Rethinking Safety in the Cultural Sector

Building design
An inconspicuous lock that does far more than traditional mechanics would suggest: Inside, ASSA ABLOY's eCLIQ technology provides a discreet but highly flexible access control system that combines security and openness in the cultural sector. Photo: ASSA ABLOY
An inconspicuous lock that does far more than traditional mechanics would suggest: Inside, ASSA ABLOY's eCLIQ technology provides a discreet but highly flexible access control system that combines security and openness in the cultural sector. Photo: ASSA ABLOY

Security requirements at cultural institutions have increased significantly in recent years. Today, museums, archives, libraries, and theaters are far more than just places of preservation and exhibition. They are vibrant spaces for exchange, research, events, and international collaboration. It is precisely this diversity that makes them open, high-traffic venues—and, at the same time, highly complex organizational systems in which security cannot be viewed merely as a protective function, but rather as an integral part of the operational model.

Complex Usage Makes Security a Systemic Issue

In modern cultural institutions, a wide variety of usage patterns overlap. While visitors come to experience exhibitions, curatorial work, conservation efforts, and technical operations are taking place in parallel. Added to this are external partners, project teams, and service providers, each of whom works in the building on a temporary basis and with varying levels of access. This simultaneity creates highly dynamic movement and access patterns that quickly push traditional security models to their limits. This becomes particularly evident in large cultural complexes where various functions are united under one roof and spaces are used for multiple purposes or temporarily repurposed. As a result, security is no longer viewed solely as a matter of individual doors, but rather as the comprehensive management of access points, times, and user groups.

The Humboldt Forum as an Example of Modern Security Architecture

The Humboldt Forum in Berlin demonstrates just how challenging this task is in practice. As an open cultural and community center with high visitor numbers and a wide-ranging program of art, science, and events, it was necessary from the outset to develop a security concept that preserves the building’s open character while reliably protecting sensitive areas. The particular challenge lay in precisely managing very diverse user groups—ranging from museum staff to research teams to external service providers—without restricting free access or the building’s public impact. This tension is typical of many large cultural institutions in Europe that must balance openness with their duty to protect.

Limitations of Traditional Locking Systems in the Cultural Sector

Mechanical locking systems rely on fixed physical access permissions and static structures. While this model can work in organizations without heavy public traffic, it quickly leads to a high administrative burden in the cultural sector. Keys must be issued, tracked, and—when lost—often replaced at great expense. Every change in the user structure has organizational—and often security-related—consequences. In dynamic exhibition venues with changing exhibitions, events, and collaborative projects, this creates constant friction between day-to-day operations and security management. Flexibility becomes a critical requirement.

Electronic Locking Systems as the Answer to Dynamic Requirements

Electronic access systems such aseCLIQ from ASSA ABLOYaddress this very issue. They combine the mechanical robustness of traditional locking technology with digital control, thereby enabling a significantly more flexible organization of access rights. Access permissions can be assigned individually, limited in time, and managed centrally. This allows for the precise mapping of a wide variety of usage scenarios within a building. This provides a decisive operational advantage, particularly in the cultural sector, where projects are often temporary and user groups change regularly.
Another key aspect is the ability to respond quickly in the event of a security incident. If a key is lost or a person leaves the organization, the corresponding access permission can be immediately revoked digitally. There is no need to physically replace lock cylinders. This not only reduces costs and effort but also significantly enhances security during ongoing operations.

Integration into Historic and Sensitive Architecture

Many cultural institutions are located in buildings that are either historic landmarks or of particular architectural significance. Any technical modifications must be carried out with the utmost restraint. Electronic locking systems offer a decisive advantage in this context, as they generally require no wiring and can easily replace existing mechanical cylinders. This allows modern security solutions to be integrated into historic buildings without compromising their architectural integrity. Security is thus not visibly superimposed, but rather discreetly embedded within existing structures.

From Individual Access to Networked Security Architecture

As modern cultural buildings become increasingly complex, the concept of access management is also evolving. It is no longer just about individual doors or areas, but about networked systems that can be controlled centrally. Digital web managers make it possible to manage access permissions across multiple locations and adjust them in real time. In large facilities, this creates a consistent security model that connects different buildings, areas, and types of use. The wide variety of cylinder types and applications also allows for the integration of a diverse range of access points—from entrances and administrative offices to display cases and technically sensitive areas. This avoids isolated solutions and creates a seamless system.

Security as an Integral Part of Overall Operations

A comprehensive security concept does not end with access control. Especially in heavily frequented cultural institutions, escape and rescue routes must also be taken into account at all times. Doors must function reliably in everyday use, yet at the same time be fully usable as escape routes in an emergency. Modern electronic locking systems such as eCLIQ from ASSA ABLOY can be configured accordingly and combine controlled access with reliable emergency functionality. As a result, security is understood not as a restriction, but as a functional component of building operations.

Security as a Prerequisite for Cultural Openness

Practical experience clearly shows that openness and security do not have to be mutually exclusive. On the contrary: only a robust and flexibly manageable security concept enables cultural institutions to operate their spaces in an open, dynamic, and audience-oriented manner. Intelligent access solutions such as eCLIQ from ASSA ABLOY provide the technical and organizational foundation for this. They make it possible to manage complex building infrastructures without restricting their openness. As a result, security becomes not an obstacle, but a prerequisite for modern, accessible, and sustainable cultural operations.

For more information, click here.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Co-creation instead of participation

Building design

Photo: Torben Eskerod

Participation versus co-creation: Would the Superkilen work better today if citizens had been integrated into the process from the outset?

Superkilen in Copenhagen has failed. The citizens as a whole use the square more as a place to pass through than to linger, even though they were integrated into the planning process through participation – according to a long-term analysis by students at the Danish Institute for Study Abroad. During the design and development process, the Superkilen planners asked citizens to suggest artifacts from their countries of origin for the new city square. Holistic planning with co-creation and prototypes would have been one way of increasing acceptance of the square.

Co-creation

Co-creation originally comes from the business world, which began to involve consumers in the product development process in the 1990s. The Leading Cities research group defines co-creation in urban development as “the active flow of ideas and information between five sectors: government, business, academia, non-profit organizations and citizens that promotes participation, engagement and development.”

What is the difference to citizen participation? Public participation is a means for planners to learn more about the attitudes and opinions of local residents and to develop new ideas. They increase acceptance for a project. Co-creation, on the other hand, involves the most important sectors of society on an equal footing from the outset.

It therefore offers citizens and citizens’ organizations a better opportunity to be truly heard and gain more influence in planning processes. Co-creation views users as proactive citizens rather than consumers, and focuses on long-term cultural change and the whole community rather than individual user groups. Where citizen participation seeks to integrate citizens’ opinions into an already prescribed program, co-creation helps future users to shape and enforce their own decisions. Co-creation is an endless process in the best sense of the word, with regular exchanges taking place between those involved.

Co-creation has a number of advantages. The public provides input and feels equal, citizens feel they are taken seriously. They become much more aware of their living environment. In return, the government has to be much more responsive and responsive to citizens and other sectors. In return, however, it saves costs because only what is actually needed and used is implemented and the risk of a new project is correspondingly low.

Prototypes

In large design projects such as Superkilen, it is extremely important to test ideas in advance before they become a permanent part of the landscape or city. It is a long way from the abstract idea, analysis and public participation to the concrete installation. The prototype should be seen as a learning tool that can be optimized and changed in the next step. Prototypes are a democratic way of dealing with public space, they also reduce the risk of a failed project and unnecessary expenditure.

The holistic approach

Combining co-creation with the prototyping approach makes it easier to explore the potential of a space. This holistic approach leads to more sustainable and vibrant places in the city. However, the Superkilen started with an assumption that co-creation and prototyping would have led to a different design. Users would accept the space better and make it more their own. Perhaps a more critical examination of the initial idea would also have been achieved.

You can read Bianca Hermannsen’s current analysis of the square here.
Robert Schäfer visited Superkilen in 2012, directly after the opening. You can read his review of the new city square in Copenhagen here.
Watch the video here to see how BIG travels with local residents to their countries of origin to select artifacts for Superkilen.

Heavyweight with a message

Building design

The Globo Uovo sculpture is an impressive work by stone sculptor Marc Reist and is currently on display at the Dürrenmatt Center in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. The artist made the 6.5-ton “global egg” out of white marble. In an interview with STEIN, the Swiss artist explains what message he wants to convey with his sculpture, why he only uses white marble and […]

The Globo Uovo sculpture is an impressive work bystone sculptorMarc Reist and is currently on display at the Dürrenmatt Center in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. The artist made the 6.5-ton “global egg” out of white marble. In an interview with STEIN, the Swiss artist explains the message hewants to conveywith hissculpture, why he only works with white stone and why he launched an appeal to collect eggshells before the opening.

Marc Reist: It’s a logical consequence of my artistic work and how I reflect on my surroundings by observing them. I notice how certain rules and mechanisms are similar on both a small and large scale. I never consciously came up with the topic, it just developed. I think it started in 2005.

The Globo Uovo symbolizes the world and the origin of life. Was there a specific reason for this idea?

Yes, that was in 2011. I was invited by a newspaper in Switzerland to write a few columns. I started to write about resources and food in these texts and about what bothers me: the way we deal with food, the way we deal with our environment. And during this phase, I designed the globe and then the egg. The eggs actually always resonate with me. Regularly for my wife – I only mention this in passing – for her birthday, for Mother’s Day, there are always drawings of chicken and egg. I either start with the chicken or the egg, but the egg always resonates.

Do the many openings in the sculpture also have a meaning?

The openings were created by the lines of longitude and latitude. And I found them very special as soon as I was able to work in the egg. There is a feeling of protection when you are in your human egg and you can see the outside world through these openings. At the same time, it could also be a prison. These feelings arose in me when I was working in the egg.

From a professional point of view – I trained as a stone sculptor and also took the master craftsman’s examination – I know almost all the materials. But even so, I used to only work with black stone for my shapes. And now, for years, I’ve only been working in white. For the small sculptures I make, I use a bright white marble. There is no other solution for me and for my forms. I have never used any materials with textures. They are beautiful, but not for my shapes.

But the marble for the egg has a certain texture. Was a block of 55 tons in pure white not available?

For the Globo Uovo, the stone is a little more marbled. Because this size in pure white – that would have been almost impossible and would have meant such a long wait. And the egg in this size in pure white would almost be a little too beautiful(laughs), almost baroque. That’s impossible. Visually too, it’s almost not rock anymore.

So the egg also looks much more “alive”.

Exactly, that’s what I mean. This methamorphosis of the rock, this mountain, that has to resonate.

How did the change from black to white rock come about?

That’s an interesting question. I have to go back to that. I wanted to make a really big sculpture in the 1990s. I chose a large block in Carrara without knowing what I was going to do with it. I wanted to be inspired by the material, by the block. I normally proceed differently. I have a drawing or a model and then work on the stone. But now I wanted to be influenced by the block. At the time, it was 20 tons in size. And that put an enormous strain on me(laughs). I suddenly realized that the further north the block was transported from Italy, the greater the strain in my head became. I was very blocked! And suddenly I found the solution. I then worked out a light cloth from this block. That was probably my solution, to release this heaviness in me in relation to the block. And since then I’ve only worked with white stone.

Are there purely visual reasons why you like to work with marble a lot, or is it also because of its properties?

Both, actually. My sculptures are also a matter of light. Not only with the large egg, but also with the other sculptures. The way the light passes through the opening and the edges is what makes it so good. And the properties for working are a pleasant side effect. It is easy to work with because it is so even, so homogeneous. But I mainly use marble because light and shadow are important for my sculptures.

You also want to send out a message with your art objects.

Yes, absolutely. I think that’s the greatest task of an artist. That his work is seen and heard, as the case may be. Communication is important. It makes no sense at all if I make an egg like this just to have another beautiful sculpture in a park somewhere. That wouldn’t be enough. It needs a message.

What message is that?

We have great difficulties with resources in general. This is most sensitive when it comes to food. And I really want to draw attention to the fact that people need to deal with the issue of food and resources. That a small train of thought changes.

Your sculpture is currently on display at the Dürrenmatt Center in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Before the exhibition began, you launched an appeal to collect eggshells. What was the reason?

We had planned a performance with a dancer for the vernissage. I needed a lot of eggshells for that. Over the course of a year, people collected around 35,000 eggshells, washed them and brought them to me. Something you would normally throw away. For the exhibition opening, we laid them out on the floor of the museum and cleared paths, like a labyrinth. The dancer danced her way through it. But every now and then she made missteps on the eggshells, causing them to crack. And at the same time, with every misstep, a part of her body died. Because the shells represent our resources and if they are destroyed, the person dies too. And so she danced through the labyrinth and gradually died a dramatic death after three or four missteps.

Find out more about the project and the natural stone work in the February issue of STEIN. You can also find more information at www.stein-magazin.de/skulptur-des-monats-globo-uovo.