Urban timber construction Berlin: House 2+ at Holzmarkt

Building design
Building 2+ at Holzmarkt 25: Urban timber construction in Berlin with a striking red façade and sustainable architecture. Photo: Photography Jan Bitter, Berlin / DE

Building 2+ at Holzmarkt 25: Urban timber construction in Berlin with a striking red façade and sustainable architecture. Photo: Photography Jan Bitter, Berlin / DE

Urban timber construction in Berlin – a remarkable project is currently establishing itself in the heart of the capital: “Haus 2+”, a new three-storey building in eye-catching red that serves as the latest access point to the Holzmarkt 25 cultural quarter. It is an architectural statement – uncompromisingly sustainable, precisely planned and embedded in a creative microcosm directly on the banks of the Spree.

The location itself is already a chapter in Berlin’s urban culture: Holzmarkt was once a central transshipment point for timber, later a GDR border area, then a wasteland. In the early 2000s, it became a stage for alternative urban culture – with the legendary Bar25 paving the way for today’s Holzmarkt 25 cultural area. Today, the quarter is home to concert halls, studios, workshops and restaurants – and the new Haus 2+ is a striking architectural and functional highlight.

House 2+, designed as an extension to the existing building complex along Holzmarktstrasse, provides a strong counterpoint to the urban surroundings with its confident red wooden façade. With a gross floor area of around 200 square meters and three levels, it combines an unusual mix of uses: a local bakery, a booking agency, a tattoo studio and a physiotherapy practice.

This mix is no coincidence – it reflects the open, permeable self-image of the district. Here, crafts, creative industries and healthcare merge into a living microcosm of urban diversity. The fact that this microcosm is built in wood not only lends the ensemble a warm atmosphere, but also sends a strong signal for resource-conserving construction in an inner-city context.

According to the responsible planners, House 2+ is the first almost 100% timber construction on the site. It is based on LIGNATUR ceiling elements that meet static, thermal and acoustic requirements in equal measure. The element ceilings take up the projections and recesses of the geometry via cantilevers – and at the same time allow a visible soffit that emphasizes the material honesty of the building.

Inside, the cavities are filled with chippings to optimize sound insulation – particularly relevant in view of the small-scale use. The integrated thermal insulation allows a cantilever without thermal bridges, which combines energy efficiency and structural clarity. The timber elements weigh just 50 kilograms per square meter, which enabled a particularly fast and minimally invasive construction method – an advantage that should not be underestimated in the middle of a busy, densely used district.

Despite its lightness of design, the building meets the high fire protection requirements for multi-storey timber construction. Certified fire barriers within the ceiling modules ensure reliable safety without compromising the architectural expression. The solution: a consistent, prefabricated construction method in which all safety-relevant aspects were already integrated into the design at the planning stage.

In functional terms, Haus 2+ is far more than just an extension of the existing infrastructure. As a new access point to the Holzmarkt quarter, it acts as an architectural threshold between public space and creative biotope. Its striking form, composed of clear geometric bodies, emphasizes the transition from urban street space to an informally organized, mixed-use world.

At the same time, the building does not appear forbidding or closed off – on the contrary. The colorfulness, the openness of the first floor use and the diversity of the tenants make Haus 2+ a lively part of the banks of the Spree, inviting passers-by and visitors alike.

On an urban planning scale, Haus 2+ shows how modern timber construction can succeed in dense urban spaces – functionally, aesthetically and sustainably at the same time. Its high level of prefabrication, visible materiality and flexible usability make it an exemplary project for the future development of Berlin, particularly in light of the growing demands for climate protection and resource-saving construction.

At the same time, the building is not an isolated lighthouse project, but part of an urban experiment that has focused on mix, participation and sustainability from the outset. The Holzmarkt 25 district remains a model of what urban transformation with social aspirations can look like – and Haus 2+ now provides architectural proof that climate-friendly construction is not only possible, but can also be outstanding in terms of design.

House 2+ is red – and sends out a signal. It stands for a new generation of urban architecture: resource-conserving, flexible, inviting. As an architectural building block in the creative fabric of the timber market, it impressively demonstrates how urban timber construction can be realized in Berlin – not as a marginal phenomenon, but as a sustainable model for urban construction in the 21st century.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Shared mobility: how digital platforms are redefining public transport

Building design

Shared mobility is becoming increasingly important in the modern city: digital platforms enable residents to use vehicles such as car-sharing cars, e-scooters and bicycles quickly and flexibly. These solutions relieve the burden on cities and contribute to sustainable urban mobility. Matthew Archuleta | Unsplash

Cities today face major challenges when it comes to mobility. Private transport leads to traffic jams, air pollution and land consumption. Shared mobility offers a solution that relies on the shared use of vehicles and thus relieves both the environment and the roads. Digital platforms and apps allow people to use vehicles flexibly without having to own a car. These new mobility models are not only an environmentally friendly alternative, but also an important step towards a more sustainable and liveable city. […]

Cities today face major challenges when it comes to mobility. Private transport leads to traffic jams, air pollution and land consumption. Shared mobility offers a solution that relies on the shared use of vehicles and thus relieves both the environment and the roads. Digital platforms and apps allow people to use vehicles flexibly without having to own a car. These new mobility models are not only an environmentally friendly alternative, but also an important step towards a more sustainable and liveable city.

Fun fact: According to a study by McKinsey, shared mobility solutions could reduce the need for private cars in cities by up to 30% by 2030.

Shared mobility is based on a combination of several technologies that work together seamlessly to provide users with a simple and convenient experience.

Digital platforms

Digital platforms such as Uber, Lyft, Free Now and Share Now connect users and vehicles in real time. These platforms offer features such as booking, payment and route optimization that allow users to use a vehicle immediately and without much effort.

Internet of Things (IoT)

The IoT is an integral part of shared mobility. Vehicles are often equipped with GPS and sensors that report their location and status in real time. This data helps to optimize operations by providing information on availability, maintenance and routes.

Mobile apps

Mobile apps are the main tool through which users access shared mobility services. They enable the booking of rides, payment and provide access to information such as the location of the next available vehicle and estimated arrival times.

Practical example: In Amsterdam, the car-sharing company Share Now uses a platform that provides real-time information on available vehicles and allows users to unlock the cars via an app.

Shared mobility comprises various models that are tailored to the different needs of users.

Car sharing

Car sharing enables users to rent a car for short periods of time. Models such as station-based car sharing (e.g. Zipcar) and free-floating car sharing (e.g. Share Now) offer flexibility and reduce the need for private car ownership.

Bike sharing

Bike sharing systems offer an environmentally friendly alternative for short distances. Users can find and use bikes at special stations or via GPS using an app. This promotes healthy, emission-free mobility.

Ridesharing and ride-hailing

Ridesharing (e.g. BlaBlaCar) and ride-hailing (e.g. Uber) offer users the opportunity to share journeys or order a vehicle with a driver. This optimizes traffic flow and reduces environmental pollution.

Scooter sharing

Electric scooters, which can be rented via an app, have established themselves as a popular option for short journeys. They are space-saving and emission-free and complement other means of transportation in the urban environment.

Practical example: Lime offers scooter sharing in many cities around the world and is a practical solution for the so-called “last mile”, which is often difficult to cover with public transport.

Shared mobility offers numerous advantages that have a positive impact on cities, the environment and users.

Reduction of emissions

As fewer people own their own car, the number of vehicles on the roads is reduced. Shared mobility promotes the use of electric and low-emission vehicles and thus helps to reduce CO₂ emissions.

Less traffic and congestion

When people share vehicles, traffic is reduced. Fewer vehicles on the roads means less congestion, better air quality and an overall more pleasant urban environment.

Lower costs for users

Shared mobility is often cheaper than owning a car, as users only pay for what they actually use. Maintenance, insurance and other fixed costs are eliminated.

Flexible mobility

Shared mobility models offer users a flexible and convenient way to get around without having to worry about finding a parking space or vehicle maintenance.

Expert opinion: According to a study by Deloitte, 55% of millennials prefer shared mobility solutions to owning their own car as they offer flexibility and cost efficiency.

Despite its advantages, shared mobility faces various challenges that need to be overcome.

Infrastructure and space requirements

Shared mobility requires special parking spaces and parking areas for bicycles and scooters, which can lead to conflicts in public spaces. Cities need to provide space for these vehicles without interfering with pedestrian traffic.

Safety concerns

Scooters and bikes can pose a safety risk, especially in busy areas. Accidents and lack of helmet use are common problems that jeopardize the safety of users.

Legal and regulatory issues

The regulation of shared mobility services is complex and varies from city to city. Providers must adhere to local regulations, which can increase operating costs and limit availability.

User acceptance and habits

Although shared mobility offers many advantages, some people still prefer to own their own car. It takes time and education to increase the acceptance of shared mobility solutions.

Example: In San Francisco, the rapid growth of scooter sharing has led to problems with poorly parked scooters on sidewalks, resulting in complaints from citizens and the need for stricter regulations.

Amsterdam: Car sharing integration with public transport

In Amsterdam, car sharing providers work closely with public transport to offer integrated mobility solutions. Users can use car-sharing vehicles as a supplement to public transport and thus increase flexibility.

San Francisco: Scooter sharing

San Francisco has successfully integrated scooter sharing and introduced strict regulations to ensure that the vehicles are parked properly and the safety of users is guaranteed.

Copenhagen: Bikesharing

Copenhagen, known as a bike-friendly city, has developed a comprehensive bike-sharing program that is used by locals and tourists alike. This has reduced the use of cars in the city center.

The future of shared mobility will be shaped by the integration of new technologies and business models.

  1. Autonomous driving: Autonomous vehicles could make shared mobility even more efficient and safer as they are continuously available and can move autonomously.
  2. Artificial intelligence (AI): AI can help to better manage traffic flows and vehicle availability in order to maximize efficiency and adapt the service to the needs of users.
  3. Mobility as a Service (MaaS): MaaS platforms combine different modes of transportation in a single app that integrates all mobility services from public transport to car sharing and offers a seamless user experience.
  4. Sustainability and electric drives: The introduction of electric shared mobility vehicles will help reduce emissions and improve air quality in cities.

Future outlook: A pilot project in Helsinki is testing autonomous, electric car sharing vehicles that can be booked via a MaaS app and offer users a complete, sustainable mobility solution.

Shared mobility is fundamentally changing the way people travel in cities. Through the use of digital platforms and innovative business models, it offers a sustainable alternative to private car ownership and contributes to solving urban challenges. Despite the challenges, particularly in terms of infrastructure and user acceptance, it is clear that shared mobility has the potential to make urban mobility more efficient, environmentally friendly and flexible.

Concluding thought: Shared mobility is more than just a technology – it is a vision for sustainable mobility that conserves resources and creates quality of life. If cities and providers work together, shared mobility could become an essential part of urban life in the future.

Read more: The European Garden Award 2024 went to a total of ten projects this year. The focus was on the topic of “Green Oasis”.

National Arena Bucharest – Stadiums of the European Championship 2021

Building design

Lia Manoliu Stadium

If you take a closer look at the national arena in the Romanian capital Bucharest, you are instinctively reminded of a Bundesliga stadium. This is no coincidence, as the roots of the arena lie in Germany. The Romanian national arena in Bucharest has German genes: the 55,000-seat soccer stadium was designed by Hamburg architects Gerkan, Marg […]

If you take a closer look at the national arena in the Romanian capital Bucharest, you are instinctively reminded of a Bundesliga stadium. This is no coincidence, as the roots of the arena lie in Germany.

The Romanian national arena in Bucharest has German genes: the 55,000-seat soccer stadium was designed by Hamburg architects Gerkan, Marg & Partner (gmp), the structural design was carried out by the engineering firms Schlaich Bergermann & Partner from Stuttgart and Krebs und Kiefer from Karlsruhe, and the general contractor was the construction company Max Bögl from Sengenthal in the Upper Palatinate.

Although it is a soccer stadium, the building is named after a female discus thrower: Lia Manoliu won the gold medal at the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico City. However, the stadium is now known exclusively as the “Arena Națională”, i.e. the “National Arena”. The new building was named after Lia Manoliu after its predecessor, the “Stadionul Național Lia Manoliu”, the old national stadium. It previously stood on the same site and was demolished in 2008.

Unlike the arena, it was a multi-purpose stadium. Its stands were not covered and the athletics facilities were located between the pitch and the stands. This meant that at the beginning of the millennium it no longer met the requirements for a venue for international soccer matches. In 2006, Max Bögl won the tender for the construction of the new national arena – which, however, had been planned quite differently at the time. However, the German company submitted an alternative project to the client, the city of Bucharest, which was much simpler and cheaper to build.

The National Arena bears unmistakable similarities to Frankfurt’s Waldstadion. This is no coincidence: the same team of general contractors, architects and engineers built the stadium on the Main between 2002 and 2005. The closable membrane roof in particular is almost a one-to-one replica of the construction in Frankfurt. As there, the roof is located in the large video cube above the pitch when folded up. It extends within 15 minutes when required. It then spans the area between the grandstand roofs. The stand roofs themselves are supported by a so-called pressure ring, which towers over the stadium like a crown. The ring rests on 40 steel pillars, which sit on the concrete construction of the grandstand ring.

The stands have two tiers. The architects designed the spectator area with seating shells in different shades of red, blue and yellow, the national colors of Romania. On the outside of the stadium, the verticality of the concrete columns supporting the stands defines the appearance of the building. The grassy embankment on which the arena stands is still a relic of the old national stadium. It mediates between the new building and the historic sports park that surrounds it. Large steps lead up the rampart. They make a visit to the National Arena a bit of a pilgrimage.

Find out more about the National Stadium Budapest. Here you can find an overview of the EURO 2021 stadiums.