Next weekend, on September 24, 2017, the 19th Bundestag elections will take place. A good opportunity for STEIN author Bärbel Daiber to ask Skilled Crafts President Hans Peter Wollseifer about the relationship between the skilled crafts sector and federal politics and what demands and expectations the German Confederation of Skilled Crafts (ZDH) has of the future government. STEIN: Mr. Wollseifer, the skilled trades and […]
Next weekend, on September 24, 2017, the 19th Bundestag elections will take place. A good opportunity for STEIN author Bärbel Daiber to ask Skilled Crafts President Hans Peter Wollseifer about the relationship between the skilled crafts sector and federal politics and what demands and expectations the German Confederation of Skilled Crafts (ZDH) has of the future government.
STEIN : Mr. Wollseifer, the skilled trades and SMEs are finally receiving more appreciation from politicians. What effect is this having and where is there still a lack of appreciation?
Hans Peter Wollseifer: The German SME sector and, as an important part of it, the more than one million craft businesses have proven to be very robust in times of crisis. At the same time, they have stood out as the economic sector that politicians can count on, especially with regard to outstanding socio-political challenges such as refugee integration. The skilled crafts sector has a stabilizing effect on society and the economy. This also has a lot to do with the dual training system, which ensures the quality of training and the supply of qualified skilled workers. Even if the majority of politicians now see it this way, there is still a lot of room for improvement in terms of financial support for vocational training and training funding, for example in higher vocational training. In order for our companies to continue to be successful, we also need the right framework conditions. Superfluous bureaucracy must be further reduced. And when it comes to the burden of taxes and social security contributions, our companies are at their pain threshold. In order for them to remain competitive, social security contributions must not exceed 40 percent in the future either.
STEIN : What urgent measures for the skilled crafts sector were neglected in the last legislative period that now urgently need to be addressed?
Hans Peter Wollseifer: Particularly in view of the shortage of skilled workers, it is urgent to make vocational training more attractive to young people again. This requires better equipment for our vocational training centers, an update for vocational schools and stronger support for vocational education overall. Following the successful Higher Education Pact, there must now be a Vocational Training Pact, also as an expression of the equal value of vocational and academic education. We have repeatedly drawn attention to the fact that much more energy-efficient refurbishment of buildings is needed if we want to achieve the climate targets – tax incentives can play a decisive role in encouraging investment. We could already be much further ahead here. In recent years, it has not been possible to keep electricity prices under control for SMEs and private households, and the EEG levy is rising and rising. From the point of view of the skilled trades, it is unacceptable that small and medium-sized businesses are being asked to pay for the privileged treatment of large companies that are exempt from the levy.
STEIN : What are the three most important issues for the skilled crafts sector that politicians must now urgently address? And what central demands of the skilled crafts sector do you derive from this for the future federal government?
Hans Peter Wollseifer: I have already mentioned that something urgently needs to be done to finance the energy transition. The costs must be distributed fairly and distortions of competition avoided, and a secure and affordable energy and electricity supply must be guaranteed. It is particularly important for craft businesses in rural areas to have access to fast internet. We need to speed up connections considerably here. Companies also need a modern data law. There must be no further burdens on our companies in terms of taxes and social security contributions. One example is the area of pensions: Past mistakes such as the maternity pension or the pension at 63 are taking their revenge here, burdening the pension fund with several billion euros every year. We urgently need to keep pension costs under control. There should therefore be no further increases in benefits, which would then have to be financed from contributions. Instead, the aim must be to make pensions demographically stable, for example by linking the retirement age to life expectancy – as will be the case in Denmark in future.
STEIN : Thank you very much for talking to us.












