroom apartments. The architects opted for four identical residential units. Their main space is structured by a series of architectural elements – a staircase, colorful doors, two-tone parquet, curved walls and ceilings. A long, winding corridor leads from the main entrance to the staircase or the rear courtyard, providing access to all the apartments. The main façade facing the street has been renovated and partially redesigned, while the façade at the rear is completely new. The street façade was clad with green and white marble slabs, whose abstract geometric shapes form a stark contrast to the historic granite window and door frames. The façade at the rear is clad with vertical strips of green, white and gray marble. It turns the tradition of the representative bourgeois street façade on its head and is ironically described by the architects as “unnecessarily proud and opulent”. The project was completed in 2017.

All pictures: Ricardo Loureiro

You can find out more about the architects and other up-and-coming architects from Europe in the March 2019 issue.