Seeing Trees – Book review

Building design
Seeing Trees, Cover: Yale University Press London

Seeing Trees, Cover: Yale University Press London

translated from the English by Anna Arndt

Can urban trees be controversial? In “Seeing Trees”, winner of the John Brinckerhoff Jackson Book Prize, Sonja Dümpelmann, professor of landscape history, explores the history of trees in New York City and Berlin in the late 19th and 20th centuries. The author sheds light on their historical function in the urban environment. Street trees and various interest groups play a central role in this book.

Seeing Trees: content and structure

The book is divided into two main parts, each with four chapters. The parts are dedicated to the respective metropolitan areas and their stories. The chapters on New York City show how public and private activism sought to change the urban landscape. The second half looks at Berlin’s trees. The focus here is on the efforts to “replant” in the period after the Second World War. Ideological differences between the planning strategies of the eastern and western sectors also play a role.

What both parts have in common is the “rediscovery” of trees by society. The 318 pages of the book cover a wide range of topics, such as the emergence of urban forestry, the beginnings of systematic planning processes and the lobbying movements resulting from aesthetic considerations and public health concerns.

Although the histories of the two cities are very different, the book emphasizes similarities. The author is less interested in comparing the two cities. Rather, the book is a juxtaposition of the different approaches and progress made in relation to urban trees.

Illustrated with historical plans and photographs

The stories about the trees are captivating. They contain clues to the identity of a city. Indeed, reading “Seeing Trees” means immersing oneself in very detailed accounts of public and private engagement that have gradually shaped citizens’ awareness of trees. The book is far from being a “mere” overview. Instead, it immerses the reader in the changing meaning of trees over the past centuries and the intricacies of the various fashions and developments that have impacted urban trees. The careful selection of historical plans, photographs and illustrations, complemented by an extensive bibliography, reflect the author’s thorough research. Meanwhile, the writing style, though formal, is clear and concise.

The book offers a convincing alternative to the traditional approach of the “nature versus culture” dichotomy. Instead, Dümpelmann presents street trees as an integral part of the urban fabric. Professionals in the fields of forestry, urban development and landscape architecture, as well as readers with a keen interest in the history of the urban landscape, will find this book enlightening.

The text was written in the “scientific writing workshop landscape architecture” at the TUM Chair of Landscape Architecture and Transformation with Prof. Udo Weilacher. As part of the seminar, students select specialist literature and work together on individual book reviews.

Dorothee Rummel’s book “Unbestimmte Räume in Städten” is also interesting. Read our review here.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Living in and with monuments

Building design
The agenda of the online conference "Living in and with monuments" includes a guided virtual tour of the exemplarily renovated Old School Klosterbruck monument in the grounds of the large Louka Monastery in Znojmo. Photo: Staircase of Louka Monastery / Znojmo / Wikimedia Commons /HamzovaT

The agenda of the online conference "Living in and with monuments" includes a guided virtual tour of the exemplarily renovated Old School Klosterbruck monument in the grounds of the large Louka Monastery in Znojmo. Photo: Staircase of Louka Monastery / Znojmo / Wikimedia Commons /HamzovaT

As part of the research project “Center for the Renewal of Shared Cultural Heritage” at Danube University – University for Continuing Education Krems, the cross-border heritage conference “Living in and with Monuments” will take place today and tomorrow, November 18 and 19, 2021 Experts from four countries will provide insights into new trends and findings in renovation, restoration and further construction in a historical setting. At […]

As part of the research project “Center for Renewal of the Common Cultural Heritage” of the Danube University – University for Continuing Education Krems, the cross-border monument protection conference “Living in and with monuments” will take place today and tomorrow, November 18 and 19, 2021

Experts from four countries will provide insights into new trends and findings in refurbishment, restoration and further construction in a historic setting. The program of the online conference “Living in and with monuments” on 18 and 19 November 2021 also includes a guided virtual tour of the exemplarily renovated monuments Kulturhaus Schüttkasten in Retz and Alte Schule Klosterbruck in the area of the large Louka Monastery in Znojmo.

The conference, organized by Danube University – University for Continuing Education Krems and the city of Retz together with Czech partners, is aimed at all interested parties, especially owners and operators of historic buildings as well as administrative experts, museum planners, tourism professionals and experts from the construction and ancillary building trades. The event will take place online and will be simultaneously translated into German and Czech. Participation is free of charge and registration is not required.

About the project “Center for Renewal of Common Cultural Heritage”

The EU Interreg research project “Center for the Renewal of the Common Cultural Heritage” aims to establish a center for the renewal of the common Austrian-Czech cultural heritage close to the border. The focus is on cross-border cooperation for the sustainable renovation of historic buildings and sites, raising public awareness of the issue and promoting the common cultural heritage. The renovation of two architectural monuments – the Old School in the Louka Monastery in Znojmo on the Czech side and the Schüttkasten in Retz on the Austrian side – as part of the project is intended to serve as a model for the successive revitalization of the entire region.

Online conference “Living in and with monuments”

Date: November 18 and 19, 2021
Location:
online via ZOOM
Registration: https://de.col-conference.eu
Queries: Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Bernhard Schneider, Center for Architectural Heritage, University for Continuing Education Krems, Tel.: +43 (0)676 7614000, bernhard.schneider@donau-uni.ac.at , www.donau-uni.ac.at/dbu

Reading tip: Natural disasters, war or climate change – our cultural heritage is exposed to many threats. Several initiatives are currently addressing this issue. Dr. Ute Strimmer spoke to Professor Christian Hanus, Dean of the Faculty of Education, Art and Architecture at Danube University – University for Continuing Education Krems. His Department of Building and Environment is one of the first to dedicate itself to new solutions in this area at university level. Read more here.

The Faculty of Education, Art and Architecture at Danube University Krems is supporting the region around Accumoli, which was hit hard by earthquakes, with teaching and research projects at the “School of Reconstruction”. In addition to the structural reconstruction, the aim of the efforts is also the cultural, social and economic revitalization of the central Italian municipality. With this in mind, the international orchestra academy “Accademia Vicino” was launched in Accumoli in summer 2021, including a series of concerts with conductor Johannes Wildner. You can watch a video about this special initiative here:

Brexit: The Institute of Conservation takes a stand

Building design

Alison Richmond is managing director of the British conservators’ association Icon. Exclusively for RESTAURO, she has taken a position on the referendum eight weeks ago. The result of the referendum on whether the UK should remain in the European Union – 52% voted to leave the EU and 48% voted to remain – was […]

Alison Richmond is managing director of the British conservators’ association Icon. Exclusively for RESTAURO, she has taken a position on the referendum eight weeks ago.

The result of the referendum on whether the UK should remain in the European Union – 52% voted to leave the EU and 48% voted to remain – came as a shock to many.

Unraveling such a complex relationship that has existed for over 40 years is an enormous undertaking. It may take years for the full extent of this decision to be revealed. Until we know more, it is business as usual. Nevertheless, we can try to imagine what consequences this decision could have for the field of cultural heritage preservation in the longer term.

Consequences for the preservation of cultural heritage?
EU research funding will presumably no longer be accessible to UK institutions. We can assume that this will have direct consequences for conservation research as well as indirect consequences due to the interdisciplinary nature of our field of work with associated disciplines such as heritage conservation, art history and archaeology. This will not only affect universities, but also museums and other heritage organizations that receive research funding from Europe. EU programs already underway, such as Horizon 2020 (with a planned budget of 80 billion euros from 2014 to 2020), may not yet be affected, but UK institutions may be excluded from future decisions on joint projects. There is a need for intensive campaigning to continue research funding in the field of conservation and heritage management. The Institute of Conservation (Icon) will seek to work with other partners in the cultural sector to ensure that we have a strong voice in decisions affecting future funding.

The conservation sector has a strong network across Europe and internationally and we know that many of our members work across Europe. The free movement of labor will be one of the issues that will need to be addressed. Icon will continue to champion conservation issues, mindful of the fact that many students who study conservation at universities in the UK stay and work there, and that many of our best heritage organizations employ conservators and heritage professionals from the rest of Europe.

Cuts for students
Icon is also aware that potential cuts to subsidized tuition fees for university students from other European countries may have a disproportionate effect on conservation degree courses. We will continue to participate in and advocate for cutting-edge education as offered in the UK.

Much of the dynamism in the conservation sector comes from the fact that it is international in nature and that knowledge and experience is shared across borders. This is something we value, and we will continue to promote the field of conservation as an open and forward-looking industry in a European and international context.

Read more about Brexit in restoration here.