To be honest, cities are never finished. At best, they are promises and ideas that are constantly overhauling themselves and surprisingly often forget to pay off old debts. While we have clung to new guiding principles with remarkable dedication in recent years – green islands here, a wider cycle path there – a task is growing in the background that can no longer be described in charming terms: the systemic redevelopment of our urban reality.
Structural wear and tear
What we are experiencing in many places is not selective renewal, but structural wear and tear. Infrastructures that were designed for a different climate, a different society and a different economy are reaching their limits. Soils are sealed, networks are overloaded, spaces are socially fragmented. And while we are still discussing quality of life, the foundations are crumbling, both figuratively and literally.
Intervening instead of decorating
Redevelopment – that sounds like construction fencing and dust, restriction and transition. Perhaps that is precisely the problem. We have forgotten how to accept the unfinished as a necessary condition. Instead, we like to stage progress as an additive measure: a bit of greening, a bit of traffic calming, a new neighborhood on the outskirts of the city. But the real challenge lies deeper. It is not a question of adding, but of readjusting. It’s not about decorating, but about intervening in existing systems.
Courage
This also means asking uncomfortable questions. How do we deal with a building stock that has fallen out of time in terms of energy, function and society? Which infrastructures do we not just need to upgrade, but radically rebuild? And above all: do we have the courage to set new priorities instead of continuing to cure symptoms?
Urban redevelopment as a cultural task
This issue therefore sees urban redevelopment not as a technical discipline, but as a cultural task. It forces us to take a closer look – at what is already there and, above all, at what we have ignored for too long. Because the future of the city is not decided by spectacular, PR-effective greening projects, but by the quality of their repair.
Perhaps that is the real point: the city of tomorrow will not be created by the new. It will come about through the intelligent use of what we have long since built and, above all, the complete conversion of existing structures.
The May issue is available here in the store.
Our April issue was all about inner city development. Read more about it here.












