The rewards of slowness

Building design

The architect Gianluca Gelmini has worked with great commitment and perseverance to ensure that the old fortified tower in the small town of Villa d’Adda is restored and used again.

After ten years in Milan, he had had enough. Gianluca Gelmini left the noise and hustle and bustle of the big city behind and moved back north with his wife and four children to his home region near Bergamo. Here, in a mountain village, he has converted two houses opposite each other on the narrow village street – one to live in and one as a studio. He makes a satisfied impression: he feels nothing of the crisis, he says, his projects are small anyway and often require a lot of supervision because communities in the surrounding area are involved and many people have a say; they progress slowly and above all require patience.

The “Torre del Borgo” in Villa d’Adda near Bergamo is just such a project. The historic fortified tower is built on three sides on a hilltop above the River Adda, in the middle of the historic town center, and is the only remnant of a medieval fortress. Gelmini had already been fascinated by this tower during his studies. During his studies, Gelmini was already thinking about a suitable use for it, as the tower had been empty for years and had fallen into disrepair. However, it took another ten years before he was able to convince the local authority that they were letting a valuable historical monument fall into disrepair.

The relic has now been renovated in a first construction phase, and the next step is for the books and their readers to move in. With a new external staircase, the architect has managed to make good use of the tower’s small footprint. However, the term “staircase” is almost banal for this scuptural, copper-clad extension, as the flights take a different route on each floor. In principle, the renovation – apart from the new extension – cannot be seen from the outside. Everything new is on the inside and consists mainly of steel: ceilings, walkways, door and window frames; the panes sit on the inner edge of the wall so that the glass surfaces are shaded from a distance and appear dark, as if the windows were still open.

Read more in Baumeister 7/2015

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Beautiful views in the creative quarter

Building design

From July 23 to October 2, the space and sound sculpture SICHTUNG II will be on display in Munich’s Kreativquartier. It has the shape of a tower and is accessible.

From July 23 to October 2, 2019, the space and sound sculpture SICHTUNG II will be on display in Munich’s Kreativquartier. The artwork was created by Hildegard Rasthofer and Christian Neumaier. It is a temporary artistic installation that can be walked through inside.

The artists Hildegard Rasthofer and Christian Neumaier used over 70 tons of steel for their sculpture SICHTUNG II. The dimensions of the artwork, which consists of 13 cubes, are variable: in Munich, it towers over 32 meters high with a base area of 2.4 x 2.4 meters – but as soon as the sculpture changes location, its dimensions also change.

It is created anew each time it is erected, depending on the location and situation. Under the name SICHTUNG II, the sculpture takes the form of a tower. Viewers reach the top level, an open platform, via a three-flight staircase.

As SICHTUNG I, the artwork already stood in Reithofen in Upper Bavaria in 2018. Following the exhibition in Munich, SICHTUNG II will be dismantled and reassembled in the mSE Kunsthalle in Unterammergau as SICHTUNG III.

Hildegard Rasthofer is an architect. She designed the modular sculpture together with the metal sculptor and master blacksmith. In their work, the two artists deal with experimental architecture and plastic-sculptural design.

The sculpture can be viewed in Munich’s Kreativquartier. Access is only possible during the opening hours of the site, via Heßstrasse (at number 134).

Further information can be found here.

Architecture is everywhere

Building design

Structuralism from staples / Photo: David Vintiner

Sou Fujimoto is a great architectural dreamer. With his buildings, he repeatedly explores what is possible in architecture. With his contribution to the Architecture Biennale in Chicago, which bears the programmatic title “Architecture is Everywhere”, he once again puts our viewing habits to the test.

Sou Fujimoto is a great architectural dreamer. With his buildings, he constantly explores what is possible in architecture. It is often difficult to classify his buildings at all. The viewer rubs his eyes in amazement and wonders whether this is really a residential building or rather a spatial illusion. Even by Japanese standards, his buildings seem radical.

Yet Fujimoto is anything but the typical architectural egomaniac. He appears rather quiet and modest. With mischievous charm, poetic lightness and a dash of naivety, he revolutionized architecture in passing.

With his contribution to the Architecture Biennale in Chicago, which bears the programmatic title “Architecture is Everywhere”, he is once again putting our viewing habits to the test. On small wooden panels, he transforms banal everyday objects such as table tennis balls, potato chips or staples into miniature architectures by artfully arranging them and placing miniature people next to them.

Each model is described with a sentence by the architect. For a simple kitchen sponge, whose structure he transforms into a residential building using three miniature people, he writes: “People live in bumps and nooks.”

Looking at his staple model, he asks himself: “A house like bookshelves? Or bookshelves like a house?”

A decapitated shuttlecock is declared a tower without further ado: “Gather towers to make new tower. Tower fades out and become the new tower. Tower becomes place, place becomes tower.”

He forms a floating architectural sculpture from six table tennis balls and writes: “Being enclose yet open. Individuality and continuity.”

And like every great revolutionary, Fujimoto also draws on the past by crossing the principles of Marcel Duchamp’s readymades with the structuralist architecture of the sixties and seventies and reinterpreting both in the present. It will be interesting to see what he dreams up for the future.