The Danish Institute for Studies Abroad has been keeping a close eye on the Superkilen in Copenhagen since it opened in 2012. The results of the analysis show: The paint is off.
Hardly any other project in recent years has produced such high-profile images as the Superkilen in Copenhagen. Its eye-catching design made it famous worldwide – a design that was intended to bring together users from different cultures and backgrounds. But does it work? Students at the Danish Institute for Study Abroad took a closer look.
Copenhagen has been named the world’s most liveable city three times in Monocle magazine’s “Quality of Life Survey”. In 2014, the Danish capital was also named “European Green Capital”. Copenhagen is known for its harbor, which has water so clean you can swim in it, for its ambitious plan to become carbon neutral by 2015 and for the fact that there are more bicycles than people here. The 2011 Municipal Plan sums it up like this: Copenhagen is a “place where you feel at home, trust your neighbors and participate in the community.”
Every semester, over 1,000 American students come to the Danish Institute for Study Abroad in Copenhagen for a semester abroad. In the “Strategies for Urban Livability” seminar, 25 of them examine whether, how and why Copenhagen is really worth living in. The city serves as an urban laboratory in which the students develop tools for a livable city.
To develop this toolkit, students learn to identify and analyze political intentions and design strategies. Qualitative and quantitative data about Copenhagen’s public spaces help to understand whether they function as intended. One of the places most frequently chosen for analysis is Superkilen in the Nørrebro district.
An area for everyone
As a traditional working-class district, Nørrebro is one of Copenhagen’s most socially, economically and culturally diverse, but also most fragile neighborhoods. The average income of the residents is 100,000 Danish kroner lower than that of the residents in neighboring Frederiksberg, and life expectancy is three years lower. In 2009, 27 percent of the people here were either immigrants or descendants of immigrants. More than half of them come from Muslim countries. In the Mjølnerparken neighborhood near Superkilen, almost half of the 2,000 people living there were unemployed.
While integration policy at national level must be considered a failure, Copenhagen’s city council has focused on religious, cultural, economic and ethnic diversity. In order to achieve peaceful coexistence, disadvantaged areas are to be adapted to the economic, cultural and social level of the city – not least with the help of urban development strategies. One of the many urban renewal projects supported was the Superkilen. It was realized by the city in cooperation with the private urban development company Realdania. The aim was to create an urban park that would promote social integration in Nørrebro and revitalize the area by creating a global identity.
Topotek 1, Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) and Superflex, a Danish artist group, won the municipal tender as a team and finally opened Superkilen in 2012: At the heart of the design are artifacts that stand for the nationalities in Nørrebro. They reflect the international identity of the district. When selecting the artifacts, the planners spoke intensively with the residents. An app provides information about each artifact.
Design theory versus reality
The Superkilen conceptually addresses all the issues that are crucial for a high-quality public space. However, the process began with a false assumption. The assumption was that you can create an area for everyone by placing artifacts that represent the nationalities of the local population. However, the assumption that appropriation happens automatically when the public is integrated into the design process is widespread. However, it ignores the fact that it is through long-term engagement that people begin to take responsibility and become actors in their own community. Short-term participation is less relevant.
Based on the data and observations collected by our students, we have identified four factors. They are intended to make tangible the extent to which the Superkilen lives up to its original goals – or not. There are four aspects: the diversity of user groups, Superkilen’s employment opportunities, the local weather and a balanced ratio of green spaces. […]
You can read exactly why Superkilen fails to achieve the concept’s goals in Garten + Landschaft 05/2016 – The square, the feeling and us.
Superkilen, Copenhagen
Client: City of Copenhagen, Realdania
Landscape architecture: Topotek 1, Berlin Architecture Bjarke Ingels Group, Copenhagen
Other parties involved: 3Superflex, Help PR & Communication, Lemming & Eriksson
Area: 33,000 square meters
Completion: 2012
Watch the video tosee how BIG travels to the residents’ countries of origin together with them to select artefacts for Superkilen .
Robert Schäfer visited Superkilen in 2012, directly after the opening. You can read his review of the new city square in Copenhagen here.
Read here why co-creation would have been a better planning tool for Superkilen .












