The Bauhaus: How a school reinvented the world of design

Building design

An art school founded in 1919 in Weimar, Thuringia, has shaped the face of modern architecture and design to this day. The Bauhaus was not just an educational institution, but a cultural movement that united art, craftsmanship and technology under one roof. Its influence extends from typography and housing construction to the digital design world of the 21st century.

When Walter Gropius opened the Staatliches Bauhaus in Weimar in April 1919, he formulated a program that challenged the art world: overcoming the separation between fine art and applied craftsmanship. The architect dreamed of a community of craftsmen who would work together to build the cathedral of the future. This almost utopian aspiration came at a time of upheaval – the Weimar Republic, politically fragile and culturally agitated, was searching for new forms of expression beyond Wilhelmine historicism. In this field of tension, an institution was created that, in its short existence of just 14 years, wrote a history of impact that continues to this day.

From Weimar to Dessau: change as a principle

The history of the school is a history of movement. In Weimar, teachers such as Johannes Itten, Paul Klee and Wassily Kandinsky developed an experimental teaching model that combined formal analysis, color theory and practical craftsmanship. Itten’s preliminary course, which all students had to complete regardless of their later specialization, is still considered one of the most influential pedagogical concepts in art education today. It trained the perception of material, contrast and composition – fundamentals that apply to painting as well as architecture and product design.
Under political pressure from conservative forces in Thuringia, the Bauhaus moved its headquarters to Dessau in 1925. Perhaps the most iconic buildings of modernism were built here: the new school building, designed by Gropius himself, and the Masters’ Houses, where Klee, Kandinsky, László Moholy-Nagy and Oskar Schlemmer lived and worked. The Dessau school building – with its glazed curtain wall, open floor plan and functional separation of the building sections – is considered a manifesto in concrete and glass: form follows function, and beauty results from constructive logic.

Art as method: the workshops and their masterpieces

What set the Bauhaus apart from other reform schools was the consistent use of workshops. There were workshops for weaving, metalworking, carpentry, stage design, ceramics, mural painting, photography and printmaking. In the metal workshop, Marianne Brandt designed objects that followed the ideal of a machine-oriented aesthetic: straightforward, industrially reproducible, yet with a peculiar elegance. Her tea combination from 1924 – a ball on a conical base – became the epitome of Bauhaus style and is still a collector’s classic today.
In the weaving workshop, Anni Albers and Gunta Stölzl developed textiles that oscillated between abstract artwork and functional fabric. Schlemmer, in turn, revolutionized the understanding of body, space and movement with the Triadic Ballet of 1922 – a stage piece that wrapped dancers in geometric costumes and thus turned the human body into a changing sculpture. This diversity of disciplines was no coincidence, but rather a program: design was to be conceived as a universal competence, not as a specialization.

Legacy and impact: a design language that changed the world

After the forced closure by the National Socialists in Berlin in 1933, the teachers scattered all over the world – taking the school’s ideas with them. Mies van der Rohe, the last director of the Bauhaus, emigrated to the USA and shaped the image of American post-war modernism with buildings such as the Seagram Building in New York (1958). Moholy-Nagy founded the New Bauhaus in Chicago in 1937, which later continued to operate as the Institute of Design. Anni Albers taught at the renowned Black Mountain College and helped textile art gain academic recognition.
The transatlantic transfer of ideas not only had an impact on architecture, but also on typography, graphic design and product design. Herbert Bayer’s typefaces, Moholy-Nagy’s lighting experiments, Breuer’s tubular steel furniture – all of this can be found in modified form in contemporary design. The fact that IKEA shelving, office chair constructions or simple lighting designs are still reminiscent of these principles today is no coincidence, but the silent afterlife of an aesthetic revolution.
To mark the centenary of the school’s founding in 2019, institutions around the world dedicated exhibitions and publications to it – from Dessau to New York, from Tel Aviv to Tokyo. The renewed interest in the Bauhaus is more than just a museum retrospective: It is a question of whether a school that combined craftsmanship, technology and free thinking still has something to say for a present that is struggling with digitalization and sustainability issues. The answer from the design world was clear: The principles of the Bauhaus – clarity of form, honesty of material, unity of aesthetics and function – are as relevant today as they were in 1919.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Shared mobility: how digital platforms are redefining public transport

Building design

Shared mobility is becoming increasingly important in the modern city: digital platforms enable residents to use vehicles such as car-sharing cars, e-scooters and bicycles quickly and flexibly. These solutions relieve the burden on cities and contribute to sustainable urban mobility. Matthew Archuleta | Unsplash

Cities today face major challenges when it comes to mobility. Private transport leads to traffic jams, air pollution and land consumption. Shared mobility offers a solution that relies on the shared use of vehicles and thus relieves both the environment and the roads. Digital platforms and apps allow people to use vehicles flexibly without having to own a car. These new mobility models are not only an environmentally friendly alternative, but also an important step towards a more sustainable and liveable city. […]

Cities today face major challenges when it comes to mobility. Private transport leads to traffic jams, air pollution and land consumption. Shared mobility offers a solution that relies on the shared use of vehicles and thus relieves both the environment and the roads. Digital platforms and apps allow people to use vehicles flexibly without having to own a car. These new mobility models are not only an environmentally friendly alternative, but also an important step towards a more sustainable and liveable city.

Fun fact: According to a study by McKinsey, shared mobility solutions could reduce the need for private cars in cities by up to 30% by 2030.

Shared mobility is based on a combination of several technologies that work together seamlessly to provide users with a simple and convenient experience.

Digital platforms

Digital platforms such as Uber, Lyft, Free Now and Share Now connect users and vehicles in real time. These platforms offer features such as booking, payment and route optimization that allow users to use a vehicle immediately and without much effort.

Internet of Things (IoT)

The IoT is an integral part of shared mobility. Vehicles are often equipped with GPS and sensors that report their location and status in real time. This data helps to optimize operations by providing information on availability, maintenance and routes.

Mobile apps

Mobile apps are the main tool through which users access shared mobility services. They enable the booking of rides, payment and provide access to information such as the location of the next available vehicle and estimated arrival times.

Practical example: In Amsterdam, the car-sharing company Share Now uses a platform that provides real-time information on available vehicles and allows users to unlock the cars via an app.

Shared mobility comprises various models that are tailored to the different needs of users.

Car sharing

Car sharing enables users to rent a car for short periods of time. Models such as station-based car sharing (e.g. Zipcar) and free-floating car sharing (e.g. Share Now) offer flexibility and reduce the need for private car ownership.

Bike sharing

Bike sharing systems offer an environmentally friendly alternative for short distances. Users can find and use bikes at special stations or via GPS using an app. This promotes healthy, emission-free mobility.

Ridesharing and ride-hailing

Ridesharing (e.g. BlaBlaCar) and ride-hailing (e.g. Uber) offer users the opportunity to share journeys or order a vehicle with a driver. This optimizes traffic flow and reduces environmental pollution.

Scooter sharing

Electric scooters, which can be rented via an app, have established themselves as a popular option for short journeys. They are space-saving and emission-free and complement other means of transportation in the urban environment.

Practical example: Lime offers scooter sharing in many cities around the world and is a practical solution for the so-called “last mile”, which is often difficult to cover with public transport.

Shared mobility offers numerous advantages that have a positive impact on cities, the environment and users.

Reduction of emissions

As fewer people own their own car, the number of vehicles on the roads is reduced. Shared mobility promotes the use of electric and low-emission vehicles and thus helps to reduce CO₂ emissions.

Less traffic and congestion

When people share vehicles, traffic is reduced. Fewer vehicles on the roads means less congestion, better air quality and an overall more pleasant urban environment.

Lower costs for users

Shared mobility is often cheaper than owning a car, as users only pay for what they actually use. Maintenance, insurance and other fixed costs are eliminated.

Flexible mobility

Shared mobility models offer users a flexible and convenient way to get around without having to worry about finding a parking space or vehicle maintenance.

Expert opinion: According to a study by Deloitte, 55% of millennials prefer shared mobility solutions to owning their own car as they offer flexibility and cost efficiency.

Despite its advantages, shared mobility faces various challenges that need to be overcome.

Infrastructure and space requirements

Shared mobility requires special parking spaces and parking areas for bicycles and scooters, which can lead to conflicts in public spaces. Cities need to provide space for these vehicles without interfering with pedestrian traffic.

Safety concerns

Scooters and bikes can pose a safety risk, especially in busy areas. Accidents and lack of helmet use are common problems that jeopardize the safety of users.

Legal and regulatory issues

The regulation of shared mobility services is complex and varies from city to city. Providers must adhere to local regulations, which can increase operating costs and limit availability.

User acceptance and habits

Although shared mobility offers many advantages, some people still prefer to own their own car. It takes time and education to increase the acceptance of shared mobility solutions.

Example: In San Francisco, the rapid growth of scooter sharing has led to problems with poorly parked scooters on sidewalks, resulting in complaints from citizens and the need for stricter regulations.

Amsterdam: Car sharing integration with public transport

In Amsterdam, car sharing providers work closely with public transport to offer integrated mobility solutions. Users can use car-sharing vehicles as a supplement to public transport and thus increase flexibility.

San Francisco: Scooter sharing

San Francisco has successfully integrated scooter sharing and introduced strict regulations to ensure that the vehicles are parked properly and the safety of users is guaranteed.

Copenhagen: Bikesharing

Copenhagen, known as a bike-friendly city, has developed a comprehensive bike-sharing program that is used by locals and tourists alike. This has reduced the use of cars in the city center.

The future of shared mobility will be shaped by the integration of new technologies and business models.

  1. Autonomous driving: Autonomous vehicles could make shared mobility even more efficient and safer as they are continuously available and can move autonomously.
  2. Artificial intelligence (AI): AI can help to better manage traffic flows and vehicle availability in order to maximize efficiency and adapt the service to the needs of users.
  3. Mobility as a Service (MaaS): MaaS platforms combine different modes of transportation in a single app that integrates all mobility services from public transport to car sharing and offers a seamless user experience.
  4. Sustainability and electric drives: The introduction of electric shared mobility vehicles will help reduce emissions and improve air quality in cities.

Future outlook: A pilot project in Helsinki is testing autonomous, electric car sharing vehicles that can be booked via a MaaS app and offer users a complete, sustainable mobility solution.

Shared mobility is fundamentally changing the way people travel in cities. Through the use of digital platforms and innovative business models, it offers a sustainable alternative to private car ownership and contributes to solving urban challenges. Despite the challenges, particularly in terms of infrastructure and user acceptance, it is clear that shared mobility has the potential to make urban mobility more efficient, environmentally friendly and flexible.

Concluding thought: Shared mobility is more than just a technology – it is a vision for sustainable mobility that conserves resources and creates quality of life. If cities and providers work together, shared mobility could become an essential part of urban life in the future.

Read more: The European Garden Award 2024 went to a total of ten projects this year. The focus was on the topic of “Green Oasis”.

National Arena Bucharest – Stadiums of the European Championship 2021

Building design

Lia Manoliu Stadium

If you take a closer look at the national arena in the Romanian capital Bucharest, you are instinctively reminded of a Bundesliga stadium. This is no coincidence, as the roots of the arena lie in Germany. The Romanian national arena in Bucharest has German genes: the 55,000-seat soccer stadium was designed by Hamburg architects Gerkan, Marg […]

If you take a closer look at the national arena in the Romanian capital Bucharest, you are instinctively reminded of a Bundesliga stadium. This is no coincidence, as the roots of the arena lie in Germany.

The Romanian national arena in Bucharest has German genes: the 55,000-seat soccer stadium was designed by Hamburg architects Gerkan, Marg & Partner (gmp), the structural design was carried out by the engineering firms Schlaich Bergermann & Partner from Stuttgart and Krebs und Kiefer from Karlsruhe, and the general contractor was the construction company Max Bögl from Sengenthal in the Upper Palatinate.

Although it is a soccer stadium, the building is named after a female discus thrower: Lia Manoliu won the gold medal at the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico City. However, the stadium is now known exclusively as the “Arena Națională”, i.e. the “National Arena”. The new building was named after Lia Manoliu after its predecessor, the “Stadionul Național Lia Manoliu”, the old national stadium. It previously stood on the same site and was demolished in 2008.

Unlike the arena, it was a multi-purpose stadium. Its stands were not covered and the athletics facilities were located between the pitch and the stands. This meant that at the beginning of the millennium it no longer met the requirements for a venue for international soccer matches. In 2006, Max Bögl won the tender for the construction of the new national arena – which, however, had been planned quite differently at the time. However, the German company submitted an alternative project to the client, the city of Bucharest, which was much simpler and cheaper to build.

The National Arena bears unmistakable similarities to Frankfurt’s Waldstadion. This is no coincidence: the same team of general contractors, architects and engineers built the stadium on the Main between 2002 and 2005. The closable membrane roof in particular is almost a one-to-one replica of the construction in Frankfurt. As there, the roof is located in the large video cube above the pitch when folded up. It extends within 15 minutes when required. It then spans the area between the grandstand roofs. The stand roofs themselves are supported by a so-called pressure ring, which towers over the stadium like a crown. The ring rests on 40 steel pillars, which sit on the concrete construction of the grandstand ring.

The stands have two tiers. The architects designed the spectator area with seating shells in different shades of red, blue and yellow, the national colors of Romania. On the outside of the stadium, the verticality of the concrete columns supporting the stands defines the appearance of the building. The grassy embankment on which the arena stands is still a relic of the old national stadium. It mediates between the new building and the historic sports park that surrounds it. Large steps lead up the rampart. They make a visit to the National Arena a bit of a pilgrimage.

Find out more about the National Stadium Budapest. Here you can find an overview of the EURO 2021 stadiums.