Risen from the ruins

Building design

Aalen has a new cultural venue. The Kulturbahnhof was created by incorporating the ruins of an old railroad building. The Stuttgart-based architecture firm a+r delivered a design that clearly distinguishes between historical and new components and creates space for a variety of cultural activities. After three years of construction, the new Kulturbahnhof opened its doors in Aalen. […]

Aalen has a new cultural venue. The Kulturbahnhof was created by incorporating the ruins of an old railroad building. The Stuttgart-based architecture firm a+r provided a design that clearly distinguishes between historical and new components and creates space for a variety of cultural activities.

After three years of construction, the new Kulturbahnhof opened its doors in Aalen. A new era of culture can now begin where only fragments of burnt-down buildings once stood. Ideas for the conversion of an old sandstone building were sought in a design competition back in 2015. The competition was won by a+r Architekten from Stuttgart. Now they have not only breathed new life into the old walls. They transformed the fragments into an architecturally high-quality example of conversion and reuse.

On the outskirts of Aalen, between the city center and Oststadt, a new part of the city has been created. Since the 19th century, the railroad depot and, from 1955, an industrial plant were located on an oval area of around 6.5 hectares. Both have not existed for many years. An urban planning competition was then held in 2010 to find concepts. With functions such as living, working, experiencing and culture, a new lively urban quarter was to grow here. This has now been achieved. Today, the new Kulturbahnhof Aalen forms the heart of a new, lively inner-city district. A total of around 250 apartments can be found on the site. There is also an administration building and a day care center. A hotel is also being built right next to the Kulturbahnhof. In the middle of these different uses is the “Drehschreibe Grüne Mitte”, an open space that invites people to linger, play and relax.

Future project Kulturbahnhof

The Kulturbahnhof Aalen is designed as a place that brings together various activities that were previously spread across several locations. Now they are all gathered together on the former railroad premises. Essentially even in two existing buildings, which have been repurposed, converted and extended. The following uses have been integrated into the existing buildings: Foyer, entrance and information area, Theater der Stadt Aalen, Spiel- und Theaterwerkstatt Ostalb, Kino am Kocher, music school and scheduling areas. The architects a+r from Stuttgart won the design competition for this comprehensive task in September 2015. They also prevailed in the subsequent VOF procedure and were ultimately awarded the contract for the construction of the Kulturbahnhof Aalen. This will take place between 2018 and 2020.

In 2014, a devastating fire broke out in the middle of the redevelopment of the site. Large parts of the historic railroad depot from the mid-19th century were destroyed, including the railroad administration building and the main hall of the repair workshop. However, as the sandstone buildings are an important document of Aalen’s railroad history, it was important to preserve the building fabric that remained after the fire as best as possible.

When converting the ruins of the railroad administration building into a cultural station, a+r contrasted the fragments of the old building with 21st century architectural forms. The architects supplemented the largely destroyed façade of the old railroad building with new façade elements in exposed concrete. Elsewhere, however, the architects renovated and reconstructed the historical substance. In some places, for example, the sandstone façade was supplemented and repaired by stonemasons. Nevertheless, a+r left the additions visible here too: the new, smoother surfaces distinguish the added sandstone from the existing building.

The roofs of the short transverse gables were rebuilt according to the historical model. However, the architects treated the longitudinal gables differently. These were replaced by a long rectangular block clad with folded perforated sheeting. It makes reference to the surroundings, to the urban edges of the adjacent neighborhood to the south. In contrast to the historic sandstone façade, which has an ornamental, handcrafted and solid appearance, the added cuboid appears delicate and restrained. Its semi-transparent perforated sheet façade allows the volumes behind it to shimmer through and is reminiscent of a cloth-like curtain.

The historic façade of the Kulturbahnhof Aalen forms the shell for a generous amount of space inside. The architects inserted various “boxes” into the completely gutted interior of the old building. They each accommodate different uses. These houses within the building also perform a structural function by bracing the building envelope. The large halls and public uses of the Kulturbahnhof were accommodated within the old perimeter walls, while the rooms of the music school and the theater workshops are located in the saddled cuboid. In this way, the rooms used for cultural production and education symbolically tower above the stages for the public.

In all interventions, the architects attached great importance to preserving the historical materials, the old window structure and the visible roof construction. The materials help to create an authentic and independent ambience for the various cultural offerings. The entire material and design concept follows the design idea of relating 19th and 21st century industrial architecture to one another.

In addition to design considerations, pragmatic aspects also played a role in the refurbishment of the old railroad building. A shared building for different cultural venues that were previously spread across several locations helps to conserve resources. It enables synergies and long-term cost savings. But Aalen is also setting an important example of sustainability by transforming a derelict site and a burnt ruin into a new, vibrant part of the city. It is therefore not surprising that the federal and state governments have supported the project with urban development funding.

Max Dudler has created a completely different cultural station in Berlin: The Museumsinsel subway station quotes a stage design by the great architect Karl Friedrich Schinkel.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE
Wartburg Castle has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1999. Photo: A.Savin - Own work, FAL, via: Wikimedia Commons

Wartburg Castle has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1999.
Photo: A.Savin - Own work, FAL, via: Wikimedia Commons

Rising high above the Thuringian countryside, Wartburg Castle is one of the most representative cultural monuments in Central Europe. Since its inscription on the UNESCO World Heritage List, it has been one of the most outstanding testimonies to European history. Architecture, political events and literary tradition intertwine here to create a multi-layered cultural narrative.

The history of Wartburg Castle begins in the 11th century, when it was founded as the residence of the Ludovingian landgraves and from then on shaped the political power in the region. Even in the High Middle Ages, the palace, enthroned on a steep limestone cliff, was considered a masterpiece of late Romanesque architecture, whose design and ornamentation make it one of the most important secular buildings north of the Alps. This architectural heritage is evidence of the feudal character of Central Europe and forms one of the foundations for the later recognition as a World Heritage Site.
Wartburg Castle’s role as a center of courtly culture and memory grows through literary traditions such as the so-called Singers’ War, which was passed down in Middle High German poetry. At the same time, historical figures such as St. Elisabeth of Thuringia, whose life and work are closely linked to the castle, are becoming firmly established in the culture of remembrance. Even if some legends were mythically exaggerated, they still reflect the early symbolic value of the place in the cultural imagination.

The architectural appearance of Wartburg Castle is the result of a long development that underwent a profound transformation, particularly in the 19th century. After centuries of changing use and partial decay, the emerging Romantic period initiated a comprehensive restoration that was based less on a historically accurate reconstruction than on an idealized image of the Middle Ages. Under this premise, the Elisabeth Bower and richly decorated interiors were created, which today form an integral part of the complex.
From an art historical perspective, this combination of original 12th century parts and historicist additions is ambivalent: on the one hand, the preserved Romanesque building elements document the civil architecture of its time; on the other hand, the 19th century additions reflect the monument preservation and historical myths of the time. It was precisely this mixture of archaeological and symbolic authenticity that was taken into account in the UNESCO nomination, with the term “authenticity” not only referring to material originality, but also including the ideas and meanings anchored in the collective consciousness.

Wartburg Castle is more than just a stone relic – it is a place of profound cultural connections. Martin Luther’s stay here during his exile from 1521 to 1522, when he wrote the German translation of the New Testament from Greek in the so-called “Junker Jörg” room, was particularly influential. This achievement in the history of language had far-reaching consequences for theology, education and the German literary language as a whole and had a lasting impact on the cultural significance of the castle.
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, Wartburg Castle also became a symbol of national identity and political integration. Events such as the Wartburg celebrations of the German student movement became part of the collective memory, as did literary and musical adaptations in works by Richard Wagner, which romanticized the image of the medieval castle courtyard. Wartburg Castle also remains a living point of reference in cultural memory as an inspirational place for artistic debate.
In 1999, the site was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List on the basis of two criteria: Firstly, as an “outstanding monument of the era of feudalism in Central Europe” (criterion (iii)) and secondly, as a site “rich in cultural references”, particularly emphasizing its connection to the history of the Reformation and the German unification movement (criterion (vi)). These criteria reflect the exceptional universal value that Wartburg Castle has beyond the borders of Thuringia. The castle not only documents the architecture and living environment of high medieval feudalism, but also exemplifies the profound influence of historical events and cultural upheavals on European civilization. The UNESCO designation therefore not only recognizes the material substance of the complex, but above all its role as a place of remembrance that inspires generations of visitors to reflect and research. The integrative perception of architecture, history and cultural impact makes Wartburg Castle a unique medium for communicating the past and present.
At a time when cultural heritage is increasingly being discussed in a global context, Wartburg Castle highlights the importance of historical sites as mediators of identity, memory and transnational understanding. Its place on the World Heritage List helps to secure this significance in the long term and make it tangible for future generations.

Safety – The Baumeister in April 2025 is here!

Building design

Will this makeshift barrier around the bronze statue actually help at night? Not sure ... Cover photo: Rona Bar & Ofen Avshalom / Connected Archives

“Security” in architecture means more than just barriers and alarm systems – there is much more to it than that. This issue sheds light on how buildings can provide protection – be it against the forces of nature, theft or social conflict. Your planners do not see security as a restriction, but as a design potential. In order to avoid repellent gestures, they often find security-relevant solutions in the building form. […]

“Security” in architecture means more than just barriers and alarm systems – there is much more to it than that. This issue sheds light on how buildings can provide protection – be it against the forces of nature, theft or social conflict. Your planners do not see security as a restriction, but as a design potential. To avoid repellent gestures, they often find security-related solutions in the building design.

Security – a word that is supposed to reassure and yet often has the opposite effect. We all long for it, but we also know that there is no such thing as absolute security. A building can protect against rain and cold, a city can be well planned – but can architecture really guarantee that we feel safe? Or does it only create an illusion? And in the end, isn’t the feeling of safety just as important as the safety itself?

The last year alone has shown us once again how fragile our built and lived environment is. Collapsing bridges, poorly maintained high-rise buildings and natural disasters that destroy entire neighborhoods. At the same time, fear of attacks in public spaces is growing, and in many cities measures are being taken to turn urban squares and buildings into high-security zones. But do we really need to turn our built reality into bastions of concrete and cameras in order to feel safe? Or is there a more intelligent answer to the question of protection?

Architecture cannot guarantee absolute security, but it can create trust. It can shape spaces that convey a sense of security without restricting freedom. Architecture has the unique potential to master precisely this balancing act. From fire and earthquake-proof school buildings to carefully considered designs for public spaces: Security architecture must not rely solely on control and barriers, but must enable trust and freedom. A clever choice of materials, for example, can preserve a feeling of openness without sacrificing protection. Ultimately, it must not be about sealing things off, but about proactive design.

Security must not become an aesthetic of mistrust. Walls, bars, barriers and confined spaces may minimize risks, but they also separate us from each other. All too often, they stifle life. The most popular place, both inside and out, is often where people meet, where light and transparency dominate, where architecture acts as a social bond and thus serves a greater purpose.

This issue is an invitation to rethink security. We show projects that prove that protection does not have to mean control, but trust. That architecture not only erects walls, but also builds bridges – between security and freedom, between control and openness. Because true security is not created by fear, but by clever (re)planning, by courageous design and by a society that does not close itself off, but proactively takes the helm. Enjoy reading!

Yours sincerely,
Tobias Hager

Editor-in-Chief
t.hager@georg-media.de

The magazine is available here in the store!

In March, our Baumeister issue was all about building on existing buildings and conversion. Read more about it here!