Practice, feedback, knowledge transfer. The journey of a curriculum

Building design
Daniel Stockhammer heads the "Bauerbe & Upcycling" specialist group at the University of Liechtenstein. Photo: Ethan Oelman

Daniel Stockhammer heads the "Bauerbe & Upcycling" specialist group at the University of Liechtenstein. Photo: Ethan Oelman

“Radically sustainable!” The Liechtenstein School of Architecture has repositioned itself and aligned its courses with the principles of sustainability. In addition to upcycling, circular construction and life cycle analysis, ethics are now also included – after all, the lecturers are responsible for the students. Daniel Stockhammer answered our questions.

Baumeister: Please introduce yourself briefly.

LIECHTENSTEIN SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE: We are the team of the Liechtenstein School of Architecture (LSA) at the University of Liechtenstein in Vaduz. We are committed to teaching and researching design and construction with social, ecological, economic and cultural responsibility. In view of social change and the issues of responsible energy, land and material consumption, we have realigned our degree programs this year and embarked on a radical sustainability course. In research and teaching, we address the most pressing issues and challenges facing architecture and spatial development: from the climate crisis, resource scarcity and urbanization processes to the development of sustainable building materials such as clay or innovative wood applications. All our degree programs are accredited by the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA). By collaborating with international partners at the interface between science and practice, we are the leading research and competence center for sustainable architecture and spatial development for Liechtenstein, the Alpine Rhine Valley and the German-speaking four-country region. We see ourselves as an open-minded think tank for critical and creative discussion and action. In doing so, we link global questions and answers with regional challenges.

B : What are you working on at the LSA?

L S A : Together with our students, we want to find out how the built environment is created, why it is designed in this way and how it should be designed in the future. We focus on interdisciplinarity and internationality to enable comparisons with other building cultures, disciplines and methods.

“We equip architects with the skills to meet global and local challenges with innovative and robust solutions.”

B : How do you approach the task practically?

LSA: In three ways:
1. in order to tackle current research topics more effectively and to better integrate young researchers thematically, we have pooled our expertise in interdisciplinary specialist groups (units). This allows us to respond quickly and flexibly to social needs. In the “Urbanism, Architecture & Society” unit, we focus on the connections between people and space and how this knowledge provides tools for tackling urgent social challenges. Our “Urbanism & Spatial Development” unit investigates how low-emission, climate change-adapted, biodiverse and integrative urban landscapes and resilient settlement structures can be created. With the Sustainable Building Unit, we are pioneering a sustainable future by using advanced green technologies and holistic approaches and harmonizing architectural practices with the planetary boundaries of the earth to improve global and local quality of life. In the Heritage & Upcycling Unit, we investigate the tangible and intangible resources of the built environment and develop strategies for their conservation, reuse and transition to circular economies, taking into account both historical values and future aspirations. And – last but not least – the “Craft & Structure” unit deals with the relationship between material, construction and structure with regard to sustainably built and tectonically joined architecture.

2. with pro bono projects: In the “Pro Bono” module, we work across disciplines on specific projects to implement the UN Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Students look for partners from the field with whom they plan and implement projects for the common good – and thus make a contribution to sustainable development in a regional and international context. Awareness of the social, political, ecological, economic and cultural relevance of the projects is particularly important to us. In this way, we impart skills that go beyond the normal scope of architectural education and equip architects with the skills to meet global and local challenges with innovative and robust solutions.

3. with “hands on” on campus: over the past few years, our students have repeatedly engaged with their campus environment and, for example, converted a seminar room themselves for unusual forms of teaching and learning. The model-making workshop and the interior design of the newest university building were also designed and built by students. The “Solar Tree” landmark in front of the Spoerry site, including photovoltaic systems, and the “Alpine Tower” were also designed by students.

B : Are you confronted with prejudices?

L S A : Recently, it is often said that architects and planners are still trained in such a way that they tear down many existing buildings and replace them with unsustainable or overly extravagant new buildings, thereby contributing significantly to the climate, resource and social crisis. However, this impression, at least at our university, has long since ceased to correspond to the reality of research and teaching. We have already consistently geared our degree courses towards ensuring that students first learn to understand existing buildings and their potential and shortcomings. Building on this, we then jointly develop, test and examine holistic designs for sustainable further development.

B: What was an aha effect in your research work?

LSA: The last time we completely overhauled our degree courses was five years ago. At that time, we made the courses very project-centered. Many minor subjects were integrated directly into the design studios. This teaching approach was very popular at the time. But the concept also had its pitfalls. Students were soon asking for more lectures, exams and a more comprehensive and general transfer of knowledge. This surprised us somewhat, but we took the criticism to heart. This fall, we are now launching a completely revised Bachelor’s degree program that meets this and many other requests. In the first four semesters in particular, the course is once again more strongly characterized by basic lectures. The design studios are designed to build on each other, and there are also many new subjects: circular construction, life cycle analysis, upcycling, urban transformation or ethics and environmental theory will also be part of the basic training in future. We continue to view our Master’s degree program as a “laboratory” where students can choose from a wide range of design studios, seminars and individual electives to tailor their studies to their own interests and deepen their knowledge of specific topics. We also attach great importance to them coming into contact with our research groups. The specializations offered correspond thematically to the specialist groups. After completing the Master’s degree, students have the opportunity to complete a PhD course with one of the specialist groups.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Stonehenge highway tunnel unlawful according to court

Building design
A freeway tunnel is to be built 200 meters next to the Stonehenge (Photo: Song Shin/Unsplash)

A freeway tunnel is to be built 200 meters next to the Stonehenge (Photo: Song Shin/Unsplash)

The Stonehenge Alliance took legal action against the Stonehenge highway tunnel planned by highways england – and won.

The British government has been campaigning for several years to tunnel under the Stonehenge Stone Age monument. It argues that there will be less noise, less congestion and a better quality of life for residents in the surrounding villages. However, the opponents of the mega project are not impressed by this. They formed the Stonehenge Alliance and took legal action against the construction project – and were proven right.

Many stories and myths surround the Neolithic monument Stonehenge, which attracts thousands of visitors every year. Many of them arrive via the A303 highway, which passes within sight and, above all, within earshot of the monument. There is no question of mystical, romantic seclusion there.

Highways England, the state-owned company that looks after England’s freeways, wanted to do something about this. Its aim is to improve the A303, which connects England’s southwest with the southeast. At Stonehenge, the single-lane section is to be widened to two lanes. But that’s not all: a tunnel is planned right next to the Neolithic monument, which would take traffic out of sight of the landmark.

However, the planned reconstruction is not just for cosmetic reasons. According to highways england, it currently takes an hour or more – depending on the time of day – to pass Stonehenge on the highway. The expansion aims to reduce this time to eight minutes.

Two tunnels more than three kilometers long – one for each direction of travel – will run 200 meters underground next to Stonehenge, reconnecting the landscape on the surface for visitors, horse riders, cyclists and, of course, flora and fauna. Several new junctions will also prevent drivers from clogging up the surrounding villages to avoid traffic jams. Highways England planned to start the first phase of the mega project in 2023.

However, this will not happen for the time being. This is because a group of NGOs and individuals have come together under the name The Stonehenge Alliance to protect the World Heritage Site. The Stonehenge Alliance was formed back in 2001 to prevent the expansion of the highway in the World Heritage Site. In the end, this was actually put on hold – whether this result can be attributed solely to the Alliance remains unclear.

Today, the Stonehenge Alliance is speaking out against highways england’s mega-project with its Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site campaign. Their argument: the expansion and conversion would severely damage the landscape, which is considered one of the most archaeologically significant land areas in Europe. Among other things, the campaign criticizes the fact that highways england has not considered any alternatives, that previously undiscovered archaeological finds could be damaged and that local animals would be permanently disturbed by the construction work. Furthermore, too few clarifications had been made regarding flood risk, groundwater protection, geology and land contamination, as the subsoil is a unique limestone rock whose reaction to the planned measures is not certain.

Stonehenge ruling as a wake-up call for the government

In addition, the planned construction work violates the UNESCO World Heritage Convention and ignores UNESCO’s recommendations on the plans. This could lead to Stonehenge ending up on the red list of World Heritage in Danger. According to UNESCO, inscription on the red list is linked to specific requirements for remedying or averting the threat, a program for remedial measures and increased monitoring through annual reports on the state of conservation.

The Stonehenge Alliance’s objections have borne fruit. At the end of July, the High Court ruled that the British Transport Minister had acted unlawfully. He had not considered less harmful alternatives. For these reasons, the judge overturned the consent order issued by the British Transport Minister. According to the British news site BBC, the project will now be put on hold until the government has decided on its next steps.

John Adams, head of the Stonehenge Alliance, expressed his delight at the ruling in a press release: “Now that we are facing a climate emergency, it is all the more important that this ruling is a wake-up call for the government. It should re-examine its roads program and take action to reduce road traffic and remove the need to build new and wider roads that threaten the environment as well as our cultural heritage.”

That Stonehenge forms a large part of the UK’s cultural heritage is clear. Not only is it one of Britain’s most famous landmarks, it is also a masterpiece of engineering. It is located in England, between Bournemouth and Bristol, and is part of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site. The structure was built over a period of several hundred years – even before the invention of the wheel or before people started working with metal. Construction began as early as 3,000 BC, with the first of several stages.

The first monument – the first stage – consisted mainly of earthworks and was used for cremation burials. It was not until around 2,500 to 2,000 BC that the typical stones were added in further stages. Stonehenge as we know it today was created from huge sarsen stones weighing several tons and smaller bluestones. However, this required enormous efforts – moving this mass (and without using wheels!) would have required the manpower of hundreds of workers at the time. Not to mention the planning and organization. In total, the construction of Stonehenge took over 1,000 years.

So what was the fun for? There are several theories and myths surrounding the Neolithic monument, but no one can say for sure what the exact purpose behind it was. This is despite the fact that researchers have been studying it for decades. But Stonehenge is so old that there is no longer any collective memory that can recall its original purpose. There are no exact records that have survived the last 4,500 years – although there are of course some theories. These include, for example, that Stonehenge was a place for ceremonies, a sacrificial site or an observatory. The latter refers to the alignment of the STEINs, which are arranged according to the solstice and equinox.

Also topical: Munich’s Olympic Park as a World Heritage Site? Read here why it has what it takes.

Ideal framework conditions

Building design
General
Portfolio

Portfolio

For a long time, the area between Tel-Aviv-Straße, Perlengraben and Blaubach – an area in the middle of Cologne’s city center – was dominated by dreary functional buildings. The overall concept for the redesign by Cologne urban planner Boris Enning won over the jury of the architectural competition. The “55 Frames” project meets urban living requirements with different formats: from penthouses and individually designed apartments to townhouses and garden apartments on the first floor.

The eponymous frames, which protrude irregularly from the white outer façade like drawers being pulled out, structure the building and open up the living space to the outside, while offering the residents protection and security through the frames. Fastening the concrete frames in this project initially seemed difficult due to the high weight, but with the help of the “Isokorb type WXT” from Schöck, the required load-bearing capacity of the projecting wall panels and thus the “frames” was achieved without any problems: For this purpose, one wall panel was each connected to an Isokorb type WXT and the internal wall, the other wall panel is anchored in the external wall with a type WXT bent into the support, as there was no internal wall here for the back anchorage. The upper and lower ceiling panels are only fixed with the Isokorb supplementary type HP-XT and rest on or hang from the wall panels. The Isokorb type WXT is a load-bearing thermal insulation element with 120 mm insulation thickness for cantilevered wall panels.

Schöck Bauteile GmbH
Vimbucher Street 2
76534 Baden-Baden, Germany
www.schoeck.de