What is the edible city?

Building design

Community gardens are part of the edible city and bring numerous social, ecological and economic benefits. Photo: via rawpixel

The term edible city refers to a concept in which fruit, vegetables and useful plants are grown in public spaces. This accessible food is freely available to everyone. Among other things, they are used for nutrition and education in cities.

Urban food production is not a new invention, but nowadays it is no longer the result of an emergency situation. Rather, the edible city is about the idea of creating new common goods and making food freely available to everyone. This increases the quality of life for everyone and city dwellers learn more about food production. Food as an accessible topic should also invite all population groups and stimulate conversation.

Edible cities are often part of landscape architecture projects. They are part of the aesthetic function of urban green spaces, but also have environmental education, social and ecological aspects. In this way, they support the sustainability goals of cities, be it through public gardens, fruit and nut trees, vegetable projects or berry bushes in the park. The concept can be implemented by both the population and the city administration.

It brings important economic benefits: Poverty reduction, increased food security, promotion of the circular economy and transparency along the value chain mean that food now has a whole new status in many cities. High-quality products can increase the multifunctionality of public green spaces.

And the participatory aspects of the edible city, which is usually cultivated by citizens, create social benefits: The “prosumers”, who consume as well as produce, develop an awareness of sustainable nutrition and have access to healthy options. Community events such as gardening or harvest festivals are a good way to develop the social impact of the edible city.

The edible city also has ecological benefits: it increases the proportion of green spaces in cities, promotes biodiversity and species diversity, teaches young people about the importance of food and can reduce food waste. It also promotes regional, closed nutrient cycles with minimal delivery routes.

If a city describes itself as “edible” – a self-chosen title – then it probably has quite a high proportion of public gardens, fruit and vegetable plants and offers such as the Mundraub app. The latter shows where accessible berries, vegetables, nuts and other foods can be picked.

Cities such as Kassel, Halle, Trier, Cologne, Andernach, Kiel and Jena proudly bear the title. Here, the city councils as well as the authorities, citizens and often private associations are behind the project. Andernach has been using the edible city designation since 2010, making it the first city in Germany to do so. There was already an “edible town” in the United Kingdom in 2008 with Todmorden. Vegetable gardens were created on public buildings, which were open to all citizens from the outset: They were allowed to harvest what grew in the public space.

There was great interest in the media. Around 150 excursions take place in Andernach every year, inspiring other cities to also become an edible city. In 2016, there were already 63 municipalities in Germany with corresponding concepts. Today there are over 100.

At first glance, the edible city concept has no disadvantages: It is easy and inexpensive to implement and fulfills numerous sustainability criteria. However, it is important that it does not remain symbolic: Rather, the edible city should lead to behavioral change in the production and processing of food. Ideally, trade and consumption should also change.

Successful edible cities are diverse: from vegetables, fruit, herbs and edible flowers in parks and pedestrian zones to balconies, walls and roof surfaces to public green spaces, playgrounds and community and school gardens, there are many opportunities to provide residents with fresh, regional food.

For this to work well, city dwellers need to take responsibility. They take care of the planting and maintenance of the areas. Ideally, the green space authorities support and coordinate this. Political and financial support, such as incentives for growing food on private land or for converting brownfield sites into community gardens, is helpful.

Educational programs and initiatives to strengthen the community, such as the Nordpark Essbare Stadt in Chemnitz, help to anchor the concept in the culture. In Berlin, the “Prinzessinnengärten” initiative shows how a wasteland can be turned into a blooming oasis in the middle of the city that feeds entire families. In the Canadian city of Toronto, entire food co-ops (cooperatives), farmers’ markets, educational programs and community-supported agriculture initiatives have emerged from small and community gardens.

The concept of the edible city continues to spread. Above all, the idea of creating new common goods is attractive to many cities. The sustainability potential of the concept is high. In order to achieve the social, environmental and economic sustainability goals, it is important that the approach leads to substantial improvements in the production and consumption of food locally.

As long as people in cities have access to fresh food grown locally – whether in community gardens, on public land or on private property – a city can be considered “edible”. The concept offers many benefits for the environment, society and the health of city dwellers. By providing suitable incentives and supporting initiatives, cities can help to shape a more sustainable future with an edible concept.

Read more: In her book “Rein ins Grüne, raus in die Stadt”, author and politician Renate Künast addresses the topic of urban gardens.

POTREBBE INTERESSARTI ANCHE

Local rainwater management “Kirkebjerg”

Building design

Photo: Group F

In the approximately 10-hectare housing estate “Kirkebjerg” in Ballerup, Denmark, there have been repeated problems with flooding and damp cellars in the past. At the same time, the local waste disposal companies had an interest in relieving the local sewer system in order to reduce sewer overflows in the wider sewer network. This resulted in a project for local rainwater management and heavy rainfall prevention […]

In the approximately 10-hectare housing estate “Kirkebjerg” in Ballerup, Denmark, there have been repeated problems with flooding and damp cellars in the past. At the same time, the local waste disposal companies had an interest in relieving the local sewer system in order to reduce sewer overflows in the wider sewer network. This resulted in a project for local rainwater management and heavy rainfall prevention in the extensive lawns of the housing estate.

Where the local height and space conditions allowed, the downpipes were decoupled from the sewer system and the rainwater was directed into the open spaces for evaporation and infiltration. A large part of the project was financed via a repayment scheme for connection fees. For every square meter of sealed surface that discharges less into the sewage system, the landowner, the housing association “Brøndby Boligselskab”, received a grant from the waste disposal company “HOFOR” and was thus able to realize the project.

Together with a residents’ working group, gruppe F Landschaftsarchitekten from Berlin developed a design concept for the areas over the course of several workshops. Inspiration for this came from the image of water droplets on a smooth surface. The excess soil from the excavation of infiltration troughs was modeled into circular mounds of various sizes. In this way, no soil had to be removed and a simple green lawn landscape with small pools and mounds was created, which changes its appearance depending on the water level. Small “puddles of water” in a green lawn landscape turn into large blue “lakes” with round green islands during heavy rainfall.

Scattered throughout this landscape are small “oases” for the residents with simple play elements, planting and recreational areas.

The project was developed by gruppe F Landschaftsarchitekten together with the Danish office Gaihede a/s and has been gradually implemented on site by the Danish office since 2018.

You can find the article on the Kurt-Schumacher Quartier in Berlin in G+L 04/2019.

In slow motion

Building design

by creating a subtle

Work on the central station in the Dutch city of Arnhem has now been going on for 20 years. As a result, skaters have appropriated the space.

Work on the central station in the Dutch city of Arnhem has now been going on for 20 years. Despite ongoing construction work, the area has been appropriated by a user group that the planner considers unpredictable and often finds no space: skaters. A success for the responsible landscape architects from Bureau B+B. But where did it come from?

Images: ©Hufton+Crow

The design of Arnhem station is the result of more than two decades of collaboration between the architects UNStudio and the landscape architects from Bureau B+B. It presented the planners with various challenges. Topographically alone: the station is located on the slope of the Veluwe massif and the planners had to overcome a height difference of 20 meters. They achieved this by creating a subtle, constantly changing landscape. The folded, undulating natural stone surfaces largely trace the terrain below, linking visitor flows and ensuring a smooth transition between the different elevation levels.

Pictures: Frank Hanswijk

If you are not continuing your journey immediately, you can also make yourself comfortable on the wooden benches that emerge from the edges of the sloping natural stone surfaces in the quiet corners of the station grounds. You don’t have to buy anything, as there is no obligation to buy anything to sit down in the rooms outside the station. This is one of the reasons why the Arnhem station forecourt is so lively. And it is in turn an explanation for the fact that these local people tend to belong to those population groups that are otherwise often pushed out of public spaces – such as older people, young people, skaters or homeless people.

The Arnhem train station shows this: The less the purpose of a public space is defined, the more opportunities users have to implement their own ideas. This is of particular benefit to population groups that are often deliberately excluded when planning public spaces. The square design also benefited from the fact that it took around two decades to implement. This allowed the user groups, who tend to be marginalized, to appropriate the space in the long term.

Curious? You can find the full article on Arnhem station in the February 2019 issue of G+L.

Translated from the English by Sigrid Ehrmann