There is currently a heated debate in Nuremberg: The Altstadtfreunde e. V. association has proposed restoring the façade of the Pellerhaus to its 16th century state. However, the current listed façade would have to be demolished first. Hard to imagine. We spoke to Brigitte Jupitz, first chairwoman of the BauLust e. V. association, Initiative for Architecture and […]
There is currently a heated debate in Nuremberg: The Altstadtfreunde e. V. association has proposed restoring the façade of the Pellerhaus to its 16th century state. However, the current listed façade would have to be demolished first. Hard to imagine. We spoke to Brigitte Jupitz, first chairwoman of the BauLust e. V. association, Initiative for Architecture and the Public, about this.
Destroyed buildings are being reconstructed all over Germany. What is your position on this “trend” as the BauLust architecture association?
Over 20 years ago, our founders advocated, among other things, the compatibility of new construction and contemporary architecture with the historical environment and thus took a deliberate stance against the reconstruction of buildings that no longer exist. We consider the “trend” to be out of date, even backward-looking, as in many cases it negates the history of the city, which is reflected in its buildings. The city thrives on change and cannot be frozen to an arbitrarily fixed period of time.
The reconstruction of the Renaissance courtyard of the Pellerhaus is therefore not in your interests either.
Correct, the almost completed reconstruction of the Renaissance courtyard in the Pellerhaus is not justifiable in our view and has the character of a museum or “Disneyland” type intervention. In terms of design and use, it takes no account of the listed status of the current Pellerhaus.
Now the Altstadtfreunde want to demolish the façade of the Pellerhaus from the 1950s in order to reconstruct the Renaissance façade. Irresponsible, isn’t it?
Yes, because the façade of the Pellerhaus, like the entire building, is a listed building (with the exception of the ongoing “reconstruction”, of course!). It stands in a row with Nuremberg buildings and facades from the same years of construction, such as the Plärrerhochhaus from 1953, which is currently being restored, or the Quelle mail order company, built at the end of the 1950s. These buildings are also listed as outstanding examples of reconstruction in Nuremberg and, like the Pellerhaus, are internationally recognized. Any change would destroy an important part of our post-war history.
Who will ultimately decide what happens to the façade of the Pellerhaus?
The Pellerhaus is owned by the City of Nuremberg. The final decision lies with the Lower Monument Protection Authority of the City of Nuremberg, as it is the approval authority responsible for enforcing the Monument Protection Act. The expert opinion of the State Office for the Protection of Monuments must be taken into account in the procedure and should be included in the consideration. However, the Lord Mayor of the City of Nuremberg has always stated that demolition is out of the question for him.
What will happen next?
We will continue the discussion objectively and continuously with experts and representatives of the City of Nuremberg in the interests of preservation. Specifically, events for the preservation of the façade are being prepared by architectural associations, the Technical University and the Nuremberg Old Town Citizens’ Association.
The interview was conducted by Alexandra Nyseth.
You can also read a commentary on the situation and discussion surrounding the Pellerhaus in RESTAURO 8/2016.