The donkey in art

Building design
The donkey in art: from biblical depictions and historical symbolism to modern painting and contemporary interpretations. Photo: Public domain, via: Wikioo

The donkey in art: from biblical depictions and historical symbolism to modern painting and contemporary interpretations.
Photo: Public domain, via: Wikioo

The donkey has a firm place in the history of art – as a beast of burden, a symbol of modesty and a silent observer of human dramas. From biblical iconography to modern painting, it appears again and again – sometimes as a faithful companion, sometimes as a mirror of human idiosyncrasies. Although he is rarely in the limelight, his appearance often reveals more about society than the heroes who ride him.

Most of us know the donkey together with the ox in the stable in connection with the birth of Christ. In fact, these animals are not mentioned in the New Testament accounts of the birth; their presence only came about through the art-historical tradition, which interpreted the simple, patient animal as a symbol of modesty and tranquillity. For a long time, the donkey was the most important mount in the Mediterranean region. It was considered noble, skillful, clever and patient. With the introduction of the horse in the sixth century BC, its role changed: the donkey was increasingly degraded to a beast of burden, and its symbolic significance was devalued as a result.

The donkey was already depicted artistically in the earliest civilizations. In Egyptian tomb paintings, it can be seen as a tireless workhorse, a symbol of constancy and provision. It was also present in antiquity – on Greek vases, Roman reliefs and coins, often in connection with peasant work or mythological scenes. Its association with the god Dionysus and the goddess Demeter is particularly interesting, as it is one of their followers. It also appears in the myth of Silen, for whom it serves as a mount. One well-known story is that of King Midas, which was handed down by Ovid. King Midas is present at the contest between the god Apollo and the shepherd god Pan. Tmolos, a mountain deity, acts as referee and chooses Apollo as the winner. Midas protests: He liked Pan’s playing with the panpipe better than Apollo’s presentation with the kithara. Apollo then punishes Midas with donkey ears.
With the advent of Christianity, the animal took on a new, deeper meaning. In biblical art, the donkey became a symbol of humility and peace. Particularly impressive: Giotto’s depiction of the Entry of Jesus into Jerusalem (around 1305) in the Scrovegni Chapel. Here, the animal carries the divine figure without splendor, but with dignity. The donkey thus becomes the embodiment of the Christian ideal: strong in silence, dignified in simplicity. But it also plays an important role as a mount on the flight from Egypt. Mary, who is pregnant with Jesus, rides on it.

In the Middle Ages, the donkey often appears in scenes of the birth of Christ – at the side of the Virgin Mary in the manger, next to the ox. This constellation, known from countless altarpieces and frescoes, stands for the simple, human and earthy. Artists such as Fra Angelico, Ambrogio Lorenzetti and Hieronymus Bosch used the donkey as a resting pole – as a symbol of patience in the midst of the divine.
At the same time, the donkey served as a symbol of folly in medieval book illumination and satire. Miniatures show monks with donkey ears, fools in priestly garb – a subtle criticism of arrogance and arrogance. Rembrandt’s painting “The Prophet Balaam and the Ass” is dedicated to a story from the Old Testament. The prophet is shown riding his donkey and has just swung a stick to strike her. However, the donkey has seen something that Balaam has not noticed: an angel of the Lord is blocking the way. The donkey stops, moves out of the way and finally says to Balaam: “What have I done to you that you are now hitting me for the third time?”. God then opens his eyes and allows the prophet to see the angel with the sword. Balaam now realizes that he has sinned. In his painting, Rembrandt masterfully emphasizes the dramatic tension between divine warning, human anger and animal wisdom, making the donkey or ass an active symbol of insight and divine providence.

In the 20th century, the donkey appeared in completely new roles. Pablo Picasso painted several depictions of the animal in his pink period, for example in “Femme à l’âne”, combining tenderness and simplicity. Marc Chagall had the donkey appear in floating scenes above villages, as in “The Donkey and the Violin”, as a poetic messenger between heaven and earth. The donkey thus became a symbol of ambivalence: purity, humility and at the same time an expression of human longing.
In modern art, the donkey is often less a motif than a metaphor. Franz Marc described the world from the animal’s perspective and remarked that a donkey’s gaze appears “sad and knowing at the same time” – an interpretation that underlines its symbolic power. A well-known work of his is the “Donkey Frieze”, which was also an important step in the painter’s artistic development. Inspired by an Egyptian relief, he created a frieze-like arrangement of donkeys.
The donkey thus remains a chameleon of meanings. Whether religious, poetic or political, its presence prompts the viewer to reflect on values such as patience, humility and dignity. The donkey may be less conspicuous in art than horses or lions, but its symbolic power is unbroken. It embodies the unspectacular, the persistent, the gentle. In a world full of noise, the donkey reminds us of silence, patience and the dignity of simplicity. And so it remains, as it has for centuries, a silent witness to human cultural history – an animal that in its modesty often tells us more than the heroes who accompany it.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Done: The future graduates of the state-recognized academy for the training of restorers of furniture and wooden objects in Munich will present their theses on 21 March. It is the crowning finale to the many months of projects and tinkering: the exhibition of the theses. Every year, students from the state-recognized academy for the training of restorers of […]

Done: The future graduates of the state-recognized academy for the training of restorers of furniture and wooden objects in Munich will present their theses on 21 March.

It is the crowning finale to the many months of projects and tinkering: the exhibition of the theses. Every year, students at the state-recognized academy for the training of restorers of furniture and wooden objects present their extensive work in their third year of study. In 2018, the future graduates, lecturers of the academy, former students and friends of the Goering Institute will meet on March 21. The venue is traditionally the Seidlvilla on Nikolaiplatz in Munich.

Naturally, the lectures are all about wood. Fabian Bodenmüller, for example, will report on “Alternatives to chemical wood protection”, Roland Depner will deal with “Research into asbestos-containing materials on furniture” and Sascha Troppmann will talk about the creation and use of bush-hammered wood. In addition, Magdalena Hartshauser will provide new information on wood painting in terms of history, material and technique. She carried out studies on a historicist cabinet. Ann Marie Löfflad presents her “Research on the upholstery fabric of an ensemble of seating furniture from around 1800”. A broad spectrum that invites professional exchange. You can find the complete program here.

For over 30 years, it has been possible to train as a conservator at the Fachakademie in Munich. The continuous development of the practical and theoretical training framework led from training workshops to a state-approved technical school for restorers to today’s “State-approved technical academy for the training of restorers of furniture and wooden objects”. The non-profit Goering Institut e.V. is the sponsor of the academy. Particular emphasis is placed on applied restoration practice. It takes up around 50 percent of the restorer course.

Pleaseregister by e-mail with Mr. Küglerto take part in the presentation of the specialist work :

kuegler@restaurierung-goering.de

The future of the churches

Building design

which is known as the "Room of Silence"

At the beginning of 2016, the Wüstenrot Foundation awarded prizes in its nationwide competition “Church buildings and their future” for special projects that renovated, converted or repurposed churches.

At the beginning of 2016, the Wüstenrot Foundation awarded prizes in its nationwide competition “Church buildings and their future” for special projects that renovated, converted or repurposed churches. The 291 entries included many examples of how church buildings and community centers can be preserved as a visible part of cultural identity. We spoke to Dr. Stefan Krämer, Head of the “Science and Research” department at the Wüstenrot Foundation.

Churches in Germany are facing major challenges. Declining parishioner numbers, changing usage requirements and high costs for the maintenance and operation of church buildings require a sustainable strategy to preserve church buildings. However, we believe that it is not only the churches that are responsible for these tasks, but society as a whole, as churches are the bearers of our cultural identity. There has not yet been a general overview of the architectural transformation of churches. Although the Christian churches or the EKD Institute in Marburg, for example, present individual projects for the conversion of churches, a broader overview has been lacking to date. We therefore decided to launch the competition “Church buildings and their future” to contribute to the development of successful strategies for church conversion.

What developments do you see in this area?

The peak of this trend has not yet been reached. Viable strategies still need to be developed in order to save church buildings from decay and convert them in an economically, culturally and urbanistically sensible way. The city of Stuttgart, for example, is planning to set up a working group to develop a plan for the next 20 years. In my experience, Bavaria is only at the beginning of the process of finding a strategy for the future use of church buildings in the context of social change. A lot will definitely happen here.

Which projects in your competition did you personally particularly like?

I think many of the entries were very successful. This time, we awarded prizes to two particularly outstanding designs, otherwise there is only ever one “1st place” in our competitions. It was very important to us to highlight two different usage strategies, on the one hand the realization of a functional church and on the other a project that demonstrates the possibility of collaboration with a cooperative sponsorship. The newly created spatial structure of the Catholic Heilig-Geist-Kirche of the St. Martinus parish in Olpe enhances the quality of the building, also in terms of urban planning. A reduction in size with a new space utilization concept is the more common variant of a redesign. To preserve the Protestant church in the Bochum-Stahlhausen district, those responsible chose to work with a multicultural educational association. The church is now used both in a sacred setting and as a district center for social educational work. This project certainly serves as a role model.

Were there also projects in which stonemasons were involved?

We see ourselves more as an interface between architects and clients. In this respect, the focus was on the interaction between these parties. However, as far as I know, stonemasons were involved in some projects. For example, in the conversion of St. Joseph’s Church in Aachen into the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. The conversion of church buildings into columbaria is particularly interesting both for the churches, as the sacred use can often be retained and a refinancing strategy is already integrated, and for stonemasons, who can carry out the work on the stone. As experts in the field of funerals, many opportunities open up for them. With burial churches, it is very important that an overall picture is created that captures the aura of the place, but also arranges the urn spaces efficiently. The aim was not to create walls of shelves like in a library, but a place that also creates islands for silence and mourning. Architects are not the only ones in demand for this design implementation.

What special insights were you able to gain?

In a comparison within Germany, the new federal states are probably the most advanced with their building projects in this field. As church buildings were no longer used in the GDR era and later – often for financial reasons – did not find their way back to their intended purpose, the question of their future has perhaps been around for a little longer. It is also interesting to note that, in my experience, it is often easier to convert Catholic churches than Protestant ones. Profanation is easier because Protestant church buildings often already have an integrated community center. Many memories of life in the parish are attached to it. The space takes on a different meaning.

In STEIN in June 2016, we take a closer look at the potential of redesigning sacred spaces for stonemasons. You can find out more about the “Church buildings and their future” competition and other Wüstenrot Foundation projects here.