UNESCO World Heritage Committee: 48th Session Begins in Busan

Building design
The UNESCO World Heritage Committee will meet from July 19–29 to discuss the inscription of new World Heritage sites. Photo: Niches in the Toyifa Palace, Domoni, Ndzuwani, Comoros; Simone Ricca, © RC Heritage
The UNESCO World Heritage Committee will meet from July 19–29 to discuss the inscription of new World Heritage sites. Photo: Niches in the Toyifa Palace, Domoni, Ndzuwani, Comoros; Simone Ricca, © RC Heritage

From July 19 to 29, 2026, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee will meet in Busan, South Korea. At its 48th session, the committee will decide on the inclusion of new sites on the World Heritage List, review the state of conservation of existing World Heritage sites, and discuss the future direction of the program. The German UNESCO Commission will provide ongoing coverage of the session, and the entire meeting will also be streamed live online.

For this year’s session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, the committee has received approximately 30 nominations for the World Heritage List of cultural and natural sites. A look at the proposed sites highlights the program’s geographic and thematic diversity: Brazil has submitted the Amazon Theaters in Manaus and Belém, which commemorate the rubber boom of the late 19th century. France has, upon request, put the 1944 Allied landing beaches in Normandy up for consideration. Poland, for its part, is submitting the modernist city center of Gdynia, a complex dating from the 1920s and 1930s that is considered an outstanding example of functionalism in urban planning. Other archaeological and cultural-historical ensembles, such as the Alamut Fortress in Iran, the medinas of the historic sultanates of the Comoros, the ancient capitals of Asuka and Fujiwara in Japan, and the porcelain manufacturing sites of Jingdezhen in China are on the list of nominations to be reviewed. Among the natural heritage sites are, among others, the Aqaba Marine Protected Area in Jordan, the coral reefs in the Gulf of Aqaba in Saudi Arabia, and the Boma-Badingilo Migration Landscape in South Sudan, whose nomination is being processed under an expedited procedure.
From a German perspective, the Zehlendorf Forest Settlement in southwest Berlin is of particular interest. Germany has proposed it as a significant example of “Neues Bauen” (New Building) to expand the “Berlin Modernism” sites, which have been inscribed since 2008. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee will decide on this expansion as part of its deliberations on boundary changes to existing World Heritage sites.

Focus on Endangered Sites

In addition to new inscriptions, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee also reviews the state of conservation of approximately 150 World Heritage sites already inscribed, including the 53 sites currently on the List of World Heritage in Danger. Threats include armed conflicts, climate change, natural disasters, and construction projects. In addition to individual conservation measures, the Committee discusses international funding programs designed to support states in preserving their World Heritage sites.
Currently, the World Heritage List comprises 1,248 cultural and natural sites in 170 countries, 53 of which are considered to be in danger. Germany is currently represented by 55 World Heritage sites. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee generally decides on new inscriptions once a year and is thus the central body responsible for implementing the 1972 World Heritage Convention.

What is UNESCO?

UNESCO, which stands for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, is the United Nations agency for education, science, and culture, headquartered in Paris. It was founded in 1945 and aims to contribute to peace and security in the world through international cooperation in the fields of education, science, culture, and communication. The idea behind this is that since wars begin in the minds of men, the defense of peace must also be rooted in the minds of men.
UNESCO’s core areas of focus include promoting quality education and lifelong learning, fostering international scientific cooperation, protecting cultural diversity, and advocating for freedom of the press and freedom of expression. A particularly visible aspect of UNESCO’s work is the protection of humanity’s cultural and natural heritage under the World Heritage Convention. Through the World Heritage List, the organization recognizes sites of outstanding universal value and supports the States Parties in preserving this heritage for future generations. Decisions regarding the inscription of new sites, as well as the preservation and protection of sites already inscribed, are made by the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, which is composed of representatives from 21 elected States Parties and meets once a year—this year in Busan.

Read more: These World Heritage Sites were designated in 2025.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Marble Architectural Awards 2014

Building design

Advertorial Article Parallax Article

Every year, the Internazionale Marmi e Macchine Carrara presents the “Marble Architectural Award” (MAA) for special projects in natural stone. This time around: a mausoleum, a lobby and a work of art called “Parallel Lives”.

Every year, the Internazionale Marmi e Macchine Carrara presents the “Marble Architectural Awards” (MAA) at the Carraramarmotec trade fair. The focus is always on one of six different regions. In 2014, this was North America, specifically the USA, Canada and Mexico. This shows clear trends and developments within each region. The winners have now been honored at this year’s CarraraMarmotec.

The Lakewood Cemetery Garden Mausoleum in Minneapolis (USA)
Photo: Paul Crosby

In the wake of the economic crisis after 2007, there was a clear trend towards medium-sized projects in North America. There was less demand for natural stone, but where it was chosen, great emphasis was placed on quality and finish. The use of natural stone from all parts of the world again demonstrates the globalization of trade.

The lobby of the building 135 Main Street, San Francisco (USA)
Photo: Matthew Millman

The first prize in the “Exterior” category went to HGA Architects and Engineers for the Lakewood Cemetery Garden Mausoleum in Minneapolis, in which white Carrara marble and various American granites were used. The winner in the “Interior” category is the Aston Pereira and Associates studio with the lobby for the 135 Main Street building in San Francisco. They used Greek marble, Jura limestone from Germany, Italian marble and French yellow onyx. And the winner of the “Urban Design” category is Jacobo Micha Mizrahi for his “Parallel Lives” in Vera Cruz (Mexico). The monument consists of various Mexican rocks.

“Parallel Lives” in Vera Cruz, Mexico
Photo: Archetonic/Eduardo Zaletas/Quitagrapas Estudio Mexico City

The projects honored with the Marble Architectural Awards are summarized in a catalog. This catalog places special emphasis on the stone itself, its technical details and its processing. The Carraramarmotec trade fair was last held in May 2014 in Carrara, Italy.

Trend analysis – The museum 3.0

Building design

to show the artist's working processes or to reveal unrecognizable layers of paint. Photo: Clair Obscur.

Art museums are breaking out of the building walls – into the digital space. Apps and online tours are now part of the permanent repertoire of art education. A survey of German consumers shows how this trend is reflected in the public. Advertorial Article Parallax Article On the website of the Amsterdam Rijksmuseum, almost every exhibit can be viewed zoomed in on in full-screen mode. […]

Art museums are breaking out of the building walls – into the digital space. Apps and online tours are now part of the permanent repertoire of art education. A survey of German consumers shows how this trend is reflected in the public.


3-D
Projection technology makes it possible, for example, to show the artist's work processes or to reveal unrecognizable layers of paint. Photo: Clair Obscur.

On the website of the Amsterdam Rijksmuseum, almost every exhibit can be viewed zoomed in on in full-screen mode. Johannes Vermeer’s Milkmaid from 1660 gazes absorbedly at the high-resolution beam of milk-white bliss. One pupil movement further on, a field with a red background vies for attention: this painting has been “liked” 10,806 times. Next to it, a scissor symbol encourages reproductive complicity: “Get creative”, “Download this work”!

Digital surfaces – apps on tablets and smartphones that wander through the halls in visitors’ hands – have also long been a familiar feature of museum spaces. In fact, this trend is closely linked to the exponential growth in visitor numbers at many art museums. The Staatsgalerie Stuttgart counted 375,694 tickets sold in 2015: an increase of 70 percent compared to the previous year, confirms Director Christiane Lange. New technologies – keyword “augmented reality” – are already on the rise. But can this trend, which focuses on the virtual, be sustained?

A survey conducted by the market research institute Promio on behalf of the media technology company fröbus among 1068 German consumers illustrates the reactions that different digital mediation methods evoke in visitors:

Proximity or distance to the object

The results of the survey show that the digital trend is currently moving back towards the object. Instead of keeping the works seemingly close but at a distance by clicking on a screen at home or integrated into the exhibition, the information conveyed by 3D visualization or projection directly on the object is gaining attention.

This impression is also confirmed by a cross-section of the current start-up scene in museum technology. Light choreography, turntables, 3D prints. The focus is on the work of art in all its facets: Details, reverse sides, as well as reconstructions of the original state are to be made accessible to visitors to the Museum 3.0 (replacing the digital-virtual 2.0). The Berlin start-up Clair Obscur, for example, has developed a new projection technology that can reveal the artist’s working process or hidden layers of paint directly on the painting. “It is important to us,” explains Lene Fischer, co-founder of Clair Obscur, “to create a closeness to the work, to tell the story of an object.”

interactive scape, who specialize in so-called multi-touch tables, choose a different way of communication. These release digital information when they are touched with a specially created haptic object. “Above all, a visit to a museum should be an experience – a tactile experience,” says Marcel Graf from interactive scape, describing their objective. This is particularly relevant in our digital age: “Our mediation concepts focus on a museum you can touch. An experience that you can’t have at home in front of a screen.”