Recap: University Day 2019

Building design

The three winning teams from TU Munich (front and back right) and TU Berlin (back right).

How will our environment have to change in the coming decades and what can students from a wide range of disciplines contribute? This question is the focus of the “Students | Design | Future” competition. Nine student finalist teams from all over Germany presented their project ideas at the 2019 University Day at BAU 2019 on January 18, 2019. The jury evaluated and […]

How will our environment have to change in the coming decades and what can students from a wide range of disciplines contribute? This question is the focus of the “Students | Design | Future” competition. Nine student finalist teams from all over Germany presented their project ideas at the 2019 University Day at BAU 2019 on January 18, 2019. The jury then evaluated and awarded prizes to the winners.

This was the third time that BAKA Berlin, together with Messe München and in cooperation with Baumeister, organized the three-stage “Students | Design | Future” competition. Students were able to submit projects that dealt with sustainability concepts and addressed the topics of sufficiency, efficiency and consistency. The focus was on the practical implementation of the project. Out of 25 submissions, nine teams were nominated for the 2019 University Day at BAU 2019. As in previous years, this was the highlight of the competition.

The nine finalist teams came from TU Berlin, TU Dortmund, KIT in Karlsruhe, TU Munich, the State Academy of Fine Arts in Stuttgart and the Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences. Prof. Georg Sahner moderated the event, during which the students each had 15 minutes to present their project idea and assert themselves against their competitors. The five jury members Prof. Dr. Susanne Rexroth, Prof. Dr. Wolfram Stephan, Prof. Ralf Niebergall, Prof. Dr. Bernd Wegener and Ingolf Kluge then assessed the projects with marks between one and ten. The tension rose when two groups received the same number of points. Only a run-off vote by the jury determined the winning team.

The first prize was ultimately awarded to a five-person team from the Technical University of Munich. The “TeilWerk” project was developed at the Chair of Energy-Efficient and Sustainable Planning and Building of Prof. Dr. Werner Lang. The students received prize money of 1000 euros. Second place also went to a team from Munich – accompanied by Prof. Dr. Hannelore Deubzer. Students of Prof. Eike Roswag-Klinge from the TU Berlin took third place.

Further information on the 2019 University Day can be found here, on the BAKA Berlin website.

Pictures: Isa Fahrenholz (Baumeister editorial team)

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB). The latest results of their […]

Alongside other important works by Rembrandt (1606-1669), the Berlin Gemäldegalerie owns his masterpiece “Susanna and the Two Old Men” (1647). Recent studies of the painting have produced spectacular new findings. We spoke about the discoveries with Katja Kleinert, research assistant, and Claudia Laurenze-Landsberg, conservator at the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (SMB).

From March 3 to May 31, 2015, the Berlin Gemäldegalerie and the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB) are presenting the latest results of their examination of the Dutch artist Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn in the exhibition “Rembrandt’s Berlin Susanna and the Two Old Men. The creation of a masterpiece”. What exactly did you find out?

Kleinert: Rembrandt worked on the Berlin “Susanna” for more than a decade and created three different versions of the depiction during this time. This was already known and documented by the Rembrandt Research Project. Now, however, it is possible to reconstruct the three versions in detail. In addition, in collaboration with the Kupferstichkabinett, it has now been possible to reassess the time when work on the painting began. The first composition must have been created around 1635 rather than 1638. What was previously completely unknown and truly spectacular is the discovery that the work was extensively reworked again in the 18th century.

How did you track down this sensation?

Kleinert : The decisive clue came from a reproduction engraving by Richard Earlom (1743-1822) from 1769. The original is kept in the Kupferstichkabinett (SMB). The sheet documents the version of the picture that Rembrandt left to posterity in the 17th century. A comparison with the present-day work reveals how much more differentiated the painterly execution of the painting must originally have been. As a result, it was possible to correlate existing art technological results, which proved that parts of the painting had clearly been reworked at a later date.

Laurenze-Landsberg: ” Earlom’s reproduction engraving was a relief for me. I had already examined the panel painting with a stereomicroscope before I became aware of it. The separation of the paint layers and chipped areas revealed beautiful, precisely executed details that had been very roughly painted over. At the time, however, I still assumed that Rembrandt had reworked the painting and was confused by the master’s superficial, less meticulous way of working.

What investigations did you then carry out to investigate the suspicion of a later intervention by a third party?

Laurenze-Landsberg: In addition to the neutron autoradiographs, we also analyzed the X-ray, infrared and grazing light images and examined the image stereoscopically. The image carrier is a sugar box wood which, contrary to previous assumptions, is not made of mahogany but amaranth. The sugar trade flourished in Amsterdam in the 17th century.

You assume that the later overpaintings are by the English painter Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792). What supports this theory?

Kleinert : The provenance of Rembrandt’s Berlin “Susanna” is very well documented. Two painters had the panel in their possession. Sir Joshua Reynolds was one of them. He owned the painting for a particularly long time. We also know that Reynolds was interested in old painting techniques. And that he often worked on other people’s works and altered or corrected them to suit his own taste. He was also not afraid to remove paint in order to study the working methods and techniques of other artists. By looking at the original together with English colleagues from the Reynolds Research Project, the painting technique could then be clearly attributed to Reynolds.

Laurenze-Landsberg: The neutron autoradiography supports this thesis. It shows intense blackening caused by the antimony isotope SB-124. Since no tin can be detected at the same time, the antimony-containing pigment must be Naples yellow. It came into increasing use from the middle of the 18th century. Elsewhere, the paint layer is swollen, which indicates the use of copaiva balsam. This is a resin that was used to “freshen up” paintings. It is known that Reynolds used it as a binding agent.

How do you assess the reworkings today?

Kleinert: There are examples of even more far-reaching interventions that raise the question of the extent to which one can still speak of an original masterpiece. The Berlin “Susanna and the Two Old Men” is a painting that has been altered at a later date and must be declared accordingly. But it remains a Rembrandt.

The interview was conducted by Britta Grigull.

More on Rembrandt’s drawings, the biblical Susanna theme and the corresponding Berlin exhibition in RESTAURO 2/2015.

Architects in snow fever

Building design

At the beginning of February 2015, the tenth open German Architects’ Championships in the disciplines of skiing and snowboarding took place in Mellau and Damüls, Austria. Around 120 participants took up the challenge. around 120 participants took up the sporting challenge.

At the beginning of February 2015, the tenth open German Architects’ Championships in the disciplines of skiing and snowboarding took place in Mellau and Damüls, Austria. Around 120 participants took up the challenge. around 120 participants took up the sporting challenge. At the warm-up in Peter Zumthor’s “Werkraum” in Andelsbuch on Thursday evening, the early arrivals were able to get a first impression. In the exhibition “No Name Design” by Franco Clivio, the focus was on the inconspicuous things that accompany us in everyday life and yet rarely attract attention.

The following evening, the GAM open 2015 was officially opened by patron Lutz Heese (President of the Bavarian Chamber of Architects) in the Elsenalpstube in Damüls. After the subsequent ‘Kässspätzle’ meal, which was a culinary highlight, originally served in a wooden bowl, the 4 kilometer long and illuminated toboggan run into the valley could be tested. In bright sunshine and perfect conditions with 1.90 meters of snow, the starting signal for the 10th GAM open in the parallel slalom discipline for skiers and snowboarders was given on Saturday morning.

Jannis Merz (men’s skiing) with 22.420s, Armin Tittel (men’s snowboarding) with 27.360s, Birgit Keppler (women’s skiing) with 26.430s and Ulrike Schneider (women’s snowboarding) with 34.780s won the championships with best times. The office championship went to the team from the Reutlingen Chamber of Architects (Nightmare 2). The award ceremony took place in the evening, followed by a party at the four-star Design Hotel Sonne in Mellau.