Stairwell Fire Safety: An Overview of the Basics and Requirements

Building design
A structural detail of the building related to stairwell fire safety
A red fire extinguisher hangs on a wall – Photo: jakubzerdzicki / Unsplash

In the event of a fire, the stairwell is the backbone of building evacuation and, at the same time, the most critical weak point in a building’s fire safety plan. Stairwell fire protection refers to the totality of all structural, technical, and organizational measures that ensure stairwells function as safe escape and rescue routes in an emergency, prevent fire and smoke from spreading to other occupancy units, and provide firefighters with a safe access route. Anyone familiar with the fundamentals of this topic understands why fire doors, smoke vents, and building component requirements are not merely bureaucratic formalities, but physically grounded protective measures with direct implications for human lives.

  • What constitutes a required stairwell under building codes and how it is classified
  • What building code requirements apply to walls, ceilings, and doors in stairwells
  • Why smoke poses the greatest danger in the event of a fire and how stairwells are kept smoke-tight
  • What role safety stairwells and pressurized ventilation systems play
  • How escape and rescue routes in stairwells are planned and dimensioned
  • What requirements apply to fire-rated doors, door closers, and door-holding systems
  • How the requirements differ depending on building class and use
  • What typical design and construction errors compromise fire safety in stairwells

The required stairwell: Definition and classification under building codes

German building codes distinguish between a general stairwell and an essential stairwell. An essential stairwell is one that is required to provide access to occupancy spaces in buildings with more than one full story and is therefore directly subject to statutory fire safety requirements. The Model Building Code (MBO) and the respective state building codes (LBO) of the federal states define the building class and type of use above which a necessary stairwell must be provided and which protection requirements apply to it. Since building code law is a matter for the federal states, the specific regulations differ in detail from one federal state to another, but all follow the common framework of the Model Building Code.

The Model Building Code classifies buildings into five classes based on height and use. Building Class 1 comprises low-rise, freestanding buildings, while Building Class 5 covers high-rise buildings with the upper edge of the floor of the top occupied room more than thirteen meters above ground level. As the building class increases, the fire protection requirements for stairwells increase significantly: wall constructions must meet higher fire resistance classes, doors must be smoke-tight and self-closing, and, starting at certain building heights, safety stairwells with mechanical pressurized ventilation systems are required. Anyone planning a building must determine this classification as the first step in fire protection planning, as it determines all subsequent requirements.

In addition to the building class, the building’s use plays a decisive role. Special-purpose buildings such as hospitals, nursing homes, schools, places of assembly, or high-rise buildings are subject to their own special building codes or regulations that go beyond the general requirements of state building codes. In these buildings, occupants are often limited in their mobility, are asleep, or are unfamiliar with the building, which further tightens the requirements for escape and rescue routes and, consequently, for stairwell fire protection. The design of such buildings generally requires a separate fire protection plan, which must be reviewed by a certified fire protection consultant or expert.

Structural Requirements: Walls, Ceilings, Floor Coverings, and Openings

The walls of a required stairwell must be constructed of non-combustible materials and have a defined fire resistance rating. In technical terminology, this property is expressed by fire resistance classes, which are classified according to DIN EN 13501-2. The designation REI stands for the three criteria: load-bearing capacity (R, from “Resistance”), compartment integrity (E, “Integrity”), and thermal insulation (I, “Insulation”), followed by the minimum duration in minutes. A wall classified as REI 90 must therefore meet all three criteria for at least ninety minutes. For stairwell walls in Class 4 and 5 buildings, the Model Building Code generally requires fire-resistant building elements, which corresponds to REI 90, while highly fire-retardant building elements (REI 60) may be sufficient for Class 3 buildings.

Ceilings and landings in stairwells must meet the same fire resistance requirements as the walls, as they are intended to prevent vertical fire spread between floors. Floor coverings in required stairwells must be made of noncombustible or at least flame-retardant materials to prevent rapid fire spread along the escape route itself. In practice, stairwells are therefore often constructed with concrete stair structures, natural stone flooring, or ceramic tiles. Textile floor coverings, untreated wooden planks, or combustible wall coverings are generally not permitted in required stairwells.

Openings in stairwell walls—that is, doors, windows, and utility penetrations—are particularly critical from a fire safety perspective because they interrupt the otherwise enclosed protective zone. Specific requirements apply to each opening: Doors must be designed as fire-rated doors, utility lines must be equipped with approved fire-sealing systems, and windows in stairwells may, under certain conditions, only be fitted with fire-resistant glazing. In practice, service penetrations are particularly often neglected: A carefully planned fire door loses its effectiveness entirely if an electrical installation is routed through the stairwell wall next to it without proper compartmentalization.

Smoke as the Main Hazard: Smoke Tightness, Smoke Exhaust, and Pressurized Ventilation

Statistically, far more people die from smoke inhalation in fires than from direct exposure to flames. Smoke spreads rapidly, rises, and fills stairwells within minutes if no effective barriers are in place. Stairwell fire protection is therefore aimed not only at stopping the fire but, above all, at keeping the stairwell smoke-free. Only a smoke-free stairwell is a safe escape route; a smoke-filled stairwell is life-threatening, even if the structure itself still withstands the fire.

Smoke-tight doors, designated as Class S (smoke) doors in the standard, prevent smoke from passing through the door jamb even in the absence of flames. They are equipped with sealing profiles that expand into a foam in the event of a fire or that provide a sufficient seal even under normal conditions. The requirement for smoke tightness must be distinguished from the requirement for fire resistance: A door can be fire-retardant without being smoke-tight, and vice versa. In stairwell fire protection, doors that combine both properties—that is, are both smoke-tight and fire-retardant or fire-resistant—are generally required.

For smoke extraction from stairwells, the Model Building Code stipulates that required stairwells on the top floor must have an opening for smoke exhaust. This smoke exhaust opening, or RAO for short, must have a minimum area and be capable of being opened manually or automatically. In practice, smoke exhaust windows or smoke exhaust dampers are used for this purpose, which are activated by manual release, a thermal switch, or a fire alarm system. The principle of thermal convection ensures that hot smoke rises and escapes through the open vent, while fresh air flows in from below, keeping the escape route clear.

In high-rise buildings and special structures, passive smoke exhaust is not sufficient. In these cases, pressurized ventilation systems (DBA) are used to actively supply the stairwell with fresh air at positive pressure. This positive pressure prevents smoke from the fire floor from entering the stairwell through open doors. Pressurized ventilation systems are technically complex: They must maintain sufficient positive pressure even when doors are open, but at the same time must not generate so much pressure that doors can no longer be opened. The design and testing of such systems are carried out in accordance with DIN EN 12101-6 and require specialized expertise in building services engineering.

Safety Stairwells and Special Access Configurations

The safety stairwell represents the highest level of protection in stairwell fire protection and is mandatory for high-rise buildings as well as certain special structures. It differs from a standard stairwell in that access from the building is not direct but occurs via a separate vestibule or airlock. This airlock, also known as a safety airlock, serves as a buffer zone between the fire floor and the stairwell and prevents smoke from entering when the stairwell door is opened. The airlock itself must also be sealed to prevent smoke from entering and equipped with its own smoke extraction system or pressurized ventilation.

In some types of buildings, particularly high-rises, the safety stairwell is designed as an exterior stairwell accessible via walkways or outdoor platforms. Since it is located outdoors, it is naturally smoke-free as long as there are no openings in the facade immediately adjacent to it. This solution is structurally simpler than a pressurized ventilation system but requires careful planning of the facade openings and the distances to fire compartments. Outdoor staircases are also subject to weather-related limitations, which is why they are used less frequently in Germany than in other countries.

In addition to the safety stairwell, building codes recognize the concept of a second escape route. This does not necessarily have to be a second stairwell; it can also be provided via fire department rescue equipment—such as ladders and aerial rescue vehicles—provided that the building’s height and local fire department capabilities permit it. However, above a certain height—which varies by state building code—the second escape route must be structurally provided, that is, through a second required stairwell. This requirement has a direct impact on floor plan design, as two independent stairwells must be spatially arranged in such a way that they cannot be blocked simultaneously in the event of a fire.

Fire Doors: Requirements, Classification, and Common Mistakes

Fire-rated doors are the most commonly used—and at the same time the most frequently improperly installed—component in stairwell fire protection. They are classified according to DIN EN 13501-2, where the designation “EI” stands for fire resistance and thermal insulation, supplemented by the letter “S” for smoke tightness. A door classified as EI2 30-S provides compartmentalization and thermal insulation for thirty minutes and is smoke-tight. In German-speaking countries, the older designations T30 (fire-retardant) and T90 (fire-resistant) are still widely used, even though they have been formally superseded by the European classification system. For required stairwells in Building Class 3, T30-RS doors (smoke-tight and self-closing) are generally required; in Building Classes 4 and 5, T30-RS or T90-RS doors are required depending on location and function.

Self-closing doors are a fundamental requirement for the proper functioning of fire-rated doors. A door closer ensures that the door automatically returns to the closed position after each opening. Only a closed fire door fulfills its protective function. In practice, door closers are often removed, blocked, or rendered inoperable with wedges because users want to keep the doors open for convenience. This is not only a violation of regulations but can also be a direct threat to life in the event of a fire. Hold-open systems, which keep a door open during normal operation and automatically close it in the event of a fire, are the technically correct solution for areas where open doors are desired for operational reasons. They are triggered by the fire alarm system or a smoke detector and must be approved in accordance with DIN 18232 or the relevant product standards.

Other common errors with fire-rated doors relate to their installation. A fire-rated door is only as good as its installation: rebates, door frames, and joints with the surrounding walls must be properly executed and sealed with approved materials. Subsequent modifications to the door, such as drilling holes for locks or shortening the door leaf, can invalidate the certification. Furthermore, the combination of a fire-rated door with a transom or side panel requires separate certification for the entire door assembly, not just for the door leaf alone. Planners and contractors must be aware of these requirements and verify them accordingly during the bidding process and final inspection.

Escape and Rescue Routes: Dimensions, Lengths, and Markings

A stairwell only fully fulfills its protective function if it can be reached safely and quickly from every occupied space. The Model Building Code and state building codes specify maximum lengths for hallways and escape routes leading to the required stairwell. This escape route length—measured as the actual walking distance from the farthest point of an occupied space to the stairwell door—is generally a maximum of thirty-five meters. In special buildings and for certain uses, different values may apply, which must be justified in the fire safety plan.

The width of staircases and stair runs is also regulated by standards. Required staircases must have a clear width of at least one meter, although larger widths are required for certain uses, such as places of assembly or nursing homes. The stair pitch affects walking speed and thus evacuation time; stairs that are too steep slow down evacuation and increase the risk of falls. Handrails on both sides are not merely a matter of convenience but a safety requirement that is particularly important for people with limited mobility.

The marking of escape and rescue routes is governed by ASR A1.3 (Technical Rules for Workplaces) and DIN ISO 7010, which establishes internationally standardized safety signs. Emergency signs with a green background and a white pictogram indicate emergency exits and escape routes. In stairwells without sufficient natural light or in buildings with a high occupancy rate, emergency lighting is required that continues to function even if the general power supply fails. This emergency lighting must be designed in accordance with DIN EN 1838 and ensure a minimum illuminance level on the escape route.

Stairwell Fire Safety in Context: Planning, Inspection, and Responsibility

Stairwell fire protection is not an isolated issue but rather part of a holistic fire protection concept that encompasses all of a building’s protection objectives: the rescue of people and animals, effective firefighting by the fire department, the prevention of fire spread to neighboring buildings, and the protection of property. The stairwell occupies a special position in this context because it serves simultaneously as an escape route, an access route for the fire department, and a vertical connection between all floors. This multifunctional role makes it the most critical zone in the fire protection structure of the entire building.

Responsibility for stairwell fire protection lies at several levels. During the planning phase, architects and specialist planners are responsible for designing the stairwell in accordance with standards; for special-purpose buildings, the involvement of a qualified fire protection planner or expert is not only recommended but is required by building codes in many federal states. During the construction phase, responsibility lies with the contractors, who must install approved products properly and immediately report any deviations from the approved plans. During operation, the owner or operator is responsible for ensuring that structural fire protection is maintained, door closers function properly, escape routes are kept clear, and maintenance schedules are followed.

Periodic inspections are an indispensable part of fire safety during operation. Fire doors, smoke exhaust systems, pressurized ventilation systems, and emergency lighting must be inspected at regular intervals by qualified personnel, and the inspections must be documented. Deficiencies identified during such inspections are not merely technical shortcomings; they can also have legal liability consequences in the event of damage. The inspection requirements are derived from state building codes, the Industrial Safety Regulation, and the relevant technical standards.

One aspect that is often underestimated is a change of use in existing buildings. If a building is repurposed—for example, an office building into a dormitory or a warehouse into a school—the fire safety requirements for stairwells change fundamentally. What was sufficient for one type of use may be inadequate for another, especially if the new use involves more people, groups of occupants requiring greater protection, or longer periods of occupancy. Changes in building use generally trigger a requirement for a building permit, which also includes an inspection and, if necessary, retrofitting of the fire protection system. Anyone who ignores this obligation not only endangers others but also exposes themselves to significant legal risks.

Stairwell fire safety is ultimately the area where structural diligence is most directly linked to human safety. No other component of a building is subjected to such intense stress in an emergency and is, at the same time, so dependent on consistent planning, professional execution, and ongoing maintenance. Those who know the basics, understand the requirements, and are aware of typical sources of error can help ensure that stairwells remain what they must be in the event of a fire: a reliable, smoke-free route to the outdoors.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

How Kigali uses GIS for participatory planning

Building design
aerial-view-of-a-city-through-which-an-influence-flows-P2d8SKdbjEE

Atmospheric aerial view of a town with a river running through it, photographed by Carrie Borden

Wie gelingt partizipative Planung in einer wachsenden Millionenstadt, in der jede Entscheidung über Straßen, Parks und Infrastrukturen das Leben von Hunderttausenden beeinflusst? Kigali, die pulsierende Hauptstadt Ruandas, hat mit dem Einsatz von GIS-Technologien nicht nur die digitale Stadtplanung revolutioniert, sondern auch eine neue Ära der Bürgerbeteiligung eingeläutet. Wer wissen will, wie datenbasierte Werkzeuge und partizipative Methoden selbst unter herausfordernden Bedingungen eine sozial gerechte Stadtentwicklung ermöglichen, sollte jetzt weiterlesen.

  • Einführung: Warum Kigali als Vorreiter für partizipative Planung mit GIS gilt
  • Grundlagen: Was ist GIS und wie funktioniert es im urbanen Kontext?
  • Partizipation digital gedacht: Wie GIS Werkzeuge neue Beteiligungsformate ermöglichen
  • Praktische Umsetzung: Konkrete Projekte und Prozesse aus Kigali
  • Herausforderungen und Learnings: Technische, gesellschaftliche und kulturelle Aspekte
  • Transferpotenziale: Was deutsche, österreichische und Schweizer Städte lernen können
  • Fazit: GIS als Katalysator für gerechtere, effizientere und transparentere Stadtentwicklung

Kigali als Labor der digitalen Stadtplanung: Warum die Hauptstadt Ruandas auf GIS setzt

Kigali hat in den letzten beiden Jahrzehnten eine Transformation durchlebt, die ihresgleichen sucht. Die Stadt, einst gebeutelt von den Nachwirkungen politischer und wirtschaftlicher Krisen, gilt heute als eine der saubersten und sichersten Metropolen Afrikas – und zunehmend auch als Innovationsmotor für Stadtentwicklung. Zentrale Rolle spielt dabei der strategische Einsatz von Geographic Information Systems, kurz GIS. Während viele europäische Städte noch über die Digitalisierung der Bauleitplanung debattieren, hat Kigali längst die Vorteile digitaler Werkzeuge erkannt und gezielt für die Stadtentwicklung adaptiert.

Doch warum ausgerechnet GIS? Anders als klassische CAD-Modelle oder statische Karten sind GIS-Plattformen lebendige, multilayerfähige Werkzeuge, die es ermöglichen, Geodaten, sozioökonomische Informationen und Umweltdaten miteinander zu verknüpfen. Im Unterschied zu herkömmlichen Planungsansätzen eröffnet GIS die Möglichkeit, große Mengen an Raumdaten zu erfassen, zu analysieren und in Echtzeit zu visualisieren. In Kigali war das kein Selbstzweck, sondern eine Notwendigkeit: Die rapide Urbanisierung, das knappe Bauland und die komplexe Topografie verlangten nach einer neuen, flexiblen und datenbasierten Herangehensweise.

Bemerkenswert ist, wie früh die Stadtverwaltung das Potenzial von GIS für die partizipative Planung erkannt hat. Während GIS in Europa oft noch als Expertentool in spezialisierten Nischen verortet wird, ist es in Kigali längst Teil der öffentlichen Debatte. Von der Planung neuer Straßen und Parks über die Analyse von Verkehrsflüssen bis hin zur Entwicklung von Hochwasserschutzmaßnahmen – überall kommt GIS zum Einsatz, und zwar nicht isoliert im Planungsamt, sondern im direkten Austausch mit der Bevölkerung.

Mit gezielten Pilotprojekten und internationalen Partnerschaften hat Kigali in den letzten Jahren eine digitale Infrastruktur aufgebaut, die vor allem eines kann: Brücken schlagen zwischen Verwaltung, Experten und Bürgern. Es geht nicht mehr um die Frage, ob GIS eingesetzt wird, sondern wie intelligent und inklusiv die Technologie genutzt werden kann, um die Stadt gemeinsam weiterzuentwickeln.

Diese konsequente Digitalisierung ist nicht ohne Risiken und Nebenwirkungen, aber sie zeigt eindrucksvoll, wie auch Städte außerhalb der klassischen Planungshochburgen innovative Impulse setzen. Kigali beweist, dass mit Mut, Know-how und politischer Entschlossenheit digitale Werkzeuge zu Katalysatoren einer neuen, partizipativen Planungskultur werden können.

GIS im urbanen Kontext: Funktionsweise, Potenziale und Grenzen

Geographic Information Systems sind weit mehr als nur digitale Landkarten. Sie sind datengetriebene Analyseplattformen, die räumliche Informationen mit Attributen verknüpfen, auswerten und für unterschiedlichste Zielgruppen aufbereiten können. Im Kern handelt es sich bei GIS um eine Kombination aus Datenbanken, Visualisierungstools und Analysewerkzeugen, die es ermöglichen, komplexe räumliche Zusammenhänge sichtbar und verständlich zu machen.

Im Kontext der Stadtplanung ist diese Technologie ein Gamechanger: Sie erlaubt es, Flächenpotenziale zu ermitteln, Infrastrukturbedarfe zu simulieren, Umweltbelastungen zu prognostizieren und soziale Dynamiken zu analysieren. GIS kann beispielsweise zeigen, wie sich ein neuer Buskorridor auf Fußwege, Luftqualität oder Lärmbelastung auswirkt. Es kann helfen, Standorte für soziale Infrastruktur wie Schulen oder Gesundheitszentren zu optimieren – und das alles auf Basis tagesaktueller Daten, die laufend aktualisiert werden können.

Die Potenziale von GIS sind enorm, insbesondere wenn es um partizipative Planung geht. Denn durch die Möglichkeit, Daten interaktiv und visuell aufzubereiten, können auch Nicht-Fachleute in Diskussionen eingebunden werden. GIS-Anwendungen lassen sich so konfigurieren, dass Bürger auf einfache Weise Ideen einbringen, Probleme melden oder Planungsszenarien bewerten können. Damit wird GIS zum Brückenbauer zwischen Verwaltungsexpertise und Alltagswissen.

Natürlich hat auch diese Technologie ihre Grenzen. Datenverfügbarkeit, Datenschutz und digitale Kompetenzen sind zentrale Herausforderungen, die es zu adressieren gilt. Gerade in Städten wie Kigali, wo der Zugang zu digitalen Endgeräten und Internet nicht flächendeckend gewährleistet ist, bedarf es intelligenter Lösungen, um niemanden auszuschließen. GIS kann und darf kein exklusives Expertensystem bleiben, sondern muss so gestaltet werden, dass es Transparenz und Inklusion fördert.

Die Entwicklung offener Schnittstellen, einfacher Bedienoberflächen und partizipativer Visualisierungstools ist daher ebenso wichtig wie die technische Weiterentwicklung. Nur wenn GIS als sozial integriertes System gedacht wird, entfaltet es seine volle transformative Wirkung für die Stadtentwicklung.

Partizipative Planung neu gedacht: Wie GIS die Beteiligungskultur in Kigali verändert

Die klassische Bürgerbeteiligung in der Stadtplanung ist in vielen Teilen der Welt noch immer geprägt von Papierplänen, Auslegungsfristen und mühseligen Konsultationsrunden. In Kigali setzt man auf einen anderen Ansatz: Die Digitalisierung der Planung mit GIS-Technologie macht Beteiligung skalierbar, zugänglich und dialogisch. Bürger können sich nicht nur informieren, sondern aktiv mitgestalten – und das auf Augenhöhe mit Behörden und Experten.

Herzstück dieser neuen Beteiligungskultur sind digitale Plattformen, auf denen Karten, Analysen und Planungsszenarien öffentlich zugänglich sind. In Workshops, Online-Dialogen und mobilen GIS-Anwendungen werden Bürger eingeladen, Vorschläge zu machen, Konflikte zu benennen oder eigene Ortskenntnisse einzubringen. Das reicht von der Markierung unsicherer Straßen über das Einzeichnen fehlender Grünflächen bis hin zur Priorisierung von Sanierungsmaßnahmen.

Ein zentrales Element ist dabei die Integration von „Community Mapping“: Lokale Gruppen, NGOs und Bewohner erfassen gemeinsam mit GIS-Experten Daten über ihre Stadtteile. So entstehen detaillierte Karten von Wegen, Märkten, Sammelpunkten oder Risikozonen, die in die formale Planung einfließen. Dieser Bottom-up-Ansatz stellt sicher, dass auch informelle Siedlungen, die im offiziellen Kataster oft fehlen, sichtbar werden und Berücksichtigung finden.

Die Rückkopplung zwischen digitalen und analogen Beteiligungsformaten ist ein weiterer Erfolgsfaktor. In Kigali werden GIS-gestützte Stadtmodelle nicht nur online, sondern auch in physischen Räumen wie Nachbarschaftszentren präsentiert, diskutiert und weiterentwickelt. Digitale Tools ersetzen damit nicht den persönlichen Dialog, sondern ergänzen und unterstützen ihn.

Diese Offenheit hat einen entscheidenden Vorteil: Sie schafft Vertrauen. Wenn Bürger sehen, dass ihre Hinweise in Karten und Plänen sichtbar werden, steigt die Akzeptanz für Planungsentscheidungen. GIS wird so zum Medium demokratischer Stadtentwicklung – transparent, nachvollziehbar und adaptiv.

Praxisbeispiele aus Kigali: GIS als Werkzeug für gerechte Stadtentwicklung

Die Umsetzung partizipativer Planung mit GIS in Kigali ist keine graue Theorie, sondern gelebte Praxis. Ein besonders eindrucksvolles Beispiel ist das „Kigali Master Plan Update“, bei dem die Stadtverwaltung gemeinsam mit internationalen Partnern und lokalen Akteuren eine umfassende Analyse der Stadtstruktur durchgeführt hat. Mithilfe von GIS wurden bestehende Infrastrukturen, Topografie, Wachstumsprognosen und soziale Indikatoren zusammengeführt – und in interaktiven Karten für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht.

Im Rahmen dieses Prozesses wurden zahlreiche Workshops organisiert, bei denen Bürger, Planer und Verwaltungsmitarbeiter gemeinsam Karten auswerteten, Verbesserungsvorschläge einbrachten und Prioritäten für die Stadtentwicklung definierten. GIS ermöglichte es, verschiedene Entwicklungsszenarien visuell zu vergleichen und deren Auswirkungen auf Verkehr, Umwelt und soziale Infrastruktur unmittelbar zu diskutieren.

Ein weiteres Anwendungsfeld ist das Management von Risiken wie Überschwemmungen oder Erdrutschen, die in Kigali aufgrund der Topografie und des Klimas ein großes Problem darstellen. GIS-Analysen helfen, gefährdete Zonen zu identifizieren, Evakuierungsrouten zu planen und Präventionsmaßnahmen gezielt einzusetzen. Auch hier werden lokale Kenntnisse systematisch integriert, indem Bewohner über mobile Apps oder Hotlines auf Problemstellen hinweisen können, die dann in die GIS-Datenbank einfließen.

Im Bereich der Grünflächenplanung nutzt Kigali GIS, um Verteilung, Qualität und Zugänglichkeit von Parks und Erholungsräumen zu erfassen. Bürger können über digitale Plattformen Wünsche äußern, Missstände melden oder Vorschläge für neue Grünflächen machen. So entsteht ein kontinuierlicher Dialog, bei dem Verwaltung und Bevölkerung gemeinsam an einer lebenswerteren Stadt arbeiten.

Nicht zuletzt dient GIS in Kigali auch der Förderung von Transparenz und Rechenschaft. Öffentliche Dashboards zeigen aktuelle Projekte, den Stand der Umsetzung und offene Herausforderungen. Bürger können so nachvollziehen, wie Planungsprozesse ablaufen und welche Argumente in Entscheidungsfindungen eingeflossen sind. Das Ergebnis: Eine intelligent gesteuerte, sozial gerechte und ökologisch nachhaltige Stadtentwicklung, die als Vorbild für viele andere Städte dienen kann.

Herausforderungen, Chancen und Lehren für den deutschsprachigen Raum

Auch wenn Kigali beeindruckende Fortschritte gemacht hat, verläuft die digitale und partizipative Planung nicht ohne Stolpersteine. Technische Infrastruktur, Datenqualität und digitale Kompetenzen sind zentrale Herausforderungen, die immer wieder adressiert werden müssen. Gerade in heterogenen Stadtgesellschaften gilt es, digitale Beteiligung so zu gestalten, dass auch marginalisierte Gruppen und informelle Siedlungen eingebunden werden. Die kontinuierliche Weiterbildung von Verwaltung und Bürgern ist dabei ebenso wichtig wie die Entwicklung barrierearmer Zugänge zu GIS-Plattformen.

Für Städte in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz sind die Erfahrungen aus Kigali hochrelevant – auch wenn die Ausgangsbedingungen unterschiedlich sind. Die konsequente Integration partizipativer Methoden in die digitale Planung, die Offenheit für lokale Expertise und die Bereitschaft, Planung als dialogischen Prozess zu verstehen, können auch hierzulande Impulse setzen. Besonders die Verbindung von digitalen Tools mit analogen Beteiligungsformaten und die transparente Kommunikation von Daten und Entscheidungen sind Erfolgsfaktoren, die überall gelten.

Ein weiteres Learning: Technische Innovation allein reicht nicht. Erst wenn GIS als kulturelles Werkzeug verstanden wird, das Verwaltung, Experten und Bürger auf Augenhöhe bringt, entsteht nachhaltige Wirkung. Das erfordert Mut zur Öffnung, Bereitschaft zur Fehlerkultur und eine Verwaltung, die sich als Dienstleister für die Stadtgesellschaft begreift.

Datenschutz und Datensouveränität sind in Mitteleuropa besonders sensible Themen. Die Erfahrungen aus Kigali zeigen, dass Transparenz, offene Schnittstellen und klare Verantwortlichkeiten das Vertrauen in digitale Systeme stärken. Gleichzeitig müssen klare Regeln für die Nutzung, Speicherung und Weitergabe von Daten entwickelt und kommuniziert werden.

Abschließend bleibt festzuhalten: Digitale und partizipative Planung mit GIS ist kein Allheilmittel, aber ein mächtiges Werkzeug für gerechtere, resiliente und zukunftsfähige Städte. Wer den Sprung wagt, wird mit besseren Prozessen, höherer Akzeptanz und einer lebendigeren Stadtgesellschaft belohnt. Kigali zeigt, wie es gehen kann – und legt die Messlatte hoch für alle, die Stadtplanung als Gemeinschaftsaufgabe begreifen.

Fazit: GIS als Motor partizipativer Stadtentwicklung – Inspiration und Auftrag zugleich

Die Geschichte Kigalis beweist eindrucksvoll, dass digitale Werkzeuge wie GIS weit mehr sind als technologische Spielereien. Sie sind Katalysatoren für einen Paradigmenwechsel in der Stadtplanung: von der Behördenlenkung zur kooperativen Governance, von der Expertenentscheidung zum gemeinsamen Aushandlungsprozess. In Kigali ist es gelungen, GIS als Brücke zwischen Verwaltung, Fachleuten und Bürgern zu etablieren – und damit die Qualität, Transparenz und Legitimität der Stadtentwicklung spürbar zu erhöhen.

Für den deutschsprachigen Raum ist das eine Einladung, den eigenen Planungsansatz zu hinterfragen und mutig Neues zu wagen. GIS muss auch hier als Instrument für soziale Innovation genutzt werden – offen, adaptiv und dialogisch. Die Integration partizipativer Methoden, die Förderung digitaler Kompetenzen und die konsequente Öffnung von Daten und Prozessen sind dabei zentrale Erfolgsfaktoren.

Natürlich gibt es Unterschiede in Infrastruktur, Ressourcen und Rechtsrahmen. Aber der Kern bleibt gleich: Nur wenn Stadtplanung als Gemeinschaftswerk verstanden wird, in dem digitale Tools die Beteiligung aller ermöglichen, entstehen wirklich nachhaltige Lösungen. GIS ist dabei kein Selbstzweck, sondern ein Werkzeug, das die Tür zu einer gerechteren, effizienteren und lebenswerteren Stadt öffnet.

Kigali hat vorgemacht, wie es geht – und dabei gezeigt, dass auch unter schwierigen Bedingungen partizipative Planung zum Erfolg führen kann. Der deutschsprachige Raum kann von diesen Erfahrungen profitieren, sie adaptieren und weiterentwickeln. Die Zukunft der Stadtplanung ist digital, kooperativ und offen. Jetzt liegt es an uns, diese Zukunft aktiv zu gestalten.

“Change of scenery” at the Bayerischer Hof

Building design

The floor-to-ceiling panoramic windows fill the rooms of the Penthouse Garden Suite with natural light and provide access to the terrace from almost all areas. Photo: Benjamin Monn

A vacation in your own city – this was possible in a special way in Munich this August. As part of the “Change of scenery” campaign, around 50 city hotels invited Munich residents to stay with them for a discounted night. The campaign aims to support Munich’s hotel industry, which has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic. Baumeister editor Theresa Ramisch took part in the campaign […].

A vacation in your own city – this was possible in a special way in Munich this August. As part of the “Change of scenery” campaign, around 50 city hotels invited Munich residents to stay with them for a discounted night. The campaign aims to support Munich’s hotel industry, which has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic. Baumeister editor Theresa Ramisch took part in the campaign and was able to stay in a room designed by Axel Vervoordt at Munich’s Grand Hotel Bayerischer Hof and met Innegrit Volkhardt, owner of the Bayerischer Hof, for a chat.

The German hospitality industry is facing a wave of insolvencies. This is the result of a survey presented by the German Hotel and Restaurant Association (DEHOGA) in mid-August. From January to July 2020, German cafés, restaurants and hotels recorded sales losses of 60.1%. For the year as a whole, businesses are expecting sales to fall by 51.0%. Restaurants and hotels in cities are particularly affected by the crisis. DEHOGA President Guido Zöllick describes their situation as “catastrophic”. While businesses in the vacation regions can already draw hope again, business travelers and tourists from abroad are still missing in the cities.

Munich has now responded to the crisis with the “Change of scenery” campaign. Supported by the local DEHOGA district office and the Munich Department of Labour and Economic Affairs, the Tourismus Initiative München (TIM) and the Munich Hotel Alliance (MHA) organized a unique offer that should at least provide the hotel industry with a small additional source of income. The promotional deal: from August 10 to September 6, 2020, residents of the city of Munich and the surrounding area were able to stay in around 50 Munich city hotels – including first-class and luxury hotels – at flat rates of 79 euros, 99 euros and 139 euros. The prices were per double room, per night including breakfast for two people. In addition, all guests received a Munich Card, with which they can visit Munich’s museums at a reduced rate and which is also a ticket for local public transport.

Munich’s grand hotel par excellence, the Bayerischer Hof, also took part in the campaign. The people of Munich were enthusiastic – within a very short time, the contingent was exhausted. “We thought it was a great idea and definitely wanted to take part out of solidarity with the other MHA members,” says Philipp Herdeg, Head of PR and Communications. This campaign does not cover the costs for the 5-star hotel – breakfast alone costs 42 euros per person. The advantage of the Bayerischer Hof is that it is debt-free. The Volkhardt family, who own the hotel, have always put 25 percent of profits into reserves and have been able to bridge the crisis comparatively well.

Security conference 2021 already planned at the Bayerischer Hof

The 5-star luxury hotel on Munich’s Promenadeplatz, which opened in 1841 and is managed by Innegrit Volkhardt in the fourth generation, has 337 rooms and suites, numerous restaurants and bars as well as a 1,300 square meter wellness area. From Empress Elisabeth and Sigmund Freud to Michael Jackson, Lenny Kravitz and Roger Waters – there is hardly a celebrity who has not stayed at the Bayerischer Hof. Then there are all the politicians, diplomats, managers and journalists who attend the annual Munich Security Conference at the Bayerischer Hof. Incidentally, this is still planned for 2021 – albeit much smaller than in previous years and with digital formats, as owner Innegrit Volkhardt reports in an interview.

The Bayerischer Hof stands for more than 150 years of hotel tradition and at the same time for intelligent, modern and authentic design – largely shaped by the Belgian interior designer, art collector and antiques dealer Axel Vervoordt. Innegrit Volkhardt and Axel Vervoordt have been working together successfully for over ten years. Following the redesign of the Garden and Atelier restaurants, the Cinema Lounge and the Palaishalle, the renovation of the north and south wings was Vervoordt’s fourth and largest project at the Bayerischer Hof to date. Between 2016 and 2018, four floors were demolished, rebuilt and an additional floor was added to the building, which now houses the 350 square meter Penthouse Garden Suite. The main challenges here were statics, construction time and the maintenance of the “Komödie”, the theater in the Bayerischer Hof, which is located below the new floors. The investment volume amounted to twelve million euros and a total of 29 new guest rooms and suites were created.

From the large scale to the smallest detail, Axel Vervoordt succeeded in linking the new building with the old building. At the same time, he gave the project his own touch without detracting from the character of the Bayerischer Hof. The design strikes a balance between traditional and modern design – partly because Vervoordt works with his surroundings, not against them. The design concept for the new rooms was based on the direction of the windows: Vervoordt designed the south-facing rooms with light colors, fabrics and tones, while he furnished the north-facing rooms with darker elements. The rooms in the north wing also become increasingly lighter towards the top.

When designing the interior of the rooms, Vervoordt focused on natural and durable materials: the reveal of the room doors is made of stone, the doors themselves are made of poplar wood and the door handles are made of pickled steel. Beds, sofas, armchairs, chairs and cushions are upholstered with linen fabrics in natural and earthy tones. The furniture, made from old wood, is always unique and allows for corners and edges. This is what is striking about Vervoordt’s interior design at the Bayerischer Hof: while quirks and breaks are an absolute no-go for many other designers in hotel rooms, Axel Vervoordt allows them in his design. In this way, he brings naturalness and calm to the rooms. And they will not be his last project at the Bayerischer Hof: He is already working on the next conversion project, the event rooms in Palais Montgelas. The opening is planned for fall 2020.

At the age of 27, Innegrit Volkhardt took over the management of the Bayerischer Hof in 1992. Today, she is the fourth generation to run the Munich grand hotel in 28 years. And with success: from 2011 to 2017, the Bayerischer Hof was the hotel with the highest turnover in Germany. We spoke to Innegrit Volkhardt about the current situation.

Baumeister: Innegrit Volkhardt, there’s no need to discuss the critical situation in the hospitality industry. The situation is extremely serious. In an interview with Handelsblatt at the beginning of June, you were critical of Germany’s coronavirus policy and said that you don’t expect business to stabilize again until 2022. In your opinion, what does the hospitality industry need now?
Innegrit Volkhardt: The first step has now been taken with the extension of short-time working. This is certainly the most important step in order to preserve jobs, but also to have the opportunity to return employees to work when the order situation improves in order to meet the increasing demand.
Of course, it is also important that the industry itself engages in good or even better lobbying. The extent to which the hotel industry in particular has been affected does not yet seem to be clear enough in the minds of politicians or the general public. Unfortunately, explanations to guests about necessary adjustments to opening hours or the reduction of services that are simply not economically feasible due to coronavirus often dominate everyday life. The discussion about a further, often necessary reduction or hours of, for example, rent or other very high fixed costs for companies that are normally profitable is also more than regrettable. For some, it is a question of bare survival in these very difficult times.

B: You and the Bayerischer Hof took part in the “Change of scenery” campaign this summer. Why?
I V: It has always been very important to my family that Munich residents are welcome in our hotel. Almost 90 percent of our five restaurants, the comedy, the spa and the cinema are used by Munich residents, which is why we naturally wanted to take the opportunity to offer locals a great overnight experience. We provided a small contingent of two rooms a day for the campaign, which were all booked in no time at all. We have also received around 150 inquiries so far. However, as we have not been able to expand our contingent, we have of course referred to the other participants. The campaign is not cost-covering for us, but purely out of solidarity with the MHA and TIM.

B: Between April 2016 and January 2018, you had the entire part of the building above the Komödie in the Hotel Bayerischer Hof renovated. You commissioned the interior designer, art collector and antiques dealer Axel Vervoordt to do this. A centerpiece of his work in your hotel is the Penthouse Garden Suite. A place to marvel at. Hand on heart: What is your personal favorite place in the Bayerischer Hof?
I V: I feel at home everywhere in the hotel. Everything is incredibly familiar. My favorite place to stay is the Penthouse Garden Suite, because it’s so quiet up there that you can even hear the birds chirping in the middle of the city.
I also particularly like the Blue Spa. I love my hometown and sitting up there on a beautiful summer evening, when the city and the cathedral are illuminated and close enough to touch and at the same time radiate a great sense of calm but also power, that is something very special.

The text was written on the occasion of the article “Unterwegs im Bayerischen Hof München” for the B10: Wohnungsbau mit Holz.