(Un)reasonable: Surface parking

Building design
The fight for the sidewalk. Source: Unsplash

The fight for the sidewalk. Source: Unsplash

Who hasn’t seen it – cars parked with two wheels on the sidewalk. Although surface parking is generally prohibited, it is usually tolerated. A legal dispute is currently underway in Bremen. What exactly is on-street parking, what are the regulations and how are they implemented? Here you can also find out what cities would look like if there were no more tires on the sidewalk.

Who hasn’t seen it – cars parked with two wheels on the sidewalk. Although surface parking is generally prohibited, it is usually tolerated. A legal dispute is currently underway in Bremen. What exactly is on-street parking, what are the regulations and how are they implemented? Here you can also find out what cities would look like if there were no more tires on the sidewalk.

According to the German Road Traffic Regulations (StVO), parking on sidewalks is prohibited. Surface parking is only permitted where there is a corresponding traffic sign (number 315). However, this only applies to vehicles under 2.8 tons. Some local authorities also allow a special permit for utility services, deliveries and trades.

In Bremen, the debate about parking on sidewalks has long been a contentious issue. Now residents have filed a complaint against the municipality. This was represented by the Senator for Climate Protection, Environment, Mobility, Urban Development and Housing. The Higher Administrative Court has now issued a ruling: the road traffic authority is generally obliged to take action against parking on the road. At the same time, however, the court grants the authority discretionary powers.

What does this mean in concrete terms? The authority only has to take action if the situation is deemed unreasonable. This threshold is exceeded if the remaining passage on the sidewalk is less than 1.50 meters wide. That sounds logical at first. However, this rule is immediately relaxed again: it only applies if there is surface parking on both sides of the entire street. The court also demands that the authorities draw attention to the ban, for example with appropriate signage. However, the ruling is not yet legally binding. The plaintiffs could appeal. This would bring the case before the Federal Administrative Court.

In its ruling, the Higher Administrative Court drew attention to the fact that vehicles have been parked on sidewalks in the district in question for decades. Although this is usually prohibited according to the StVO, the judges did not derive a general obligation to tow away the vehicles. This was precisely what the residents were demanding. The court is now recommending that the authorities specifically identify the areas of the city where the problem of parking is particularly serious. Based on these findings, a comprehensive concept should then be developed for the whole of Bremen.

Mobility Senator Maike Schaefer reacts positively to the ruling. It shows that surface parking is illegal in many residential areas of the city. Interior Senator Ulrich Mäurer is also satisfied. According to him, the court has recognized in a “balanced decision” that, due to limited resources, step-by-step action must be taken against parking on the street.

The ruling has further sparked existing discussions in cities such as Hamburg and Frankfurt. The movement is also supported by the pedestrian interest group FUSS e. V. So what are the consequences? If strict action is taken against on-street parking, parking spaces will be lost. This is currently causing a lot of commotion in the city. In reality, however, people have no right to a public parking space. The dilemma is also exacerbated by the trend towards larger cars. On the other hand, getting around with baby carriages, walking frames and the like is now more convenient. Hamburg-Nord district manager Werner-Boelz, for example, says: “The implementation is an important step not only for the traffic turnaround, but above all for more fairness in road traffic, as mobility-impaired people in particular will benefit from it.” The mobility turnaround is also evident at federal level. In 2022, for example, one million euros in funding was spent on model projects and redesigns for pedestrian traffic for the first time.

By the way: a test track for the Hyperloop recently opened near Munich. Find out more here.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

How much space does the price need?

Building design

In the May issue, we discuss the possible abolition of the HOAI. We let the landscape architects have their say online and ask for their opinions.

In the May issue, landscape architect and expert Dieter Pfrommer discusses what would happen if the European Commission were to overturn the HOAI. He is certain that landscape architecture would face upheaval if the scale of fees were to be abolished. We asked landscape architects about their assessments and expectations, here are their statements:

Christian Burkhardt from Burkhardt Sandler Landschaftsarchitekten: We view a possible abolition of the HOAI as very critical. Without HOAI, there are no defined services. This leads to uncertainty on both sides as to what to do and what to demand. I can’t imagine how this would work without the HOAI as a basis. Do the clients make their own individual provisions, which the contractor then has to deal with anew each time, or do the contractors make their own provisions, which the client then has to deal with?

Michael Heinze from landschaftDrei: If the HOAI is overturned, it is to be feared that our services will be defined solely in terms of price. It’s easy to imagine what that would lead to. Dumping prices across the board, which makes quality-oriented work extremely difficult, if not impossible. It will be our task to convince future clients that quality has its price.

Jens Rossa from r+b Landschaftsarchitektur: Worrying! We regard the HOAI as an essential seal of quality for a sustainable building culture, among other things! Under no circumstances should the primacy of price be placed above that of quality. If you look at the costs for the landscape architect, these only make up a single-digit percentage of the costs of the building over its life cycle. Demotivation due to inadequate fees not only harms the planners in the long term, but also the clients, the much-vaunted art of building and the numerous sustainability aspects that stand for stability and the natural regeneration capabilities of the respective system.

Tilman Latz from Latz+Partner: ” Well, a discontinuation will dramatically change the business in Germany. Up to now, we have been able to achieve high quality with the calculated fees, even if the client(s) had less interest in it. In future, this would often only be possible through self-exploitation, because the VOF procedures that are increasingly becoming the norm – even following competition procedures that supposedly aim for the “highest quality” – by and large only reward dumping.

Relaciones

Building design
Max Nunez MAD Building

MAD

Ansgar and Benedikt Schulz teach in the context of the Dortmunder Modell Bauwesen. One focus of their teaching is South American architecture.

The architectural brothers and professors Ansgar and Benedikt Schulz place their research and teaching on building construction in the context of the Dortmund Model of Construction. They also look beyond the national horizon – the professors promote international university cooperation in order to sensitize students to different challenges and approaches.

South American architecture and the cooperation with Fadu in Buenos Aires is a key topic. Exchange programs and excursions now also include the current symposium Relaciones, which explores international development trends in architecture. Some of the most interesting protagonists of the South American architecture scene have been invited to Dortmund to discuss the challenges of current works and compare them in a joint exhibition.

The preparations for the exhibition and symposium were part of Ansgar and Benedikt Schulz’ s teaching at the Chair of Building Construction. The conception, development and implementation of the entire series of events was worked on in student groups. The focus was on the previous relationships and experiences from the cooperation with the South American partners, combined with the aim of comparing architecture and its cultural significance between Germany and South America.

Excursions and media reports in which the students had participated in the previous semesters laid the foundations. For the series of events, new multimedia exhibition and presentation formats were required that went beyond a classic exhibition of works.
The development was carried out in three working groups: Technical conception, typesetting/media department and contribution editing.

The works of the following architects were selected for the content of the contributions:

– Cristiane Muniz(UNA Arquitetos, Sao Paulo, Brazil)
– Tristán Dieguez(Dieguez Fridman Architectos, Buenos Aires, Argentina)
– Marcelo and Martín Gualano(gualano+gualano arquitectos, Montevideo, Uruguay)
– Max Núñez(Max Núñez Arquitectos, Santiago, Chile)

The exhibition will kick off with a one-day symposium. This will bring together the protagonists of the show for a discourse, moderated by Ansgar Schulz, Benedikt Schulz and Jutta Albus. There will be three panel discussions on the topics of social housing and landscape design, sacred buildings and education systems, and conversion and industrial architecture.

The 20-minute talks will be kicked off by four-minute thematic film clips on the work of the exhibition and panel guests. The talks are defined as open discussions that include opinions and questions from the audience. At the end of the symposium, there will be a joint aperitif to further deepen positions in small groups.

The stage is the multimedia exhibition, which shows photos, drawings and interviews on the architects’ work as projections on the room-forming walls.

Participation in the symposium is free of charge and is recognized by the Chamber of Architects of North Rhine-Westphalia as an advanced training event with a duration of 4 hours.

Here you can find a pdf of the daily schedule

Venue
Dortmund U
Center for Art and Creativity
University floor Leonie-Reygers-Terrasse
44137 Dortmund

Opening hours
December 1, 2017 to January 7, 2018
Tue + Wed 11 am to 6 pm
Thu + Fri 11 am to 8 pm
Sat + Sun 11 am to 6 pm
Mon closed

Admission is free